Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 2011
Registration No. 333-177677
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
VERASTEM, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
2834 (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) |
27-3269467 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
215 First Street, Suite 440
Cambridge, MA 02142
(617) 252-9300
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
Verastem, Inc.
215 First Street, Suite 440
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
(617) 252-9300
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to: | ||
David E. Redlick, Esq. Brian A. Johnson, Esq. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 (617) 526-6000 |
Patrick O'Brien, Esq. Ropes & Gray LLP Prudential Tower 800 Boylston Street Boston, Massachusetts 02199 (617) 951-7000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is declared effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer ý (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS | Subject to Completion | December 7, 2011 |
shares
Common Stock
This is the initial public offering of our common stock. No public market currently exists for our common stock. We are offering all of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus. We expect the public offering price to be between $ and $ per share.
We have applied to list our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "VSTM."
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before buying any shares, you should carefully read the discussion of material risks of investing in our common stock in "Risk factors" beginning on page 11.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
Per share |
Total |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public offering price |
$ | $ | |||||
Underwriting discounts and commissions |
$ | $ | |||||
Proceeds to Verastem, before expenses |
$ | $ | |||||
The underwriters may also purchase up to an additional shares of our common stock at the public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us, to cover over-allotments, if any, within 30 days from the date of this prospectus. If the underwriters exercise this option in full, the total underwriting discounts and commissions will be $ and our total proceeds, after underwriting discounts and commissions but before expenses, will be $ .
The underwriters are offering the common stock as set forth under "Underwriting." Delivery of the shares will be made on or about , 2012.
UBS Investment Bank | Leerink Swann |
Lazard Capital Markets
Oppenheimer & Co.
Rodman & Renshaw, LLC
We have not authorized anyone to provide any information other than that contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where such offers and sales are permitted. The information in this prospectus or any free writing prospectus is accurate only as of its date, regardless of its time of delivery or of any sale of shares of our common stock. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in our common stock. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, especially the "Risk factors" section and our financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus, before making an investment decision.
OUR BUSINESS
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing proprietary small molecule drugs targeting cancer stem cells along with proprietary companion diagnostics. A cancer stem cell is a particularly aggressive type of tumor cell, resistant to conventional cancer therapy, that we believe is an underlying cause of tumor recurrence and metastasis. We also believe that the presence of cancer stem cells in tumors may be a key reason for the ultimate failure of many existing chemotherapeutics and other cancer therapies to achieve a durable clinical response. Building on discoveries by our scientific co-founders, Robert Weinberg, Ph.D., Eric Lander, Ph.D., and Piyush Gupta, Ph.D., published in the peer reviewed scientific journal Cell, we use our proprietary technology to create a stable population of cancer stem cells to screen for and identify small molecule compounds that target cancer stem cells. We believe that our technology and approach provide an opportunity to develop a next generation of oncology therapeutics addressing the large unmet medical need of patients with many types of cancers.
THE PROBLEM
Cancer is one of the world's most serious health problems and the second most common cause of death in the United States after heart disease. Current treatments for cancer include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy and targeted therapy. According to estimates by the National Institutes of Health, in the United States in 2010, the direct medical costs of cancer of all types exceeded $100 billion. IMS Health estimates that in the United States in 2010, approximately $22 billion was spent on drugs to treat cancer, representing the largest class of drug spending in the United States. Despite years of intensive research and clinical use, current treatments often fail to cure cancer. Cancer patients who relapse often develop metastatic disease. Metastatic disease is the cause of more than 90% of cancer deaths.
We believe that cancer stem cells, or CSCs, which are also sometimes referred to as tumor-initiating cancer cells, are responsible for the initiation, metastasis and recurrence of many cancers and may be a key reason for the ultimate failure of many current therapies to achieve a durable clinical response. CSCs have the ability to:
CSCs have been identified in many types of cancer, including breast, pancreatic, colon, brain, lung and leukemia. As illustrated in the figure below, while current treatments may succeed at initially decreasing tumor burden, they may leave behind a population of CSCs that can regenerate tumors.
1
OUR SOLUTION
Our solution is to discover and develop a next generation of oncology therapeutics targeting CSCs along with companion diagnostics. We believe that by developing therapeutics that target CSCs we can address the problem of cancer recurrence and metastasis so as to deliver a durable clinical response.
Our scientific co-founders at the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, an affiliate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT, and the Broad Institute, an affiliate of MIT and Harvard University, made discoveries that link the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, or EMT, to the emergence of CSCs. This transition involves the transformation of one type of cancer cell into a more aggressive and drug resistant type of cancer cell. Our solution utilizes proprietary technology based on these discoveries along with rapid and automated assays, referred to as high-throughput screening, to identify drugs targeting CSCs and develop companion diagnostics. To achieve a durable clinical response, we believe that it may be necessary to kill both CSCs and other types of cancer cells in a tumor, as illustrated in the figure below, either with a combination of current cancer treatments and CSC-targeted drugs or a single therapeutic found to target both cancer cell populations.
Our proprietary technology
A persistent problem in the discovery of drugs targeting CSCs is the difficulty of isolating large numbers of CSCs. Without such large numbers, the discovery of drugs targeting CSCs using high-throughput screening is extremely difficult. Moreover, when CSCs are isolated, they typically do not remain stable in culture. Instead, over a short period of time, CSCs convert into other types of cancer cells. To address this problem, our scientific co-founders developed proprietary technology based on the EMT process to create a stable population of CSCs that are suitable for use in high-throughput screening of small molecule compounds. We license this proprietary technology from the Whitehead Institute.
2
To identify compounds that are selective for CSCs, we grow cancer non-stem cells in the laboratory and then induce the EMT process to create a stable population of CSCs. As illustrated in the figure below, we then screen compounds to assess their ability to kill the CSCs. Because these CSCs are stable in culture, the screening process can be conducted using high-throughput technology on a large number and wide variety of small molecule compound libraries. These compound libraries include new chemical entities, approved drugs and compounds that are in preclinical and clinical development. We then profile the compounds that are identified as targeting CSCs using additional assays to identify suitable clinical candidates.
OUR PRODUCT CANDIDATES AND COMPANION DIAGNOSTICS
Using our proprietary technology, we have identified a pipeline of small molecule compounds with the potential to target CSCs. Our most advanced product candidates are VS-507, VS-4718 and VS-5095. We are currently evaluating VS-507, VS-4718 and VS-5095 in preclinical studies as potential therapies for breast and other cancers. We believe that these compounds may be especially beneficial as therapeutics in aggressive cancers with a high percentage of CSCs, such as triple negative breast cancer, or TNBC. TNBC is a type of breast cancer in which a high percentage of CSCs has been identified and that has a poorer prognosis and lower overall survival rate than other types of breast cancer. We also are currently evaluating additional proprietary product candidates in preclinical studies for their use in breast and other cancers.
Our scientific co-founders identified VS-507 as a drug candidate for killing breast cancer stem cells and published their research in Cell in 2009. This study included an analysis of the effect of VS-507 on TNBC cell lines. We believe that the targeted action of VS-507 on CSCs is effected through the inhibition of a network of proteins, known as the Wnt/beta-catenin cell signaling pathway, which Dr. Weinberg described in 2011 in Cell as critical for the development and maintenance of CSCs. Additional third-party published research has reported that VS-507's activity may be mediated through the blockade of the Wnt/beta-catenin cell signaling pathway. In mouse models of breast cancer, VS-507 treatment decreased biophysical or biochemical markers, referred to as biomarkers, of CSCs. In contrast, treatment in the same model with a standard chemotherapeutic agent, paclitaxel, increased biomarkers of CSCs. Assuming successful completion of preclinical studies, we expect to file an investigational new drug application, or IND, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in late 2012 to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial of VS-507.
We identified the CSC-targeted activity of VS-4718 and VS-5095 using our proprietary technology. In preclinical testing, these compounds were found to be potent and selective inhibitors of Focal Adhesion Kinase, or FAK, a protein which is involved in cell adhesion and motility. FAK expression is greater in many tumor types compared to normal tissue, particularly in cancers that have a high invasive and metastatic capability. In preclinical mouse models, both VS-4718 and VS-5095 demonstrated good oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and reduced both primary tumor growth and metastatic burden. We expect to file an IND with the FDA in early 2013 to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial of one of VS-4718 or VS-5095.
An important element of our business strategy is the development and use of proprietary, companion diagnostics in connection with the development of our therapeutic drug candidates. CSCs are often characterized by a distinctive set of biomarkers, which we believe may be a key to identifying patients with tumors that are likely to respond to therapies targeting CSCs. We plan to use diagnostics, based
3
on these biomarkers, as part of a personalized medicine approach to identify patients with aggressive tumors that have a high percentage of CSCs. We also believe that these diagnostics may be used to monitor patients' progress on therapy and aid physicians' ongoing treatment decisions. In addition, we expect that our use of proprietary diagnostics may accelerate the clinical development process for our drug candidates by enabling smaller, targeted trials and providing early, objective signals of drug activity.
OUR STRATEGY
Our goal is to build a leading biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and, ultimately, commercialization of novel drugs and companion diagnostics targeting CSCs. Key elements of our strategy to achieve this goal are:
OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM AND SCIENTIFIC CO-FOUNDERS AND ADVISORS
Our management team includes our Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and co-founder Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D., our Chief Operating Officer, Robert Forrester, and our Vice President, Head of Research, Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D.
Our management team is supported by our scientific advisory board comprised of leading academic and industry scientists. Our scientific advisory board consists of:
Scientific advisory board |
|
|
---|---|---|
Robert Weinberg, Ph.D. | Founding Member of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical | |
Scientific co-founder | Research, Professor of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and recipient of the 1997 National Medal of Science | |
Eric Lander, Ph.D. |
Founding Director of the Broad Institute, Professor of Biology |
|
Scientific co-founder | at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Professor of Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School |
4
Scientific advisory board |
|
|
---|---|---|
Piyush Gupta, Ph.D. |
Member of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research |
|
Scientific co-founder | and Assistant Professor of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology | |
Julian Adams, Ph.D. |
President of Research and Development of Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc., former Senior Vice President of Drug Discovery and Development of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and co-inventor and co-developer of Velcade |
|
José Baselga, M.D., Ph.D. |
Chief of Hematology and Oncology at Massachusetts General Hospital, Associate Director of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School |
|
George Daley, M.D., Ph.D. |
Professor of Hematology and Oncology and Director of the Stem Cell Transplantation Program at Children's Hospital and Professor of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at Harvard Medical School |
|
Peter Elliott, Ph.D. |
Former Senior Vice President and Head of Research and Development of Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., former Vice President of Pharmacology and Drug Development of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and co-developer of Velcade |
|
Daniel Haber, M.D., Ph.D. |
Director of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School |
|
Joseph (Yossi) Schlessinger, Ph.D. |
Chairman and Professor in the Department of Pharmacology at Yale School of Medicine |
|
Phillip A. Sharp, Ph.D. |
Institute Professor at the David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and recipient of the 1993 Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology |
|
Roger Tung, Ph.D. |
President and Chief Executive Officer of Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc., former Vice President of Drug Discovery of Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and co-inventor of Lexiva and Agenerase |
|
Christopher Walsh, Ph.D. |
Hamilton Kuhn Professor in the Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at Harvard Medical School |
|
Eric Winer, M.D. |
Director of the Breast Oncology Center at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School |
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESS
Our business is subject to a number of risks of which you should be aware before making an investment decision. These risks are discussed more fully in the "Risk factors" section of this prospectus immediately following this prospectus summary. These risks include the following:
5
foreseeable future and may never achieve profitability. Our net loss was $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $784,000 for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2011, we had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $8.5 million.
OUR CORPORATE INFORMATION
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in August 2010. Our principal executive offices are located at 215 First Street, Suite 440, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 and our telephone number is (617) 252-9300. Our website address is www.verastem.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of this prospectus. We have included our website address in this prospectus solely as an inactive textual reference.
In this prospectus, unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, references to "Verastem," "we," "us," "our" and similar references refer to Verastem, Inc. The Verastem name and logo are our trademarks. The other trademarks, trade names and service marks appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
6
Common stock offered by us | shares | |
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
shares |
|
Over-allotment option |
The underwriters have an option for a period of 30 days to purchase up to additional shares of our common stock to cover over-allotments. |
|
Use of proceeds |
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for preclinical and clinical development of our lead product candidates, discovery, research and preclinical studies of our other product candidates, additional compounds and companion diagnostics and other general corporate purposes. |
|
Risk factors |
You should read the "Risk factors" section starting on page 11 of this prospectus for a discussion of factors to consider carefully before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock. |
|
Proposed NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
VSTM |
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on 10,476,652 actual shares of our common stock outstanding as of November 30, 2011, including 5,021,572 shares of unvested restricted stock subject to repurchase by us, and 41,092,825 additional shares of our common stock issuable upon the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock upon the closing of this offering.
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering excludes:
7
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes:
8
You should read the following summary financial data together with our financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus and the "Selected financial data" and "Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations" sections of this prospectus. We have derived the statements of operations data for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 from our audited financial statements included in this prospectus. We have derived the statements of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011 and the balance sheet data as of September 30, 2011 from our unaudited financial statements included in this prospectus. The unaudited financial data include, in the opinion of our management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations for these periods. Our historical results for any prior period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period, and our results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full fiscal year.
Statement of operations data:
|
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 400 | $ | 5,483 | $ | 5,883 | |||||
General and administrative |
384 | 2,195 | 2,579 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
784 | 7,678 | 8,462 | ||||||||
Operating loss |
(784 | ) | (7,678 | ) | (8,462 | ) | |||||
Net loss |
$ | (784 | ) | $ | (7,678 | ) | $ | (8,462 | ) | ||
Accretion of preferred stock |
(2 | ) | (18 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders |
$ | (786 | ) | $ | (7,696 | ) | $ | (8,482 | ) | ||
Net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (1.79 | ) | $ | (2.20 | ) | ||
Weighted-average number of common shares used in net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
2,976 | 4,291 | 3,841 | ||||||||
Pro forma net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
$ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (0.38 | ) | |||||
Weighted-average number of common shares used in pro forma net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
4,638 |
20,474 |
|||||||||
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per common share is calculated assuming the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock, excluding shares of our series C preferred stock that we issued and sold in November 2011.
9
The pro forma balance sheet data set forth below gives effect to:
The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data set forth below give further effect to our issuance and sale of shares of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance sheet data:
|
Actual
|
Pro forma
|
Pro forma as adjusted |
||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 41,421 | $ | 61,824 | |||||||
Working capital |
39,419 | 59,822 | |||||||||
Total assets |
42,364 | 62,767 | |||||||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock |
47,878 | | |||||||||
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
(8,462 | ) | (8,462 | ) | |||||||
Total stockholders' (deficit) equity |
(7,639 | ) | 60,642 |
10
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before investing in our common stock, you should consider carefully the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this prospectus, including our financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In these circumstances, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR FINANCIAL POSITION AND NEED FOR ADDITIONAL CAPITAL
We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.
Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net loss was $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $784,000 for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2011, we had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $8.5 million. To date, we have not generated any revenues and have financed our operations through private placements of our preferred stock. We have devoted substantially all of our efforts to research and development. We have not initiated clinical development of any product candidates and expect that it will be many years, if ever, before we have a product candidate ready for commercialization. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future. The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if and as we:
To become and remain profitable, we must develop and eventually commercialize a product or products with significant market potential. This will require us to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including completing preclinical testing and clinical trials of our product candidates, obtaining marketing approval for these product candidates and manufacturing, marketing and selling those products for which we may obtain marketing approval. We may never succeed in these activities and, even if we do, may never generate revenues that are significant or large enough to achieve profitability. We are currently only in the preclinical testing stages for our most advanced product candidates and have not yet completed formulation development of any of our lead product candidates, VS-507, VS-4718 and VS-5095. If we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain
11
Risk factors
profitable would decrease the value of the company and could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our research and development efforts, expand our business or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company could also cause you to lose all or part of your investment.
Our short operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.
We are an early stage company. We commenced active operations in the second half of 2010. Our operations to date have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring and developing our technology, identifying potential product candidates and undertaking preclinical studies of our most advanced product candidates. All of our product candidates are still in preclinical development. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to initiate or successfully complete any clinical trials, including large-scale, pivotal clinical trials, obtain marketing approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product, or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product commercialization. It takes about ten to 15 years to develop one new medicine from the time it is discovered to when it is available for treating patients. Consequently, any predictions you make about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.
In addition, as a new business, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other known and unknown factors. We will need to transition from a company with a research focus to a company capable of supporting commercial activities. We may not be successful in such a transition.
We will need substantial additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.
We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we continue the research and development and later initiate clinical trials of, and seek marketing approval for, our product candidates. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. Furthermore, upon the closing of this offering, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or any future commercialization efforts.
We expect that the net proceeds from this offering, together with our existing cash and cash equivalents, will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least . Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
12
Risk factors
Identifying potential product candidates and conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain marketing approval and achieve product sales. In addition, our product candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our commercial revenues, if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be commercially available for many years, if at all. Accordingly, we will need to continue to rely on additional financing to achieve our business objectives. Adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, including purchasers of common stock in this offering, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates.
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. We do not have any committed external source of funds. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends.
If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
RISKS RELATED TO THE DISCOVERY, DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF OUR PRODUCT CANDIDATES
Our approach to the discovery and development of product candidates that target CSCs is unproven, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any products of commercial value.
Our scientific approach focuses on using proprietary technology to create a stable population of CSCs in the laboratory that we then use to screen for and identify product candidates targeting these CSCs. Research on CSCs is an emerging field and, consequently, there is ongoing debate regarding the existence of CSCs, whether the appropriate nomenclature to refer to these cells is cancer stem cells, tumor-initiating cells or another term and the importance of these cells as an underlying cause of tumor recurrence and metastasis.
13
Risk factors
Although there is general consensus that some cancer cells have tumor-initiating capacity, there also is some debate in the scientific community regarding the defining characteristics of these cells, which we call CSCs, and the origin of these cells. Some believe that normal adult stem cells mutate and transform into CSCs. Others believe that all cancer cells have tumor-initiating capabilities, these capabilities cannot be attributed to a factor intrinsic to a particular cell and, therefore, a definitive CSC cannot be isolated or targeted. We believe that the discovery by our scientific co-founders of the link between the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, or EMT, and the emergence of cancer stem cells is one way a cancer cell can transition to a CSC, but this view is not universally accepted.
Even if our beliefs regarding the existence, characteristics and function of CSCs are correct, any drugs that we develop may not effectively target CSCs. We do not believe that any drugs that target CSCs have been successfully developed to date for the treatment of cancer. If we are able to develop a drug that targets CSCs in preclinical studies, we may nonetheless not succeed in demonstrating safety and efficacy of the drug in human clinical trials. Our focus on using our proprietary technology to screen for and identify product candidates targeting CSCs may not result in the discovery and development of commercially viable drugs to treat cancer.
We may not be successful in our efforts to identify or discover additional potential product candidates.
A key element of our strategy is to identify and test additional compounds that target CSCs in a variety of different types of cancer. A significant portion of the research that we are conducting involves new compounds, new uses of existing compounds and new and unproven drug discovery methods, including our proprietary technology. The drug discovery that we are conducting using our EMT technology may not be successful in identifying compounds that are useful in treating cancer. Our research programs may initially show promise in identifying potential product candidates, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development for a number of reasons, including:
In particular, because our EMT technology induces the EMT process to create a stable population of CSCs, it is possible that these stable CSCs may not react in precisely the same manner as naturally occurring CSCs when treated with a particular product candidate. As a result, a product candidate that shows initial promise in targeting our stable population of CSCs may not have the same effect on tumors with naturally occurring CSCs.
Research programs to identify new product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources. We may choose to focus our efforts and resources on a potential product candidate that ultimately proves to be unsuccessful.
If we are unable to identify suitable compounds for preclinical and clinical development, we will not be able to obtain product revenues in future periods, which likely would result in significant harm to our financial position and adversely impact our stock price.
14
Risk factors
We may not be successful in obtaining necessary rights to compounds and product candidates for our development pipeline through acquisitions and in-licenses.
Because we are screening a range of compounds, including compounds with proprietary rights held by third parties, for their activity against CSCs, the growth of our business will depend in significant part on our ability to acquire or in-license rights to these compounds. However, we may be unable to acquire or in-license any compounds or product candidates from third parties that we identify using our proprietary EMT technology or otherwise. The licensing and acquisition of proprietary compounds is a competitive area, and a number of more established companies are also pursuing strategies to license or acquire compounds and product candidates that we may consider attractive. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, cash resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities.
For example, although the Broad Institute has granted us a right of first negotiation for specified compounds and other intellectual property owned by the Broad Institute, we may be unable to negotiate a license within the specified time frame. If we are unable to do so, the Broad Institute may offer the intellectual property to other parties. In addition, the Whitehead Institute has retained the right to use the EMT technology that we license from it for research, teaching and educational purposes and could seek to license to third parties any intellectual property rights that it discovers using the EMT technology while pursuing these purposes. Pursuant to our license agreement with the Whitehead Institute, we will have an opportunity, subject to the Whitehead Institute's obligations under any third-party research funding agreements, to negotiate a license to any such intellectual property that is developed or conceived on or prior to a specified date in Robert Weinberg's laboratory at the Whitehead Institute. Our failure to reach an agreement with either the Broad Institute or the Whitehead Institute for any applicable intellectual property could result in a third party acquiring the related rights.
In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We also may be unable to license or acquire the relevant compound or product candidate on terms that would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment.
In addition, we expect competition for acquisition and in-licensing product candidates that are attractive to us may increase in the future, especially if our approach of targeting CSCs gains greater scientific acceptance, which may mean fewer suitable opportunities for us as well as higher acquisition or licensing prices. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to suitable compounds or product candidates, our business, financial condition and prospects for growth could suffer.
All of our product candidates are still in preclinical development. Preclinical testing and clinical trials of our product candidates may not be successful. If we are unable to commercialize our product candidates or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.
We have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the identification and preclinical development of drugs that target CSCs. Our ability to generate product revenues, which we do not expect will occur for many years, if ever, will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of our product candidates. The success of our product candidates will depend on several factors, including the following:
15
Risk factors
If we do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, which would materially harm our business.
If clinical trials of our product candidates fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of regulatory authorities or do not otherwise produce positive results, we may incur additional costs or experience delays in completing, or ultimately be unable to complete, the development and commercialization of our product candidates.
Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of our product candidates, we must complete preclinical development and then conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. The outcome of preclinical testing and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interim results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their products. For example, standard measures of clinical activity with respect to solid tumors, such as Response Criteria in Solid Tumors, or RECIST, measurement guidelines, which are based on gross changes in the size of tumor lesions, may not be sufficient to detect the targeting of CSCs by our product candidates.
We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, clinical trials that could delay or prevent our ability to receive marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates, including:
16
Risk factors
If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of our product candidates beyond those that we currently contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete clinical trials of our product candidates or other testing, if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or are only modestly positive or if there are safety concerns, we may:
Our product development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or marketing approvals. We do not know whether any clinical trials will begin as planned, will need to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, or at all. Significant clinical trial delays also could shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do and impair our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business and results of operations.
If we experience delays or difficulties in the enrollment of patients in clinical trials, our receipt of necessary regulatory approvals could be delayed or prevented.
We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for our product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States. In addition, many of our competitors have ongoing clinical trials for product candidates that treat the same indications as our product candidates, and patients who would otherwise be eligible for our clinical trials may instead enroll in clinical trials of our competitors' product candidates.
17
Risk factors
Patient enrollment is affected by other factors including:
Our inability to enroll a sufficient number of patients for our clinical trials would result in significant delays or may require us to abandon one or more clinical trials altogether. Enrollment delays in our clinical trials may result in increased development costs for our product candidates, which would cause the value of our company to decline and limit our ability to obtain additional financing.
If serious adverse or inappropriate side effects are identified during the development of our product candidates, we may need to abandon or limit our development of some of our product candidates.
All of our product candidates are still in preclinical development and their risk of failure is high. It is impossible to predict when or if any of our product candidates will prove effective or safe in humans or will receive marketing approval. If our product candidates are associated with undesirable side effects or have characteristics that are unexpected, we may need to abandon their development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. Many compounds that initially showed promise in early stage testing for treating cancer have later been found to cause side effects that prevented further development of the compound.
We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate or indication and fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.
Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we focus on research programs and product candidates that we identify for specific indications. As a result, we may forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for other indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. Our spending on current and future research and development programs and product candidates for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable products. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such product candidate.
18
Risk factors
If we are unable to successfully develop companion diagnostics for our therapeutic product candidates, or experience significant delays in doing so, we may not realize the full commercial potential of our therapeutics.
We plan to develop companion diagnostics for our therapeutic product candidates. There has been limited success to date industry wide in developing these types of companion diagnostics. To be successful, we would need to address a number of scientific, technical and logistical challenges. We have only recently initiated development of companion diagnostics. We have limited experience in the development of diagnostics and may not be successful in developing appropriate diagnostics to pair with any of our therapeutic product candidates that receive marketing approval. Companion diagnostics are subject to regulation by the FDA and similar regulatory authorities outside the United States as medical devices and require separate regulatory approval prior to commercialization. Given our limited experience in developing diagnostics, we expect to rely in part on third parties for their design and manufacture. If we, or any third parties that we engage to assist us, are unable to successfully develop companion diagnostics for our therapeutic product candidates, or experience delays in doing so:
As a result, our business would be harmed, possibly materially.
Even if any of our product candidates receive marketing approval, they may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, healthcare payors and others in the medical community necessary for commercial success.
If any of our product candidates receive marketing approval, they may nonetheless fail to gain sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, healthcare payors and others in the medical community. For example, current cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation therapy are well established in the medical community, and doctors may continue to rely on these treatments. If our product candidates do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues and we may not become profitable. The degree of market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:
19
Risk factors
If, in the future, we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to sell and market our product candidates, we may not be successful in commercializing our product candidates if and when they are approved.
We do not have a sales or marketing infrastructure and have no experience in the sale, marketing or distribution of pharmaceutical products. To achieve commercial success for any approved product, we must either develop a sales and marketing organization or outsource these functions to third parties. In the future, we may choose to build a focused sales and marketing infrastructure to market or co-promote some of our product candidates if and when they are approved.
There are risks involved with both establishing our own sales and marketing capabilities and entering into arrangements with third parties to perform these services. For example, recruiting and training a sales force is expensive and time consuming and could delay any product launch. If the commercial launch of a product candidate for which we recruit a sales force and establish marketing capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these commercialization expenses. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our sales and marketing personnel.
Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our products on our own include:
If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing and distribution services, our product revenues or the profitability of these product revenues to us are likely to be lower than if we were to market and sell any products that we develop ourselves. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell and market our product candidates or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. We likely will have little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our products effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.
We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than we do.
The development and commercialization of new drug products is highly competitive. We face competition with respect to our current product candidates, and will face competition with respect to any product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in the future, from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide. There are a number of large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies that currently market and sell products or are pursuing the development of products for the treatment of the disease indications for which we are developing our product candidates. Some of these competitive products and therapies are based on scientific approaches that are the same as or similar to our approach, and
20
Risk factors
others are based on entirely different approaches. Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization.
We are developing our product candidates for the treatment of cancer. There are a variety of available therapies marketed for cancer. In many cases, these drugs are administered in combination to enhance efficacy. Some of these drugs are branded and subject to patent protection, and others are available on a generic basis. Many of these approved drugs are well established therapies and are widely accepted by physicians, patients and third-party payors. Insurers and other third-party payors may also encourage the use of generic products. We expect that if our product candidates are approved, they will be priced at a significant premium over competitive generic products. This may make it difficult for us to achieve our business strategy of using our product candidates in combination with existing therapies or replacing existing therapies with our product candidates.
There are also a number of products in clinical development by third parties to treat cancer by targeting CSCs. These companies include divisions of large pharmaceutical companies, including Astellas Pharma US, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Pfizer Inc. and others. There are also biotechnology companies of various size that are developing therapies against CSCs, including OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston Biomedical, Inc. and Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. Our competitors may develop products that are more effective, safer, more convenient or less costly than any that we are developing or that would render our product candidates obsolete or non-competitive. In addition, our competitors may discover biomarkers that more efficiently measure CSCs than our methods, which may give them a competitive advantage in developing potential products. Our competitors may also obtain marketing approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market.
Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and other early stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.
Even if we are able to commercialize any product candidates, the products may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party reimbursement practices or healthcare reform initiatives, which would harm our business.
The regulations that govern marketing approvals, pricing and reimbursement for new drug products vary widely from country to country. In the United States, recently passed legislation may significantly change the approval requirements in ways that could involve additional costs and cause delays in obtaining approvals. Some countries require approval of the sale price of a drug before it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted. In some foreign markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains subject to continuing governmental control even after initial approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain marketing approval for a product in a particular country, but then be subject to price regulations that delay our commercial launch of the product, possibly for lengthy time periods, and negatively impact the revenues we are able to generate from the sale of the product in that country. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in one or more product candidates, even if our product candidates obtain marketing approval.
21
Risk factors
Our ability to commercialize any products successfully also will depend in part on the extent to which reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Government authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations, decide which medications they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Government authorities and third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications. Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. We cannot be sure that reimbursement will be available for any product that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, the level of reimbursement. Reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval. Obtaining reimbursement for our products may be particularly difficult because of the higher prices often associated with drugs administered under the supervision of a physician. If reimbursement is not available or is available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval.
There may be significant delays in obtaining reimbursement for newly approved drugs, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the drug is approved by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States. Moreover, eligibility for reimbursement does not imply that any drug will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Interim reimbursement levels for new drugs, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be made permanent. Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the drug and the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on reimbursement levels already set for lower cost drugs and may be incorporated into existing payments for other services. Net prices for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drugs from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States. Third-party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement policies. Our inability to promptly obtain coverage and profitable payment rates from both government-funded and private payors for any approved products that we develop could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products and our overall financial condition.
Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to limit commercialization of any products that we may develop.
We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our product candidates in human clinical trials and will face an even greater risk if we commercially sell any products that we may develop. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our product candidates or products caused injuries, we will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:
22
Risk factors
We currently hold $3.0 million in product liability insurance coverage in the aggregate, with a per incident limit of $3.0 million, which may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. We may need to increase our insurance coverage when we begin clinical trials or the commercialization of our product candidates, if ever. Insurance coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise.
If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological materials. Our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from our use of hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.
Although we maintain workers' compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposal of biological, hazardous or radioactive materials.
In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR DEPENDENCE ON THIRD PARTIES
We expect to depend on collaborations with third parties for the development and commercialization of our product candidates. If those collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to capitalize on the market potential of these product candidates.
We may seek third-party collaborators for the development and commercialization of our product candidates. Our likely collaborators for any collaboration arrangements include large and mid-size pharmaceutical companies, regional and national pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies. If we do enter into any such arrangements with any third parties, we will likely have limited control over the amount and timing of resources that our collaborators dedicate to the development or commercialization of our product candidates. Our ability to generate revenues from these arrangements will depend on our collaborators' abilities to successfully perform the functions assigned to them in these arrangements.
Collaborations involving our product candidates would pose the following risks to us:
23
Risk factors
Collaboration agreements may not lead to development or commercialization of product candidates in the most efficient manner or at all. If a present or future collaborator of ours were to be involved in a business combination, the continued pursuit and emphasis on our product development or commercialization program could be delayed, diminished or terminated.
If we are not able to establish collaborations, we may have to alter our development and commercialization plans.
Our drug development programs and the potential commercialization of our product candidates will require substantial additional cash to fund expenses. For some of our product candidates, we may decide to collaborate with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for the development and potential commercialization of those product candidates.
We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator's resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator's evaluation of a number of factors. Those factors may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the United States, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate to patients, the potential of competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge and industry and market conditions generally. The collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us for our product candidate. We may also be restricted under existing license agreements from entering into agreements on certain terms with potential collaborators.
24
Risk factors
Collaborations are complex and time-consuming to negotiate and document. In addition, there have been a significant number of recent business combinations among large pharmaceutical companies that have resulted in a reduced number of potential future collaborators.
We may not be able to negotiate collaborations on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to do so, we may have to curtail the development of such product candidate, reduce or delay its development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of any sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may not be able to further develop our product candidates or bring them to market and generate product revenue.
We expect to rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials and some aspects of our compound formulation research and preclinical testing, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such trials, research or testing.
We do not plan to independently conduct clinical trials of our product candidates. In addition, we do not expect to independently conduct all aspects of our compound formulation research or preclinical testing of our product candidates. We expect to rely on third parties, such as contract research organizations, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions and clinical investigators, to conduct our clinical trials. We currently rely and expect to continue to rely on third parties to conduct some aspects of our compound formulation research and preclinical testing. For example, we currently rely on third parties in the development of various formulations of VS-507, VS-4718 and VS-5095. We cannot finish preclinical testing and initiate clinical trials of these product candidates until the development of a formulation is complete. Any of these third parties may terminate their engagements with us at any time. If we need to enter into alternative arrangements, it would delay our product development activities.
Our reliance on these third parties for research and development activities will reduce our control over these activities but will not relieve us of our responsibilities. For example, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial. Moreover, the FDA requires us to comply with standards, commonly referred to as Good Clinical Practices, for conducting, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. We also are required to register ongoing clinical trials and post the results of completed clinical trials on a government-sponsored database, ClinicalTrials.gov, within certain timeframes. Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions.
Furthermore, these third parties may also have relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols, we will not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, marketing approvals for our product candidates and will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize our product candidates.
We also expect to rely on other third parties to store and distribute drug supplies for our clinical trials. Any performance failure on the part of our distributors could delay clinical development or marketing
25
Risk factors
approval of our product candidates or commercialization of our products, producing additional losses and depriving us of potential product revenue.
We contract with third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates for preclinical testing and expect to continue to do so for clinical trials and for commercialization. This reliance on third parties increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or products or such quantities at an acceptable cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.
We do not have any manufacturing facilities or personnel. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third-party manufacturers for the manufacture of our product candidates for preclinical testing, other than small amounts of compounds that we may synthesize ourselves for such purpose. To date, we have obtained starting materials for our supply of the cGMP bulk drug substance for our product candidates from one third-party manufacturer. We do not have a long term supply agreement with this third-party manufacturer, and we purchase our required drug supply on a purchase order basis.
We expect to rely on third-party manufacturers or third-party collaborators for the manufacture of our product candidates for clinical trials and for commercial supply of any of these product candidates for which we or our collaborators obtain marketing approval. We may be unable to establish any agreements with third-party manufacturers or to do so on acceptable terms. Even if we are able to establish agreements with third-party manufacturers, reliance on third-party manufacturers entails additional risks, including:
Third-party manufacturers may not be able to comply with current good manufacturing practices, or cGMP, regulations or similar regulatory requirements outside the United States. Our failure, or the failure of our third-party manufacturers, to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product candidates or products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect supplies of our products and harm our business and results of operations.
Any products that we may develop may compete with other product candidates and products for access to manufacturing facilities. There are a limited number of manufacturers that operate under cGMP regulations and that might be capable of manufacturing for us.
Any performance failure on the part of our existing or future manufacturers could delay clinical development or marketing approval. We do not currently have arrangements in place for redundant supply or a second source for bulk drug substance. If our current contract manufacturer cannot perform as agreed, we may be required to replace that manufacturer. Although we believe that there are several potential alternative manufacturers who could manufacture our product candidates, we may incur added costs and delays in identifying and qualifying any such replacement.
Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product candidates or products may adversely affect our future profit margins and our ability to commercialize any products that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.
26
Risk factors
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
If we fail to comply with our obligations under our intellectual property licenses with third parties, we could lose license rights that are important to our business.
We are a party to a number of intellectual property license agreements with third parties, including the Whitehead Institute and Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Poniard, and expect to enter into additional license agreements in the future. Our existing license agreements impose, and we expect that future license agreements will impose, various diligence, milestone payment, royalty, insurance and other obligations on us. For example, under our license agreements with the Whitehead Institute and Poniard, we are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize licensed products under the agreement and to satisfy other specified obligations. If we fail to comply with our obligations under these licenses, our licensors may have the right to terminate these license agreements, in which event we might not be able to market any product that is covered by these agreements, or to convert the license to a non-exclusive license, which could materially adversely affect the value of the product candidate being developed under the license agreement. Termination of these license agreements or reduction or elimination of our licensed rights may result in our having to negotiate new or reinstated licenses with less favorable terms. If the Whitehead Institute were to terminate its license agreement with us for any reason, we would lose access to the EMT technology and the ability to use the stable population of CSCs for high-throughput screening. If Poniard were to terminate its license agreement with us for any reason, we would lose our rights to VS-4718 and VS-5095.
If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our technology and products, or if our licensors are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for the technology or products that we license from them, or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our technology and products may be adversely affected.
Our success depends in large part on our and our licensors' ability to obtain and maintain patent protection in the United States and other countries with respect to our proprietary technology and products. We and our licensors seek to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our novel technologies and products that are important to our business. To date, no patents have issued that cover any of our proprietary technology or product candidates, and we cannot be certain that any patents will issue with claims that cover any of our proprietary technology or product candidates.
The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Moreover, in some circumstances, we do not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology or products that we license from third parties and are reliant on our licensors. For example, we do not control the prosecution of the patent applications licensed to us under our agreement with the Whitehead Institute or those patent applications owned by The Scripps Research Institute, or Scripps, licensed to us under our agreement with Poniard. Therefore, we cannot be certain that these patents and applications will be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. If such licensors fail to maintain such patents, or lose rights to those patents, the rights we have licensed may be reduced or eliminated.
27
Risk factors
The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our and our licensors' patent rights are highly uncertain. Our and our licensors' pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or products or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection.
The laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, or in some cases not at all. Therefore we cannot be certain that we or our licensors were the first to make the inventions claimed in our owned or licensed patents or pending patent applications, or that we or our licensors were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions.
Assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, currently, in the United States, the first to make the claimed invention is entitled to the patent, while outside the United States, the first to file a patent application is entitled to the patent. In March 2013, the United States will transition to a first inventor to file system in which, assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application will be entitled to the patent. We may be subject to a third party preissuance submission of prior art to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter parties review or interference proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse determination in any such submission, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technology or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third-party patent rights.
Even if our owned and licensed patent applications issue as patents, they may not issue in a form that will provide us with any meaningful protection, prevent competitors from competing with us or otherwise provide us with any competitive advantage. Our competitors may be able to circumvent our owned or licensed patents by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner. For example, although we expect to file patent applications with respect to our product candidate VS-507 with claims directed to its formulation and method of use, patent protection is not available for composition of matter claims directed to its active pharmaceutical ingredient. Because VS-507 lacks composition of matter protection for its active pharmaceutical ingredient, competitors will be able to offer and sell products with the same active pharmaceutical ingredient so long as these competitors do not infringe any other patents that we may obtain covering this drug.
The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability, and our owned and licensed patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and abroad. Such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, which could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.
28
Risk factors
We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents, which could be expensive, time consuming and unsuccessful.
Competitors may infringe our patents. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is invalid or unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation proceeding could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, our licensors may have rights to file and prosecute such claims and we are reliant on them.
Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing their intellectual property rights, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
Our commercial success depends upon our ability and the ability of our collaborators to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. We have yet to conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate searches to determine whether our use of certain of the patent rights licensed to us would infringe patents issued to third parties. We may become party to, or threatened with, future adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our products and technology, including interference proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing patents or patents that may be granted in the future. If we are found to infringe a third party's intellectual property rights, we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to continue developing and marketing our products and technology. However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. We could be forced, including by court order, to cease commercializing the infringing technology or product. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our product candidates or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business. Claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similar negative impact on our business.
For example, we are aware of a U.S. patent application filed by a third party almost one year after the priority date of the U.S. patent application filed by Scripps and licensed to us by Poniard, which has pending generic claims that, if issued as written, potentially cover VS-4718 and VS-5095. The third-party patent application also specifically discloses VS-4718. Although the Scripps patent application has a priority date that is earlier than the priority date of the third-party application, we cannot be sure which party was the first to make the claimed invention. Because the United States currently uses a first to invent standard to determine priority, if a patent issues under the third-party patent application covering the composition of matter of VS-4718 or VS-5095 and such third party was determined to be the first to make the claimed invention, we would need to obtain a license to the patented technology to commercialize VS-4718 or VS-5095 in the United States, which would cause us to incur licensing related costs. However, a license to this patent might not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Our failure to obtain a license to any such patent could delay or prevent our potential commercialization of VS-4718 or VS-5095 in the United States.
29
Risk factors
We may be subject to claims that our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.
Many of our employees were previously employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or these employees have used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any such employee's former employer. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.
Intellectual property litigation could cause us to spend substantial resources and distract our personnel from their normal responsibilities.
Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses, and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing or distribution activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.
In addition to seeking patents for some of our technology and products, we also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect these trade secrets, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to them, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position would be harmed.
30
Risk factors
RISKS RELATED TO REGULATORY APPROVAL OF OUR PRODUCT CANDIDATES AND OTHER LEGAL COMPLIANCE MATTERS
If we are not able to obtain, or if there are delays in obtaining, required regulatory approvals, we will not be able to commercialize our product candidates, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.
Our product candidates and the activities associated with their development and commercialization, including their design, testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale and distribution, are subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the United States and by comparable authorities in other countries. Failure to obtain marketing approval for a product candidate will prevent us from commercializing the product candidate. We have not received approval to market any of our product candidates from regulatory authorities in any jurisdiction. We have only limited experience in filing and supporting the applications necessary to gain marketing approvals and expect to rely on third-party contract research organizations to assist us in this process. Securing FDA approval requires the submission of extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting information to the FDA for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate's safety and efficacy. Securing FDA approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the FDA. Our product candidates may not be effective, may be only moderately effective or may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude our obtaining marketing approval or prevent or limit commercial use.
The process of obtaining marketing approvals, both in the United States and abroad, is expensive, may take many years if additional clinical trials are required, if approval is obtained at all, and can vary substantially based upon a variety of factors, including the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved. Changes in marketing approval policies during the development period, changes in or the enactment of additional statutes or regulations, or changes in regulatory review for each submitted product application, may cause delays in the approval or rejection of an application. The FDA has substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data is insufficient for approval and require additional preclinical, clinical or other studies. In addition, varying interpretations of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical testing could delay, limit or prevent marketing approval of a product candidate. Any marketing approval we ultimately obtain may be limited or subject to restrictions or post-approval commitments that render the approved product not commercially viable.
If we experience delays in obtaining approval or if we fail to obtain approval of our product candidates, the commercial prospects for our product candidates may be harmed and our ability to generate revenues will be materially impaired.
Failure to obtain marketing approval in international jurisdictions would prevent our product candidates from being marketed abroad.
In order to market and sell our products in the European Union and many other jurisdictions, we or our third-party collaborators must obtain separate marketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ substantially from that required to obtain FDA approval. The regulatory approval process outside the United States generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. In addition, in many countries outside the United States, it is required that the product be approved for reimbursement before the product can be approved for sale in that country. We or these third parties may not obtain approvals from regulatory
31
Risk factors
authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by one regulatory authority outside the United States does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. We may not be able to file for marketing approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market.
Any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or if we experience unanticipated problems with our products, when and if any of them are approved.
Any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval, along with the manufacturing processes, post-approval clinical data, labeling, advertising and promotional activities for such product, will be subject to continual requirements of and review by the FDA and other regulatory authorities. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration and listing requirements, cGMP requirements relating to quality control, quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and documents, requirements regarding the distribution of samples to physicians and recordkeeping. Even if marketing approval of a product candidate is granted, the approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. The FDA closely regulates the post-approval marketing and promotion of drugs to ensure drugs are marketed only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved labeling. The FDA imposes stringent restrictions on manufacturers' communications regarding off-label use and if we do not market our products for their approved indications, we may be subject to enforcement action for off-label marketing.
In addition, later discovery of previously unknown problems with our products, manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may yield various results, including:
32
Risk factors
Our relationships with customers and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.
Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell and distribute our products for which we obtain marketing approval. Restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations, include the following:
33
Risk factors
Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we expect to do business are found to be not in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs.
Recently enacted and future legislation may increase the difficulty and cost for us to obtain marketing approval of and commercialize our product candidates and affect the prices we may obtain.
In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of our product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect our ability to profitably sell any product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval.
In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, or Medicare Modernization Act, changed the way Medicare covers and pays for pharmaceutical products. The legislation expanded Medicare coverage for drug purchases by the elderly and introduced a new reimbursement methodology based on average sales prices for physician administered drugs. In addition, this legislation provided authority for limiting the number of drugs that will be covered in any therapeutic class. Cost reduction initiatives and other provisions of this legislation could decrease the coverage and price that we receive for any approved products. While the Medicare Modernization Act applies only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement rates. Therefore, any reduction in reimbursement that results from the Medicare Modernization Act may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors.
More recently, in March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Health Care Reform Law, a sweeping law intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for health care and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms. Effective October 1, 2010, the Health Care Reform Law revises the definition of "average manufacturer price" for reporting purposes, which could increase the amount of Medicaid drug rebates to states. Further, the new law imposes a significant annual fee on companies that manufacture or import branded prescription drug products. Substantial new provisions affecting compliance have also been enacted, which may affect our business practices with health care practitioners. We will not know the full effects of the Health Care Reform Law until applicable federal and state agencies issue regulations or guidance under the new law. Although it is too early to determine the effect of the Health Care Reform Law, the new law appears likely to continue the pressure on pharmaceutical pricing, especially under the Medicare program, and may also increase our regulatory burdens and operating costs.
Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for pharmaceutical products. We cannot be sure whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether the FDA regulations, guidance or interpretations will be
34
Risk factors
changed, or what the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals of our product candidates, if any, may be. In addition, increased scrutiny by the U.S. Congress of the FDA's approval process may significantly delay or prevent marketing approval, as well as subject us to more stringent product labeling and post-marketing testing and other requirements.
RISKS RELATED TO EMPLOYEE MATTERS AND MANAGING GROWTH
Our future success depends on our ability to retain our chief executive officer and other key executives and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
We are highly dependent on Christoph Westphal, our Chief Executive Officer, Robert Forrester, our Chief Operating Officer, and Jonathan Pachter, our Vice President, Head of Research, as well as the other principal members of our management and scientific teams, including our scientific co-founders, Robert Weinberg, Eric Lander and Piyush Gupta. Although we have formal employment agreements with Robert Forrester and Jonathan Pachter, these agreements do not prevent them from terminating their employment with us at any time. We do not have an employment agreement with Christoph Westphal. We do not maintain "key person" insurance for any of our executives or other employees. The loss of the services of any of these persons could impede the achievement of our research, development and commercialization objectives.
In addition to his role as Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of our company, Dr. Westphal also serves as a general partner of Longwood Founders Fund, LP, a venture capital investment fund and one of our principal stockholders. We and Dr. Westphal anticipate that he will transition to an executive Chairman role at our company in the future based on our having meaningfully advanced our discovery, research and development efforts, the overall growth of our company and our identifying and hiring a suitable successor. In connection with Dr. Westphal's transition to this role, we will need to recruit and hire a new principal executive officer. Our inability to hire a suitable executive to assume this position in a timely fashion could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.
Recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, clinical, manufacturing and sales and marketing personnel will also be critical to our success. We may not be able to attract and retain these personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for similar personnel. We also experience competition for the hiring of scientific and clinical personnel from universities and research institutions. In addition, we rely on consultants and advisors, including scientific and clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategy. Our consultants and advisors, including our scientific co-founders, may be employed by employers other than us and may have commitments under consulting or advisory contracts with other entities that may limit their availability to us.
We expect to expand our development, regulatory and future sales and marketing capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.
We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in the areas of drug development, regulatory affairs and sales and marketing. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources and the limited experience of our management team in managing a company with such anticipated growth, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel.
35
Risk factors
The physical expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK AND THIS OFFERING
After this offering, our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders will maintain the ability to control all matters submitted to stockholders for approval.
Upon the closing of this offering, our executive officers, directors and stockholders who owned more than 5% of our outstanding common stock before this offering will, in the aggregate, beneficially own shares representing approximately % of our capital stock. As a result, if these stockholders were to choose to act together, they would be able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, as well as our management and affairs. For example, these persons, if they choose to act together, would control the election of directors and approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of voting power could delay or prevent an acquisition of our company on terms that other stockholders may desire.
Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
Provisions in our corporate charter and our bylaws that will become effective upon the closing of this offering may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of us that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our common stock. In addition, because our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors. Among other things, these provisions:
36
Risk factors
Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
If you purchase shares of common stock in this offering, you will suffer immediate dilution of your investment.
The initial public offering price of our common stock is substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our common stock. Therefore, if you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you will pay a price per share that substantially exceeds our net tangible book value per share after this offering. To the extent shares are issued under outstanding options or the restricted stock units granted effective upon the closing of this offering or the warrant issuable pursuant to our license agreement with Poniard, you will incur further dilution. Based on an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, you will experience immediate dilution of $ per share, representing the difference between our pro forma net tangible book value per share after giving effect to this offering and the assumed initial public offering price. In addition, purchasers of common stock in this offering will have contributed approximately % of the aggregate price paid by all purchasers of our stock but will own only approximately % of our common stock outstanding after this offering.
An active trading market for our common stock may not develop.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price for our common stock will be determined through negotiations with the underwriters. Although we have applied to list our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market, an active trading market for our shares may never develop or be sustained following this offering. If an active market for our common stock does not develop, it may be difficult for you to sell shares you purchase in this offering without depressing the market price for the shares or at all.
If our stock price is volatile, purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
Our stock price is likely to be volatile. The stock market in general and the market for biopharmaceutical companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, you may not be able to sell your common stock at or above the initial public offering price. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:
37
Risk factors
We have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.
Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering and could spend the proceeds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, cause the price of our common stock to decline and delay the development of our product candidates. Pending their use, we may invest the net proceeds from this offering in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.
We will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.
As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission and NASDAQ have imposed various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, we will be required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting, including an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. To achieve compliance with Section 404 within the prescribed period, we will be engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that neither we nor our independent registered public accounting firm will be able to conclude within the prescribed timeframe that our internal control over financial reporting
38
Risk factors
is effective as required by Section 404. This could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. In addition, the terms of any future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
A significant portion of our total outstanding shares are restricted from immediate resale but may be sold into the market in the near future, which could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock. After this offering, we will have outstanding shares of common stock based on the number of shares outstanding as of November 30, 2011. This includes the shares that we are selling in this offering, which may be resold in the public market immediately without restriction, unless purchased by our affiliates. Of the remaining shares, shares are currently restricted as a result of securities laws or lock-up agreements but will be able to be sold after the offering as described in the "Shares eligible for future sale" section of this prospectus. Moreover, after this offering, holders of an aggregate of shares of our common stock will have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders. We also intend to register all shares of common stock that we may issue under our equity compensation plans. Once we register these shares, they can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to volume limitations applicable to affiliates and the lock-up agreements described in the "Underwriting" section of this prospectus.
39
Special note regarding forward-looking statements
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management, are forward-looking statements. The words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "predict," "project," "target," "potential," "will," "would," "could," "should," "continue," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words.
The forward-looking statements in this prospectus include, among other things, statements about:
We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important factors in the cautionary statements included in this prospectus, particularly in the "Risk factors" section, that we believe could cause actual results or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may make.
You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus are made as of the date of this prospectus, and we do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements except as required by applicable law.
40
We estimate that the net proceeds from our issuance and sale of shares of our common stock in this offering will be approximately $ million, assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, we estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $ million.
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds from this offering by approximately $ million, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.
We currently estimate that we will use the net proceeds from this offering as follows:
This expected use of the net proceeds from this offering represents our intentions based upon our current plans and business conditions. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly depending on numerous factors, including the progress of our development efforts, the status of and results from clinical trials, as well as any collaborations that we may enter into with third parties for our product candidates, and any unforeseen cash needs. As a result, our management will retain broad discretion over the allocation of the net proceeds from this offering. We have no current understandings, agreements or commitments for any material acquisitions or licenses of any compounds, product candidates or technology.
Based on our planned use of the net proceeds from this offering, we expect that such funds, together with our existing cash and cash equivalents, will be sufficient to enable us to complete preclinical and Phase 1 clinical development of VS-507 and either VS-4718 or VS-5095 and, subject to successfully completing Phase 1 clinical development, initiate Phase 2 clinical development of VS-507 and either VS-4718 or VS-5095. However, it is possible that we will not achieve the progress that we expect because the actual costs and timing of research and development are difficult to predict, subject to substantial risks and delays and often vary depending on the particular indication and development strategy. We do not expect that the net proceeds from this offering and our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to enable us to fund the completion of development of any of our product candidates.
Pending our use of the net proceeds from this offering, we intend to invest the net proceeds in a variety of capital preservation investments, including short-term, investment grade, interest bearing instruments and U.S. government securities.
41
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future.
42
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of September 30, 2011:
Our capitalization following the closing of this offering will be adjusted based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing. You should read this table together with "Selected financial data," our financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus and the "Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations" section of this prospectus.
|
As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual
|
Pro forma
|
Pro forma as adjusted |
||||||||
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 41,421 | $ | 61,824 | |||||||
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 16,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding, actual; and no shares authorized, issued and outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted |
15,935 | | |||||||||
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 16,025 shares authorized, issued and outstanding, actual; and no shares authorized, issued and outstanding, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted |
31,943 | | |||||||||
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 9,068 shares authorized in November 2011, no shares issued and outstanding, actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted |
| | |||||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 45,000 shares authorized and 4,986 shares issued and outstanding, actual(1); and 53,093 shares authorized and 46,079 shares issued and outstanding, pro forma(1); shares authorized and shares issued and outstanding, pro forma as adjusted |
1 | 5 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
822 | 69,099 | |||||||||
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
(8,462 | ) | (8,462 | ) | |||||||
Total stockholders' (deficit) equity |
(7,639 | ) | 60,642 | ||||||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 40,239 | $ | 60,642 | |||||||
43
Capitalization
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash equivalents, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders' equity (deficit) and total capitalization on a pro forma as adjusted basis by approximately $ million, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.
The table above does not include:
44
If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your ownership interest will be diluted immediately to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock after this offering.
Our historical net tangible book value as of September 30, 2011 was $(7.7) million, or $(0.73) per share of our common stock. Historical net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by 10,476,652 shares of our common stock outstanding, including 5,490,319 shares of unvested restricted stock subject to repurchase by us.
Our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2011 was $60.6 million, or $1.18 per share of our common stock. Pro forma net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the pro forma number of shares of our common stock outstanding after giving effect to our issuance and sale in November 2011 of an aggregate of 9,067,825 shares of our series C preferred stock at a price per share of $2.25 for an aggregate purchase price of $20.4 million and the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock, including shares of our series C preferred stock that we issued and sold in November 2011, into an aggregate of 41,092,825 shares of our common stock upon the closing of this offering.
After giving effect to our issuance and sale of shares of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2011 would have been $ million, or $ per share. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share of $ to existing stockholders and immediate dilution of $ in pro forma net tangible book value per share to new investors purchasing common stock in this offering.
Dilution per share to new investors is determined by subtracting pro forma net tangible book value per share after this offering from the initial public offering price per share paid by new investors. The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share basis.
Assumed initial public offering price per share |
$ | |||||||
Historical net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2011 |
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
|||||
Increase attributable to the conversion of outstanding preferred stock |
1.91 |
|||||||
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2011 |
1.18 |
|||||||
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors |
||||||||
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after this offering |
||||||||
Dilution per share to new investors |
$ |
|||||||
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) our pro forma net tangible book value by approximately $ , our pro forma net tangible book value per share by approximately $ and dilution per share to new investors by approximately
45
Dilution
$ , assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option or if any additional shares are issued in connection with outstanding options, you will experience further dilution.
The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2011, the total number of shares purchased from us, the total consideration paid, or to be paid, and the average price per share paid, or to be paid, by existing stockholders and by new investors in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, before deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. As the table shows, new investors purchasing shares in this offering will pay an average price per share substantially higher than our existing stockholders paid.
|
Shares purchased | Total consideration | |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Average price per share |
||||||||||||||||
|
Number
|
Percentage
|
Amount
|
Percentage
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Existing stockholders |
% | $ | % | $ | |||||||||||||
New investors |
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
100 | % | $ | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) the total consideration paid by new investors by $ million and increase (decrease) the percentage of total consideration paid by new investors by approximately %, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same.
The table above is based on actual shares of our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and 41,092,825 additional shares of our common stock issuable upon the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock, including shares of our series C preferred stock that we issued and sold in November 2011, upon the closing of this offering.
The table above excludes:
46
Dilution
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, the following will occur:
47
You should read the following selected financial data together with our financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus and the "Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations" section of this prospectus. We have derived the statements of operations data for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010 from our audited financial statements included in this prospectus. We have derived the statements of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011 and the balance sheet data as of September 30, 2011 from our unaudited financial statements included in this prospectus. The unaudited financial data include, in the opinion of our management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations for these periods. Our historical results for any prior period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period, and our results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full fiscal year.
Statement of operations data:
|
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 400 | $ | 5,483 | $ | 5,883 | |||||
General and administrative |
384 | 2,195 | 2,579 | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
784 | 7,678 | 8,462 | ||||||||
Operating loss |
(784 | ) | (7,678 | ) | (8,462 | ) | |||||
Net loss |
$ | (784 | ) | $ | (7,678 | ) | $ | (8,462 | ) | ||
Accretion of preferred stock |
(2 | ) | (18 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders |
$ | (786 | ) | $ | (7,696 | ) | $ | (8,482 | ) | ||
Net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (1.79 | ) | $ | (2.20 | ) | ||
Weighted-average number of common shares used in net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
2,976 | 4,291 | 3,841 | ||||||||
Pro forma net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
|||||
Weighted-average number of common shares used in pro forma net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
4,638 | 20,474 | |||||||||
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per common share is calculated assuming the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock, excluding shares of our series C preferred stock that we issued and sold in November 2011.
48
Selected financial data
The pro forma balance sheet data set forth below gives effect to:
The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data set forth below give further effect to our issuance and sale of shares of our common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the price range listed on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance sheet data:
|
Actual
|
Pro forma
|
Pro forma as adjusted |
||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 41,421 | $ | 61,824 | |||||||
Working capital |
39,419 | 59,822 | |||||||||
Total assets |
42,364 | 62,767 | |||||||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock |
47,878 | | |||||||||
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
(8,462 | ) | (8,462 | ) | |||||||
Total stockholders' (deficit) equity |
(7,639 | ) | 60,642 |
49
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this prospectus, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should read the "Risk factors" section of this prospectus for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.
OVERVIEW
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing proprietary small molecule drugs targeting cancer stem cells in breast and other cancers along with proprietary companion diagnostics. A cancer stem cell is a particularly aggressive type of tumor cell, resistant to conventional cancer therapy, that we believe is an underlying cause of tumor recurrence and metastasis. Our scientific co-founders, Robert Weinberg, Ph.D., Eric Lander, Ph.D., and Piyush Gupta, Ph.D., have made discoveries that link the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, or EMT, to the emergence of cancer stem cells. This transition involves the transformation of one type of cancer cell into a more aggressive and drug resistant type of cancer cell. Building on these discoveries, our scientific co-founders developed proprietary technology to create a stable population of cancer stem cells that we use to screen for and identify small molecule compounds that target cancer stem cells. We expect to file an investigational new drug application, or IND, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in late 2012 for our product candidate VS-507 and in early 2013 for one of our product candidates VS-4718 or VS-5095, in each case to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial of these product candidates.
We commenced active operations in the second half of 2010. Our operations to date have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring and developing our technology, identifying potential product candidates and undertaking preclinical studies of our most advanced product candidates. To date, we have not generated any revenues and have financed our operations with net proceeds from the private placement of our preferred stock.
As of September 30, 2011, we had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $8.5 million. Our net loss was $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, $784,000 for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 and $8.5 million for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011. We expect to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future. We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we continue the research and development and later initiate clinical trials of, and seek marketing approval for, our product candidates. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. Furthermore, upon the closing of this offering, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. Adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or any future commercialization efforts. We will need to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability, and we may never do so.
50
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
FINANCIAL OPERATIONS OVERVIEW
Revenue
To date, we have not generated any revenues. Our ability to generate product revenues, which we do not expect will occur for many years, if ever, will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of our product candidates.
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses consist of costs associated with our research activities, including our drug discovery efforts, and the development of our therapeutic product candidates and companion diagnostics. Our research and development expenses consist of:
We expense research and development cost to operations as incurred. We account for nonrefundable advance payments for goods and services that will be used in future research and development activities as expenses when the service has been performed or when the goods have been received, rather than when the payment is made.
We use our employee and infrastructure resources across multiple research and development projects. We do not allocate employee-related expenses or depreciation to any particular project. Because all of our development projects are in preclinical development, we do not track research and development costs by project. The components of our research and development costs are described in more detail in "Results of operations." We expect to track specific project costs when product candidates enter toxicology studies to enable the filing of an IND with the FDA.
We anticipate that our research and development expenses will increase significantly in future periods as we increase the scope and rate of our drug discovery efforts and begin costlier development activities, including clinical trials for our current and additional product candidates in the future.
Our most advanced product candidates are VS-507, VS-4718 and VS-5095. We are currently evaluating these compounds in preclinical studies as potential therapies for breast and other cancers. We expect to initiate IND-enabling toxicology studies for VS-507 in January 2012. Assuming successful completion of preclinical studies, including IND-enabling toxicology studies, we expect to file an IND with the FDA in late 2012 to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial of VS-507. We expect to initiate IND-enabling toxicology studies for VS-4718 and VS-5095 in the first half of 2012. Assuming successful completion of preclinical studies, including IND-enabling toxicology studies, we expect to file an IND with the FDA in early 2013 to initiate a Phase I clinical trial of one of VS-4718 or VS-5095. We currently estimate that before initiating clinical trials for VS-507 and either VS-4718 or VS-5095, we will incur between $1.5 million and $2.5 million of additional preclinical development expenses for each of these two programs.
51
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
The successful development of our product candidates is highly uncertain. As this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and estimated costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete development of our product candidates or the period, if any, in which material net cash inflows from our product candidates may commence. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing drugs, including the uncertainty of:
A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of a product candidate could mean a significant change in the costs and timing associated with the development of that product candidate. For example, if the FDA or other regulatory authority were to require us to conduct clinical trials beyond those which we currently anticipate will be required for the completion of clinical development of a product candidate or if we experience significant delays in enrollment in any clinical trials, we could be required to expend significant additional financial resources and time on the completion of clinical development.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs for personnel, including stock-based compensation expense, in our executive, finance and business development functions. Other general and administrative expenses include allocated facility costs and professional fees for legal, patent, investor and public relations, consulting and accounting services.
We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in future periods to support increases in our research and development activities and as a result of increased headcount, expanded infrastructure, increased legal, compliance, accounting and investor and public relations expenses associated with being a public company and increased insurance premiums, among other factors.
Interest income
Prior to September 30, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents were invested in non-interest-bearing accounts. As a result, we have not earned any interest through September 30, 2011. We expect interest income to increase in future periods as we invest the proceeds from our series B and series C preferred stock financings.
Accretion of preferred stock
Our preferred stock is redeemable beginning in 2016 at its original issue price plus any declared but unpaid dividends upon a specified vote of the preferred stockholders. Accretion of preferred stock reflects the periodic accretion of issuance costs on our preferred stock to its redemption value.
52
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND SIGNIFICANT JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES
Our management's discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which we have prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to accrued expenses and stock-based compensation described in greater detail below. We base our estimates on our limited historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in the notes to our financial statements appearing at the end of this prospectus. However, we believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid you in fully understanding and evaluating our financial condition and results of operations.
Accrued research and development expenses
As part of the process of preparing our financial statements, we are required to estimate our accrued expenses. This process involves reviewing quotations and contracts, identifying services that have been performed on our behalf and estimating the level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for the service when we have not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of the actual cost. The majority of our service providers invoice us monthly in arrears for services performed or when contractual milestones are met. We make estimates of our accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in our financial statements based on facts and circumstances known to us at that time. We periodically confirm the accuracy of our estimates with the service providers and make adjustments if necessary. The significant estimates in our accrued research and development expenses include fees paid to CROs in connection with research and development activities for which we have not yet been invoiced.
We base our expenses related to CROs on our estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to quotes and contracts with CROs that conduct research and development on our behalf. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. There may be instances in which payments made to our vendors will exceed the level of services provided and result in a prepayment of the research and development expense. In accruing service fees, we estimate the time period over which services will be performed and the level of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from our estimate, we adjust the accrual or prepaid accordingly. Although we do not expect our estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, our understanding of the status and timing of services performed relative to the actual status and timing of services performed may vary and could result in us reporting amounts that are too high or too low in any particular period.
Stock-based compensation
As we continue to expand our headcount, we expect to make additional stock option and restricted stock grants, which will result in additional stock-based compensation expense. Accordingly, we describe below the methodology we have employed to date in measuring such expenses. Following the
53
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
consummation of this offering, stock option values will be determined based on the market price of our common stock.
Since our inception in August 2010, we have applied the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, which we refer to as ASC 718. Determining the amount of stock-based compensation to be recorded requires us to develop estimates of the fair value of stock options as of their grant date. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period, which in most cases is the vesting period of the award. Calculating the fair value of stock-based awards requires that we make highly subjective assumptions. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value our stock option awards. Use of this valuation methodology requires that we make assumptions as to the volatility of our common stock, the expected term of our stock options, the risk free interest rate for a period that approximates the expected term of our stock options and our expected dividend yield. Because we are a privately-held company with a limited operating history, we utilize data from a representative group of companies to estimate expected stock price volatility. We selected companies from the biopharmaceutical industry with similar characteristics to us, including early stage of product development and therapeutic focus. We use the simplified method as prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment, to calculate the expected term of stock option grants to employees as we do not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term of stock options granted to employees. We utilize a dividend yield of zero based on the fact that we have never paid cash dividends and have no current intention to pay cash dividends. The risk-free interest rate used for each grant is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for instruments with a similar expected life.
Stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options granted to employees was insignificant for the period August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, and totaled $7,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2011, we had $169,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of related forfeiture estimates, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average remaining vesting period of approximately 3.8 years. While our stock-based compensation for stock options granted to employees to date has not been material to our financial results, we expect the impact to grow in future periods due to the potential increases in the value of our common stock and headcount.
Under ASC 718, we are required to estimate the level of forfeitures expected to occur and record compensation expense only for those awards that we ultimately expect will vest. Due to the lack of historical forfeiture activity of our plan, we estimated our forfeiture rate based on data from a representative group of companies with similar characteristics to us. Through September 30, 2011, forfeitures have not been material.
The following table sets forth information with respect to stock options granted to employees since August 4, 2010 (inception).
|
Number of shares underlying options granted |
Exercise price per share |
Common stock fair value per share on grant date |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 3, 2010 |
235,000 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | |||||
March 3, 2011 |
75,000 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | |||||
June 8, 2011 |
280,000 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 | |||||
September 6, 2011 |
403,000 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.55 | |||||
September 20, 2011 |
20,000 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.55 |
54
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
We have granted stock options at exercise prices not less than the estimated fair market value of our common stock. As there was no public market for our common stock, our board of directors determined the estimated fair value of our common stock, taking into consideration various objective and subjective factors, including:
For the period from November 30, 2010 through June 30, 2011, our board of directors determined the fair value of our common stock to be $0.08 per share. This was an increase from the previous fair value of our common stock of $0.0001, as determined by our board of directors in August 2010. The increase in value from August 2010 was primarily due to the following factors:
Because of the minimal value of non-cash assets owned during this period, including the early stage of our research and development efforts under our licensed rights, the superior preferences associated with our series A preferred stock in relation to our common stock and our focus on start-up activities, we attributed a nominal fair value to our common stock during this time.
We performed contemporaneous valuations of our common stock as of November 30, 2010, July 31, 2011 and September 30, 2011 in accordance with the framework of the 2004 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Technical Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, or the Practice Aid. Based on the valuation methodology selection criteria set forth in the Practice Aid, with a focus on the early stage of our development as a company, including the early stage status of our development efforts, very limited operations and the fact that we had an incomplete management team, as of November 30, 2010, we determined that an asset-based approach was the most appropriate method to use to determine the enterprise value of our company. We then allocated the enterprise value using the current value method. We concluded that this was the most appropriate method since we did not have any projections as of the valuation date due to the early stage of our research and development. As such, an income approach would not have provided a reliable fair value determination. In addition, as a result of the lack of comparative information available for publicly-traded or privately-held start-up enterprises, and because any investments in shares of stock are unlikely to be a reliable indicator of fair value at such an early stage, we concluded
55
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
that the market approach would also not provide a reliable fair value determination as of this date. The results of this valuation methodology were consistent with our expectations, as we would not have expected any significant value to have been created for the common stockholders. We concluded that there were no significant transactions affecting our capital structure or significant developments in our research and development which would have indicated that an update to our valuation was required at dates until after June 30, 2011.
In July 2011, we completed our series B preferred stock financing and hired our Vice President, Head of Research. Based on the significance of these transactions, we deemed it appropriate to update the valuation of our common stock as of July 31, 2011. For the period from July 31, 2011 to September 20, 2011, our board of directors determined the fair value of our common stock to be $0.55 per share. This was an increase from the previous fair value of our common stock of $0.08 per share. The increase in value from November 30, 2010 was primarily due to the following factors:
We performed a contemporaneous valuation of our common stock as of July 31, 2011 in accordance with the framework of the Practice Aid. Based on the valuation methodology selection criteria set forth in the Practice Aid and the stage of our development as a company as of July 31, 2011, we determined that the option pricing method was the most appropriate valuation methodology to estimate the fair value of our common stock. Key variables in the option pricing method were as follows:
56
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
from U.S. Tax Court cases regarding privately-held business valuations, fundamental business factors and empirical studies on the discount for lack of marketability. We corroborated the discount factor based on the value of a put option compared to the value of common stock using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. We also considered that our preferred stock has rights that our common stock does not have, including anti-dilution protection, redemption rights, protective provisions in our certificate of incorporation and rights to participate in future rounds of financing. Our preferred stockholders have control and influence over the enterprise, which provides them with the optionality over future liquidity, financing and other decisions that the common stock optionholders do not control.
For our valuation as of July 31, 2011, we assumed a weighted-average two-year time to a liquidity event based on a probability-weighted analysis of the time to a liquidity event under an IPO scenario and several sale scenarios. Our estimates were supported by our belief that we would have multiple product candidates in clinical trials in mid-2013. At that time, we believed that an IPO or other liquidity event could occur in anticipation of the availability of those data.
We updated the valuation of our common stock again on September 30, 2011, which resulted in a fair value of $1.52 per share. This was an increase from the previous fair value of $0.55 per share. The increase in value from July 31, 2011 was primarily due to the following factors:
As of September 30, 2011, we concluded that a liquidity event was possible within six months due to the fact that we had selected investment bankers and initiated the initial process of preparing to file a registration statement for an IPO. We also believed that a sale was equally likely to occur after the availability of the clinical data from our initial clinical trial, which was still expected within two years of the valuation date. We calculated valuations using both liquidity event assumptions and equally weighted the results to estimate the fair value of our common stock. We believed that an equal weight applied to both scenarios was appropriate based upon our assessment of the probability of each scenario occurring, acknowledging market risks and other factors that might impact our ability to complete an IPO.
In the IPO scenario, we assumed all of our preferred shares would convert into common stock and the present value of the future projected enterprise value was based on the value of the anticipated series C preferred stock financing at $2.25 per share, which was contemplated as of the valuation date. There was no discount for lack of marketability applied to the IPO scenario. The estimated time to complete an IPO was six months.
For the sale scenario, we utilized the option pricing method and key assumptions were as follows:
57
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
The primary reason for the lower fair value per share of our common stock in comparison to the fair value per share of our preferred stock on each valuation date was the value of the superior rights and preferences associated with the preferred stock, the most significant of which are the liquidation rights held by the preferred stockholders.
There are significant judgments and estimates inherent in the determination of these valuations. These judgments and estimates include assumptions regarding our future performance, including the successful completion of our preclinical studies and clinical trials and the time to completing an IPO or sale, as well as the determination of the appropriate valuation methods at each valuation date. If we had made different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense could have been different. The foregoing valuation methodologies are not the only methodologies available and they will not be used to value our common stock once this offering is complete. Accordingly, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the foregoing valuation methodologies as an indicator of our future stock price.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We were incorporated on August 4, 2010. As a result, our results of operations reflect the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 and the nine month period ended September 30, 2011. There is no comparable period for 2010.
Discussion of the nine month period ended September 30, 2011
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses were $5.5 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011. Expenses during the period included:
58
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses were $2.2 million for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011. Expenses during the period included:
Accretion of preferred stock. We recorded $18,000 of accretion in the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 reflecting the periodic accretion of issuance costs associated with our series A and series B preferred stock.
Discussion of the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses were $400,000 for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. Expenses during the period included:
59
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses were $384,000 for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. Expenses during the period included:
Accretion of preferred stock. We recorded $2,000 of accretion in the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 reflecting the periodic accretion of issuance costs associated with our series A and series B preferred stock.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources of liquidity
To date, we have not generated any revenues. We have financed our operations to date through private placements of our preferred stock. As of September 30, 2011, we had received $47.9 million in net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock. As of September 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $41.4 million. In November 2011, we received proceeds of $20.4 million from the issuance of our series C preferred stock. We primarily invest our cash and cash equivalents in a U.S. Treasury money market fund.
60
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
Cash flows
The following table sets forth the primary sources and uses of cash for each of the periods set forth below.
(in thousands) |
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net cash used in operating activities |
$ | (330 | ) | $ | (5,298 | ) | |
Net cash used in investing activities |
(8 | ) | (840 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
3,922 | 43,975 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,584 | $ | 37,837 | |||
Operating activities. The use of cash in all periods resulted primarily from our net losses adjusted for non-cash charges and favorable changes in the components of working capital. The significant increase in cash used in operating activities for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 compared to the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 is due to an increase in research and development expenses as we increased our research and development headcount, increased spending on external research and development costs and increases in the balance of accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred rent. In addition, we commenced operations in August 2010 and, as such, the period ended December 31, 2010 reflects only five months of activity. We expect cash used in operating activities to continue to increase for the foreseeable future as we fund our increased research and development activities. We currently estimate that before initiating clinical trials for VS-507 and either VS-4718 or VS-5095, we will incur between $1.5 million and $2.5 million of additional preclinical development expenses for each of these two programs.
Investing activities. The cash used in investing activities for all periods reflects the purchases of property and equipment. The majority of such purchases in the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 were for laboratory equipment. In addition, during the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, investing activities included an $86,000 increase in restricted cash related to a standby letter of credit issued as a security deposit for our facility lease.
Financing activities. The cash provided by financing activities in the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 is the result of the sale and issuance of 12,000,000 shares of our series A preferred stock for net proceeds of $12.0 million, the sale and issuance of 16,025,000 shares of our series B preferred stock for net proceeds of $31.9 million and $38,000 of net proceeds from the sale of restricted stock to employees. The cash provided by financing activities in the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 is primarily the result of the sale and issuance of 4,000,000 shares of our series A preferred stock for net proceeds of $3.9 million.
Funding requirements
All of our product candidates are still in preclinical development. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially if and as we:
61
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
We expect that the net proceeds from this offering, together with our existing cash and cash equivalents, including the $20.4 million in proceeds from the issuance and sale of our series C preferred stock in November 2011, will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least . We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and commercialization of our product candidates, and the extent to which we may enter into collaborations with third parties for development and commercialization of our product candidates, we are unable to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenses associated with completing the development of our current product candidates. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. We do not have any committed external source of funds. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our stockholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required
62
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at September 30, 2011.
(in thousands)
|
Total
|
Remainder of 2011 |
2012-2013
|
2014-2015
|
Beyond 2015 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating lease obligations |
$ | 1,104 | $ | 86 | $ | 711 | $ | 307 | | |||||||
License agreements(1) |
| | | | |
Under our exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute, we also have agreed to make milestone payments to the Whitehead Institute upon achieving various development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. For each licensed product, we agreed to make milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $1,560,000 plus an additional amount for each subsequent approval of additional indications for a maximum number of licensed products. For each identified product that is not a licensed product, we agreed to make milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $815,000 plus an additional amount for each subsequent approval of additional indications for a maximum number of identified products. Each type of specified milestone payment is payable only for each of the maximum number of licensed products and the maximum number of identified products, as the case may be, to achieve the applicable milestone. In addition, a separate milestone payment is due upon the first commercial sale of each licensed product or identified product that is a diagnostic or prognostic test. A single additional milestone payment is due for the first issuance of licensed patent rights in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain or Italy. In addition, we have agreed to pay the Whitehead Institute royalties as a percentage of net sales of licensed products. The royalty rate is in the low single digits as a percentage of net sales for licensed products that are therapeutics, the mid single digits for licensed products that are diagnostics or prognostics and less than one percent for identified products.
Under our license agreement with Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Poniard, that we entered into in November 2011 relating to VS-4718 and VS-5095 and other compounds covered by a licensed patent right under that agreement that have the inhibition of Focal Adhesion Kinase as a primary mode of action, we paid an upfront license fee and agreed to pay Poniard milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $13,250,000 upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestones. We also agreed to issue to Poniard a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock upon the first dosing of the first patient in our first Phase 1 clinical trial of a licensed product. The exercise price of such warrant would be equal to the average closing price of our common stock during the five trading days preceding such issue date. In addition, we agreed to pay low to mid single digit royalties to Poniard as a percentage of net sales of licensed products.
63
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined under Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
TAX LOSS CARRYFORWARDS
As of December 31, 2010, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of $570,000 and state net operating loss carryforwards of $578,000, which are available to reduce future taxable income. We also had federal tax credits of $15,000 and state tax credits of $5,000, which may be used to offset future tax liabilities. The net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards will expire at various dates through 2030. Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service and state tax authorities and may become subject to an annual limitation in the event of certain cumulative changes in the ownership interest of significant stockholders over a three-year period in excess of 50%, as defined under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as similar state provisions. This could limit the amount of tax attributes that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income or tax liabilities. The amount of the annual limitation is determined based on the value of our company immediately prior to the ownership change. Subsequent ownership changes may further affect the limitation in future years. At December 31, 2010, we recorded a 100% valuation allowance against our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards of approximately $320,000, as we believe it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will not be fully realized. In the future, if we determine that a portion or all of the tax benefits associated with our tax carryforwards will be realized, net income would increase in the period of determination.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. We had cash and cash equivalents of $3.6 million as of December 31, 2010 and $41.4 million as of September 30, 2011, consisting of cash and money market funds. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly because our investments are in short-term securities. Our available for sale securities are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. Due to the short-term duration of our investment portfolio and the low risk profile of our investments, an immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the fair market value of our portfolio.
We contract with CROs and contract manufacturers globally. We may be subject to fluctuations in foreign currency rates in connection with these agreements. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded based on exchange rates at the time such transactions arise. As of September 30, 2011, approximately $36,000 of our total liabilities were denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. As of December 31, 2010, all of our liabilities were denominated in our functional currency.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
We have not recently adopted any new accounting standards. There are no recently issued accounting standards that have a material impact on us.
64
OVERVIEW
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing proprietary small molecule drugs targeting cancer stem cells in breast and other cancers along with proprietary companion diagnostics. A cancer stem cell is a particularly aggressive type of tumor cell, resistant to conventional cancer therapy, that we believe is an underlying cause of tumor recurrence and metastasis. Our scientific co-founders, Robert Weinberg, Ph.D., Eric Lander, Ph.D., and Piyush Gupta, Ph.D., have made discoveries that link the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, or EMT, to the emergence of cancer stem cells. This transition involves the transformation of one type of cancer cell into a more aggressive and drug resistant type of cancer cell. Building on these discoveries, our scientific co-founders developed proprietary technology to create a stable population of cancer stem cells that we use to screen for and identify small molecule compounds that target cancer stem cells. We expect to file an investigational new drug application, or IND, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, in late 2012 for our product candidate VS-507 and in early 2013 for one of our product candidates VS-4718 or VS-5095, in each case to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial of these product candidates.
Cancer is a group of diseases characterized by uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells. The American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States in 2011, approximately 1.6 million new cases of cancer will be diagnosed and nearly 600,000 people will die from the disease. Current treatments for cancer include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy and targeted therapy. According to estimates by the National Institutes of Health, in the United States in 2010, the direct medical costs of cancer of all types exceeded $100 billion. IMS Health estimates that in the United States in 2010, approximately $22 billion was spent on drugs to treat cancer, representing the largest class of drug spending in the United States. Despite years of intensive research and clinical use, current treatments often fail to cure cancer.
We believe that a key reason for the ultimate failure of many current therapies to achieve a durable clinical response may be the presence of cancer stem cells, or CSCs, which are also sometimes referred to as tumor-initiating cancer cells, within tumors. CSCs have been identified in many types of cancer, including breast, pancreatic, colon, brain, lung and leukemia. Following many cancer treatments, the tumor can remain with a high percentage of CSCs and become more aggressive and resistant to further treatment. In addition, patients who relapse often develop metastatic disease in which the cancer spreads to other sites in the body. Tumor metastasis to critical organs is the cause of more than 90% of cancer deaths. We believe that it is the drug resistance and ability of CSCs to spread to other sites in the body that may be the root causes of these failed therapies. Accordingly, our mission is to develop drugs targeting CSCs that either in combination with other cancer treatments or alone can kill all of the cells comprising a tumor and, thus, create a durable clinical response.
We license our EMT technology from the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, an affiliate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT. We also have a first right to negotiate a license for additional related intellectual property from the Broad Institute, an affiliate of MIT and Harvard University. Using our proprietary technology, we can create a stable population of CSCs in the laboratory for use in rapid and automated assays, referred to as high-throughput screening, to enable discovery of novel drugs targeting these CSCs. We are using our discovery approach to identify a pipeline of small molecule compounds with the potential to target CSCs.
Our most advanced product candidates are VS-507, VS-4718 and VS-5095. We are currently evaluating these compounds in preclinical studies as potential therapies for breast and other cancers. We believe that these compounds may be especially beneficial as therapeutics in aggressive cancers with
65
Business
a high percentage of CSCs, such as triple negative breast cancer, or TNBC. TNBC is a type of breast cancer in which a high percentage of CSCs has been identified and that has a poorer prognosis and lower overall survival rate than other types of breast cancer.
Using our EMT technology, our scientific co-founders identified VS-507 as a drug candidate for killing breast CSCs. Their research on VS-507, which included an analysis of the effect of VS-507 on cell lines derived from TNBC, was published in the peer reviewed scientific journal Cell in 2009. Recently published third-party research has reported that VS-507's activity may be mediated through the blockade of the Wnt/beta-catenin cell signaling pathway, a network of proteins that Dr. Weinberg described in 2011 in Cell as critical for the development and maintenance of CSCs. In mouse models of breast cancer, VS-507 treatment decreased biophysical or biochemical markers, referred to as biomarkers, of CSCs. In contrast, treatment in the same model with a standard chemotherapeutic agent, paclitaxel, increased biomarkers of CSCs.
We identified the CSC-targeted activity of VS-4718 and VS-5095 using our proprietary technology. In preclinical testing, these compounds were found to be potent and selective inhibitors of Focal Adhesion Kinase, or FAK, a protein which is involved in cell adhesion and motility. FAK expression is greater in many tumor types compared to normal tissue, particularly in cancers that have a high invasive and metastatic capability. In preclinical mouse models, both VS-4718 and VS-5095 demonstrated good oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and effectively reduced both primary tumor growth and metastatic burden.
An important element of our business strategy is the development and use of proprietary, companion diagnostics in connection with the development of our therapeutic drug candidates. We plan to use these diagnostics as part of a personalized medicine approach to identify patients with aggressive cancers that have a high percentage of CSCs, which is the group that we believe will benefit most from our therapies. We also believe that these diagnostics may be used to monitor patients' progress on therapy and aid physicians' ongoing treatment decisions.
OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM AND SCIENTIFIC CO-FOUNDERS AND ADVISORS
Our experienced management team includes our Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and co-founder Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D., our Chief Operating Officer, Robert Forrester, and our Vice President, Head of Research, Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. Dr. Westphal has been involved in founding a number of biotechnology companies as chief executive officer, including Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which was acquired by GlaxoSmithKline plc in 2008, as well as Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Westphal also co-founded Alnara Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which was acquired by Eli Lilly and Co. in 2010. Mr. Forrester has been the chief executive officer, chief operating officer and chief financial officer of both private and public life science companies, including Forma Therapeutics, Inc., CombinatoRx, Inc., now Zalicus Inc., and Coley Pharmaceutical Group, Inc., which was acquired by Pfizer Inc. in 2007. Dr. Pachter has over 20 years of experience in leading the discovery of small molecule and monoclonal antibody therapeutics for the treatment of cancer, most recently as the Senior Director of Cancer Biology at OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc., which was acquired by Astellas Pharma Inc. in 2010.
Our scientific co-founders are recognized leaders in the field of cancer biology. Robert Weinberg, Ph.D., Founding Member of the Whitehead Institute and Professor of Biology at MIT, has played a key role in identifying the genetic basis of cancer. Dr. Weinberg discovered the first tumor oncogene, the first tumor suppressor gene, the role of a protein related to the cell surface receptor HER2 in preclinical studies and the mechanisms underlying the formation of CSCs. Eric Lander, Ph.D., Founding Director of the Broad Institute, Professor of Biology at MIT and Professor of Systems
66
Business
Biology at Harvard Medical School, played a central role in the Human Genome Project. Piyush Gupta, Ph.D., Member of the Whitehead Institute and Assistant Professor of Biology at MIT, co-developed with Dr. Lander and Dr. Weinberg our proprietary EMT technology for use in the identification of drugs targeting CSCs and a genetic expression signature, useful as a biomarker, to monitor the effect of treatment.
Our management team is supported by our scientific advisory board comprised of leading academic and industry scientists. Our scientific advisory board consists of:
Scientific advisory board
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Robert Weinberg, Ph.D. Scientific co-founder |
Founding Member of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Professor of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and recipient of the 1997 National Medal of Science | |
Eric Lander, Ph.D. Scientific co-founder |
Founding Director of the Broad Institute, Professor of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Professor of Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School |
|
Piyush Gupta, Ph.D. Scientific co-founder |
Member of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Assistant Professor of Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
|
Julian Adams, Ph.D. |
President of Research and Development of Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc., former Senior Vice President of Drug Discovery and Development of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and co-inventor and co-developer of Velcade |
|
José Baselga, M.D., Ph.D. |
Chief of Hematology and Oncology at Massachusetts General Hospital, Associate Director of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School |
|
George Daley, M.D., Ph.D. |
Professor of Hematology and Oncology and Director of the Stem Cell Transplantation Program at Children's Hospital and Professor of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at Harvard Medical School |
|
Peter Elliott, Ph.D. |
Former Senior Vice President and Head of Research and Development of Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., former Vice President of Phamacology and Drug Development of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and co-developer of Velcade |
|
Daniel Haber, M.D., Ph.D. |
Director of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School |
|
Joseph (Yossi) Schlessinger, Ph.D. |
Chairman and Professor in the Department of Pharmacology at Yale School of Medicine |
67
Business
Scientific advisory board
|
|
|
---|---|---|
Phillip A. Sharp, Ph.D. | Institute Professor at the David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and recipient of the 1993 Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology | |
Roger Tung, Ph.D. |
President and Chief Executive Officer of Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc., former Vice President of Drug Discovery of Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and co-inventor of Lexiva and Agenerase |
|
Christopher Walsh, Ph.D. |
Hamilton Kuhn Professor in the Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at Harvard Medical School |
|
Eric Winer, M.D. |
Director of the Breast Oncology Center at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School |
THE PROBLEM
The cancer death rate in the United States has only decreased modestly since the early 1990s. Cancer remains one of the world's most serious health problems and is the second most common cause of death in the United States after heart disease. The American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States in 2011, approximately 1.6 million new cases of cancer will be diagnosed and nearly 600,000 people will die from the disease. According to estimates by the National Institutes of Health, in the United States in 2010, the direct medical cost of cancer of all types exceeded $100 billion and the cancer type responsible for the highest individual disease costs was breast cancer at $16.5 billion. The following table sets forth the U.S. annual incidence, based on 2011 estimates from the American Cancer Society, and the prevalence, or the number of people in the United States who have been previously diagnosed with cancer, based on 2010 estimates from the National Cancer Institute, for select cancers in which CSCs have been implicated.
Cancer type
|
U.S. annual incidence
|
U.S. prevalence
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Breast |
230,480 | 2,645,621 | |||||
Lung and bronchus |
221,130 | 373,489 | |||||
Colorectal |
141,210 | 1,110,077 | |||||
Leukemia |
44,600 | 253,350 | |||||
Pancreatic |
44,030 | 34,657 | |||||
Brain and other nervous system cancers |
22,340 | 128,193 |
For tumors that have not yet metastasized and remain localized to the site of original tumor formation, current treatments for cancer can be effective in initially reducing tumor burden. However, for many forms of cancer, current treatments lack sufficient efficacy to achieve a durable clinical response. Following initial treatment, the tumor may recur at the same site or metastasize and spread to other sites in the body. The vast majority of patients who succumb to cancer are killed by tumors that have metastasized. This is illustrated by the information in the following table, which shows, according to the National Cancer Institute's SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 2001-2007, the reduction in five-year survival rate for breast cancer patients based on the stage of the disease at the time at which the
68
Business
disease is diagnosed. The percentage of patients diagnosed at each stage of disease, referred to as stage distribution, is included below for comparative purposes.
Breast cancer stage at diagnosis
|
Stage distribution(1)
|
Five-year relative survival rate |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Localized (confined to primary site) |
60 | % | 98.6 | % | |||
Regional (spread to regional lymph nodes) |
33 | % | 83.8 | % | |||
Distant (cancer has metastasized) |
5 | % | 23.4 | % |
With the application of new technologies and key discoveries, we believe that we are now entering an era of cancer research characterized by a more sophisticated understanding of the biology of cancer. We believe that the discovery of CSCs and the role that they play in cancer development are important new insights that present the opportunity to develop more effective treatments.
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
In most solid tumors, the cells that make up the tissue mass have a characteristic epithelial appearance. Epithelial cells generally have a multi-sided, uniform shape. Epithelial cells also have well-defined contact points with neighboring cells and a strong attachment to the underlying connective tissue that creates a framework for solid tumors in the body. Epithelial cells generally lack the ability to separate from these connection points to move, invade or metastasize into surrounding tissue or other sites in the body.
Epithelial cells can undergo a transformation to a different cell type, called mesenchymal cells, through a process called epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, or EMT. In contrast with epithelial cells, mesenchymal cells have an elongated spindle shape, lack orderly contacts with neighboring cells and can survive without contact with a surface or connective tissue. The EMT process is a series of reprogramming events that normally operates during the development of tissues and organs prior to birth. However, the EMT process also can be appropriated by epithelial cancer cells that are referred to as carcinoma cells. When epithelial carcinoma cells residing in a solid tumor undergo the EMT process, the resulting mesenchymal cancer cells have the capability to invade through local barriers and metastasize to other sites in the body.
Another consequence of epithelial carcinoma cells undergoing the EMT process is that the resulting mesenchymal cancer cells have significantly increased resistance to current cancer treatments. Retrospective analyses of data from two Phase 3 clinical trials in lung cancer, one published in Clinical Cancer Research in 2005 and the other presented at the 2009 World Conference on Lung Cancer, revealed that patients with high expression of epithelial biomarkers responded better to the anti-cancer drug Tarceva in terms of both progression-free survival and overall survival than patients in the same two trials with low levels of epithelial biomarkers in their tumors. These results suggest that the mesenchymal cancer cell population, which lacks epithelial biomarkers, is resistant to these therapies. These clinical observations are consistent with preclinical studies published in Cancer Research in 2005 reporting that lung cancer cells expressing mesenchymal biomarkers appeared to be resistant to Tarceva and other targeted anti-cancer agents when transplanted into mice.
69
Business
Cancer stem cells
We believe that CSCs, which are sometimes referred to as tumor-initiating cancer cells, are responsible for the initiation, metastasis and recurrence of many cancers. CSCs have the ability to:
CSCs are often characterized by a distinctive set of biomarkers, which we believe may be a key to identifying patients with tumors that are likely to respond to therapies targeting CSCs.
CSCs may be more resistant to current cancer treatments than other types of cancer cells. Thus, as illustrated in the figure below, while current treatments may succeed at initially decreasing tumor burden, they may leave behind a population of CSCs that can regenerate tumors. Therefore, the presence of a mixture of CSCs and other types of cancer cells within a tumor may necessitate a therapeutic approach combining drugs that can kill both cell populations.
The need to target CSCs may apply across the treatment of a broad range of cancers. CSCs have been isolated and characterized from many types of cancer, including breast, pancreatic, colon, brain, lung and leukemia. The CSCs isolated from each of these tumor types have been found to confer greater tumor-forming capability when transplanted into mice than other types of cancer cells from the same tumor.
Several specific signaling pathways have been implicated in CSC biology. The combined action in vitro of the TGF-beta and Wnt signaling pathways in the formation and survival of CSCs was described by Dr. Weinberg in Cell in 2011. Separately, FAK has been found to increase the metastatic capability of breast cancer cells following the EMT process.
CSCs from breast cancer have been characterized in several studies. For example, in a study conducted at the Baylor College of Medicine, breast cancer biopsies were taken from patients at the time of initial diagnosis and again following 12 weeks of treatment with docetaxel, a standard cancer chemotherapy widely used to treat breast cancer. The biopsies taken after 12 weeks of treatment showed increased expression of biomarkers for CSCs and an increased number of chemoresistant cells as compared to biopsies taken at the time of initial diagnosis. This result indicates that the CSC component of the tumor was relatively resistant to the chemotherapy. Moreover, it supports our belief that either a
70
Business
combination of treatments or a single therapy that can effectively target both CSCs and other types of cancer cells is critical to create a durable clinical response.
OUR SOLUTION
Our solution is to discover and develop a next generation of oncology therapeutics targeting cancer stem cells along with companion diagnostics. We believe that by developing therapeutics that target CSCs we can address the problem of cancer recurrence and metastasis and create a durable clinical response.
Our scientific co-founders at the Whitehead Institute and the Broad Institute made discoveries linking the activation of the EMT process in epithelial cancer cells to the emergence of CSCs. Their studies demonstrated that the EMT process can be activated in vitro by forcing a higher level of expression of genes that direct the EMT process or by eliminating key epithelial proteins. The mesenchymal cancer cells that emerge from this induced EMT process have the hallmarks of CSCs, including tumor-forming ability and increased resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. Our solution utilizes proprietary technology based on the discovery linking the EMT process to the emergence of CSCs. We use this technology along with high-throughput screening methods to identify drugs targeting CSCs and develop companion diagnostics. To achieve a durable clinical response, we believe that it may be necessary to kill both CSCs and other types of cancer cells in a tumor, as illustrated in the figure below, either with a combination of current cancer treatments and CSC-targeted drugs or a single therapeutic found to target both cancer cell populations.
Our proprietary technology
A persistent problem in the discovery of drugs targeting CSCs is the difficulty of isolating large numbers of CSCs. Without such large numbers, the discovery of drugs targeting CSCs using high-throughput screening is extremely difficult. Moreover, when CSCs are isolated, they typically do not remain stable in culture. Instead, over a short period of time, CSCs convert into other types of cancer cells. To address this problem, our scientific co-founders developed proprietary technology based on the EMT process to create a stable population of CSCs that are suitable for use in high-throughput screening of small molecule compounds. These stable CSCs are similar to natural CSCs in that they are drug resistant and capable of forming new tumors.
We license our EMT technology from the Whitehead Institute. Through September 30, 2011, we and scientists at the Whitehead Institute and the Broad Institute had used our technology and high-throughput screening methods to evaluate the ability of over 300,000 compounds to kill CSCs. We hold exclusive license rights to compounds and uses identified under our agreement with the
71
Business
Whitehead Institute and a right of first negotiation to compounds identified under our agreement with the Broad Institute.
To identify compounds that are selective for CSCs, we grow cancer non-stem cells in the laboratory and then induce the EMT process to create a stable population of CSCs. As illustrated in the figure below, we then screen compounds to assess their ability to kill the CSCs. Because these CSCs are stable in culture, the screening process can be conducted using high-throughput technology on a large number and wide variety of small molecule compound libraries. These compound libraries include new chemical entities, or NCEs, approved drugs and compounds that are in preclinical and clinical development. We then profile the compounds that are identified as selective for CSCs using additional assays to identify suitable clinical candidates.
Biomarkers and diagnostics
Because of the high level of toxicity of traditional chemotherapies and the variability in response of tumors to these treatments, it is critically important to get the right cancer drug to the right patient. As a result, the oncology field has been at the forefront of developing diagnostics to select patients who may benefit from specific therapies, which is sometimes referred to as personalized medicine. We plan to build on the methods incorporated in our EMT technology to develop diagnostics designed to enhance our ability to deliver the right drug to the right patient.
In particular, we are identifying specific protein and gene biomarkers that are either present or conspicuously absent in CSCs. We are also developing panels of multiple biomarkers, which we believe may be more effective at identifying CSCs than individual biomarkers alone. We believe that our diagnostics will enable us to identify patients with aggressive cancers that have a high percentage of CSCs. We further believe that these patients are the most likely to benefit from our drug candidates. By screening to identify these patients, we expect to be able to select appropriate patients for enrollment in our clinical trials and ultimately, if we obtain marketing approval, patients who are likely to respond to our therapies. We also plan to use these diagnostics to measure the selective killing of CSCs by our drug candidates as one of the ways of determining their efficacy.
We expect that our use of proprietary diagnostics may accelerate the clinical development process for our drug candidates by enabling smaller, targeted trials. We believe that use of these diagnostics may provide early, objective signals of drug activity to guide us to optimal dosing and the sequencing of agents more quickly. We also believe that this approach may ultimately enable physicians to identify patients who are likely to benefit most from these therapies and make better clinical decisions during therapy.
We are working on companion diagnostics for our therapeutic programs based on both in-licensed and internally developed technology and science. We believe that augmenting our internal capabilities with external collaborations with experienced third parties can reduce development risk and accelerate our progress in this field.
72
Business
OUR STRATEGY
We believe that a key reason for the failure of many current cancer treatments is that they fail to kill CSCs, which we believe are responsible for the initiation, metastasis and recurrence of many cancers. Our goal is to build a leading biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery, development and, ultimately, commercialization of novel drugs and companion diagnostics targeting CSCs. Key elements of our strategy to achieve this goal are:
OUR PRODUCT CANDIDATES
Using our proprietary technology and high-throughput screening methods, we are evaluating compounds for their activity against CSCs in a way that we believe has not been previously possible. We are focused on the discovery and development of small molecules to expedite the path to human clinical trials and to allow flexibility in the design of molecules for optimized efficacy and safety regardless of the route of administration.
73
Business
We intend to incorporate CSC-specific biomarkers into companion diagnostics for our product candidates for use in identifying patients whose tumors have a high percentage of CSCs and are likely to benefit from treatment. We may use this information to aid in the selection of patients for late stage clinical trials. We also plan to utilize these diagnostics to measure the effect that our product candidates have on CSCs in a tumor.
We are developing our product candidates for the treatment of breast cancer, initially triple negative breast cancer, and other cancers with a high percentage of CSCs. We believe that our product candidates target CSCs that have been implicated in aggressive cancers, metastasis and chemotherapeutic resistance. To enhance therapeutic benefit, we may also use our product candidates in combination with existing therapies in an effort to target both CSCs and other types of cancer cells.
BREAST CANCER
Overview
The National Cancer Institute estimated that in January 2008 there were approximately 2.6 million women in the United States with a history of breast cancer. Breast cancer is currently the second most frequently diagnosed and the second most deadly cancer among women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States in 2011, approximately 230,500 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in women and approximately 39,500 women will die from the disease.
Breast cancers can be segregated into subtypes based upon the positive presence of three protein receptors:
Triple negative breast cancer, or TNBC, is a type of breast cancer that does not express any of these three receptors. According to results from a population-based study of the California Cancer Registry published by the American Cancer Society in 2007, approximately 15% of all breast cancers were classified as TNBC. In comparison with other breast cancers, TNBC tends to grow faster and has a higher rate of metastases. Furthermore, TNBC tends to recur more often than other subtypes of breast cancer. Patients with TNBC generally have a poorer prognosis and lower overall survival rate than patients with breast cancers that are positive for the hormone receptors ER and PR.
We believe that the natural disease progression of TNBC exhibits the key hallmarks of CSCs. Specifically, we believe that:
74
Business
We believe that our product candidates may be especially beneficial as therapeutics for the treatment of TNBC, in particular for the subset of TNBC patients whose tumors are classified as claudin-low. Claudin-low TNBC patients have tumors containing a low level of protein biomarkers called claudins. Claudin-low tumors are highly aggressive, are resistant to treatment and have a high percentage of CSCs relative to other breast cancer types. The prognosis for patients with claudin-low TNBC is poor.
Current treatment of breast cancer
Surgery, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, hormone therapy and combinations of conventional chemotherapy are often used to treat breast cancer. However, these therapies carry significant side effects and frequently do not result in a durable clinical response, especially for patients with TNBC.
The choice of cancer drugs used to treat breast cancer is guided by clinical classification of the tumor as ER positive or negative, PR positive or negative and HER2 positive or negative. The presence, absence or combination of these biomarkers in patient tumors informs the selection of prescribed drugs, which include the anti-estrogen therapies Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors, as well as agents that directly target HER2, such as Herceptin and Tykerb. These treatments may slow or stop cancer growth and are currently considered the most successful treatments for breast cancer. However, because TNBC patients are negative for ER, PR and HER2, the treatment options for these patients are limited. In particular, the targeted therapies, including Herceptin, Tykerb and anti-estrogen treatments, are not effective for these patients.
Combinations of conventional chemotherapy work by stopping the function of cancer cells through a variety of mechanisms. Chemotherapies are usually not targeted at any specific differences between cancer cells and normal cells. Rather, they kill cancer cells because cancer cells generally grow more rapidly than normal cells and, as a result, are relatively more affected by the chemotherapy than normal cells. Because CSCs exhibit mechanisms of resistance, including a slower rate of growth than other cancer cells, they are often not susceptible to conventional chemotherapy. As a result, the treatments may succeed at initially decreasing tumor burden but ultimately fail to kill the CSCs. For example, in a study conducted at Baylor College of Medicine, in which biopsies were taken from breast cancer patients both before and after conventional chemotherapy treatment, the percentage of CSCs increased over the 12-week treatment period, indicating the survival of these cells.
If tumors recur, which happens more often in TNBC than other breast cancers, further therapy with conventional chemotherapy is generally palliative, not curative, as the CSCs are able to metastasize and spread to other sites in the body.
VS-507
Overview
We are currently evaluating VS-507 in preclinical studies as a potential therapy for breast cancer. Our scientific co-founders identified VS-507 using the proprietary technology that we license from the Whitehead Institute and published the results in the peer reviewed scientific journal Cell in 2009. We hold an exclusive license from the Whitehead Institute for use of VS-507 in treating cancer. We expect to file an IND with the FDA in late 2012 to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial of VS-507.
We believe VS-507 targets CSCs by disrupting signaling inside these cells. A group of scientific researchers recently reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, or PNAS, that VS-507's activity may be mediated through the blockade of the Wnt/beta-catenin cell signaling pathway. Numerous research reports, including a 2011 paper published in Cell by our scientific co-founder Robert Weinberg, describe a critical role of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in the development and maintenance of CSCs.
75
Business
Wnts are a family of proteins that bind to receptor proteins, called Frizzled receptors, on the tumor cell surface. We believe that blocking Wnt function could dramatically impair survival and growth of CSCs. However, Wnt signaling is extremely complex, involving 19 different Wnt proteins stimulating through 10 different Frizzled receptors. While it may be possible to develop a small molecule or antibody that can block binding of one or perhaps a few Wnts to their receptors, such a drug likely would not effectively eliminate CSCs because other Wnt and Frizzled proteins that remain unblocked would be sufficient to maintain CSC function.
A potential breakthrough solution to this problem has come through the identification of the LRP6 protein, which interacts with multiple Wnt proteins and appears to be necessary for the development and maintenance of CSCs. LRP6 may represent a single common point of the Wnt system that can be targeted to kill CSCs. In the PNAS study referenced above, VS-507 decreased the levels of LRP6 protein in vitro and blocked the ability of Wnt proteins to stimulate beta-catenin, a signaling protein that regulates genes responsible for CSC function. We believe this disruption of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway is responsible for the inhibitory effects of VS-507 on CSCs that we have observed in preclinical studies.
Preclinical development
We are conducting a comprehensive preclinical program to study VS-507 as a potential treatment for breast cancer. Key results of this program to date, based on experiments conducted by our scientific co-founders, are summarized below.
Laboratory studies. The effect of VS-507 on CSCs as compared to other cancer cells was evaluated in vitro. We believe that a biomarker useful for identifying breast CSCs is the expression ratio of the cell surface proteins CD44 to CD24, which can be measured for each individual cell using a method known as flow cytometry. Using this method, the amount of each protein is measured on the cell surface and the number of CSCs in a cell culture is determined by quantifying cell populations based on their expression of CD44 and CD24. As originally reported in PNAS in 2003, breast CSCs express high levels of CD44 and low levels of CD24 relative to other types of breast cancer cells. This differential expression is represented in the figure below as an increase in the shading in the top left portion of the flow cytometry plot. Treatment of a breast cancer cell line containing CSCs with VS-507 resulted in a decrease in the population of CSCs compared to the placebo control. In contrast, treatment with paclitaxel resulted in an increase in the population of CSCs compared to the placebo control. We believe that the opposing actions of VS-507 and paclitaxel are due to a selective effect of VS-507 on the killing of CSCs not observed with paclitaxel treatment.
Gene expression analysis. Opposing effects of VS-507 and paclitaxel also were shown by gene expression analysis. Human breast cancer cells were treated in culture with either VS-507 or paclitaxel
76
Business
for one week and then incubated in the absence of drug for three weeks prior to analysis. The two populations were subjected to comparative global gene expression analysis, which can identify the genes that have the greatest differential change in expression in response to treatment. The panel of genes exhibiting the greatest differential change in this analysis comprise a gene expression signature that may be used for the identification of CSCs. In this experiment, VS-507 and paclitaxel had opposing actions on biomarkers of CSCs and genes known to be commonly expressed in epithelial tissue types. Unlike treatment with paclitaxel, treatment with VS-507 resulted in the loss of expression of CSC-associated genes. Expression of these genes is correlated with poor-prognosis tumors.
Mouse models of breast cancer. The functional presence of CSCs was assessed by evaluating in vivo tumor-initiating, or tumor-forming, ability after chemical compound treatment. In these experiments, a human breast cancer cell line containing a mixture of CSCs and other cancer cells was treated with VS-507, paclitaxel or a placebo control in vitro for seven days and expanded in culture for at least 14 days in the absence of treatment. The cells were then injected into mice. As shown in the figure below, treatment of these cells with VS-507 resulted in the formation of tumors in fewer mice than treatment with paclitaxel. These findings suggest that CSCs within breast cancer cell populations may be resistant to paclitaxel but sensitive to treatment with VS-507.
Mouse model of metastatic breast cancer. To specifically evaluate the effects of a therapeutic compound on the metastatic potential of cells following treatment, murine breast cancer cells treated in vitro with VS-507, paclitaxel or a placebo control were injected into the tail vein of mice and the number of metastases that subsequently appeared in the lungs was measured. After three weeks of growth of these cells in vivo, mice injected with cells that had been treated with VS-507 displayed a four-fold reduction in metastatic burden compared to the placebo control while, in contrast, mice injected with cells that had been treated with paclitaxel displayed a two-fold increase in metastatic burden compared to the placebo control.
VS-507 clinical development plan
Assuming successful completion of preclinical studies, we anticipate filing an IND with the FDA to initiate clinical trials of VS-507. If this application becomes effective, we anticipate initiating a dose escalation portion of a Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors. The dose escalation portion of the Phase 1 clinical trial would be designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of VS-507. We also plan to assess safety and tolerability of VS-507 in this portion of the trial.
77
Business
Upon identification of the maximum tolerated dose, we plan to enroll an expanded cohort of breast cancer patients to further assess the safety of VS-507 and evaluate efficacy on a preliminary basis in accordance with Response Criteria in Solid Tumors, or RECIST, measurement guidelines, and based on the presence of CSC-specific biomarkers. RECIST has traditionally been used as a standard measure of activity in clinical trials. However, because RECIST is based on gross changes in the size of tumor lesions of more than 30%, it is possible that changes in the tumor burden following selective targeting of CSCs in a single-agent, maximum-tolerated-dose study will not be detected using RECIST. As a result, we believe that sensitive CSC-specific biomarkers may be useful in conjunction with RECIST to quantify the effect of VS-507 on CSCs.
VS-4718 / VS-5095
Overview
We are currently evaluating VS-4718 and VS-5095 as potential therapies for cancers with a high percentage of CSCs. We identified the CSC-targeted activity of these compounds using our proprietary technology and hold worldwide exclusive rights to these compounds and their use. We expect to file an IND with the FDA in early 2013 to initiate a Phase 1 clinical trial of one of VS-4718 or VS-5095.
We believe VS-4718 and VS-5095 target CSCs through inhibition of FAK signaling. FAK expression is greater in many tumor types compared to normal tissue, particularly in cancers that have a high invasive and metastatic capability. The contact between epithelial cancer cells and connective tissue stimulates FAK signaling. However, epithelial cancer cells that undergo EMT acquire the ability to survive in the absence of contact with connective tissue. We believe that FAK signaling in CSCs may be maintained through alternative mechanisms, thus providing CSCs the ability to survive in the absence of cell contact. Accordingly, we believe that FAK signaling may be a central component of CSC biology that allows CSCs to survive after exiting from a tumor mass and enable metastasis to other sites in the body.
In 2009, our scientific co-founder Robert Weinberg reported in PNAS that in a mouse model of breast cancer FAK signaling was required to enable lung metastasis. Epithelial cells, which lack the ability to increase their FAK signaling activity through alternative mechanisms, remained non-metastatic in this model and did not survive dissemination to the lungs. In addition, researchers at McGill University reported in PNAS that in a genetically modified mouse model the specific deletion of FAK from the mammary cells prevented primary tumor formation and metastasis.
Scientific research suggests that increased FAK expression and activity is associated with metastatic progression and poor prognosis in multiple cancer types. For example, a 2009 retrospective study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation identified the amplification, or increase in number, of the gene encoding FAK in a large percentage of breast cancers. This gene amplification, and resulting high FAK expression, significantly correlated with the progression of early stage, primary breast cancer to advanced metastatic disease. In an analysis of 295 breast cancer patients that was part of this study, elevated FAK expression was a marker of poor survival. The correlation of elevated FAK expression with poor survival was more significant than and independent of other commonly used clinical parameters, such as hormone receptor status. We believe targeted disruption of the FAK signaling pathway with VS-4718 or VS-5095 may reduce both the primary tumor burden and the ability of CSCs to form metastases.
Preclinical development
We are conducting a preclinical program to study VS-4718 and VS-5095 as potential treatments for breast and other cancers associated with increased FAK activity. Key results to date from preclinical
78
Business
studies of VS-4718 performed by our licensor are summarized below. Comparable studies conducted to date of VS-5095 generally have provided similar overall results.
Biochemical and cellular tests. In biochemical testing, VS-4718 inhibited purified FAK kinase and demonstrated in vitro selectivity against a panel of 107 different protein kinases. In addition, in an in vitro assessment of cell proliferation using our EMT technology, VS-4718 exhibited potent activity and approximately 10-fold or greater preferential effect, or selectivity, for CSCs as compared to other types of cancer cells.
Pharmacokinetics and tolerability in mice. VS-4718 was well tolerated in mice after both acute and chronic dosing. VS-4718 also exhibited acceptable pharmacokinetics in mice. Pharmacokinetics is the process by which a drug is absorbed, distributed and metabolized in the body. In mouse models assessing pharmacodynamics, a single dose of VS-4718 inhibited FAK activity in tumors over a 12-hour period. Pharmacodynamics refers to the biochemical and physiological effect of a drug on the body.
Mouse models of breast cancer. VS-4718 has exhibited tumor growth inhibition and reduction of metastatic burden in several mouse models of breast cancer. In one experiment, VS-4718 was tested in a model in which TNBC cells were implanted into a mouse and the tumor was allowed to develop. Upon tumor formation, the mice were treated with VS-4718 in drinking water at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml or a placebo control beginning at day 12 through the end of the experiment. As shown in the figure below, the tumor volume in the VS-4718 treatment group was significantly smaller than in the placebo group from day 27 through the end of the experiment. In addition, at day 70 the weight of the primary tumor and the number of lung metastases in the VS-4718 treatment group were both significantly less than in the placebo group.
The vertical line on each data point in the tumor volume figure above represents the standard deviation from the mean. The box and vertical line for each data point in the tumor weight and metastases figures above show the distribution of the data. The square data point inside the box represents the mean. The bottom of the box represents the 25th percentile, the middle line in the box represents the median and the top of the box represents the 75th percentile. The vertical lines projecting from the bottom and top of the box represent the 5th and 95th percentiles.
79
Business
VS-4718 / VS-5095 development plan
We are progressing both VS-4718 and VS-5095 through additional preclinical efficacy and toxicology studies. It is our intention to select only one of these compounds for an IND filing. Upon selection of the lead candidate and assuming successful completion of preclinical studies, we anticipate filing an IND with the FDA to initiate clinical trials of this product candidate. If this application becomes effective, we anticipate initiating a dose escalation portion of a Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumors. The dose escalation portion of the Phase 1 clinical trial would be designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose. We also plan to assess safety and tolerability in this portion of the trial.
Upon identification of the maximum tolerated dose, we plan to enroll an expanded cohort of patients with breast and other cancers associated with increased FAK activity to further assess the safety of the product candidate and evaluate efficacy on a preliminary basis in accordance with RECIST measurement guidelines, and based on the presence of CSC-specific biomarkers. As with VS-507, it is possible that changes in the tumor burden following selective targeting of CSCs in a single-agent, maximum-tolerated-dose study will not be detected using RECIST. As a result, we believe that sensitive CSC-specific biomarkers may be useful in conjunction with RECIST to quantify the effect on CSCs following treatment.
NEW CHEMICAL ENTITIES (NCEs)
We have initiated NCE programs on more than 10 series of chemical compounds identified using our proprietary EMT technology along with high-throughput screening methods. In addition, we have synthesized several drug candidates that are chemically similar to VS-507 and are currently optimizing their activity in blocking the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and CSC survival.
We evaluate the activity of chemical compounds in vitro by measuring their potency and selectivity against CSCs. In general, the more potent a drug is, the lower the dose required for a therapeutic effect. In an in vitro assessment of cell proliferation, one of the series of NCE compounds that we have identified has exhibited potent activity and greater than 10-fold selectivity for CSCs as compared to other types of cancer cells. A second series of compounds has shown potent activity and greater than 50-fold selectivity for killing of CSCs compared to its effects on other types of cancer cells. Compounds from our NCE programs also have demonstrated preclinical activity in a broad range of cancer cells, including breast cancer cell lines derived from TNBC tumors in which a high percentage of CSCs have been identified. We are currently evaluating additional proprietary product candidates from our NCE programs in preclinical studies for their use in breast and other cancers.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We aggressively strive to protect the proprietary technology that we believe is important to our business, including seeking and maintaining patents intended to cover our products and compositions, their methods of use and processes for their manufacture, as well as our diagnostic, biomarker, patient selection and drug discovery technologies and any other inventions that are commercially important to the development of our business. We also rely on trade secrets to protect aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection.
Our success will depend on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for commercially important technology, inventions and know-how related to our business, defend and enforce our patents, preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets and operate without infringing the valid and enforceable patents and proprietary rights of third parties. We also rely on know-how, continuing technological innovation and in-licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our
80
Business
proprietary position. We seek to obtain domestic and international patent protection, and endeavor to promptly file patent applications for new commercially valuable inventions.
We license a portfolio of patent applications owned by MIT and the Whitehead Institute. As of November 30, 2011, we hold licenses from the Whitehead Institute to three pending U.S. patent applications, as well as foreign counterparts to these patent applications. Of these licensed patent applications, we license one on an exclusive basis and two on a non-exclusive basis.
The patent application that we license on an exclusive basis from the Whitehead Institute includes claims covering: methods of identifying compounds that inhibit the growth or survival of CSCs, methods of identifying CSCs and methods of treating cancer, including methods of selecting courses of treatment for cancer therapy based, for example, on the presence of a biomarker. The application also includes claims to methods of using certain compounds, identified for example by the claimed screening technology, in the treatment of cancer. Any U.S. or EU patents that may issue from this application would have a statutory expiration date in 2029.
The two patent applications that we license on a non-exclusive basis from the Whitehead Institute include claims covering: additional methods of identifying CSCs, in vitro methods of creating CSCs, for example through activation of the EMT process, progenitor cells and uses for those cells, methods of determining the metastatic potential of a tumor and methods of diagnosing, preventing and treating cancer metastasis. Any U.S. patents that may issue from this application would have a statutory expiration date in 2026.
We have an agreement with the Broad Institute, which grants us under certain circumstances the first right to negotiate a license for intellectual property. This intellectual property includes patent applications and patents covering the use of biomarkers related to the EMT process. This intellectual property also includes compounds that can be used for treatment of cancer. An example is a compound that is identified by screening the effects of compounds on CSCs, notably CSCs created through the EMT process.
We also exclusively license a portfolio of patent applications relating to FAK inhibitors from Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Poniard. As of November 30, 2011, we hold licenses from Poniard to four patent applications, as well as foreign counterparts to these patent applications. One of these patent applications is owned by The Scripps Research Institute, or Scripps, and licensed to Poniard and the other three are owned by Poniard. The patent application owned by Scripps includes claims covering the composition of matter of compounds, which, for example, can inhibit FAK, and methods of using these compounds to treat disorders such as cancer. Any U.S. or EU patents that may issue from this application would have a statutory expiration date in 2028. The patent applications owned by Poniard include claims covering oral formulations of kinase inhibitors, such as FAK inhibitors, and methods of use thereof, methods of synthesis of certain compounds, for example, certain FAK inhibitors, and methods of use thereof, and methods of using a compound to promote apoptosis in tumor cells. Any U.S. or EU patents that may issue from these applications would have a statutory expiration date in 2030 or 2031.
We may rely, in some circumstances, on trade secrets to protect our technology. However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and contractors. We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information technology systems. While we have confidence in these individuals, organizations and systems, agreements or security measures may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. To the
81
Business
extent that our consultants, contractors or collaborators use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
LICENSES
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research
Exclusive license agreement
In October 2010, we entered into an exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute, both on its own behalf and as sole and exclusive agent of MIT. Under the license agreement, we acquired an exclusive, royalty-bearing, worldwide license under patent rights owned by the Whitehead Institute and MIT to develop, make, use and sell products covered by the licensed patent rights, including VS-507 for use in treating cancer, and to develop and perform licensed processes, in each case, for all human therapeutic, prognostic and diagnostic uses. These exclusive licensed patent rights are described in more detail above under "Intellectual Property."
We are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize licensed products under the agreement. In particular, we are required to fulfill specific development and regulatory milestones by particular dates and, during each calendar year, either spend a specified amount for research and development, actively conduct one or more clinical trials for a licensed product or a product identified using a licensed process that does not constitute a licensed product, which we refer to as an identified product, prepare, file or pursue a filed application for regulatory approval of a licensed product or an identified product, or launch or sell a licensed product or identified product.
Under the agreement, we paid the Whitehead Institute an upfront license fee and reimbursed patent related fees and costs incurred by the Whitehead Institute and MIT totaling $104,000 in the aggregate and issued 583,333 shares of our common stock to the Whitehead Institute and entities and individuals affiliated with the Whitehead Institute.
We also agreed to pay the Whitehead Institute annual license maintenance fees, milestone payments, royalties as a percentage of net sales and a percentage of sublicense income that we receive. Annual license maintenance fees are creditable against royalties, which are described below, earned during the same calendar year. Milestone payments are triggered upon the achievement of specified development, regulatory and commercialization milestones and are not creditable against the royalties described below. For each licensed product, we agreed to make milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $1,560,000 plus an additional amount for each subsequent approval of additional indications for a maximum number of licensed products. For each identified product that is not a licensed product, we agreed to make milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $815,000 plus an additional amount for each subsequent approval of additional indications for a maximum number of identified products. Each type of specified milestone payment is payable only for each of the maximum number of licensed products and the maximum number of identified products, as the case may be, to achieve the applicable milestone. In addition, a separate milestone payment is due upon the first commercial sale of each licensed product or identified product that is a diagnostic or prognostic test. A single additional milestone payment is due for the first issuance of licensed patent rights in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain or Italy. The royalty rate is in the low single digits as a percentage of net sales for licensed products that are therapeutics, the mid single digits for licensed products that are diagnostics or prognostics and less than one percent for identified products.
The Whitehead Institute and MIT retain the right to, and may grant licenses to other academic and non-profit institutions for the right to, practice the licensed patent rights for research, teaching and educational purposes. The Whitehead Institute, MIT or any such other institution could seek to license
82
Business
to third parties any intellectual property rights that it discovers using the licensed patent rights while pursuing these purposes. Under the agreement, we have a right, subject to the Whitehead Institute's obligations under third party research funding agreements, to negotiate a license for any compounds identified prior to a specified date in the Whitehead Institute's laboratory run by Dr. Weinberg that selectively target CSCs generated by induction through the EMT process.
After a specified period of time, if a third party requests to sublicense the patent rights for a product or process that is not directly competitive with our products or processes, we must enter into good-faith negotiations to grant a sublicense for such proposed product or process. If we do not grant a sublicense within a specified period of time after receiving a written request, the Whitehead Institute may grant a license to the third party and our rights in the field of use of such sublicense will terminate. Additionally, after a specified period of time, if we are not actively conducting high-throughput screening using the licensed patent rights to identify product candidates, then, except for any rights directed to uses that we are actively developing, the Whitehead Institute may convert our license to the licensed patent rights from exclusive to nonexclusive.
We have the right to terminate the agreement for any reason upon at least 90 days' prior written notice. The Whitehead Institute has the right to terminate the agreement if we and all of our sublicensees cease to carry on business related to the agreement for a specified period of time, we fail to pay any amounts due and payable under the agreement to the Whitehead Institute, subject to a grace period, we materially breach the agreement and fail to cure such breach within a specified grace period or we or a sublicensee challenge the licensed patent rights in a legal or administrative proceeding. The agreement otherwise terminates upon the expiration or abandonment of all licensed patents and patent applications.
Non-exclusive license agreement
In October 2010, we entered into a separate non-exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute under which we acquired a non-exclusive, worldwide license to patent rights owned by the Whitehead Institute for our internal research purposes, including research as part of a program to develop and commercialize small molecules or biologic molecules as pharmaceutical products. These non-exclusive licensed patent rights are described in more detail above under "Intellectual Property."
Under the agreement, we paid the Whitehead Institute upfront license fees. We also are obligated to pay the Whitehead Institute an annual license maintenance fee beginning in 2012. We have the right to terminate the agreement for any reason upon at least 90 days' prior written notice. The Whitehead Institute has the right to terminate the agreement if we cease to carry on business related to the agreement for a period in excess of six months, we fail to pay any amounts due and payable under the agreement to the Whitehead Institute, subject to a grace period, we materially breach the agreement and fail to cure such breach within a specified grace period or we challenge the licensed patent rights in a legal or administrative proceeding.
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
In October 2010, the Broad Institute granted to us the first right to negotiate a license in good faith for specified intellectual property owned by the Broad Institute if we have not breached the terms of the exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute described above. Following written notice of the availability of such intellectual property for licensing by the Broad Institute to us, the Broad Institute has agreed not to negotiate with any other party during our right of first negotiation period. If we and the Broad Institute are unable to negotiate a license within such period, the Broad Institute may then offer the intellectual property for licensing to other parties. The intellectual property subject to this right of first negotiation is described in more detail above under "Intellectual Property."
83
Business
Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
In November 2011, we entered into a license agreement with Poniard under which we acquired an exclusive, worldwide license under patent rights and know-how owned or controlled by Poniard to develop, make, use and sell compounds and products covered by the licensed patent rights for the diagnosis, treatment, prevention or control of all human diseases and conditions. The licensed compounds include VS-4718 and VS-5095 and any other compounds covered by a licensed patent right under the agreement that have the inhibition of FAK as a primary mode of action. These licensed patent rights are described in more detail above under "Intellectual Property" and include patent rights owned by Scripps and licensed to Poniard. In accordance with the agreement between Poniard and Scripps, Scripps retains the right to grant non-exclusive licenses, without the right to sublicense, to nonprofit or academic institutions to use for any noncommercial research or education purposes any licensed patent rights owned by Scripps and licensed to Poniard.
Under the agreement, we paid Poniard an upfront license fee and agreed to pay Poniard milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $13,250,000 upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestones. We also agreed to issue to Poniard a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock upon the first dosing of the first patient in our first Phase 1 clinical trial of a licensed product. The exercise price of such warrant would be equal to the average closing price of our common stock during the five trading days preceding such issue date. In addition, we agreed to pay low to mid single digit royalties to Poniard as a percentage of net sales of licensed products. Our obligation to pay royalties continues on a country by country basis until the expiration of all licensed patent rights covering licensed products in such country. If the royalty term under our agreement with Poniard expires with respect to a licensed product in a country and Poniard continues to have royalty payment obligations under its agreement with Scripps with respect to our net sales of licensed products in such country, we agreed to pay Poniard the royalty amount due to Scripps with respect to net sales of such licensed product in such country.
Poniard is responsible for all amounts payable to any third party under any agreement to which Poniard was a party as of the date of our agreement that are applicable to rights licensed to us, including amounts payable to Scripps with respect to the patent rights owned by Scripps and licensed to Poniard. If we license or acquire technology from a third party in order to develop or commercialize a licensed product and are required to pay such third party license fees, milestone payments, royalties or other amounts, then we may deduct up to 50% of the amount paid to such third party from the payments that we owe to Poniard for such licensed product. This deduction is subject to specified limitations, including that in no event will any such deduction reduce a payment that we owe to Poniard to less than 50% of the otherwise applicable amount.
We are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and, subject to regulatory approval, commercialize licensed products in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan.
We have the right to terminate the agreement or any portion of our licensed rights under the agreement upon at least 90 days' prior written notice. We and Poniard each have the right to terminate the agreement if the other party materially breaches the agreement and fails to cure such breach within a specified grace period, subject to the right of either party to submit a dispute to arbitration. The agreement otherwise terminates upon the last to expire licensed patent right covering a licensed product.
84
Business
COMPETITION
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are characterized by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition and a strong emphasis on proprietary products. While we believe that our technology, development experience and scientific knowledge provide us with competitive advantages, we face potential competition from many different sources, including major pharmaceutical, specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions and governmental agencies and public and private research institutions. Any product candidates that we successfully develop and commercialize will compete with existing therapies and new therapies that may become available in the future.
There are other companies working to develop therapies that target CSCs. These companies include divisions of large pharmaceutical companies including Astellas Pharma Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Pfizer Inc. and others. There are also biotechnology companies of various sizes that are developing therapies against CSCs, including OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston Biomedical Inc. and Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.
Many of our competitors may have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostic industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors. These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. Smaller or early stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies.
The key competitive factors affecting the success of all of our product candidates, if approved, are likely to be their efficacy, safety, convenience, price, the effectiveness of companion diagnostics in guiding the use of related therapeutics, the level of generic competition and the availability of reimbursement from government and other third-party payors.
Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than any products that we may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for ours, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. In addition, our ability to compete may be affected in many cases by insurers or other third-party payors seeking to encourage the use of generic products. There are many generic products currently on the market for the indications that we are pursuing, and additional products are expected to become available on a generic basis over the coming years. If our therapeutic product candidates are approved, we expect that they will be priced at a significant premium over competitive generic products.
The most common methods of treating patients with cancer are surgery, radiation and drug therapy, including chemotherapy, hormone therapy and targeted drug therapy. There are a variety of available drug therapies marketed for cancer. In many cases, these drugs are administered in combination to enhance efficacy. While our product candidates may compete with many existing drug and other therapies, to the extent they are ultimately used in combination with or as an adjunct to these therapies, our product candidates will not be competitive with them. Some of the currently approved drug therapies are branded and subject to patent protection, and others are available on a generic basis. Many of these approved drugs are well established therapies and are widely accepted by
85
Business
physicians, patients and third-party payors. In general, although there has been considerable progress over the past few decades in the treatment of cancer and the currently marketed therapies provide benefits to many patients, these therapies all are limited to some extent in their efficacy and frequency of adverse events, and none of them are successful in treating all patients. As a result, the level of morbidity and mortality from cancer remains high.
In addition to currently marketed therapies, there are also a number of products in late stage clinical development to treat cancer. These products in development may provide efficacy, safety, convenience and other benefits that are not provided by currently marketed therapies. As a result, they may provide significant competition for any of our product candidates for which we obtain market approval.
MANUFACTURING
We do not own or operate, and currently have no plans to establish, any manufacturing facilities. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacture of our product candidates and any products that we may develop, other than small amounts of compounds that we may synthesize ourselves for preclinical testing. To date, we have obtained starting materials for our supply of the bulk drug substance for our product candidates from one third-party manufacturer. We obtain our supplies from this manufacturer on a purchase order basis and do not have a long-term supply arrangement in place. We do not currently have arrangements in place for redundant supply or a second source for bulk drug substance. If our current third-party manufacturer should become unavailable to us for any reason, we believe that there are several potential replacements, although we might incur some delay in identifying and qualifying such replacements.
All of our drug candidates are organic compounds of low molecular weight, generally called small molecules. We select compounds not only on the basis of their potential efficacy and safety, but also for their ease of synthesis and reasonable cost of their starting materials. We expect to continue to develop drug candidates that can be produced cost-effectively at third-party manufacturing facilities.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local level, and in other countries extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, including any manufacturing changes, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing, post-approval monitoring and reporting, import and export of pharmaceutical products, such as those we are developing.
United States drug approval process
In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, the Public Health Service Act and implementing regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable United States requirements at any time during the product development process, approval process or after approval, may subject an applicant to a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as the FDA's refusal to approve pending applications, withdrawal of an approval, imposition of a clinical hold, issuance of warning letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement of profits or civil or criminal penalties.
86
Business
The process required by the FDA before a drug may be marketed in the United States generally involves the following:
Preclinical studies
Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry and formulation, as well as in vitro and animal studies to assess the potential for adverse events and in some cases to establish a rationale for therapeutic use. The conduct of preclinical studies is subject to federal regulations and requirements, including GLP regulations for safety/toxicology studies. An IND sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data, any available clinical data or literature and plans for clinical studies, among other things, to the FDA as part of an IND. Some long-term preclinical testing, such as animal tests of reproductive adverse events and carcinogenicity, may continue after the IND is submitted. An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless before that time the FDA raises concerns or questions related to one or more proposed clinical trials and places the trial on clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. As a result, submission of an IND may not result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to commence.
Clinical trials
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include, among other things, the requirement that all research subjects provide their informed consent in writing before their participation in any clinical trial. Clinical trials are conducted under written study protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the study, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. A protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. In addition, an IRB at each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that institution, and the IRB must conduct continuing review. The IRB must review and approve, among other things, the study protocol and informed consent information to be provided to study subjects. An IRB must operate in compliance with FDA
87
Business
regulations. Information about certain clinical trials must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health for public dissemination on their ClinicalTrials.gov website.
Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases, which may overlap or be combined:
Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more frequently if serious adverse events occur. Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, or at all. Furthermore, the FDA or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or if the drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.
Marketing approval
Assuming successful completion of the required clinical testing, the results of the preclinical and clinical studies, together with detailed information relating to the product's chemistry, manufacture, controls and proposed labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA requesting approval to market the product for one or more indications. Under federal law, the submission of most NDAs is additionally subject to a substantial application user fee, currently exceeding $1.8 million, and the sponsor of an approved NDA is also subject to annual product and establishment user fees, currently exceeding $98,000 per product and $520,000 per establishment. These fees are typically increased annually.
The FDA conducts a preliminary review of all NDAs within the first 60 days after submission before accepting them for filing to determine whether they are sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review. The FDA has agreed to specified performance goals in the review of NDAs. Under these goals, the FDA has committed to review most such applications for non-priority products within 10 months, and most applications for priority review products, that is, drugs that the FDA determines represent a significant improvement over existing therapy, within six months. These performance goals likely will be extended by several months when the Prescription Drug User Fee Act is reauthorized in 2012. The review process may be extended by the FDA for three additional months to consider certain information or clarification regarding information already provided in the submission. The FDA may also refer applications for novel drugs
88
Business
or products that present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee, typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.
Before approving an NDA, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. In addition, before approving an NDA, the FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP and integrity of the clinical data submitted.
The testing and approval process requires substantial time, effort and financial resources, and each may take many years to complete. Data obtained from clinical activities are not always conclusive and may be susceptible to varying interpretations, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. The FDA may not grant approval on a timely basis, or at all. We may encounter difficulties or unanticipated costs in our efforts to develop our product candidates and secure necessary governmental approvals, which could delay or preclude us from marketing our products.
After the FDA's evaluation of the NDA and inspection of the manufacturing facilities, the FDA may issue an approval letter or a complete response letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for specific indications. A complete response letter generally outlines the deficiencies in the submission and may require substantial additional testing or information in order for the FDA to reconsider the application. If and when those deficiencies have been addressed to the FDA's satisfaction in a resubmission of the NDA, the FDA will issue an approval letter. The FDA has committed to reviewing such resubmissions in two or six months depending on the type of information included. Even with submission of this additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval and refuse to approve the NDA.
Even if the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved indications for use for the product, require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling, require that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a drug's safety after approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution restrictions or other risk management mechanisms, which can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product. The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of post-market studies or surveillance programs. After approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval.
Fast track designation
The FDA is required to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs that are intended for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening condition for which there is no effective treatment and which demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs for the condition. Under the fast track program, the sponsor of a new drug candidate may request the FDA to designate the product for a specific indication as a fast track product concurrent with or after the filing of the IND for the product candidate. The FDA must determine if the product candidate qualifies for fast track designation within 60 days after receipt of the sponsor's request.
89
Business
In addition to other benefits, such as the ability to use surrogate endpoints and have greater interactions with the FDA, the FDA may initiate review of sections of a fast track product's NDA before the application is complete. This rolling review is available if the applicant provides and the FDA approves a schedule for the submission of the remaining information and the applicant pays applicable user fees. However, the FDA's time period goal for reviewing a fast track application does not begin until the last section of the NDA is submitted. In addition, the fast track designation may be withdrawn by the FDA if the FDA believes that the designation is no longer supported by data emerging in the clinical trial process.
Priority review
Under FDA policies, a product candidate may be eligible for priority review, or review within a six-month time frame from the time a complete application is received. Products regulated by the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, or CDER, are eligible for priority review if they provide a significant improvement compared to marketed products in the treatment, diagnosis or prevention of a disease. A fast track designated product candidate would ordinarily meet the FDA's criteria for priority review.
Accelerated approval
Under the FDA's accelerated approval regulations, the FDA may approve a drug for a serious or life-threatening illness that provides meaningful therapeutic benefit to patients over existing treatments based upon a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. In clinical trials, a surrogate endpoint is a measurement of laboratory or clinical signs of a disease or condition that substitutes for a direct measurement of how a patient feels, functions or survives. Surrogate endpoints can often be measured more easily or more rapidly than clinical endpoints. A product candidate approved on this basis is subject to rigorous post-marketing compliance requirements, including the completion of Phase 4 or post-approval clinical trials to confirm the effect on the clinical endpoint. Failure to conduct required post-approval studies, or confirm a clinical benefit during post-marketing studies, would allow the FDA to withdraw the drug from the market on an expedited basis. All promotional materials for drug candidates approved under accelerated regulations are subject to prior review by the FDA.
Orphan drugs
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug designation to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States. Orphan drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA. After the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the generic identity of the drug and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval process. The first NDA applicant to receive FDA approval for a particular active ingredient to treat a particular disease with FDA orphan drug designation is entitled to a seven-year exclusive marketing period in the United States for that product, for that indication. During the seven-year exclusivity period, the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the same orphan indication, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity in that it is shown to be safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. Orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from approving a different drug for the same disease or condition, or the same drug for a different disease or condition. Among the other benefits of
90
Business
orphan drug designation are tax credits for certain research and a waiver of the NDA application user fee.
Pediatric information
Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, as amended and reauthorized by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, or the FDAAA, an NDA or supplement to an NDA must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full or partial waivers from the pediatric data requirements. Unless otherwise required by regulation, the pediatric data requirements do not apply to products with orphan drug designation.
The Hatch-Waxman act
Abbreviated new drug applications
In seeking approval for a drug through an NDA, applicants are required to list with the FDA each patent with claims that cover the applicant's product or a method of using the product. Upon approval of a drug, each of the patents listed in the application for the drug is then published in the FDA's Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, commonly known as the Orange Book. Drugs listed in the Orange Book can, in turn, be cited by potential competitors in support of approval of an abbreviated new drug application, or ANDA. Generally, an ANDA provides for marketing of a drug product that has the same active ingredients in the same strengths, dosage form and route of administration as the listed drug and has been shown to be bioequivalent through in vitro or in vivo testing or otherwise to the listed drug. ANDA applicants are not required to conduct or submit results of preclinical or clinical tests to prove the safety or effectiveness of their drug product, other than the requirement for bioequivalence testing. Drugs approved in this way are commonly referred to as "generic equivalents" to the listed drug, and can often be substituted by pharmacists under prescriptions written for the original listed drug.
The ANDA applicant is required to certify to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the approved product in the FDA's Orange Book, except for patents covering methods of use for which the ANDA applicant is not seeking approval. Specifically, the applicant must certify with respect to each patent that:
A certification that the new product will not infringe the already approved product's listed patents or that such patents are invalid or unenforceable is called a Paragraph IV certification. If the applicant does not challenge the listed patents or indicate that it is not seeking approval of a patented method of use, the ANDA application will not be approved until all the listed patents claiming the referenced product have expired.
91
Business
If the ANDA applicant has provided a Paragraph IV certification to the FDA, the applicant must also send notice of the Paragraph IV certification to the NDA and patent holders once the ANDA has been accepted for filing by the FDA. The NDA and patent holders may then initiate a patent infringement lawsuit in response to the notice of the Paragraph IV certification. The filing of a patent infringement lawsuit within 45 days after the receipt of a Paragraph IV certification automatically prevents the FDA from approving the ANDA until the earlier of 30 months, expiration of the patent, settlement of the lawsuit or a decision in the infringement case that is favorable to the ANDA applicant.
The ANDA also will not be approved until any applicable non-patent exclusivity period, such as exclusivity for obtaining approval of a new chemical entity, for the referenced product has expired. Federal law provides a period of five years following approval of a drug containing no previously approved active moiety during which ANDAs for generic versions of those drugs cannot be submitted unless the submission contains a Paragraph IV challenge to a listed patent, in which case the submission may be made four years following the original product approval. Federal law provides for a period of three years of exclusivity during which the FDA cannot grant effective approval of an ANDA if a listed drug contains a previously approved active moiety, but FDA requires as a condition of approval new clinical trials conducted by or for the sponsor. This three-year exclusivity period often protects changes to a previously approved drug product, such as a new dosage form, route of administration, combination or indication. Under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, federal law also provides that periods of patent and non-patent marketing exclusivity listed in the Orange Book for a drug may be extended by six months if the NDA sponsor conducts pediatric studies identified by the FDA in a written request. For written requests issued by the FDA after September 27, 2007, the date of enactment of the FDAAA, the FDA must grant pediatric exclusivity no later than nine months prior to the date of expiration of patent or non-patent exclusivity in order for the six-month pediatric extension to apply to that exclusivity period.
Section 505(b)(2) new drug applications
Most drug products obtain FDA marketing approval pursuant to an NDA or an ANDA. A third alternative is a special type of NDA, commonly referred to as a Section 505(b)(2) NDA, which enables the applicant to rely, in part, on the FDA's previous approval of a similar product, or published literature, in support of its application.
505(b)(2) NDAs often provide an alternate path to FDA approval for new or improved formulations or new uses of previously approved products. Section 505(b)(2) permits the filing of an NDA where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies not conducted by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference. If the 505(b)(2) applicant can establish that reliance on the FDA's previous approval is scientifically appropriate, it may eliminate the need to conduct certain preclinical or clinical studies of the new product. The FDA may also require companies to perform additional studies or measurements to support the change from the approved product. The FDA may then approve the new product candidate for all or some of the label indications for which the referenced product has been approved, as well as for any new indication sought by the Section 505(b)(2) applicant.
To the extent that the Section 505(b)(2) applicant is relying on studies conducted for an already approved product, the applicant is required to certify to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the approved product in the Orange Book to the same extent that an ANDA applicant would. As a result, approval of a 505(b)(2) NDA can be stalled until all the listed patents claiming the referenced product have expired, until any non-patent exclusivity, such as exclusivity for obtaining approval of a new chemical entity, listed in the Orange Book for the referenced product has expired, and, in the case of a Paragraph IV certification and subsequent patent infringement suit, until the earlier of 30 months,
92
Business
settlement of the lawsuit or a decision in the infringement case that is favorable to the Section 505(b)(2) applicant.
Combination products
The FDA regulates combinations of products that cross FDA centers, such as drug, biologic or medical device components that are physically, chemically or otherwise combined into a single entity, as a combination product. The FDA center with primary jurisdiction for the combination product will take the lead in the premarket review of the product, with the other center consulting or collaborating with the lead center.
The FDA's Office of Combination Products, or OCP, determines which center will have primary jurisdiction for the combination product based on the combination product's "primary mode of action." A mode of action is the means by which a product achieves an intended therapeutic effect or action. The primary mode of action is the mode of action that provides the most important therapeutic action of the combination product, or the mode of action expected to make the greatest contribution to the overall intended therapeutic effects of the combination product.
Often it is difficult for the OCP to determine with reasonable certainty the most important therapeutic action of the combination product. In those difficult cases, the OCP will consider consistency with other combination products raising similar types of safety and effectiveness questions, or which center has the most expertise to evaluate the most significant safety and effectiveness questions raised by the combination product.
A sponsor may use a voluntary formal process, known as a Request for Designation, when the product classification is unclear or in dispute, to obtain a binding decision as to which center will regulate the combination product. If the sponsor objects to that decision, it may request that the agency reconsider that decision.
Overview of FDA regulation of companion diagnostics
We are developing in vitro and in vivo companion diagnostics for use in selecting the patients that we believe will respond to our cancer therapeutics.
FDA officials have issued draft guidance that, when finalized, would address issues critical to developing in vitro companion diagnostics, such as biomarker qualification, establishing clinical validity, the use of retrospective data, the appropriate patient population and when the FDA will require that the device and the drug be approved simultaneously. The draft guidance issued in July 2011 states that if safe and effective use of a therapeutic product depends on an in vitro diagnostic, then the FDA generally will require approval or clearance of the diagnostic at the same time that the FDA approves the therapeutic product. The FDA has yet to issue further guidance, and it is unclear whether it will do so, or what the scope would be.
The FDA previously has required in vitro companion diagnostics intended to select the patients who will respond to the cancer treatment to obtain Pre-Market Approval, or PMA, simultaneously with approval of the drug. Based on the draft guidance, and the FDA's past treatment of companion diagnostics, we believe that the FDA will require one or more of our in vitro companion diagnostics to obtain PMA for our companion diagnostics to identify patient populations suitable for our cancer therapies, such as the in vitro companion diagnostic for VS-507, VS-4818 or VS-5095. The review of these in vitro companion diagnostics in conjunction with the review of our cancer treatments involves coordination of review by CDER and by the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health Office of In Vitro Diagnostics Device Evaluation and Safety.
93
Business
PMA approval pathway
A medical device, including an in vitro diagnostic, or IVD, to be commercially distributed in the United States must receive either 510(k) clearance or PMA approval from the FDA prior to marketing. Devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life supporting or implantable devices, or devices deemed not substantially equivalent to a previously 510(k) cleared device or a preamendment class III device for which PMA applications have not been called, are placed in Class III requiring PMA approval. The PMA approval pathway requires proof of the safety and effectiveness of the device to the FDA's satisfaction.
The PMA approval pathway generally takes from one to three years or even longer from submission of the application.
A PMA application for an IVD must provide extensive preclinical and clinical trial data. Preclinical data for an IVD includes many different tests, including how reproducible the results are when the same sample is tested multiple times by multiple users at multiple laboratories. The clinical data need to establish that the test is sufficiently safe, effective and reliable in the intended use population. In addition, the FDA must be convinced that a device has clinical utility, meaning that an IVD provides information that is clinically meaningful. A biomarker's clinical significance may be obvious, or the applicant may be able to rely upon published literature or submit data to show clinical utility.
A PMA application also must provide information about the device and its components regarding, among other things, device design, manufacturing and labeling. The sponsor must pay an application fee.
As part of the PMA review, the FDA will typically inspect the manufacturer's facilities for compliance with Quality System Regulation, or QSR, requirements, which impose elaborate testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures.
Upon submission, the FDA determines if the PMA application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review, and, if so, the FDA accepts the application for filing. The FDA then commences an in-depth review of the PMA application. The entire process typically takes one to three years, but may take longer. The review time is often significantly extended as a result of the FDA asking for more information or clarification of information already provided. The FDA also may respond with a not approvable determination based on deficiencies in the application and require additional clinical trials that are often expensive and time-consuming and can substantially delay approval.
During the review period, an FDA advisory committee, typically a panel of clinicians, may be convened to review the application and recommend to the FDA whether, or upon what conditions, the device should be approved. Although the FDA is not bound by the advisory panel decision, the panel's recommendation is important to the FDA's overall decision making process.
If the FDA's evaluation of the PMA application is favorable, the FDA typically issues an approvable letter requiring the applicant's agreement to specific conditions, such as changes in labeling, or specific additional information, such as submission of final labeling, in order to secure final approval of the PMA. If the FDA concludes that the applicable criteria have been met, the FDA will issue a PMA for the approved indications, which can be more limited than those originally sought by the manufacturer. The PMA can include post-approval conditions that the FDA believes necessary to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device, including, among other things, restrictions on labeling, promotion, sale and distribution. Failure to comply with the conditions of approval can result in material adverse enforcement action, including the loss or withdrawal of the approval.
Even after approval of a PMA, a new PMA or PMA supplement may be required in the event of a modification to the device, its labeling or its manufacturing process. Supplements to a PMA often
94
Business
require the submission of the same type of information required for an original PMA, except that the supplement is generally limited to the information needed to support the proposed change from the product covered by the original PMA.
Clinical trials
A clinical trial is almost always required to support a PMA application. In some cases, one or more smaller Investigational Device Exemption, or IDE, studies may precede a pivotal clinical trial intended to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the investigational device.
All clinical studies of investigational devices must be conducted in compliance with the FDA's requirements. If an investigational device could pose a significant risk to patients pursuant to FDA regulations, the FDA must approve an IDE application prior to initiation of investigational use. IVD trials usually do not require an IDE, as the FDA does not judge them to be a significant risk because the results do not affect the patients in the study. However, for a trial where the IVD result directs the therapeutic care of patients with cancer, we believe that the FDA would consider the investigation to present significant risk.
An IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as laboratory test results, showing that it is safe to test the device in humans and that the testing protocol is scientifically sound. The FDA typically grants IDE approval for a specified number of patients. A nonsignificant risk device does not require FDA approval of an IDE. Both significant risk and nonsignificant risk investigational devices require approval from IRBs at the study centers where the device will be used.
During the trial, the sponsor must comply with the FDA's IDE requirements for investigator selection, trial monitoring, reporting and record keeping. The investigators must obtain patient informed consent, rigorously follow the investigational plan and study protocol, control the disposition of investigational devices and comply with all reporting and record keeping requirements. Prior to granting PMA approval, the FDA typically inspects the records relating to the conduct of the study and the clinical data supporting the PMA application for compliance with applicable requirements.
Although the QSR does not fully apply to investigational devices, the requirement for controls on design and development does apply. The sponsor also must manufacture the investigational device in conformity with the quality controls described in the IDE application and any conditions of IDE approval that the FDA may impose with respect to manufacturing.
Post-market
After a device is on the market, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These requirements include: the QSR, labeling regulations, the FDA's general prohibition against promoting products for unapproved or "off label" uses, the Medical Device Reporting regulation, which requires that manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur, and the Reports of Corrections and Removals regulation, which requires manufacturers to report recalls and field actions to the FDA if initiated to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA.
The FDA enforces these requirements by inspection and market surveillance. If the FDA finds a violation, it can institute a wide variety of enforcement actions, ranging from a public warning letter to more severe sanctions such as: fines, injunctions and civil penalties; recall or seizure of products; operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of production; refusing requests for PMA approval of new products; withdrawing PMA approvals already granted; and criminal prosecution.
95
Business
Other regulatory requirements
Any drug manufactured or distributed by us pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements relating to recordkeeping, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting of adverse experiences with the product. After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims are subject to prior FDA review and approval.
The FDA may impose a number of post-approval requirements as a condition of approval of an NDA. For example, the FDA may require post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance to further assess and monitor the product's safety and effectiveness after commercialization. Regulatory approval of oncology products often requires that patients in clinical trials be followed for long periods to determine the overall survival benefit of the drug.
In addition, drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and these state agencies for compliance with cGMP requirements. Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval before being implemented. FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon us and any third-party manufacturers that we may decide to use. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the areas of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information, imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program. Other potential consequences include, among other things:
The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of products that are placed on the market. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off label uses may be subject to significant liability.
96
Business
Additional provisions
Anti-kickback and false claims laws
In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing of pharmaceutical products, several other types of state and federal laws have been applied to restrict certain marketing practices in the pharmaceutical industry in recent years. These laws include anti-kickback statutes and false claims statutes. The federal healthcare program anti-kickback statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for the purchase, lease or order of any healthcare item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federally financed healthcare programs. This statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on the one hand and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers on the other. Violations of the anti-kickback statute are punishable by imprisonment, criminal fines, civil monetary penalties and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. Although there are a number of statutory exemptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting certain common activities from prosecution or other regulatory sanctions, the exemptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly, and practices that involve remuneration intended to induce prescribing, purchases or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exemption or safe harbor.
Federal false claims laws prohibit any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement to have a false claim paid. Recently, several pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws for allegedly inflating drug prices they report to pricing services, which in turn were used by the government to set Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates, and for allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product. In addition, certain marketing practices, including off-label promotion, may also violate false claims laws. The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to the federal anti-kickback law and false claims laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor.
Physician drug samples
As part of the sales and marketing process, pharmaceutical companies frequently provide samples of approved drugs to physicians. The Prescription Drug Marketing Act, or the PDMA, imposes requirements and limitations upon the provision of drug samples to physicians, as well as prohibits states from licensing distributors of prescription drugs unless the state licensing program meets certain federal guidelines that include minimum standards for storage, handling and record keeping. In addition, the PDMA sets forth civil and criminal penalties for violations.
Foreign regulation
In order to market any product outside of the United States, we would need to comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of our products. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we would need to obtain the necessary approvals by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries before we can commence clinical trials or marketing of the product in those countries. The approval process varies from country to country and can involve additional product testing and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain approval in other countries might differ from and be
97
Business
longer than that required to obtain FDA approval. Regulatory approval in one country does not ensure regulatory approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may negatively impact the regulatory process in others.
To date, we have not initiated any discussions with the European Medicines Agency or any other foreign regulatory authorities with respect to seeking regulatory approval for any of our products in Europe or in any other country outside the United States.
New legislation and regulations
From time to time, legislation is drafted, introduced and passed in Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the testing, approval, manufacturing and marketing of products regulated by the FDA. For example, the FDAAA discussed above was enacted in 2007. In addition to new legislation, FDA regulations and policies are often revised or interpreted by the agency in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. It is impossible to predict whether further legislative changes will be enacted or whether FDA regulations, guidance, policies or interpretations changed or what the effect of such changes, if any, may be.
Pharmaceutical coverage, pricing and reimbursement
Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of any drug products for which we obtain regulatory approval. Sales of any of our product candidates, if approved, will depend, in part, on the extent to which the costs of the products will be covered by third-party payors, including government health programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, commercial health insurers and managed care organizations. The process for determining whether a payor will provide coverage for a drug product may be separate from the process for setting the price or reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the drug product once coverage is approved. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific drug products on an approved list, or formulary, which might not include all of the approved drugs for a particular indication.
In order to secure coverage and reimbursement for any product that might be approved for sale, we may need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of the product, in addition to the costs required to obtain FDA or other comparable regulatory approvals. Our product candidates may not be considered medically necessary or cost-effective. A payor's decision to provide coverage for a drug product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Third-party reimbursement may not be sufficient to enable us to maintain price levels high enough to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development.
The containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of federal, state and foreign governments, and the prices of drugs have been a focus in this effort. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services and examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy. If these third-party payors do not consider our products to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may not cover our products after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our products at a profit. The U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid health care costs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription drugs. Adoption of such controls and measures, and tightening of restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could limit payments for pharmaceuticals
98
Business
such as the drug candidates that we are developing and could adversely affect our net revenue and results.
Pricing and reimbursement schemes vary widely from country to country. Some countries provide that drug products may be marketed only after a reimbursement price has been agreed. Some countries may require the completion of additional studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies. For example, the European Union provides options for its member states to restrict the range of drug products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. European Union member states may approve a specific price for a drug product or may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the drug product on the market. Other member states allow companies to fix their own prices for drug products, but monitor and control company profits. The downward pressure on health care costs in general, particularly prescription drugs, has become very intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products. In addition, in some countries, cross-border imports from low-priced markets exert competitive pressure that may reduce pricing within a country. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations for drug products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of our products.
The marketability of any products for which we receive regulatory approval for commercial sale may suffer if the government and third-party payors fail to provide adequate coverage and reimbursement. In addition, an increasing emphasis on managed care in the United States has increased and we expect will continue to increase the pressure on drug pricing. Coverage policies, third-party reimbursement rates and drug pricing regulation may change at any time. In particular, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was enacted in the United States in March 2010 and contain provisions that may reduce the profitability of drug products, including, for example, increased rebates for drugs sold to Medicaid programs, extension of Medicaid rebates to Medicaid managed care plans, mandatory discounts for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries and annual fees based on pharmaceutical companies' share of sales to federal health care programs. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which we receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.
EMPLOYEES
As of November 30, 2011, we had 18 full-time employees, including a total of nine employees with M.D. or Ph.D. degrees. Of these full-time employees, 11 employees are engaged in research and development activities. None of our employees is represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.
FACILITIES
We occupy approximately 7,484 square feet of office and laboratory space in Cambridge, Massachusetts under a lease that expires in October 2014. We believe that our facility is sufficient to meet our current needs and that suitable additional space will be available as and when needed.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.
99
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers and directors as of November 30, 2011.
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D.(2) |
43 | Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||
Robert Forrester |
48 | Chief Operating Officer | ||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
54 | Vice President, Head of Research | ||
Richard Aldrich(2)(3) |
57 | Director | ||
John K. Clarke(1) |
58 | Director | ||
Ansbert Gadicke, M.D.(2) |
53 | Director | ||
Stephen Kraus(1)(3) |
35 | Director | ||
Henri Termeer(1)(3) |
65 | Director |
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. has served as our Chief Executive Officer since September 2011. He has served on our board of directors since August 2010 and as the Chairman of our board of directors since March 2011. Dr. Westphal has served as a partner of Longwood Founders Fund, LP, a venture capital investment fund, since 2010. He served as the President of SR One, the corporate venture capital arm of GlaxoSmithKline, from 2010 until 2011. Dr. Westphal has previously been involved in founding a number of biotechnology companies as chief executive officer. Dr. Westphal co-founded Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which was acquired by GlaxoSmithKline plc in 2008, and served as its Chief Executive Officer from 2004 to 2010. He also co-founded Alnara Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Acceleron Pharma, Inc., serving as its Chief Executive Officer in 2003, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., serving as its Chief Executive Officer in 2002, and Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., serving as its Chief Executive Officer in 2001. Dr. Westphal serves on the Board of Fellows of Harvard Medical School and the Board of Overseers for the Boston Symphony Orchestra and is a member of the Research Advisory Council at the Massachusetts General Hospital. He earned his M.D. from Harvard Medical School, his Ph.D. in genetics from Harvard University and his B.A. from Columbia University. We believe that Dr. Westphal is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his experience in the life sciences industry as an entrepreneur and venture capitalist and his service on the boards of directors of other life sciences companies.
Robert Forrester has served as our Chief Operating Officer since March 2011. Mr. Forrester has previously held executive level positions at both private and public life sciences companies. Prior to joining us, Mr. Forrester served as Chief Operating Officer of Forma Therapeutics, Inc. from 2010 until 2011. Previously he served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of CombinatoRx, Inc., now Zalicus Inc., from 2009 until 2010 and as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2004 to 2009. Mr. Forrester served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Corporate Development at Coley Pharmaceuticals Group, Inc. from 2000 to 2003. He earned his LL.B. from Bristol University in England.
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. has served as our Vice President, Head of Research since July 2011. Prior to joining us, Dr. Pachter served as the Senior Director of Cancer Biology at OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which was acquired by Astellas Pharma Inc. in 2010, from 2005 to 2011. He earned his Ph.D. in Neuroscience and his M.S. in Pharmacology from Baylor College of Medicine.
100
Management
Richard Aldrich has served as a member of our board of directors since August 2010. Mr. Aldrich has served as a partner of Longwood Founders Fund, LP, a venture capital investment fund, since 2010. He founded RA Capital Management LLC, a hedge fund, in 2004 and served as a Managing Member from 2004 to 2008 and as a Co-Founding Member from 2008 until 2011. He co-founded Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which was acquired by GlaxoSmithKline plc in 2008, and served on its board of directors from 2004 to 2008; co-founded Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and has served as chairman of its board of directors since 2006; and co-founded Alnara Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and served on its board of directors from 2008 to 2010. Mr. Aldrich also joined Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at its founding in 1989 and served as its Senior Vice President and Chief Business Officer until 2001. He earned his M.B.A from the Amos Tuck School at Dartmouth College and his B.S. from Boston College. We believe that Mr. Aldrich is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his experience in the life sciences industry as an entrepreneur and venture capitalist and his service on the boards of directors of other life sciences companies.
John K. Clarke has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2010. Mr. Clarke co-founded Cardinal Partners, a venture capital firm, and has served as its Managing General Partner since 1997. Mr. Clarke co-founded Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and has served on its board of directors since 2002. He also serves on the board of directors of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Clarke also co-founded and has served as chief executive officer for a number of other companies, including Alkermes, Inc., Arris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the DNX Corporation. He earned his M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and his B.A. in Biology and Economics from Harvard College. We believe that Mr. Clarke is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his financial expertise, years of experience providing advisory services to organizations in the life sciences industry and his service on the boards of directors of other life sciences companies.
Ansbert Gadicke, M.D. has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2010. Dr. Gadicke co-founded MPM Group, a venture capital firm, and has served as the managing director of MPM Asset Management LLC since 1996. He serves on the board of directors of Radius Health, Inc. and a number of privately-held life sciences companies. Dr. Gadicke previously served as a member of the board of directors of Pharmasset, Inc. from 1999 until 2007 and as a member of the board of directors of PharmAthene, Inc. from 2004 until 2007. Dr. Gadicke also serves on the Board of Fellows of Harvard Medical School. He earned his M.D. from J.W. Goethe University in Frankfurt. We believe that Dr. Gadicke is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his experience in the life sciences industry as a venture capitalist, his training as a physician and his service on the boards of directors of other life sciences companies.
Stephen Kraus has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2010. Mr. Kraus has served as an investment professional at Bessemer Venture Partners, a venture capital firm, since 2004 and has been employed as a Partner since 2010. He serves on the board of directors of a number of privately-held life sciences companies. He previously served as a member of the board of directors of Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2005 until 2007 and as a member of the board of directors of Restore Medical, Inc. from 2005 until 2008. He earned his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and his B.A. from Yale University. We believe that Mr. Kraus is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his experience in the life sciences industry as a venture capitalist and his service on the boards of directors of other life sciences companies.
Henri Termeer has served as a member of our board of directors since June 2011. Mr. Termeer served as President and a member of the board of directors of Genzyme Corporation from 1983 until its acquisition by sanofi-aventis U.S., LLC in 2011, its Chief Executive Officer from 1985 to 2011 and the chairman of its board of directors from 1988 to 2011. He serves on the Council of Economic
101
Management
Advisors to Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick and as co-chair of the Leadership Counsel of the Massachusetts Life Sciences Collaborative. Mr. Termeer is also chairman emeritus of the New England Healthcare Institute and a trustee for the Boston Museum of Science. Mr. Termeer serves on the board of directors of ABIOMED Inc., AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Massachusetts General Hospital, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Corporation and Partners HealthCare, and, until December 31, 2011, as chairman of the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Mr. Termeer also serves on the Board of Fellows of Harvard Medical School. He earned his M.B.A. from the Darden School at the University of Virginia. We believe Mr. Termeer is qualified to serve on our board of directors due to his senior executive experience in developing and managing Genzyme Corporation over the course of many years, his service on the boards of directors of Genzyme Corporation and other life sciences companies and his deep life sciences industry experience and knowledge.
BOARD COMPOSITION AND ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our board of directors is currently authorized to have seven members. Upon the closing of this offering, our board of directors will consist of six directors. In accordance with the terms of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws that will become effective upon the closing of this offering, our board of directors will be divided into three classes, class I, class II and class III, with members of each class serving staggered three-year terms. Upon the closing of this offering, the members of the classes will be divided as follows:
Upon the expiration of the term of a class of directors, directors in that class will be eligible to be elected for a new three-year term at the annual meeting of stockholders in the year in which their term expires. Our directors may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of 75% or more of our voting stock.
Our board of directors has determined that all of our directors, other than Dr. Westphal, are independent directors, as defined by applicable NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. In making such determination, the board of directors considered the relationships that each such non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances that the board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.
There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.
BOARD COMMITTEES
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a nominating and corporate governance committee and a compensation committee, each of which will operate, upon the closing of this offering, under a charter that has been approved by our board. The composition of each committee will be effective upon the closing of this offering.
Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee, other than
102
Management
Dr. Westphal, are independent as defined under NASDAQ Marketplace Rules, including, in the case of all the members of our audit committee, the independence requirements contemplated by Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Audit committee
The members of our audit committee are Mr. Clarke, Mr. Kraus and Mr. Termeer. Mr. Clarke chairs the audit committee. Upon the closing of this offering, our audit committee's responsibilities will include:
All audit and non-audit services, other than de minimis non-audit services, to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm must be approved in advance by our audit committee.
Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Clarke is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in applicable SEC rules.
Nominating and corporate governance committee
The members of our nominating and corporate governance committee are Mr. Aldrich, Dr. Gadicke, and Dr. Westphal. Mr. Aldrich chairs the nominating and corporate governance committee.
Under NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5615(b)(1), we are permitted to phase in our compliance with the independent nominating and corporate governance committee requirements set forth in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5605(e) as follows: (1) one independent member at the time of listing, (2) a majority of independent members within 90 days of listing and (3) all independent members within one year of listing. Our board of directors has determined that each of Mr. Aldrich and Dr. Gadicke is an independent director under NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Within one year of our listing on The NASDAQ Global Market, we expect that Dr. Westphal will resign from our nominating and corporate governance committee and be replaced with a new director, who is independent under NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.
103
Management
Upon the closing of this offering, our nominating and corporate governance committee's responsibilities will include:
Compensation committee
The members of our compensation committee are Mr. Termeer, Mr. Aldrich and Mr. Kraus. Mr. Termeer chairs the compensation committee. Upon the closing of this offering, our compensation committee's responsibilities will include:
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or our compensation committee. From December 2010 until December 2011, the members of our compensation committee were John K. Clarke, Stephen Kraus and Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. Neither Mr. Clarke nor Mr. Kraus is or has been an officer or employee of our company. Dr. Westphal has served as our Chief Executive Officer since September 2011. For a description of transactions between us and members of our compensation committee and affiliates of such members, please see "Transactions with related persons."
104
Management
OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
In addition to his role as Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of our company, Dr. Westphal also serves as a general partner of Longwood Founders Fund, LP, a venture capital investment fund and one of our principal stockholders. Dr. Westphal currently devotes a majority of his business time to our company with responsibility for all aspects of our business and operations. We and Dr. Westphal anticipate that he will transition to an executive Chairman role at our company in the future based on our having meaningfully advanced our discovery, research and development efforts, the overall growth of our company and our identifying and hiring a suitable successor. As executive Chairman, we expect that Dr. Westphal will continue to devote significant time to our company. In such role, we and Dr. Westphal expect that he will particularly focus on our company's strategic initiatives and key business, financial and scientific decisions. Dr. Westphal owns 2,200,000 shares of our common stock as a founder of our company, including shares currently held in a family trust. As of November 30, 2011, 1,134,375 of these shares remain subject to vesting on a quarterly basis through August 2014. In addition, Longwood Founders Fund has invested approximately $12.0 million in our company through November 30, 2011 and, upon completion of this offering, will own 7,944,444 shares of our common stock. Dr. Westphal does not receive any cash compensation from us for his services as our Chief Executive Officer.
105
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
This section discusses the principles underlying our policies and decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers and what we believe are the most important factors relevant to an analysis of these policies and decisions. This section also describes the material elements of compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each of our named executive officers for 2011. Our "named executive officers" for 2011 consist of our three current executive officers, Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D., our Chief Executive Officer, Robert Forrester, our Chief Operating Officer who also serves as our principal financial officer, and Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D., our Vice President, Head of Research; and three individuals who previously served as executives officers with us, Paul Brannelly, our current Vice President of Finance who served as our principal financial officer prior to the arrival of Mr. Forrester, Satish Jindal, Ph.D., our former President and Chief Operating Officer who remains with us as a non-executive employee, and Peter Elliott, Ph.D., our former Head of Research and Development. In addition, this section provides qualitative information regarding the manner and context in which compensation is awarded to and earned by our executive officers and is intended to provide context for the data presented in the tables and narrative that follow.
We commenced operations in November 2010 and hired each of our current executive officers in 2011. Dr. Westphal, our Chief Executive Officer, does not currently receive, and has not historically received, any compensation from us for his service as Chief Executive Officer because of his service as a general partner of Longwood Founders Fund, LP, a venture capital investment fund and one of our principal stockholders. The compensation of each of our other current executive officers is based on individual terms approved by our board of directors at the time of hire. Our board of directors is in the process of developing and implementing the executive compensation program that will be in place following this offering. This section highlights key aspects of this program that we expect to implement in 2012. Following this offering, our compensation committee will oversee these compensation policies and, together with our board of directors, will periodically evaluate the need for revisions to ensure our compensation program is competitive with the companies with which we compete for executive talent.
Objectives and philosophy of our executive compensation program
The primary objectives of the board of directors in designing our executive compensation program are to:
106
Executive compensation
Each of our named executive officers was hired by us before our board of directors established a formal executive compensation program. To achieve these objectives in the future, we expect that our board of directors and compensation committee will evaluate our executive compensation program for 2012 with the goal of setting and maintaining compensation at levels that are justifiable based on each executive's level of experience, performance and responsibility and that the board believes are competitive with those of other companies in our industry and our region that compete with us for executive talent. In addition, beginning in 2012, we expect that our executive compensation program will tie a substantial portion of each executive's overall compensation to key strategic, financial and operational goals. We have provided, and expect to continue to provide, a portion of our executive compensation in the form of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units that vest over time, which we believe helps to retain our executives and aligns their interests with those of our stockholders by allowing them to participate in the longer term success of our company as reflected in stock price appreciation.
Use of compensation consultants and market benchmarking
For purposes of determining total compensation and the primary components of compensation for our executive officers in 2011, we did not retain the services of a compensation consultant or use survey information or compensation data to engage in benchmarking. Beginning with 2012 compensation, we expect that our compensation committee will consider publicly available compensation data for national and regional companies in the biotechnology industry to help guide its executive compensation decisions at the time of hiring and for subsequent adjustments in compensation. In connection with designing our compensation program for future periods, our board of directors recently retained the services of Pearl Meyer & Partners, or Pearl Meyer, an independent compensation consultant, to provide additional comparative data on executive compensation practices in our industry and to advise on our executive compensation program generally. Although we expect that our board of directors and compensation committee will consider Pearl Meyer's advice and recommendations about our executive compensation program, the board of directors and compensation committee will ultimately make their own decisions about these matters.
We anticipate that Pearl Meyer will provide our board of directors and compensation committee with comparative data showing where our total compensation and each element of our compensation rate among both public and private companies in the biotechnology and life sciences industry generally and a peer group of publicly-traded companies in the life science industry at a stage of development, market capitalization and size comparable to ours with which the board of directors and compensation committee believe we compete for executive talent. We currently expect that the companies to be included in this peer group will be:
Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Curis Inc. |
Cytokinetics, Inc. Endocyte, Inc. Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Myrexis, Inc. Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp. Zalicus Inc. |
This peer group is subject to change, and we anticipate that our board of directors and compensation committee will periodically review and update the list. The peer group will be used for purposes of gathering data to help develop our executive compensation practices and guide our compensation decisions. We also expect that Pearl Meyer will make suggestions about our executive compensation
107
Executive compensation
practices based on the data it provides to us as well as compensation trends in our industry. We expect that the board of directors and compensation committee will consider peer group and other industry compensation data and the recommendations of Pearl Meyer when making decisions related to executive compensation, with the goal of ensuring that our compensation levels are reasonably competitive relative to the compensation paid by companies in our peer group. Based in part on initial consultation with Pearl Meyer and review of Pearl Meyer's analysis and recommendations, we generally expect that our board of directors and compensation committee will, in making future compensation decisions, target the total compensation paid to our executive officers between the 50th and 75th percentile of companies in our peer group.
Annual compensation review process
We expect to conduct annual compensation reviews beginning in 2012. As part of the reviews we conduct in 2012, we expect to address bonus awards for 2011, our first full year of operations, and for all aspects of compensation for 2012. During the first quarter of 2012 and each subsequent year, we expect to evaluate each executive officer's performance during the prior year. We expect that our chief executive officer will evaluate each executive other than himself from his own perspective and based on input from others within our company. This process will lead to a recommendation by the chief executive officer to the compensation committee with respect to each executive officer, other than himself, as to:
These recommendations will be reviewed by our compensation committee and taken into account when it makes a final determination on all such matters.
Components of our executive compensation program
The primary elements of our executive compensation program are:
We do not, and do not expect in the future to, have a formal or informal policy for allocating between long-term and short-term compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation or among the different forms of non-cash compensation. Instead, our board of directors, after reviewing data it considers relevant, has determined subjectively what it believes to be the appropriate level and mix of the various compensation components. Beginning with 2012, we expect that our compensation committee also will consider information provided to it by Pearl Meyer in making this determination. Ultimately, the objective in allocating between long-term and currently paid compensation is to ensure adequate base compensation to attract and retain personnel, while providing incentives to maximize long-term value for our company and our stockholders. Therefore, we provide cash compensation in
108
Executive compensation
the form of base salary to meet competitive salary norms and in the form of bonus compensation to incentivize and reward superior performance on an annual basis. To further focus our executives on longer-term performance and the creation of stockholder value, we rely upon equity-based awards that vest over a meaningful period of time. In addition, we provide our executives with benefits that are generally available to all our employees, including health and dental insurance, life and disability insurance and a 401(k) plan. Finally, we offer our executives severance benefits to incentivize them to continue to achieve stockholder value in connection with change in control or other situations in which they could be terminated without cause.
We have employment agreements with two of our named executive officers, Mr. Forrester and Dr. Pachter. These employment agreements provide for specific base salaries, target annual bonuses and severance and change in control arrangements for these executive officers. Dr. Pachter also received a signing bonus and reimbursement of certain relocation expenses in connection with the commencement of his employment. Details of these employment agreements are provided below under the heading "Employment agreements."
Base salary
We use base salaries to recognize the experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities of our employees, including our executive officers. Base salaries for our named executive officers were established through arm's-length negotiation at the time the executive was hired, taking into account the position for which the executive was considered and the executive's qualifications, prior experience and prior salary. None of our named executive officers is currently party to an employment agreement that provides for automatic or scheduled increases in base salary. However, we expect that our compensation committee will annually review and evaluate, with input from our chief executive officer, the need for adjustment of the base salaries of our executives based on changes and expected changes in the scope of an executive's responsibilities, including promotions, the individual contributions made by and performance of the executive during the prior year, the executive's performance over a period of years, overall labor market conditions, the relative ease or difficulty of replacing the executive with a well-qualified person, our overall growth and development as a company, general salary trends in our industry and among our peer group and where the executive's salary falls in the salary range presented by that data. In making decisions regarding salary increases, we may also draw upon the experience of members of our board of directors with other companies. We do not expect that our executive officers will receive any formulaic base salary increase, but we do expect that our compensation committee will, in making future compensation decisions, target the total cash compensation of our named executive officers, consisting of their base salaries and target annual cash bonuses, generally between the 50th and 75th percentile of companies in our peer group.
Dr. Westphal does not currently receive, and has not historically received, a base salary from us. Effective upon the closing of this offering, Dr. Westphal will receive annual compensation in connection with his service on our board of directors, as further described under the heading "Director compensation."
Mr. Forrester's 2011 annual base salary is $310,000 pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement that we entered into with him upon the commencement of his employment in March 2011. Dr. Pachter's 2011 annual base salary is $280,000 pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement that we entered into with him upon the commencement of his employment in July 2011. Our board of directors approved the base salaries of Mr. Forrester and Dr. Pachter based on the recommendations of Dr. Westphal. In making his recommendations, Dr. Westphal considered the factors discussed above, including the qualifications, prior experience and prior salary of each of Mr. Forrester and Dr. Pachter.
109
Executive compensation
We are amending and restating our employment agreements with Mr. Forrester and Dr. Pachter effective upon the closing of this offering.
Mr. Brannelly's 2011 base salary was $125,000 for the first eight months of 2011 when he was serving as our part-time employee and was increased to $250,000 in September 2011 when he began serving as our full-time employee. Dr. Jindal was paid $300,000 in total salary for 2011 as our former President and Chief Operating Officer and in his current capacity as our non-executive employee pursuant to the terms of a transition services agreement we entered into with him in February 2011, which provides a current 2011 annual base salary of $300,000 through mid-April 2012. Prior to his departure in August 2011, Dr. Elliott was paid $108,000 in total salary for 2011. As with our current executive officers, the base salary for each of these individuals was determined at the time of hire based on the factors set forth above.
For 2012, our board of directors determined to increase the base salaries for our current executive officers from 2011 levels based on our board's view, and the recommendation of Pearl Meyer, with respect to typical annual salary increases for executives in our industry. Mr. Forrester's 2012 annual base salary is $318,000. Dr. Pachter's 2012 annual base salary is $284,000. In addition, the amended and restated employment agreements to be effective upon the closing of this offering will provide for further increases in the base salaries for our current executive officers to recognize their increased responsibilities with respect to serving as executives of a publicly-traded company. Following the closing of this offering, Mr. Forrester's annual base salary will be $370,000 and Dr. Pachter's annual base salary will be $300,000. We believe that the base salaries established for our named executive officers for 2012 and upon the closing of this offering are aligned with our executive compensation objectives stated above and are competitive with those of similarly-situated companies.
Annual performance-based cash bonus
Because we only commenced operations in November 2010, none of our named executive offices received an annual cash bonus for 2010. Our board of directors subjectively determined the amount of annual cash bonuses for our current executive officers for 2011 in December 2011. We did not establish specific corporate or individual performance goals for our executive officers for 2011.
Dr. Westphal will not receive an annual cash bonus for 2011. In accordance with the terms of their employment agreements with us, Mr. Forrester and Dr. Pachter were eligible to receive an annual bonus for 2011 based on a percentage of their base salary. Mr. Forrester has an annual bonus target of 35% of his base salary, and Dr. Pachter has an annual bonus target of 30% of his base salary. Our board of directors awarded Mr. Forrester a 2011 bonus of $130,000 and Dr. Pachter a 2011 bonus of $38,500. Our board of directors also awarded Mr. Brannelly a 2011 discretionary cash bonus of $55,000. Our board's determination of these bonus awards was based primarily on its consideration of key company achievements during 2011, including the following:
110
Executive compensation
Neither Dr. Jindal nor Dr. Elliott received an annual bonus for 2011.
We are in the process of designing an annual cash bonus program to reward our named executive officers in the future. Beginning with 2012, we expect that our annual cash bonus program will be based upon the achievement of specified annual corporate and individual goals that will be established in advance by our compensation committee. We expect that our annual cash bonus program will emphasize pay-for-performance and will be intended to closely align executive compensation with achievement of specified operating results as the amount will be calculated on the basis of percentage of corporate goals achieved. The performance goals established by our compensation committee beginning with the 2012 fiscal year will be based on the business strategy of the company and the objective of building stockholder value. We expect that there will be three steps to determine if and the extent to which an annual cash bonus is payable to a named executive officer. First, at the beginning of the year, our compensation committee will determine the target annual cash incentive award for the named executive officer based on a percentage of the officer's annual base salary for that year. Second, the compensation committee will establish the specific performance goals, including both corporate and individual objectives, that must be met for the officer to receive the award. Third, shortly after the end of the year, the compensation committee will determine the extent to which these performance goals were met and the amount of the award. We expect that, beginning in 2012, our compensation committee will work with our chief executive officer to develop corporate and individual goals that they believe can be reasonably achieved with hard work over the course of the year and will target total cash compensation, consisting of base salaries and target annual cash bonuses, generally between the 50th and 75th percentile of companies in our peer group. The amended and restated employment agreements to be effective upon the closing of this offering will provide for increases in the target bonus percentage for our current executive officers to recognize their increased responsibilities with respect to serving as executives of a publicly-traded company. Following the closing of this offering, Mr. Forrester's agreement will provide for an annual bonus target of 40% of his base salary and Dr. Pachter's agreement will provide for an annual bonus target of 35% of his base salary.
Stock-based awards
Our equity award program is the primary vehicle for offering long-term incentives to our executives. While we do not have any equity ownership guidelines for our executives, we believe that equity grants provide our executives with a strong link to our long-term performance, create an ownership culture and help to align the interests of our executives and our stockholders. In addition, the vesting feature of our equity awards contributes to executive retention by providing an incentive for our executives to remain in our employ during the vesting period. Prior to this offering, our executives were eligible to participate in our 2010 equity incentive plan, and all equity awards granted in 2011 were pursuant to the 2010 equity incentive plan. Following the closing of this offering, our employees and executives will be eligible to receive stock-based awards pursuant to our 2012 incentive plan. Under our 2012 incentive plan, executives will be eligible to receive grants of stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, stock appreciation rights and other stock-based equity awards at the discretion of our board of directors.
Our equity awards have typically been in the form of stock options. Because our executives profit from stock options only if our stock price increases relative to the stock option's exercise price, we believe stock options provide meaningful incentives for our executives to achieve increases in the value of our stock over time. While we currently expect to continue to use stock options as the primary form of equity awards that we grant, we have used and may in the future continue to use alternative forms of equity awards, such as restricted stock and restricted stock units.
111
Executive compensation
To date, we have generally used equity awards to compensate our executive officers in the form of initial grants in connection with the commencement of employment. However, we have also approved restricted stock units, granted effective upon the closing of this offering, to our executive officers other than Dr. Westphal as further described under the heading "Grants of plan-based awards in 2011." In the future, we also generally plan to grant equity awards on an annual basis to our executive officers. We expect that, beginning in 2012, our compensation committee generally will target the equity awards of our executive officers at the 75th percentile of companies in our peer group. We may also make additional discretionary grants, typically in connection with the promotion of an employee, to reward an employee, for retention purposes or in other circumstances recommended by management.
In general, the equity awards that we have granted to our executives vest with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of the grant date and with respect to the remaining shares in approximately equal quarterly installments through the fourth anniversary of the grant date. Vesting ceases upon termination of employment and exercise rights cease shortly after termination of employment. Prior to the exercise of a stock option, the holder has no rights as a stockholder with respect to the shares subject to such option, including voting rights or the right to receive dividends or dividend equivalents.
We have granted stock options with exercise prices that are set at no less than the fair value of shares of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by our board of directors. The exercise price of all stock options granted after the closing of this offering will be equal to the fair value of shares of our common stock on the date of grant, which generally will be determined by reference to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant.
We have not granted any equity awards to Dr. Westphal in connection with his service as our Chief Executive Officer. As one of our co-founders, we issued and sold to Dr. Westphal 2,200,000 shares of our common stock in August 2010 in connection with our formation. These shares are subject to repurchase by us pursuant to the terms of a restricted stock agreement, as further described under the heading "Transactions with related personsRestricted stock grants to co-founders." In addition, effective upon the closing of this offering, Dr. Westphal will receive annual stock option awards in connection with his service on our board of directors, as further described under the heading "Director compensation."
In April 2011, in recognition of the commencement of Mr. Forrester's employment with us, we issued and sold to Mr. Forrester 448,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to his employment agreement. These shares are subject to repurchase by us pursuant to the terms of a restricted stock agreement. These shares vest with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of his date of hire and with respect to the remaining shares in approximately equal monthly installments through the fourth anniversary of his date of hire. The purchase price of the restricted stock was $0.08 per share, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by our board of directors. We have approved a grant of restricted stock units to Mr. Forrester, effective upon the closing of this offering, as described under the heading "Grants of plan-based awards in 2011."
In September 2011, in recognition of the commencement of Dr. Pachter's employment with us, we granted Dr. Pachter an option to purchase 240,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to his employment agreement. This option vests with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of his date of hire and with respect to the remaining shares in approximately equal quarterly installments through the fourth anniversary of his date of hire. The exercise price of this option is $0.55 per share, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by our board of directors. We have approved a grant of restricted stock units to Dr. Pachter, effective upon the closing of this offering, as described under the heading "Grants of plan-based awards in 2011."
112
Executive compensation
We did not grant any equity awards to Mr. Brannelly in 2011. In December 2010, in recognition of the commencement of Mr. Brannelly's employment with us, we granted Mr. Brannelly an option to purchase 210,000 shares of our common stock. This option vests with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of his date of hire and with respect to the remaining shares in approximately equal quarterly installments through the fourth anniversary of his date of hire. The exercise price of this option is $0.08 per share, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by our board of directors. We have approved a grant of restricted stock units to Mr. Brannelly, effective upon the closing of this offering, as described under the heading "Grants of plan-based awards in 2011."
We did not grant any equity awards to Dr. Jindal in 2011. As one of our co-founders, we issued and sold to Dr. Jindal 1,250,000 shares of our common stock in August 2010 in connection with our formation. Pursuant to a restricted stock agreement with Dr. Jindal, as amended, we repurchased 582,681 shares from him, as further described under the heading "Transactions with related personsRestricted stock grants to co-founders."
In April 2011, in recognition of the commencement of Dr. Elliott's employment with us, we issued and sold to Dr. Elliott 448,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to his employment agreement at a price of $0.08 per share, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by our board of directors. Pursuant to a restricted stock agreement with Dr. Elliott, we repurchased 420,000 shares in connection with Dr. Elliott's transition from our employee to a member of our scientific advisory board.
Benefits and other compensation
We believe that establishing competitive benefit packages for our employees is an important factor in attracting and retaining highly qualified personnel. We maintain broad-based benefits that are provided to all employees, including health and dental insurance, life and disability insurance and a 401(k) plan. All of our executives are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, in each case on the same basis as other employees. Under our 401(k) plan, we match 100% of employee contributions up to an amount equal to 3% of the employee's salary and then match 50% of employee contributions up to an amount equal to an additional 2% of the employee's salary. The match vests immediately. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, we intend to continue to maintain our current benefits for our named executive officers.
In certain circumstances, we may award cash signing bonuses or may reimburse relocation expenses when executives first join us. Whether a signing bonus is paid or relocation expenses are reimbursed, and the amount of either such benefit, is determined by our board of directors on a case-by-case basis based on the specific hiring circumstances and the recommendation of our chief executive officer.
Dr. Pachter, who joined us in June 2011, received a signing bonus of $50,000 payable upon commencement of employment. We also reimbursed Dr. Pachter for $30,000 of relocation expenses in connection with his move to our area to commence employment with us.
Severance and change in control benefits
Pursuant to employment agreements we have entered into with certain of our executives, these executives are entitled to specified benefits in the event of the termination of their employment under specified circumstances, including termination following a change in control of our company. Please refer to "Employment agreements" for a more detailed discussion of these benefits. We have provided estimates of the value of the severance payments made and other benefits provided to
113
Executive compensation
executives under various termination circumstances, under the heading "Potential payments upon termination or change in control" below.
We believe providing these benefits helps us compete for executive talent. After reviewing the practices of companies represented in the compensation peer group, we believe that our severance and change in control benefits are generally in line with severance packages offered to executives of the companies in our peer group. Based on the substantial business experience of the members of our board of directors and consultation with Pearl Meyer, we believe that our severance and change in control benefits are generally in line with severance packages offered to executives by companies at comparable stages of development in our industry and related industries.
We have structured our change in control benefits as "double trigger" benefits. In other words, the change in control does not itself trigger benefits. Rather, benefits are paid only if the employment of the executive is terminated during a specified period in connection with the change in control. We believe a "double trigger" benefit maximizes stockholder value because it prevents an unintended windfall to executives in the event of a friendly change in control, while still providing them appropriate incentives to cooperate in negotiating any change in control in which they believe they may lose their jobs.
Risk considerations in our compensation program
Our board of directors is evaluating the philosophy and standards on which our compensation plans will be implemented across our company. It is our belief that our compensation programs do not, and in the future will not, encourage inappropriate actions or risk taking by our executive officers. We do not believe that any risks arising from our employee compensation policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. In addition, we do not believe that the mix and design of the components of our executive compensation program will encourage management to assume excessive risks. We believe that our current business process and planning cycle fosters the behaviors and controls that would mitigate the potential for adverse risk caused by the action of our executives. We believe that the following aspects of our executive compensation program that we plan to implement will mitigate the potential for adverse risk caused by the action of our executives:
Tax and accounting considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which will become applicable to us upon the closing of this offering, generally disallows a tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1.0 million paid to our chief executive officer and our three other most highly paid officers (other than the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer). Qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the deduction limitation if specified requirements are met. We will
114
Executive compensation
periodically review the potential consequences of Section 162(m) and we generally intend to structure the performance-based portion of our executive compensation, where feasible, to comply with exemptions in Section 162(m) so that the compensation will remain tax deductible to us. However, the board of directors may, in its judgment, authorize compensation payments that do not comply with the exemptions in Section 162(m) when it believes that such payments are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent and are in the best interests of our stockholders.
We account for equity compensation paid to our employees in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standard Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, which requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense in our financial statements for all share-based payments based on an estimate of their fair value over the service period of the award. We record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is accrued.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth the total compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our named executive officers during 2011.
Name and principal position
|
Year
|
Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock awards ($)(1) |
Option awards ($)(2) |
All other compensation ($)(3) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D.(4) |
2011 | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert Forrester |
2011 |
252,769 |
130,000 |
35,840 |
|
418,609 |
||||||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
2011 |
129,231 |
88,500 |
(5) |
|
81,336 |
30,000 |
329,067 |
||||||||||||||
Vice President, Head of Research |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Paul Brannelly |
2011 |
164,423 |
55,000 |
|
|
219,423 |
||||||||||||||||
Vice President of Finance, Former principal financial officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Satish Jindal, Ph.D.(6) |
2011 |
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
||||||||||||||||
Former President and Chief Operating Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Peter Elliott, Ph.D.(7) |
2011 |
108,500 |
|
35,840 |
|
144,340 |
||||||||||||||||
Former Head of Research and Development |
115
Executive compensation
Name
|
401(k) match ($) |
Group life insurance premium ($) |
Relocation expense reimbursement ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. |
| ||||||||||||
Robert Forrester |
|||||||||||||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
30,000 | ||||||||||||
Paul Brannelly |
| ||||||||||||
Satish Jindal, Ph.D. |
| ||||||||||||
Peter Elliott, Ph.D. |
|
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2011
The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers during 2011.
Name
|
Grant date
|
All other stock awards: number of shares of stock (#) |
All other option awards: number of securities underlying options (#) |
Exercise price of option awards ($/share)(1) |
Grant date fair value of stock and option awards ($)(2) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. |
| | | | | |||||||||||
Robert Forrester |
3/3/2011 | 448,000 | (3) | | | 35,840 | ||||||||||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
9/6/2011 | | 240,000 | (4) | 0.55 | 81,336 | ||||||||||
Paul Brannelly |
| | | | | |||||||||||
Satish Jindal, Ph.D. |
| | | | | |||||||||||
Peter Elliott, Ph.D. |
3/3/2011 | 448,000 | (5) | | | 35,840 |
116
Executive compensation
We have approved awards of restricted stock units, to be granted effective upon the closing of this offering, to various employees, including our executive officers, as part of our effort to bring our equity compensation more into line with that of companies in our peer group. We approved these awards of restricted stock units to our named executive officers other than Dr. Westphal as follows:
Name
|
Number of restricted stock units |
|
---|---|---|
Robert Forrester |
500,000 | |
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
300,000 | |
Paul Brannelly |
100,000 |
Each restricted stock unit represents the right to receive one share of our common stock if the vesting conditions are satisfied. The restricted stock units vest with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of the closing of this offering and with respect to the remaining shares in approximately equal semi-annual installments through the fourth anniversary of the closing of this offering.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2011
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2011.
|
Option awards | |
|
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable |
Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable |
|
|
Stock awards | ||||||||||||||
Name
|
Option exercise price ($) |
Option expiration date |
Number of shares that have not vested (#) |
Market value of shares that have not vested ($) |
|||||||||||||||
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. |
| | | | 1,134,375 | (1) | (2) | ||||||||||||
Robert Forrester |
| | | | 448,000 | (3) | (2) | ||||||||||||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
| 240,000 | (4) | 0.55 | 9/6/2021 | | | ||||||||||||
Paul Brannelly |
52,500 | 157,500 | (5) | 0.08 | 12/3/2020 | | | ||||||||||||
Satish Jindal, Ph.D. |
| | | | 61,851 | (6) | (2) | ||||||||||||
Peter Elliott, Ph.D. |
| | | | | |
117
Executive compensation
OPTIONS EXERCISED AND STOCK VESTED
None of our named executive officers exercised any options during 2011. The following table sets forth information regarding the vesting of stock during 2011 for each of our named executive officers.
|
Stock awards | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of shares acquired on vesting (#) |
Value realized on vesting ($)(1) |
|||||
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. |
412,500 | (2) | 229,969 | ||||
Robert Forrester |
0 | | |||||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
| | |||||
Paul Brannelly |
| | |||||
Satish Jindal, Ph.D. |
234,375 | (3) | 130,663 | ||||
Peter Elliott, Ph.D. |
28,000 | (4) | 15,400 |
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
In connection with the commencement of their employment with us, we entered into employment agreements with each of Mr. Forrester and Mr. Pachter. We are amending and restating these agreements effective upon the closing of this offering. Each of these employment agreements provides that employment will continue for an indefinite period until either we or the employee provides written notice of termination in accordance with the terms of the agreement. In addition, each of these executive officers is bound by the terms of an employee non-solicitation, non-competition, confidential information and inventions assignment agreement that, among other things, prevents the executive from competing with us during the term of his employment and for a specified time thereafter.
Pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated employment agreements effective upon the closing of this offering, Mr. Forrester and Dr. Pachter will receive the following base salaries and will be eligible for the following bonus percentages.
Name
|
Annual Base Salary $ |
Bonus Percentage (%) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||
Robert Forrester |
370,000 | 40 | |||||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D |
300,000 | 35 |
Upon execution and effectiveness of a release of claims, each of Mr. Forrester and Dr. Pachter will be entitled to severance payments if we terminate his employment without cause, as defined in the employment agreement, or Mr. Forrester or Dr. Pachter terminates employment with us for good reason, as defined in the employment agreement.
118
Executive compensation
If Mr. Forrester's or Dr. Pachter's employment terminates under these circumstances, in each case absent a change in control, as defined in the employment agreement, we will be obligated for a period of 12 months, in the case of Mr. Forrester, and nine months, in the case of Dr. Pachter, (1) to pay such executive officer his base salary, (2) to provide that any equity awards granted prior to or in connection with the closing of this offering will continue vesting and (3) to the extent allowed by applicable law and the applicable plan documents, continue to provide to such executive officer all company employee benefit plans and arrangements that he was receiving at the time of termination.
If Mr. Forrester's or Dr. Pachter's employment terminates under these circumstances, in each case within 90 days prior to, or 18 months following, a change in control, we will be obligated (1) to pay such executive officer a lump sum amount equal to 12 months of his base salary, (2) accelerate in full the vesting of all outstanding equity awards and (3) to the extent allowed by applicable law and the applicable plan documents, continue to provide to such executive officer, for a period of 12 months, all company employee benefit plans and arrangements that he was receiving at the time of termination.
To the extent that any severance or compensation payment to Mr. Forrester pursuant to his employment agreement constitutes an "excess parachute payment" within the meaning of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, then Mr. Forrester will be entitled to an additional gross-up payment equal to the sum of the amount of tax owed by him in connection with such "excess parachute payment" and any interest or penalties thereon.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
The following tables set forth information regarding potential payments that each named executive officer who was serving as an executive officer as of December 31, 2011 would have received if the executive officer's employment had terminated as of December 31, 2011 under the circumstances set forth below, assuming that the amended and restated employment agreements described above for each of the named executive officers were in effect as of December 31, 2011.
|
Termination without cause or for good reason absent a change in control |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Cash payment $ |
Value of stock options with accelerated vesting (1) $ |
Value of benefits $ |
|||||||
Robert Forrester |
370,000 | (2) | ||||||||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
225,000 |
119
Executive compensation
|
Termination without cause or for good reason within 90 days prior to, or 18 months following, a change in control |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Cash payment $ |
Value of stock options with accelerated vesting(1) $ |
Value of benefits $ |
||||||
Robert Forrester |
370,000 | (2) | |||||||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
300,000 |
PENSION BENEFITS
We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
We do not maintain any nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
STOCK OPTION AND OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The two incentive plans described in this section are the 2010 equity incentive plan and the 2012 incentive plan. Prior to this offering, we granted awards to eligible participants under the 2010 equity incentive plan. Following the closing of this offering, we expect to grant awards to eligible participants under the 2012 incentive plan, which will become effective immediately prior to the closing of this offering.
2012 incentive plan
Our 2012 incentive plan was adopted by our board of directors in December 2011 and approved by our stockholders in . The 2012 incentive plan will become effective immediately prior to the closing of this offering. The 2012 incentive plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and other stock-based or cash awards. Upon effectiveness of the plan, the number of shares of our common stock that will be reserved for issuance under the 2012 incentive plan will be the sum of (1)12,000,000 shares plus (2) the number of shares (up to 1,999,348 shares) equal to the sum of the number of shares of our common stock then available for issuance under the 2010 equity incentive plan described below and the number of shares of our common stock subject to outstanding awards under the 2010 equity incentive plan, described below, that expire, terminate or are otherwise surrendered, cancelled, forfeited or repurchased by us at their original issuance price pursuant to a contractual repurchase right plus (3) an annual increase, to be added on the first day of each year beginning in 2013 and each subsequent anniversary until the expiration of the 2012 incentive plan, equal to the lowest of 4,500,000 shares of our common stock, 4.0% of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding on the first day of the year and an amount determined by our board of directors.
120
Executive compensation
Our employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors are eligible to receive awards under the 2012 incentive plan. However, incentive stock options may only be granted to our employees. The maximum number of shares of our common stock with respect to which awards may be granted to any participant under the 2012 incentive plan is 4,000,000 per calendar year. For purposes of this limit on the maximum number of shares that may be awarded to any participant, the combination of an option in tandem with a stock appreciation right will be treated as a single award. The maximum amount of cash awards which may be granted to any participant under the 2012 incentive plan is $5.0 million per calendar year.
Pursuant to the terms of the 2012 incentive plan, our board of directors administers the plan and, subject to any limitations in the plan, selects the recipients of awards and determines:
Our board of directors has delegated authority to our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating Officer to grant awards under our 2012 incentive plan. Each officer has the power to make awards to all of our employees, except himself, any other executive officer and any other person that our board of directors or compensation committee may from time to time designate in writing as not being eligible. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating Officer are not authorized to grant options for more than 250,000 shares of our common stock to any person in any one year, for more than 500,000 shares of our common stock in the aggregate in one year, or for more than 2,000,000 shares of our common stock in the aggregate. The officers are required to maintain a list of the options granted pursuant to this authority and report to our compensation committee upon request. The exercise price of such options will be equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.
Upon a merger or other reorganization event, our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, take any one or more of the following actions pursuant to the 2012 incentive plan as to some or all outstanding awards other than restricted stock:
121
Executive compensation
provide for a cash payment to the participants with respect to each award held by a participant equal to (1) the number of shares of common stock subject to the vested portion of the award (after giving effect to any acceleration of vesting that occurs upon or immediately prior to such reorganization event) multiplied by (2) the excess, if any, of the cash payment for each share surrendered in the reorganization event over the exercise, measurement or purchase price of such award and any applicable tax withholdings, in exchange for the termination of such award;
Our board of directors does not need to take the same action with respect to all awards and may take different actions with respect to portions of the same award.
In the case of certain restricted stock units, no assumption or substitution is permitted, and the restricted stock units will instead be settled in accordance with the terms of the applicable restricted stock unit agreement.
Upon the occurrence of a reorganization event other than a liquidation or dissolution, the repurchase and other rights with respect to outstanding restricted stock awards will continue for the benefit of the successor company and will, unless the board of directors may otherwise determine, apply to the cash, securities or other property into which shares of our common stock are converted or exchanged pursuant to the reorganization event. Upon the occurrence of a reorganization event involving a liquidation or dissolution, all restrictions and conditions on each outstanding restricted stock award will automatically be deemed terminated or satisfied, unless otherwise provided in the agreement evidencing the restricted stock award.
At any time, our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, provide that any award under the 2012 incentive plan will become immediately exercisable in full or in part, free of some or all restrictions or conditions, or otherwise realizable in full or in part.
No award may be granted under the 2012 incentive plan on or after , 2022. Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the 2012 incentive plan at any time, except that stockholder approval may be required to comply with applicable law or stock market requirements.
Effective upon the closing of this offering, restricted stock units with respect to an aggregate of 2,100,000 shares of our common stock will be granted under our 2012 incentive plan.
2010 equity incentive plan
Our 2010 equity incentive plan was adopted by our board of directors and approved by our stockholders in November 2010. Upon the closing of this offering and the approval of the 2012 stock incentive plan, we do not expect to grant any additional awards under the 2010 equity incentive plan.
The 2010 equity incentive plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights. The number of shares of our common stock that are reserved for issuance under the 2010 equity incentive plan is 1,999,348.
Our employees, directors, consultants and advisors are eligible to receive awards under the 2010 equity incentive plan. However, incentive stock options may only be granted to our employees.
122
Executive compensation
Upon a merger or other reorganization event, our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, take any one or more of the following actions pursuant to the 2010 equity incentive plan as to some or all outstanding awards:
Our board of directors does not need to take the same action with respect to all awards and may take different actions with respect to portions of the same award.
At any time, our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, provide that any award under the 2010 equity incentive plan will become immediately exercisable in full or in part, free of some or all restrictions or conditions, or otherwise realizable in full or in part.
As of November 30, 2011, there were options to purchase an aggregate of 1,418,000 shares of common stock outstanding under the 2010 equity incentive plan at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.21 per share and no shares of common stock issued upon the exercise of options granted under the 2010 equity incentive plan. If the 2012 stock incentive plan is approved by our stockholders, we will grant no further stock options or other awards under the 2010 equity incentive plan. However, any shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2010 equity incentive plan that remain available for issuance and any shares of common stock subject to awards under the 2010 equity incentive plan that expire, terminate or are otherwise surrendered, cancelled, forfeited or repurchased by us at the original issuance price pursuant to a contractual repurchase right will be available for issuance under the 2012 stock incentive plan up to a specified number of shares.
401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
We maintain a defined contribution employee retirement plan for our employees. Our 401(k) plan is intended to qualify as a tax-qualified plan under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code so that contributions to our 401(k) plan, and income earned on such contributions, are not taxable to participants until withdrawn or distributed from the 401(k) plan. Our 401(k) plan provides that each participant may contribute up to 100% of his or her pre-tax compensation, up to a statutory limit, which is $17,000 for 2012. Participants who are at least 50 years old can also make "catch-up" contributions, which in 2012 may be up to an additional $5,500 above the statutory limit. Under our 401(k) plan, each employee is fully vested in his or her deferred salary contributions. Employee contributions are held and invested by the plan's trustee. Our 401(k) plan also permits us to make discretionary contributions and matching contributions, subject to established limits and a vesting schedule. Beginning in July 2011, we made an employer matching contribution equal to (1) 100% of
123
Executive compensation
employee deferral contributions up to a deferral rate of 3% of compensation plus (2) 50% of employee deferral contributions up to an deferral rate of an additional 2% of compensation.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION
Our certificate of incorporation, which will become effective upon the closing of this offering, limits the personal liability of directors for breach of fiduciary duty to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law and provides that no director will have personal liability to us or to our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty or other duty as a director. However, these provisions do not eliminate or limit the liability of any of our directors:
Any amendment to or repeal of these provisions will not eliminate or reduce the effect of these provisions in respect of any act, omission or claim that occurred or arose prior to such amendment or repeal. If the Delaware General Corporation Law is amended to provide for further limitations on the personal liability of directors of corporations, then the personal liability of our directors will be further limited to the greatest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
In addition, our certificate of incorporation, which will become effective upon the closing of this offering, provides that we must indemnify our directors and officers and we must advance expenses, including attorneys' fees, to our directors and officers in connection with legal proceedings, subject to very limited exceptions.
We maintain a general liability insurance policy that covers certain liabilities of our directors and officers arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors. These indemnification agreements may require us, among other things, to indemnify each such director for some expenses, including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by him in any action or proceeding arising out of his service as one of our directors.
Certain of our non-employee directors may, through their relationships with their employers, be insured and/or indemnified against certain liabilities incurred in their capacity as members of our board of directors.
RULE 10B5-1 SALES PLANS
Our directors and executive officers may adopt written plans, known as Rule 10b5-1 plans, in which they will contract with a broker to buy or sell shares of our common stock on a periodic basis. Under a Rule 10b5-1 plan, a broker executes trades pursuant to parameters established by the director or officer when entering into the plan, without further direction from the director or officer. The director or officer may amend or terminate the plan in some circumstances. Our directors and executive officers may also buy or sell additional shares outside of a Rule 10b5-1 plan when they are not in possession of material, nonpublic information.
124
Executive compensation
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
During 2011, we did not pay cash compensation to any director for his service as a director, except Henri Termeer. Mr. Termeer received an annual retainer fee of $25,000 for his service on our board of directors in 2011. We have historically reimbursed our non-employee directors for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending board of director and committee meetings.
As discussed in the "Executive compensation" section of this prospectus, our Chief Executive Officer, Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D., who is also chairman of our board of directors, has not historically received any compensation in connection with his service as our Chief Executive Officer. Effective upon the closing of this offering, Dr. Westphal will be compensated for his service on our board of directors as described below.
During 2011, we did not grant equity awards as compensation to any of our directors, except Henri Termeer. In June 2011, in recognition of the commencement of his service on our board of directors, we granted Mr. Termeer an option to purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock. This option vests with respect to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of the grant date and with respect to the remaining shares in approximately equal quarterly installments through the fourth anniversary of the grant date. The exercise price of this option is $0.08 per share, the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by our board of directors.
Effective upon the closing of this offering, our directors will be compensated for service on our board of directors as follows:
Subject to the director's continued service a director, the initial and annual stock option grants will vest in approximately equal monthly installments through the first anniversary of the grant date.
In addition, we will continue to reimburse our non-employee directors for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending board of director and committee meetings.
125
Transactions with related persons
Since our incorporation in August 2010, we have engaged in the following transactions with our directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of our voting securities, and affiliates or immediately family members of our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 5% of our voting securities, and our co-founders. We believe that all of these transactions were on terms as favorable as could have been obtained from unrelated third parties.
SERIES C PREFERRED STOCK FINANCING
In November 2011, we issued and sold an aggregate of 9,067,825 shares of our series C preferred stock at a price per share of $2.25 for an aggregate purchase price of $20.4 million. The following table sets forth the number of shares of our series C preferred stock that we issued to our 5% stockholders and their affiliates.
Name(1)
|
Shares of series C preferred stock |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Advanced Technology Ventures VIII, L.P. |
100,000 | |||
Entities affiliated with Bessemer Venture Partners(2) |
133,333 | (3) | ||
CHP III, L.P.(4) |
444,444 | |||
Eastern Capital Limited |
4,000,000 | |||
Longwood Founders Fund, LP(5) |
444,444 | |||
MPM Bioventures V, LP(6) |
266,666 |
126
Transactions with related persons
SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK FINANCING
In July 2011, we issued and sold an aggregate of 16,025,000 shares of our series B preferred stock at a price per share of $2.00 for an aggregate purchase price of $32,050,000. The following table sets forth the number of shares of our series B preferred stock that we issued to our 5% stockholders and their affiliates.
Name(1)
|
Shares of series B preferred stock |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Advanced Technology Ventures VIII, L.P. |
2,500,000 | |||
Entities affiliated with Bessemer Venture Partners(2) |
2,500,000 | (3) | ||
CHP III, L.P.(4) |
2,500,000 | |||
Longwood Founders Fund, LP(5) |
3,500,000 | |||
MPM Bioventures V, LP(6) |
2,500,000 |
SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK FINANCING
In November 2010 and April 2011, we issued and sold an aggregate of 16,000,000 shares of our series A preferred stock at a price per share of $1.00 for an aggregate purchase price of $16,000,000. The following table sets forth the number of shares of our series A preferred stock that we issued to our 5% stockholders and their affiliates.
Name(1)
|
Shares of series A preferred stock |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Entities affiliated with Bessemer Venture Partners(2) |
4,000,000 | (3) | ||
CHP III, L.P.(4) |
4,000,000 | |||
Longwood Founders Fund, LP(5) |
4,000,000 | |||
MPM Bioventures V, LP(6) |
4,000,000 |
127
Transactions with related persons
RESTRICTED STOCK GRANTS TO CO-FOUNDERS
In August 2010, in connection with our formation, we issued and sold an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $0.0001 for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000 to our co-founders. These shares are subject to repurchase by us pursuant to restricted stock agreements with each of our co-founders. These shares vest with respect to 25% of the shares on the grant date and with respect to the remaining shares in approximately equal quarterly installments through the fourth anniversary of the grant date. The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock that we issued to our co-founders.
Name
|
Shares of common stock |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Richard Aldrich(1) |
1,900,000 | (2) | ||
Michelle Dipp |
600,000 | |||
Piyush Gupta, Ph.D.(1) |
1,550,000 | (3) | ||
Eric Lander, Ph.D. |
1,250,000 | |||
Satish Jindal |
1,250,000 | (4) | ||
Robert Weinberg, Ph.D. |
1,250,000 | |||
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D.(1) |
2,200,000 | (5) |
SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY BOARD AGREEMENTS WITH CO-FOUNDERS
Three of our co-founders, Robert Weinberg, Ph.D., Eric Lander, Ph.D., and Piyush Gupta, Ph.D., are also members of our scientific advisory board and receive compensation for their participation pursuant to our scientific advisory board agreements with them. The following table sets forth the amount of cash compensation paid to each of these co-founders for their membership on our scientific advisory board since our formation.
Name
|
Amount
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Piyush Gupta, Ph.D.(1) |
$ | 100,000 | ||
Eric Lander, Ph.D. |
75,000 | |||
Robert Weinberg, Ph.D. |
75,000 |
AGREEMENTS WITH ENTITIES AFFILIATED WITH CO-FOUNDERS
From our formation in August 2010 through May 2011, we rented office space from Longwood Founders Fund, LP, an entity affiliated with three of our co-founders, Richard Aldrich, Michelle Dipp and Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. We paid Longwood Founders Fund, LP an aggregate of $46,000 for our office space.
128
Transactions with related persons
In October 2010, we entered into agreements regarding the licensing of intellectual property with the Whitehead Institute, an entity affiliated with two of our co-founders, Robert Weinberg, Ph.D. and Piyush Gupta, Ph.D., and the Broad Institute, an entity affiliated with one of our co-founders, Eric Lander, Ph.D. See "BusinessLicenses" for additional information regarding these agreements. Pursuant to one of the agreements, we issued 583,333 shares of our common stock to the Whitehead Institute and entities and individuals affiliated with the Whitehead Institute, including three of our co-founders. The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock that we issued to our co-founders in connection with our agreement with the Whitehead Institute.
Name
|
Shares of common stock |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Piyush Gupta, Ph.D.(1) |
27,609 | |||
Eric Lander, Ph.D. |
22,088 | |||
Robert Weinberg, Ph.D. |
22,088 |
REGISTRATION RIGHTS
We are a party to an investor rights agreement with certain holders of our common stock and holders of our series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock, including some of our directors, executive officers and 5% stockholders and their affiliates and entities affiliated with our directors. The investor rights agreement provides these holders the right, following the completion of this offering, to demand that we file a registration statement or request that their shares be covered by a registration statement that we are otherwise filing. See "Description of capital stockRegistration rights" for additional information regarding these registration rights.
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS
Our certificate of incorporation in effect upon the closing of this offering provides that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors. See "Executive compensationLimitation of liability and indemnification" for additional information regarding these agreements.
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Our board of directors has adopted written policies and procedures for the review of any transaction, arrangement or relationship in which Verastem is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and one of our executive officers, directors, director nominees or 5% stockholders, or their immediate family members, each of whom we refer to as a "related person," has a direct or indirect material interest.
If a related person proposes to enter into such a transaction, arrangement or relationship, which we refer to as a "related person transaction," the related person must report the proposed related person transaction to our principal financial officer. The policy calls for the proposed related person transaction to be reviewed and, if deemed appropriate, approved by our audit committee. Whenever practicable, the reporting, review and approval will occur prior to entry into the transaction. If advance review and approval is not practicable, the committee will review, and, in its discretion, may ratify the related person transaction. The policy also permits the chairman of the committee to review and, if deemed appropriate, approve proposed related person transactions that arise between
129
Transactions with related persons
committee meetings, subject to ratification by the committee at its next meeting. Any related person transactions that are ongoing in nature will be reviewed annually.
A related person transaction reviewed under the policy will be considered approved or ratified if it is authorized by the committee after full disclosure of the related person's interest in the transaction. As appropriate for the circumstances, the committee will review and consider:
The committee may approve or ratify the transaction only if the committee determines that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is in Verastem's best interests. The committee may impose any conditions on the related person transaction that it deems appropriate.
In addition to the transactions that are excluded by the instructions to the SEC's related person transaction disclosure rule, our board of directors has determined that the following transactions do not create a material direct or indirect interest on behalf of related persons and, therefore, are not related person transactions for purposes of this policy:
The policy provides that transactions involving compensation of executive officers shall be reviewed and approved by the compensation committee in the manner specified in its charter.
We did not have a written policy regarding the review and approval of related person transactions prior to this offering. Nevertheless, with respect to such transactions, it was our policy for our board of directors to consider the nature of and business reason for such transactions, how the terms of such transactions compared to those which might be obtained from unaffiliated third parties and whether such transactions were otherwise fair to and in the best interests of, or not contrary to, our best interests. In addition, all related person transactions required prior approval, or later ratification, by our board of directors.
130
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of November 30, 2011 by:
The column entitled "Percentage of shares beneficially ownedBefore offering" is based on a total of 51,569,477 shares of our common stock outstanding as of November 30, 2011 assuming the conversion of all outstanding shares of our preferred stock into an aggregate of 41,092,825 shares of our common stock upon the closing of this offering.
The column entitled "Percentage of shares beneficially ownedAfter offering" is based on shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering, including the shares of our common stock that we are selling in this offering, but not including any additional shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options or the warrant issuable pursuant to our license agreement with Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or the shares underlying the restricted stock units granted effective upon the closing of this offering.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to our common stock. Shares of our common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of November 30, 2011 are considered outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of that person but not for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise noted, we believe the persons and entities in this table have sole voting and investing power with respect to all of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where applicable. Except as otherwise set forth below, the address of the beneficial owner is c/o Verastem, Inc., 215 First Street, Suite 440, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142.
131
Principal stockholders
|
|
Percentage of shares beneficially owned |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name and address of beneficial owner
|
Number of shares beneficially owned |
Before offering |
After offering |
|||||||||
5% stockholders: |
||||||||||||
Advanced Technology Ventures VIII, L.P.(1) |
2,600,000 | 5.0 | % | % | ||||||||
1000 Winter Street |
||||||||||||
Waltham, MA 02451 |
||||||||||||
Entities affiliated with Bessemer Venture Partners(2) |
6,633,333 | 12.9 | % | % | ||||||||
196 Broadway, 2nd Floor |
||||||||||||
Cambridge, MA 02139 |
||||||||||||
CHP III, L.P.(3) |
6,944,444 | 13.5 | % | % | ||||||||
230 Nassau Street |
||||||||||||
Princeton, NJ 08542 |
||||||||||||
Eastern Capital Limited(4) |
4,000,000 | 7.8 | % | % | ||||||||
c/o Foreshore Corporate Services Ltd. |
||||||||||||
4th Floor, Queensgate House |
||||||||||||
113 South Church Street |
||||||||||||
George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-1104 |
||||||||||||
Cayman Islands |
||||||||||||
Longwood Founders Fund, LP(5) |
7,944,444 | 15.4 | % | % | ||||||||
800 Boylston Street, Suite 1555 |
||||||||||||
Boston, MA 02199 |
||||||||||||
MPM Bioventures V, LP(6) |
6,766,666 | 13.1 | % | % | ||||||||
c/o MPM Asset Management |
||||||||||||
200 Clarendon Street, 54th Floor |
||||||||||||
Boston, MA 02116 |
||||||||||||
Directors and Executive Officers |
||||||||||||
Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D.(7) |
10,144,444 | 19.7 | % | % | ||||||||
Robert Forrester |
448,000 | * | % | |||||||||
Jonathan Pachter, Ph.D. |
| | % | |||||||||
Satish Jindal, Ph.D. |
667,319 | 1.3 | % | % | ||||||||
Paul Brannelly |
| | % | |||||||||
Peter Elliot, Ph.D. |
28,000 | * | % | |||||||||
Richard Aldrich(8) |
9,844,444 | 19.1 | % | % | ||||||||
John K. Clarke(9) |
6,944,444 | 13.5 | % | % | ||||||||
Ansbert Gadicke, M.D.(10) |
6,766,666 | 13.1 | % | % | ||||||||
Stephen Kraus(11) |
| | % | |||||||||
Henri Termeer |
| | % | |||||||||
All executive officers and directors as a group (8 persons)(12) |
26,203,554 | 50.8 | % | % |
132
Principal stockholders
are Steve Baloff, Michael Carusi, Wes Raffel, Jean George, Bob Hower and William Wiberg. Each of the ATV Managing Directors disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by ATV VIII.
133
Principal stockholders
of the Richard H. Aldrich Irrevocable Trust of 2011 is Nicole Aldrich and she exercises sole voting and investment power over the shares of record held by the trust. The ultimate general partner of Longwood Founders Fund, LP is Longwood Founder GP, LLC. Voting and investment power with respect to the shares held by Longwood Founders Fund, LP. are vested in Mr. Aldrich, Michelle Dipp and Christoph Westphal, the managers of Longwood Founder GP, LLC.
134
GENERAL
The following description of our capital stock and provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws are summaries and are qualified by reference to the certificate of incorporation and the bylaws that will be in effect upon the closing of this offering. We have filed copies of these documents with the SEC as exhibits to our registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. The description of the capital stock reflects changes to our capital structure that will occur upon the closing of this offering.
Upon the closing of this offering, our authorized capital stock will consist of shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and shares of our preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, all of which preferred stock will be undesignated.
As of November 30, 2011, we had issued and outstanding:
As of November 30, 2011, we also had outstanding options to purchase 1,418,000 shares of our common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.21 per share.
COMMON STOCK
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and do not have cumulative voting rights. An election of directors by our stockholders shall be determined by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote on the election. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive proportionately any dividends as may be declared by our board of directors, subject to any preferential dividend rights of outstanding preferred stock.
In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, the holders of common stock are entitled to receive proportionately all assets available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any outstanding preferred stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to and may be adversely affected by the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock that we may designate and issue in the future.
PREFERRED STOCK
Under the terms of our certificate of incorporation, our board of directors is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series without stockholder approval. Our board of directors has the discretion to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation preferences, of each series of preferred stock.
135
Description of capital stock
The purpose of authorizing our board of directors to issue preferred stock and determine its rights and preferences is to eliminate delays associated with a stockholder vote on specific issuances. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions, future financings and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or could discourage a third party from seeking to acquire, a majority of our outstanding voting stock. Upon the closing of this offering, there will be no shares of preferred stock outstanding, and we have no present plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.
STOCK OPTIONS AND OTHER EQUITY AWARDS
As of November 30, 2011, options to purchase 1,418,000 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $0.21 per share were outstanding under our 2010 equity incentive plan. Effective upon the closing of this offering, restricted stock units with respect to an aggregate of 2,100,000 shares of our common stock will be granted under our 2012 incentive plan.
WARRANTS
We have agreed to issue a warrant for the purchase of 500,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price equal to the average closing price of our common stock during the five days preceding the date of issuance to Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. upon achievement of a milestone described in our license agreement.
DELAWARE ANTI-TAKEOVER LAW AND CERTAIN CHARTER AND BYLAWS PROVISIONS
Delaware law
We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Subject to certain exceptions, Section 203 prevents a publicly-traded Delaware corporation from engaging in a "business combination" with any "interested stockholder" for three years following the date that the person became an interested stockholder, unless either the interested stockholder attained such status with the approval of our board of directors, the business combination is approved by our board of directors and stockholders in a prescribed manner or the interested stockholder acquired at least 85% of our outstanding voting stock in the transaction in which it became an interested stockholder. A "business combination" includes, among other things, a merger or consolidation involving us and the "interested stockholder" and the sale of more than 10% of our assets. In general, an "interested stockholder" is any entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by such entity or person. The restrictions contained in Section 203 are not applicable to any of our existing stockholders that will own 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock upon the closing of this offering.
Staggered board
Our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws divide our board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year terms. In addition, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws provide that directors may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of 75% of our shares of capital stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. Under our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, any vacancy on our board of directors, including a vacancy resulting from an enlargement of our board of directors, may be filled only by vote of a majority of our directors then in office. Furthermore, our certificate of incorporation provides that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by the resolution of our board of directors. The classification of our board of directors and the limitations on the ability of our stockholders to remove directors, change
136
Description of capital stock
the authorized number of directors and fill vacancies could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or discourage a third party from seeking to acquire, control of our company.
Stockholder action; special meeting of stockholders; advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and director nominations
Our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws provide that any action required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders at an annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders may only be taken if it is properly brought before such meeting and may not be taken by written action in lieu of a meeting. Our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws also provide that, except as otherwise required by law, special meetings of the stockholders can only be called by our chairman of the board, our president or chief executive officer or our board of directors. In addition, our bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders, including proposed nominations of candidates for election to our board of directors. Stockholders at an annual meeting may only consider proposals or nominations specified in the notice of meeting or brought before the meeting by or at the direction of our board of directors, or by a stockholder of record on the record date for the meeting who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has delivered timely written notice in proper form to our secretary of the stockholder's intention to bring such business before the meeting. These provisions could have the effect of delaying until the next stockholder meeting stockholder actions that are favored by the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities. These provisions also could discourage a third party from making a tender offer for our common stock, because even if it acquired a majority of our outstanding voting stock, it would be able to take action as a stockholder, such as electing new directors or approving a merger, only at a duly called stockholders meeting and not by written consent.
Super-majority voting
The Delaware General Corporation Law provides generally that the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on any matter is required to amend a corporation's certificate of incorporation or bylaws, unless a corporation's certificate of incorporation or bylaws, as the case may be, requires a greater percentage. Our bylaws may be amended or repealed by a majority vote of our board of directors or the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the votes that all our stockholders would be entitled to cast in any annual election of directors. In addition, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 75% of the votes that all our stockholders would be entitled to cast in any election of directors is required to amend or repeal or to adopt any provisions inconsistent with any of the provisions of our certificate of incorporation described above.
Registration rights
We have entered into a second amended and restated investor rights agreement, dated November 1, 2011, which we refer to as the investor rights agreement, with certain holders of shares of our common stock, series A preferred stock, series B preferred stock and series C preferred stock. Upon the completion of this offering, holders of a total of 41,092,825 shares of our common stock as of November 30, 2011, including shares issuable upon conversion of our preferred stock, will have the right to require us to register these shares under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Act, and to participate in future registrations of securities by us, under the circumstances described below. The holders of an additional 9,865,319 shares of our common stock as of November 30, 2011 will have the right to participate in future registrations of securities by us, under the circumstances described below. After registration pursuant to these rights, these shares will become freely tradable without restriction under the the Securities Act. If not otherwise exercised, the rights described below will expire five years after the closing of this offering.
137
Description of capital stock
Demand registration rights
Beginning 180 days after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, subject to specified limitations set forth in the investor rights agreement, at any time, the holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares having rights under the investor rights agreement, which we refer to as registrable shares, may at any time demand in writing that we register all or a portion of the registrable shares under the Securities Act if the total amount of registrable shares registered have an aggregate offering price of at least $5.00 million (based on the then current market price or fair value). We are not obligated to file a registration statement pursuant to this provision on more than two occasions, and we are not obligated to file a registration statement pursuant to this provision within 180 days of the effective date of any other registration statement that we may file.
Form S-3 registration rights
In addition, at any time after we become eligible to file a registration statement on Form S-3, subject to specified limitations set forth in the investor rights agreement, the holders of at least 30% of the registrable shares may demand in writing that we register on Form S-3 all or a portion of the registrable shares so long as the total amount of registrable shares being registered have an aggregate offering price of at least $1.00 million (based on the then current market price). We are not obligated to file a Form S-3 pursuant to this provision on more than two occasions in any 12-month period.
Incidental registration rights
If, at any time after the closing of this offering, we propose to file a registration statement under the Securities Act, other than pursuant to the demand registration rights described above, the holders of registrable shares will be entitled to notice of the registration and, subject to specified exceptions, have the right to require us to register all or a portion of the registrable shares then held by them.
In the event that any registration in which the holders of registrable shares participate pursuant to our investor rights agreement is an underwritten public offering, we agree to enter into an underwriting agreement containing customary representation and warranties and covenants, including without limitation customary provisions with respect to indemnification of the underwriters of such offering.
In the event that any registration in which the holders of registrable shares participate pursuant to our investor rights agreement is an underwritten public offering, we will use our best efforts to include the requested registrable shares to be included, but may be limited by market conditions.
Expenses
Pursuant to the investor rights agreement, we are required to pay all registration expenses, including registration and filing fees, exchange listing fees, printing expenses and accounting fees and the fees and expenses of one counsel to represent the selling stockholders, other than any underwriting discounts and commissions, related to any demand or incidental registration. The registration rights agreement contains customary cross-indemnification provisions, pursuant to which we are obligated to indemnify the selling stockholders in the event of material misstatements or omissions in the registration statement attributable to us, and they are obligated to indemnify us for material misstatements or omissions in the registration statement attributable to them.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock will be .
NASDAQ GLOBAL MARKET
We have applied to list our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "VSTM."
138
Shares eligible for future sale
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock, and a liquid trading market for our common stock may not develop or be sustained after this offering. Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, including shares issued upon exercise of outstanding options or restricted stock units or warrants, or the anticipation of these sales, could adversely affect market prices prevailing from time to time and could impair our ability to raise capital through sales of equity securities.
Upon the closing of this offering, we will have outstanding an aggregate of shares of our common stock, assuming the underwriters do not exercise their over-allotment option and no options outstanding as of November 30, 2011 or the warrant issuable pursuant to our license agreement with Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. are exercised and no shares underlying the restricted stock units granted effective upon the closing of this offering are issued.
Of the shares to be outstanding immediately after the closing of this offering, we expect that the shares to be sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act unless purchased by our "affiliates," as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The remaining shares of our common stock outstanding after this offering will be "restricted securities" under Rule 144, and we expect that substantially all of these restricted securities will be subject to either the 180-day or 360-day lock-up period under the lock-up agreements as described below. These restricted securities may be sold in the public market only if registered or pursuant to an exemption from registration, such as Rule 144 or Rule 701 under the Securities Act.
RULE 144
In general, under Rule 144, beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, any person who is not our affiliate and has held their shares for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner other than one of our affiliates, may sell shares without restriction, subject to the availability of current public information about us. In addition, under Rule 144, any person who is not our affiliate and has not been our affiliate at any time during the preceding three months and has held their shares for at least one year, including the holding period of any prior owner other than one of our affiliates, would be entitled to sell an unlimited number of shares immediately upon the closing of this offering without regard to whether current public information about us is available.
Beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a person who is our affiliate or who was our affiliate at any time during the preceding three months and who has beneficially owned restricted securities for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner other than one of our affiliates, is entitled to sell a number of shares within any three-month period that does not exceed the greater of:
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates are also subject to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us.
Upon expiration of the 180-day lock-up period described below, approximately shares of our common stock will be eligible for sale under Rule 144, including shares eligible for resale
139
Shares eligible for future sale
immediately upon the closing of this offering as described above. We cannot estimate the number of shares of our common stock that our existing stockholders will elect to sell under Rule 144.
RULE 701
In general, under Rule 701 of the Securities Act, any of our employees, consultants or advisors, other than our affiliates, who purchased shares from us in connection with a qualified compensatory stock plan or other written agreement is eligible to resell these shares 90 days after the date of this prospectus in reliance on Rule 144, but without compliance with the holding period requirements of Rule 144 and without regard to the volume of such sales or the availability of public information about us. Subject to the 180-day and 360-day lock-up periods described below, approximately shares of our common stock will be eligible for sale in accordance with Rule 701.
LOCK-UP AGREEMENTS
We, each of our directors and executive officers and holders of substantially all of our outstanding shares of common stock have agreed that, without the prior written consent of UBS Securities LLC and Leerink Swann LLC on behalf of the underwriters, we and they will not, subject to limited exceptions, during the period ending 180 days after the date of this prospectus, in the case of us and holders of our common stock issued upon conversion of our preferred stock, or 360 days after the date of this prospectus, in the case of our directors, executive officers and other current holders of our common stock, subject to extension in specified circumstances:
The lock-up restrictions, specified exceptions and the circumstances under which either the 180-day or 360-day lock-up period may be extended are described in more detail under "Underwriting."
REGISTRATION RIGHTS
Subject to the lock-up agreements described above, upon the closing of this offering, the holders of an aggregate of 41,092,825 shares of our common stock will have the right to require us to register these shares under the Securities Act under specified circumstances and the holders of an additional 9,865,319 shares of our common stock will have the right to participate in future registrations of securities by us. After registration pursuant to these rights, these shares will become freely tradable
140
Shares eligible for future sale
without restriction under the Securities Act. See "Description of capital stockRegistration rights" for additional information regarding these registration rights.
STOCK OPTIONS AND OTHER EQUITY AWARDS
As of November 30, 2011, we had outstanding options to purchase 1,418,000 shares of our common stock, of which options to purchase 160,000 shares were vested. Effective upon the closing of this offering, we will grant restricted stock units for an aggregate of 2,100,000 shares of our common stock. Following this offering, we intend to file one or more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register all of the shares of our common stock subject to outstanding options and options and other awards issued or issuable pursuant to our 2012 incentive plan and shares of our common stock subject to outstanding options issued pursuant to our 2010 equity incentive plan. See "Executive compensationStock option and other employee benefit plans" for additional information regarding these plans. Accordingly, shares of our common stock registered under the registration statements will be available for sale in the open market, subject to Rule 144 volume limitations applicable to affiliates, and subject to any vesting restrictions and lock-up agreements applicable to these shares.
141
We are offering the shares of our common stock described in this prospectus through the underwriters named below. UBS Securities LLC and Leerink Swann LLC are acting as joint book-running managers of this offering and the representatives of the underwriters. We have entered into an underwriting agreement with the representatives on behalf of the underwriters named below. Subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, each of the underwriters has severally agreed to purchase the number of shares of common stock listed next to its name in the following table:
Underwriters
|
Number of shares
|
|
---|---|---|
UBS Securities LLC |
||
Leerink Swann LLC |
||
Lazard Capital Markets LLC |
||
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc |
||
Rodman & Renshaw, LLC |
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters must buy all of the shares if they buy any of them. However, the underwriters are not required to take or pay for the shares covered by the underwriters' over-allotment option described below.
Our common stock is offered subject to a number of conditions, including:
In connection with this offering, certain of the underwriters or securities dealers may distribute prospectuses electronically.
OVER-ALLOTMENT OPTION
We have granted the underwriters an option to buy up to an aggregate of additional shares of our common stock. The underwriters may exercise this option solely for the purpose of covering over-allotments, if any, made in connection with this offering. The underwriters have 30 days from the date of this prospectus to exercise this option. If the underwriters exercise this option, they will each purchase additional shares approximately in proportion to the amounts specified in the table above.
COMMISSIONS AND DISCOUNTS
Shares sold by the underwriters to the public will initially be offered at the initial public offering price set forth on the cover of this prospectus. Any shares sold by the underwriters to securities dealers may be sold at a discount of up to $ per share from the public offering price. Sales of shares made outside the United States may be made by affiliates of the underwriters. If all the shares are not sold at the initial public offering price, the representatives may change the offering price and the other selling terms. Upon execution of the underwriting agreement, the underwriters will be obligated to purchase the shares at the prices and upon the terms stated therein.
142
Underwriting
The following table shows the per share and total underwriting discounts and commissions we will pay to the underwriters assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters' option to purchase additional shares of our common stock.
|
No exercise
|
Full exercise
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Per share |
$ | $ | |||||
Total |
We estimate that the total expenses of this offering payable by us, not including the underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately $ .
NO SALES OF SIMILAR SECURITIES
We, each of our directors and executive officers and holders of substantially all of our common stock have entered into lock-up agreements with the underwriters. Under these agreements, subject to certain exceptions, we and each of these persons may not offer, sell, contract or agree to sell, hypothecate, pledge, grant any option to purchase or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock, or publicly disclose the intention to do the same. These restrictions will be in effect for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus, in the case of holders of our common stock issued upon conversion of our preferred stock, or 360 days after the date of this prospectus, in the case of our directors, executive officers and other current holders of our common stock, subject in each case to extension in the circumstances described in the paragraph below. At any time and without public notice, UBS Securities LLC and Leerink Swann LLC, may, in their sole discretion, release some or all of the securities held by our executive officers, directors and the holders of all of our common stock from these lock-up agreements.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (1) during the last 15 calendar days plus three business days of the 180-day or 360-day restricted period, we issue an earnings release or material news or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the 180-day or 360-day restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the 180-day or 360-day period, the restrictions described above shall continue to apply until the date that is 15 calendar days plus three business days after the date of the issuance of the earnings release or the occurrence of the material news or material event.
INDEMNIFICATION
We agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including certain liabilities under the Securities Act. If we are unable to provide this indemnification, we have agreed to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.
NASDAQ GLOBAL MARKET LISTING
We have applied to list our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "VSTM."
PRICE STABILIZATION, SHORT POSITIONS
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of our common stock, including:
143
Underwriting
Stabilizing transactions consist of bids or purchases made for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our common stock while this offering is in progress. These transactions may also include making short sales of our common stock, which involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of shares of common stock than they are required to purchase in this offering, and purchasing shares of common stock on the open market to cover positions created by short sales. Short sales may be "covered short sales," which are short positions in an amount not greater than the underwriters' over-allotment option referred to above, or may be "naked short sales," which are short positions in excess of that amount.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position by either exercising their over-allotment option, in whole or in part, or by purchasing shares in the open market. In making this determination, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through the over-allotment option.
Naked short sales are short sales made in excess of the over-allotment option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of the common stock in the open market that could adversely affect investors who purchased in this offering.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. This occurs when a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of the underwriting discount received by it because the representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the account of that underwriter in stabilizing or short covering transactions.
As a result of these activities, the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If these activities are commenced, they may be discontinued by the underwriters at any time. The underwriters may carry out these transactions on The NASDAQ Global Market, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE
Prior to this offering, there was no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price will be determined by negotiation by us and the representative of the underwriters. The principal factors to be considered in determining the initial public offering price include:
144
Underwriting
AFFILIATIONS
Certain of the underwriters and their affiliates may in the future from time to time provide investment banking and other financing, trading, banking, research, transfer agent and trustee services to us or our subsidiaries, for which they may in the future receive customary fees and expenses.
Lazard Frères & Co. LLC referred this transaction to Lazard Capital Markets LLC and will receive a referral fee from Lazard Capital Markets LLC in connection therewith.
NOTICE TO INVESTORS
Notice to prospective investors in the European Economic Area
In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area (EEA) that has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a relevant member state), other than Germany, with effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that relevant member state (the relevant implementation date), an offer of securities described in this prospectus may not be made to the public in that relevant member state other than:
provided that no such offer of securities shall require us or any underwriter to publish a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
For purposes of this provision, the expression an "offer of securities to the public" in any relevant member state means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the securities to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe for the securities, as the expression may be varied in that member state by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that member state, and the expression "Prospectus Directive" means Directive 2003/71/EC (and amendments thereto, including the 2010 PD Amending Directive, to the extent implemented in the Relevant Member State), and includes any relevant implementing measure in the Relevant Member State, and includes any relevant implementing measure in each relevant member state. The expression 2010 PD Amending Directive means Directive 2010/73/EU.
We have not authorized and do not authorize the making of any offer of securities through any financial intermediary on its behalf, other than offers made by the underwriters with a view to the final placement of the securities as contemplated in this prospectus. Accordingly, no purchaser of the securities, other than the underwriters, is authorized to make any further offer of the securities on behalf of us or the underwriters.
The EEA selling restriction is in addition to any other selling restrictions set out in this prospectus.
145
Underwriting
Notice to prospective investors in Australia
This offering memorandum is not a formal disclosure document and has not been, nor will be, lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. It does not purport to contain all information that an investor or its professional advisers would expect to find in a prospectus or other disclosure document (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)) for the purposes of Part 6D.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia) or in a product disclosure statement for the purposes of Part 7.9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), in either case, in relation to the securities.
The securities are not being offered in Australia to "retail clients" as defined in sections 761G and 761GA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia). This offering is being made in Australia solely to "wholesale clients" for the purposes of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia) and, as such, no prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document in relation to the securities has been, or will be, prepared.
This offering memorandum does not constitute an offer in Australia other than to wholesale clients. By submitting an application for our securities, you represent and warrant to us that you are a wholesale client for the purposes of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Australia). If any recipient of this offering memorandum is not a wholesale client, no offer of, or invitation to apply for, our securities shall be deemed to be made to such recipient and no applications for our securities will be accepted from such recipient. Any offer to a recipient in Australia, and any agreement arising from acceptance of such offer, is personal and may only be accepted by the recipient. In addition, by applying for our securities you undertake to us that, for a period of 12 months from the date of issue of the securities, you will not transfer any interest in the securities to any person in Australia other than to a wholesale client.
Notice to prospective investors in Hong Kong
Our securities may not be offered or sold in Hong Kong, by means of this prospectus or any document other than (1) to "professional investors" within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder, or (2) in circumstances which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong), or (3) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a "prospectus" within the meaning of the Companies Ordinance (Cap.32, Laws of Hong Kong). No advertisement, invitation or document relating to our securities may be issued or may be in the possession of any person for the purpose of issue (in each case whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere) which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to the securities which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to "professional investors" within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571, Laws of Hong Kong) and any rules made thereunder.
Notice to prospective investors in Japan
Our securities have not been and will not be registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law) and our securities will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan, or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan (which term as used herein means any person resident in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under the laws of Japan), or to others for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan, or to a resident of Japan, except pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of, and
146
Underwriting
otherwise in compliance with, the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law and any other applicable laws, regulations and ministerial guidelines of Japan.
Notice to prospective investors in Singapore
This document has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore and in Singapore, the offer and sale of our securities is made pursuant to exemptions provided in sections 274 and 275 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (SFA). Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of our securities may not be circulated or distributed, nor may our securities be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (1) to an institutional investor as defined in Section 4A of the SFA pursuant to Section 274 of the SFA, (2) to a relevant person as defined in section 275(2) of the SFA pursuant to Section 275(1) of the SFA, or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A) of the SFA, and in accordance with the conditions specified in Section 275 of the SFA or (3) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA, in each case subject to compliance with the conditions (if any) set forth in the SFA. Moreover, this document is not a prospectus as defined in the SFA. Accordingly, statutory liability under the SFA in relation to the content of prospectuses would not apply. Prospective investors in Singapore should consider carefully whether an investment in our securities is suitable for them.
Where our securities are subscribed or purchased under Section 275 of the SFA by a relevant person which is:
shares of that corporation or the beneficiaries' rights and interest (howsoever described) in that trust shall not be transferable for six months after that corporation or that trust has acquired the shares under Section 275 of the SFA, except:
In addition, investors in Singapore should note that the securities acquired by them are subject to resale and transfer restrictions specified under Section 276 of the SFA, and they, therefore, should seek their own legal advice before effecting any resale or transfer of their securities.
147
Underwriting
Notice to prospective investors in Switzerland
The Prospectus does not constitute an issue prospectus pursuant to Article 652a or Article 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations (CO) and the shares will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange. Therefore, the Prospectus may not comply with the disclosure standards of the CO and/or the listing rules (including any prospectus schemes) of the SIX Swiss Exchange. Accordingly, the shares may not be offered to the public in or from Switzerland, but only to a selected and limited circle of investors, which do not subscribe to the shares with a view to distribution.
Notice to prospective investors in United Kingdom
This prospectus is only being distributed to and is only directed at: (1) persons who are outside the United Kingdom; (2) investment professionals falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Order); or (3) high net worth companies, and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated, falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons falling within (1)-(3) together being referred to as "relevant persons"). The shares are only available to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to subscribe, purchase or otherwise acquire such shares will be engaged in only with, relevant persons. Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this prospectus or any of its contents.
148
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby is being passed upon for us by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP. Ropes & Gray LLP is acting as counsel for the underwriters in connection with this offering.
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, as set forth in their report included in this prospectus. We have included our financial statements in this prospectus and elsewhere in this registration statement in reliance on Ernst & Young LLP's report, given on their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
Where you can find more information
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock we are offering to sell. This prospectus, which constitutes part of the registration statement, does not include all of the information contained in the registration statement and the exhibits, schedules and amendments to the registration statement. For further information with respect to us and our common stock, we refer you to the registration statement and to the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus about the contents of any contract, agreement or other document are not necessarily complete, and, in each instance, we refer you to the copy of the contract, agreement or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. Each of theses statements is qualified in all respects by this reference.
You may read and copy the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part at the SEC's public reference room, which is located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. You can request copies of the registration statement by writing to the Securities and Exchange Commission and paying a fee for the copying cost. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for more information about the operation of the SEC's public reference room. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website, which is located at http://www.sec.gov, that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. You may access the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part at the SEC's Internet website. Upon completion of this offering, we will be subject to the information reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and we will file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.
149
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 and unaudited information for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period
from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011
CONTENTS
F-1
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Verastem, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Verastem, Inc. (a development stage company) (the Company) as of December 31, 2010, and the related statements of operations, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Verastem, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 2, 2011, except for Note 12(b),
as to which the date is December 2, 2011
F-2
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2011 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||
|
Actual
|
Pro forma
|
|||||||||
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
|
(In thousands except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Assets |
|||||||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,584 | $ | 41,421 | $ | 61,824 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
12 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||
Total current assets |
3,596 | 41,427 | 61,830 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
8 |
719 |
719 |
||||||||
Other assets |
| 132 | 132 | ||||||||
Restricted cash |
| 86 | 86 | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,604 | $ | 42,364 | $ | 62,767 | |||||
Liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' (deficit) equity |
|||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 279 | $ | 1,246 | $ | 1,246 | |||||
Accrued expenses |
89 | 762 | 762 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities |
368 | 2,008 | 2,008 | ||||||||
Deferred rent |
| 81 | 81 | ||||||||
Liability for shares subject to repurchase |
| 36 | 36 | ||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|||||||||||
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 16,000 shares authorized, 4,000 and 16,000 (unaudited) shares issued and outstanding (actual) at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, respectively and no shares issued and outstanding pro forma (Liquidation preference of $4,000 and $16,000 (unaudited) as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, respectively) |
3,923 |
15,935 |
|
||||||||
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 16,025 shares authorized, issued and outstanding (actual) at September 30, 2011(unaudited) and no shares issued and outstanding pro forma (Liquidation preference of $32,050 as of September 30, 2011(unaudited)) |
| 31,943 | | ||||||||
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 9,068 shares authorized in November 2011, no shares issued and outstanding actual and pro forma (unaudited) |
| | | ||||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 30,000, 45,000 and 53,093 shares authorized at December 31, 2010, September 30, 2011 (actual, unaudited) and September 30, 2011 (pro forma, unaudited), respectively, 3,552 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010, 4,986 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 (actual, unaudited) and 46,079 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 (pro forma, unaudited) |
1 |
1 |
5 |
||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
96 | 822 | 69,099 | ||||||||
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
(784 | ) | (8,462 | ) | (8,462 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders' (deficit) equity |
(687 | ) | (7,639 | ) | 60,642 | ||||||
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' (deficit) equity |
$ | 3,604 | $ | 42,364 | $ | 62,767 | |||||
See accompanying notes.
F-3
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
|
(In thousands except per share data)
|
|||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 400 | $ | 5,483 | $ | 5,883 | ||||
General and administrative |
384 | 2,195 | 2,579 | |||||||
Total operating expenses |
784 | 7,678 | 8,462 | |||||||
Loss from operations |
(784 | ) | (7,678 | ) | (8,462 | ) | ||||
Net loss |
(784 | ) | (7,678 | ) | (8,462 | ) | ||||
Accretion of preferred stock |
(2 | ) | (18 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders |
$ | (786 | ) | $ | (7,696 | ) | $ | (8,482 | ) | |
Net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (1.79 | ) | $ | (2.20 | ) | |
Weighted-average number of common shares used in net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
2,976 | 4,291 | 3,841 | |||||||
Pro forma net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted (unaudited) |
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
||||
Weighted-average number of common shares used in pro forma net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted (unaudited) |
4,638 | 20,474 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-4
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
STATEMENTS OF REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT) EQUITY
|
Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock |
Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock |
Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock |
|
|
|
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Common stock |
Additional paid-in capital |
Totals stockholder's (deficit) equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(In thousands except for per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at August 4, 2010 (inception) |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||||||||
Sale of common stock to founders |
| | | | | | 2,500,000 | 1 | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock |
| | | | | | 468,747 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in exchange for license |
| | | | | | 583,333 | | 46 | | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of offering costs of $79 |
4,000,000 | 3,921 | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value |
| 2 | | | | | | | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
| | | | | | | | 52 | | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | | | (784 | ) | (784 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
4,000,000 | 3,923 | | | | | 3,552,080 | 1 | 96 | (784 | ) | (687 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock(unaudited) |
12,000,000 | 12,000 | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of offering costs of $113 (unaudited) |
| | 16,025,000 | 31,937 | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value (unaudited) |
| 12 | | 6 | | | | | (18 | ) | | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock (unaudited) |
| | | | | | 1,434,253 | | 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | 742 | | 742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | (7,678 | ) | (7,678 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
16,000,000 | 15,935 | 16,025,000 | 31,943 | | | 4,986,333 | 1 | 822 | (8,462 | ) | (7,639 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock (unaudited) |
| | | | 9,067,825 | 20,403 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock into common stock (unaudited) |
(16,000,000 | ) | (15,935 | ) | (16,025,000 | ) | (31,943 | ) | (9,067,825 | ) | (20,403 | ) | 41,092,825 | 4 | 68,277 | | 68,281 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pro forma, September 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | 46,079,168 | $ | 5 | $ | 69,099 | $ | (8,462 | ) | $ | 60,642 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-5
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||
|
(In thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (784 | ) | $ | (7,678 | ) | $ | (8,462 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 43 | 43 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
52 | 742 | 794 | |||||||||
Common stock issued in exchange for license |
46 | | 46 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(12 | ) | 6 | (6 | ) | |||||||
Other assets |
| (132 | ) | (132 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable |
279 | 967 | 1,246 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses and deferred rent |
89 | 754 | 843 | |||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(330 | ) | (5,298 | ) | (5,628 | ) | ||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(8 | ) | (754 | ) | (762 | ) | ||||||
Increase in restricted cash |
| (86 | ) | (86 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(8 | ) | (840 | ) | (848 | ) | ||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock |
3,921 | 43,937 | 47,858 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
1 | 38 | 39 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
3,922 | 43,975 | 47,897 | |||||||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
3,584 | 37,837 | 41,421 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
| 3,584 | | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 3,584 | $ | 41,421 | $ | 41,421 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activity |
||||||||||||
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock to redemption value |
$ | 2 | $ | 18 | $ | 20 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-6
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
1. Organization and basis of presentation
Verastem, Inc. (the "Company"), incorporated on August 4, 2010 as a Delaware corporation, is a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing proprietary small molecule drugs targeting cancer stem cells along with proprietary companion diagnostics. The Company's operations to date have been limited to organizing and staffing the Company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring and developing its technology, identifying potential product candidates and undertaking preclinical studies of its most advanced product candidates. The Company has not commenced its planned principal operations. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in the development stage as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 915, Development Stage Entities.
The Company is subject to a number of risks similar to other life science companies in the development stage, including, but not limited to, the need to obtain adequate additional funding, possible failure of preclinical testing or clinical trials, inability to obtain marketing approval of product candidates, competitors developing new technological innovations, market acceptance of the Company's products and protection of proprietary technology. If the Company does not successfully commercialize any of its product candidates, it will be unable to generate product revenue or achieve profitability. As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $784,000 and $8.5 million, respectively. The Company expects that its cash balance at December 31, 2010, the $12 million of proceeds from the issuance of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock in April 2011, the $32.1 million of proceeds from the issuance of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock in July 2011 and the $20.4 million of proceeds from the issuance of Series C redeemable convertible preferred stock in November 2011 will fund its operations through at least January 1, 2012.
2. Significant accounting policies
Unaudited interim financial data
The accompanying unaudited September 30, 2011 interim balance sheet and the statements of operations, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the related interim information contained within the notes to the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and the notes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair statement of the Company's financial position at September 30, 2011 and results of its operations and its cash flows for the nine months then ended. The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of future results.
Unaudited pro forma presentation
On October 25, 2011, the Company's board of directors authorized management of the Company to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission permitting the Company to sell shares of its common stock to the public. The unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of
F-7
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
September 30, 2011 reflects the issuance and sale of 9,067,825 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock for an aggregate purchase price of $20.4 million in November 2011 and the conversion of all Series A, B and C convertible preferred stock into 41,092,825 shares of common stock, occurring immediately prior to the closing of the Company's proposed initial public offering.
Unaudited pro forma net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding after giving effect to the pro forma effect of the conversion of all redeemable convertible preferred stock during the year ended December 31, 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011 into shares of the Company's common stock as if such conversion had occurred at the beginning of the period presented, or the date of original issuance, if later. The 9,067,825 shares of Series C convertible preferred stock issued in November 2011 are not reflected in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding because this issuance occurred after September 30, 2011.
Use of estimates
The preparation of the Company's financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from such estimates.
The Company utilizes significant estimates and assumptions in determining the fair value of its common stock. The Company granted stock options at exercise prices not less than the fair market value of its common stock as determined by the board of directors, with input from management. The board of directors has determined the estimated fair value of the Company's common stock based on a number of objective and subjective factors, including external market conditions affecting the biotechnology industry sector and the prices at which the Company sold shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock, the superior rights and preferences of securities senior to the Company's common stock at the time and the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or sale of the Company.
The Company utilized various valuation methodologies in accordance with the framework of the 2004 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Technical Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, to estimate the fair value of its common stock. The methodologies included an asset-based approach and the current value method for the Company's initial common stock valuation as of November 30, 2010, the option pricing method utilizing the reverse backsolve method to estimate the Company's underlying equity value as of July 31, 2011 and a methodology that determined an estimated value under an IPO scenario and a sale scenario based upon an assessment of the probability of occurrence of each scenario as of September 30, 2011. Each valuation methodology includes estimates and assumptions that require the Company's judgment. These estimates include assumptions regarding future performance, including the successful completion of preclinical studies and clinical trials and the time to completing an IPO or sale. Significant changes to the key assumptions used in the valuations could result in different fair values of common stock at each valuation date.
F-8
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
Segment and geographic information
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company views its operations and manages its business in one operating segment, which is the business of developing drugs that target cancer stem cells, and the Company operates in only one geographic segment.
Comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive loss was equal to net loss for all periods presented.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents of $40.0 million as of September 30, 2011 consist of money market funds. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2010.
Fair value of financial instruments
The Company is required to disclose information on all assets and liabilities reported at fair value that enables an assessment of the inputs used in determining the reported fair values. The fair value hierarchy is now established that prioritizes valuation inputs based on the observable nature of those inputs. The fair value hierarchy applies only to the valuation inputs used in determining the reported fair value of the investments and is not a measure of the investment credit quality. The hierarchy defines three levels of valuation inputs:
Level 1 inputs | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities | |
Level 2 inputs |
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly |
|
Level 3 inputs |
Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company's own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability |
The following table presents information about the Company's financial assets that have been measured at fair value at September 30, 2011 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs utilized to determine such fair value (in thousands).
Description |
Total
|
Quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) |
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2) |
Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 40,000 | $ | 40,000 | $ | | $ | |
F-9
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
There were no financial instruments recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2010. The carrying amounts of accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities.
Concentrations of credit risk and off-balance sheet risk
Cash and cash equivalents are financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk. As of December 31, 2010, substantially all of the Company's cash was deposited in accounts at a single financial institution. As of September 30, 2011, the Company's cash and cash equivalents were deposited at two financial institutions. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with high quality, accredited financial institutions and, accordingly, such funds are subject to minimal credit risk. The Company has no significant off-balance sheet concentrations of credit risk, such as foreign currency exchange contracts, option contracts or other hedging arrangements.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment consists of laboratory equipment, office furniture, and computer equipment. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are recorded to expense as incurred, whereas major betterments are capitalized as additions to property and equipment. Depreciation is calculated over the following estimated useful lives of the assets:
Laboratory equipment |
5 years | |||
Furniture |
5 years | |||
Computer equipment |
3 years |
Upon retirement or sale, the cost of the disposed asset and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized.
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets may not be fully recoverable and that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate. Each impairment test is based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flow to the recorded value of the asset. If impairment is indicated, the asset will be written down to its estimated fair value. To date, no such impairment losses have been recorded.
Organizational costs
All organizational costs have been expensed as incurred.
Research and development costs
The Company expenses research and development costs to operations as incurred. Research and development expenses consist of costs associated with research activities, including drug discovery efforts and the development of therapeutic product candidates and companion diagnostics. The Company accounts for nonrefundable advance payments for goods and services that will be used in future research and development activities as expenses when the service has been performed or when
F-10
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
the goods have been received rather than when the payment is made. Research and development expenses consist of:
Stock-based compensation
The Company expenses the fair value of employee stock options over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. Compensation expense is measured using the fair value of the award at the grant date, net of estimated forfeitures, and is adjusted annually to reflect actual forfeitures. The fair value of each stock-based award is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
Stock-based awards issued to nonemployees, including directors for non-board related services, are accounted for based on the fair value of such services received or of the equity instruments issued, whoever is more reliably measured. These stock-based option awards are revalued at each vesting date using the fair value method.
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
The carrying value of the Company's Series A and Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock is adjusted by periodic accretions such that the carrying value will equal the redemption amount at the redemption date. The carrying value is also adjusted to reflect dividends when and if declared by the board of directors. No dividends have been declared by the board of directors since inception.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Tax benefits are recognized when it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained during an audit. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if current evidence indicates that it is considered more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized.
F-11
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
Net loss per share
Basic and diluted net loss per common share is calculated by dividing net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. The Company's potentially dilutive shares, which include redeemable convertible preferred stock, outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock are considered to be common stock equivalents and are only included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share when their effect is dilutive. The following table reconciles net loss to net loss applicable to common shareholders (in thousands, except per share data):
|
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) through December 31, 2010 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Net loss |
$ | (784 | ) | $ | (7,678 | ) | $ | (8,462 | ) | |
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock |
(2 | ) | (18 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders |
$ | (786 | ) | $ | (7,696 | ) | $ | (8,482 | ) | |
Weighted-average number of common shares used in net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
2,976 | 4,291 | 3,841 | |||||||
Net loss per share applicable to common stockholdersbasic and diluted |
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (1.79 | ) | $ | (2.20 | ) |
The amounts in the table below were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share, prior to the use of the treasury stock method, due to their anti-dilutive effect (in thousands):
|
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Preferred stock |
4,000 | 32,025 | 32,025 | |||||||
Outstanding stock options |
620 | 1,418 | 1,418 | |||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
7,031 | 5,490 | 5,490 |
F-12
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
3. Property and equipment
Property and equipment and related accumulated depreciation are as follows (in thousands):
|
December 31, 2010 |
September 30, 2011 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||
Computer equipment |
$ | | $ | 27 | |||
Laboratory equipment |
8 | 691 | |||||
Furniture |
| 44 | |||||
|
8 | 762 | |||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
| (43 | ) | ||||
|
$ | 8 | $ | 719 | |||
The Company did not record any depreciation expense in the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. Depreciation expense was $43,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011.
4. Redeemable convertible preferred stock
In November 2010, the Company sold 4 million shares of Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock (Series A Preferred Stock) at a price of $1.00 per share for gross proceeds of $4 million. In accordance with the terms of the Series A Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company sold an additional 12 million shares at $1.00 per share in a second subsequent closing. The milestones necessary to achieve the subsequent closing were met in April 2011 and the Company sold 12 million shares of Series A Preferred Stock for gross proceeds of $12 million. The Company incurred approximately $79,000 of issuance costs as part of the first closing of the Series A Preferred Stock. No additional issuance costs were incurred as part of the second closing. The issuance costs are being accreted through the earliest redemption date.
In July 2011, the Company sold approximately 16 million shares of series B redeemable convertible preferred stock (Series B Preferred Stock) at a price of $2.00 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $32 million. The Company incurred approximately $113,000 of issuance costs as part of the closing of the Series B Preferred Stock. The issuance costs are being accreted through the earliest redemption date.
The Company assessed the Series A Preferred Stock and B Preferred Stock (collectively, the Preferred Stock) for any beneficial conversion features or embedded derivatives that would require bifurcation from the Preferred Stock and receive separate accounting treatment. On the date of each issuance, the value of the common stock into which the Preferred Stock is convertible had a fair value less than the effective conversion price of the Preferred Stock and, as such, there was no intrinsic value on the respective commitment dates. No embedded derivatives were identified that would require bifurcation.
F-13
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
The rights, preferences, and privileges of Preferred Stock are as follows:
Conversion
Shares of Preferred Stock are convertible into common stock based on a defined conversion ratio, which is originally set at one-for-one, adjustable for certain dilutive events. Conversion is at the option of the holders of Preferred Stock (Preferred Stockholders) at anytime without any additional considerations, although conversion is automatic upon the earlier of the sale of shares of common stock to the public at a price of at least $3.00 per share, for gross proceeds of at least $35 million, and where the shares are traded on either the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAQ or upon the written consent of holders of at least 60% of the outstanding Preferred Stock.
Dividends
Prior to the payment of any dividend, except a common stock dividend, to the common stockholders, the Preferred Stockholders are entitled to receive an amount at least equal to the amount that would have been received by the Preferred Stockholders had all shares of Preferred Stock been converted to common stock immediately prior to issuance of the dividend.
Liquidation preference
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, including a deemed liquidation event, such as certain mergers or a disposition of substantially all the assets of the Company, unless holders of at least 60% of the outstanding Preferred Stock elect otherwise, the Preferred Stockholders are entitled to receive, in preference to common stockholders, an amount equal to the Original Issue Price ($1.00 per share for Series A Preferred Stock and $2.00 per share for Series B Preferred Stock, adjustable for certain dilutive events) plus all declared but unpaid dividends. If the Company has insufficient assets to pay the Preferred Stockholders the full amount to which they are entitled, the Preferred Stockholders share ratably in any distribution in proportion to the respective amounts which would otherwise be payable.
After payment of these preferential amounts, the remaining assets of the Company are distributable ratably to the holders of common stock and Preferred Stock on an as-converted to common basis. However, the Preferred Stockholders are limited to the receipt of an aggregate amount (including through payment of the preferential amounts described above) equal to the greater of:
Voting rights
Holders of the Preferred Stock are entitled to vote as a single class with the holders of common stock, and have one vote for each equivalent common share into which the Preferred Stock is convertible. A 60% vote of the Preferred Stockholders is required in order to effect a liquidation, reclassification or recapitalization of the Company's capital stock or a deemed liquidation event, such as certain mergers or a disposition of substantially all the assets of the Company, amend the certificate of incorporation
F-14
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
or bylaws, create or issue shares of another class of stock that is pari passu or senior to the Preferred Stock, repurchase or redeem or pay any dividend on any capital stock, subject to limited exceptions, issue any debt security such that the Company's aggregate indebtedness would exceed $1 million, acquire capital stock of another entity, increase or decrease the authorized number of directors or increase the number of shares of common stock reserved under the Company's equity incentive plan. The holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to elect four directors, the Preferred Stockholders and common stockholders, voting as one class on an as-converted basis, are entitled to elect two directors, and the common stockholders are entitled to elect one director.
Redemption
The Preferred Stock is redeemable at the applicable Original Issue Price plus any declared but unpaid dividends. The Series B Preferred Stock is redeemable beginning in 2016 at the demand of holders of at least two-thirds of the Series B Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock is redeemable upon the redemption of another series of Preferred Stock at the demand of holders of at least two-thirds of the Series A Preferred Stock. The redemption for the Preferred Stock is payable in three equal annual installments.
5. Common stock
The Company has reserved the following shares of common stock for the potential conversion of outstanding Preferred Stock and the exercise of stock options (in thousands):
|
December 31, 2010 |
September 30, 2011 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||
Series A Preferred Stock |
16,000 | 16,000 | |||||
Series B Preferred Stock |
| 16,025 | |||||
Stock options |
1,418 | 1,971 | |||||
|
17,418 | 33,996 | |||||
Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote, subject to certain voting rights of the Preferred Stock as discussed in Note 4. The holders of the common stock are also entitled to receive dividends whenever funds are legally available and when declared by the board of directors, subject to the prior rights of the Preferred Stockholders.
Common stock issued for license
The Company issued 583,333 shares of common stock in the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 in exchange for certain intellectual property rights. The fair value of the common stock was determined to be $0.08 per share and the fair value was determined to be more readily determinable than the fair value of the license. As a result, the fair value of the shares of approximately $46,000 was recorded as research and development expense.
F-15
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
6. Stock-based compensation
In November 2010, the Company adopted the Verastem, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan) under which it may grant incentive stock options (ISOs), nonstatutory stock options (NSOs), restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards and stock appreciation rights to purchase up to approximately 1.4 million shares of common stock to eligible employees, officers, directors and consultants. In March 2011, the Company increased the number of shares of common stock available under the Plan to approximately 2.0 million shares. As of September 30, 2011, 105,348 shares are available for future issuance under the Plan. Terms of stock option agreements, including vesting requirements, are determined by the board of directors, subject to the provisions of the Plan. Generally, options granted by the Company vest over four years, expire no later than ten years from the date of grant and have an exercise price equal to the estimated fair value of the common stock as determined by the board of directors on the date of grant.
Restricted common stock
In August 2010, the Company issued 10 million shares of its common stock to the founders at a purchase price of $0.0001 per share, determined to be the fair value of the common stock on the date of issuance. The shares were issued under restricted stock purchase agreements, which allow the Company, at its discretion, to repurchase unvested shares if the founders terminate their relationship with the Company. Upon execution of the restricted stock purchase agreements, 25% of the shares vested immediately and the remaining shares vest ratably on a quarterly basis over a four year term.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 896,000 shares of its common stock to new employees of the Company at a purchase price of $0.08 per share, determined to be the fair value of the common stock on the date of issuance. The shares were issued under the terms of the Plan, and allow the Company, at its discretion, to repurchase unvested shares if the employees terminate their relationship with the Company. The shares vest over a four year term, with 25% vesting after the first year and the remainder vesting ratably on a quarterly basis for the remaining three years. The purchase price received for the shares was not material to the financial statements. The shares are recorded in stockholders deficit as they vest.
The Company records stock-based compensation expense for the common stock subject to repurchase based on the grant date intrinsic value for employees and the vesting date intrinsic value for non-employees. All of the restricted shares were issued at fair value. The Company has recorded stock-based compensation expense of $51,000, $597,000 and $648,000 for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and for the period from August 4, 2011 (inception) to September 30, 2011, respectively, associated with restricted common stock. The $597,000 recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 includes $34,000 associated with modifications to certain restricted stock purchase agreements.
F-16
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
A summary of the Company's restricted stock activity and related information is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
Shares
|
Weighted- average purchase price per share |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding at August 4, 2010 |
| $ | | ||||
Granted |
10,000 | 0.0001 | |||||
Vested |
(2,969 | ) | 0.0001 | ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
7,031 | 0.0001 | |||||
Granted (unaudited) |
896 | 0.0800 | |||||
Vested (unaudited) |
(1,434 | ) | 0.0017 | ||||
Forfeited (unaudited) |
(1,003 | ) | 0.0335 | ||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
5,490 | 0.0066 | |||||
Stock options
A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
Shares
|
Weighted- average price per share |
Weighted- average remaining contractual term (years) |
Aggregate intrinsic value |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding at August 4, 2010 |
| $ | | |||||||||||
Granted |
620 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
620 | 0.08 | 9.9 | $ | 12 | |||||||||
Granted (unaudited) |
798 | 0.32 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
1,418 | 0.21 | 9.5 | 176 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
9.9 |
$ |
12 |
||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
3 | $ | 0.08 | 9.7 | $ | | ||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2010 |
620 | $ | 0.08 | 9.9 | $ | 12 | ||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
1,418 | $ | 0.21 | 9.7 | $ | 176 | ||||||||
F-17
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
The fair value of each stock-based award is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions:
|
December 31, 2010 |
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.0 | % | 1.1-2.7 | % | |||
Dividend yield |
| | |||||
Volatility |
67 | % | 69-70 | % | |||
Expected term (years) |
6.1 | 6.0-6.1 |
The Company uses the simplified method as prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment, to calculate the expected term as it does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected term for options granted to employees and utilizes the contractual term for options granted to non-employees. The expected term is applied to the stock option grant group as a whole, as the Company does not expect substantially different exercise or post-vesting termination behavior among its employee population. The computation of expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of a representative group of companies with similar characteristics to us, including early stage of product development and therapeutic focus. The representative group of companies consisted of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Curis Inc., Cytokinetics, Inc., Exelixis, Inc. and Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The risk-free interest rate is based on a treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. Management estimates expected forfeitures based on data from a representative group of companies with similar characteristics to us and recognizes compensation costs only for those equity awards expected to vest.
For the period from August 4, 2011 (inception) to December 31, 2010, the Company did not recognize any stock-based compensation for employee stock option grants. The Company recognized total stock-based compensation expense for employee stock option grants of $8,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011. The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted in the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011 was $0.05, $0.21 and $0.17 per share, respectively.
Stock-based awards issued to nonemployees, including directors for non-board related services, are accounted for using the fair value method. These stock-based option awards are revalued on each vesting and reporting date. The Company recognized total stock-based compensation expense of approximately $1,000, $137,000, and $138,000 in the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011, respectively. Due to an operating loss, the Company does not record tax benefits associated with stock-based compensation and option exercises. Tax benefits will be recorded when realized.
F-18
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
At December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, there was $35,000 and $625,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options, respectively. As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, the Company expects to recognize these costs over a remaining weighted-average period of 3.8 years and 3.2 years, respectively.
7. Income taxes
As of December 31, 2010 the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $570,000 and state net operating loss carryforwards of $578,000, which are available to reduce future taxable income. The Company also had federal tax credits of $15,000 and state tax credits of $5,000, which may be used to offset future tax liabilities. The net operating loss (NOL) and tax credit carryforwards will expire at various dates through 2030. The NOL and tax credit carryforwards are subject to review and possible adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service and state tax authorities. Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are subject to review and possible adjustment and may become subject to an annual limitation in the event of certain cumulative changes in the ownership interest of significant shareholders over a three-year period in excess of 50%, as defined under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as similar state provisions. This could limit the amount of tax attributes that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income or tax liabilities. The amount of the annual limitation is determined based on the value of the Company immediately prior to the ownership change. Subsequent ownership changes may further affect the limitation in future years.
A reconciliation of income taxes computed using the U.S. federal statutory rate to that reflected in operations follows:
|
Period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Income tax benefit using U.S. federal statutory rate |
34.00 | % | ||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
5.62 | % | ||
Research and development tax credits |
1.96 | % | ||
Permanent items |
(0.78 | %) | ||
Change in the valuation allowance |
(40.80 | %) | ||
Other |
| |||
|
| % | ||
F-19
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
The principal components of the Company's deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
December 31, 2010 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deferred tax assets: |
|||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
$ | 225 | |||
Capitalized research and development |
55 | ||||
Research and development credits |
18 | ||||
Stock-based compensation |
20 | ||||
Other |
2 | ||||
Gross deferred tax assets |
320 | ||||
Valuation allowance |
(320 | ) | |||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ | | |||
The Company has recorded a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 because the Company's management believes that it is more likely than not that these assets will not be fully realized. The increase in the valuation allowance in 2010 primarily relates to the net loss incurred by the Company.
Upon inception, the Company adopted accounting guidance related to accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The Company's reserves related to taxes are based on a determination of whether and how much of a tax benefit taken by the Company in its tax filings or positions is more likely than not to be realized following resolution of any potential contingencies present related to the tax benefit. Upon adoption, the Company recognized no material adjustment for unrecognized income tax benefits. As of the adoption date and through December 31, 2010, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits or related interest and penalties accrued. The Company has not, as yet, conducted a study of research and development (R&D) credit carryforwards. This study may result in an adjustment to the Company's R&D credit carryforwards; however, until a study is completed and any adjustment is known, no amounts are being presented as an uncertain tax position. A full valuation allowance has been provided against the Company's R&D credits and, if an adjustment is required, this adjustment would be offset by an adjustment to the valuation allowance. Thus, there would be no impact to the balance sheet or statement of operations if an adjustment were required. The Company would recognize both accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized benefits in income tax expense. The Company's uncertain tax positions are related to years that remain subject to examination by relevant tax authorities. Since the Company is in a loss carryforward position, the Company is generally subject to examination by the U.S. federal, state and local income tax authorities for all tax years in which a loss carryforward is available.
8. Commitments and contingencies
From November 2010 through May 2011, the Company leased office space from a shareholder. There was no formal lease arrangement with the shareholder. Rent paid to the shareholder was $12,000, $34,000 and $46,000 for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, the
F-20
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011, respectively.
In May 2011, the Company entered into a non-cancelable operating lease for office and laboratory space, which expires October 31, 2014. The lease agreement provides for free rent for the first four months of the lease term and includes escalating rent payments. The rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company is also obligated to pay for certain operating costs and a proportional share of certain common area costs. The Company has the right to extend the lease for a two-year period. The annual rent for each additional year is determined annually at the then fair market rate. The Company secured a letter of credit for $86,000 in connection with the lease, which is included in restricted cash on the balance sheet. The minimum aggregate future lease commitments are as follows (in thousands):
2011 |
$ | 115 | ||
2012 |
351 | |||
2013 |
360 | |||
2014 |
307 | |||
|
$ | 1,133 | ||
The Company recorded rent expense of $12,000, $199,000 and $211,000 for the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011, respectively.
9. Accrued expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
December 31, 2010 |
September 30, 2010 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||
Professional fees |
$ | 35 | $ | 173 | |||
License fees |
30 | | |||||
Compensation and related benefits |
15 | 391 | |||||
Deferred rent |
| 25 | |||||
Contract research organizations |
| 103 | |||||
Other expenses |
9 | 70 | |||||
|
$ | 89 | $ | 762 | |||
10. License agreements
In October 2010, the Company entered into an exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (the Licensor) for certain intellectual property. The Company paid the Licensor an upfront license fee and reimbursed patent related fees and costs incurred by the Licensor and an affiliate of the Licensor totaling $104,000 in the aggregate and issued 583,333 shares
F-21
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
of common stock to the Licensor and entities and individuals affiliated with the Licensor. The fair value of the common stock was determined to be $0.08 per share, and the fair value was determined to be more readily determinable than the fair value of the license. As a result, the fair value of the shares of approximately $46,000 was recorded as research and development expense. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company also agreed to pay annual license maintenance fees, milestone payments, royalties as a percentage of net sales and a percentage of sublicense income the Company receives. Annual license maintenance fees are creditable against royalties earned during the same calendar year. Milestone payments are triggered upon the achievement of specified development, regulatory and commercialization milestones and are not creditable against royalties. Actual amounts due under the agreement will vary depending on the number of products developed, the type and development path of the products, and other related factors. The Company may terminate the agreement at any time with 90 days' prior written notice.
In October 2010, the Company also entered into a nonexclusive license agreement with an institution for certain intellectual property. The Company paid upfront license fees. The Company is obligated to pay an annual license maintenance fee beginning in 2012. The Company may terminate the agreement at any time with 90 days' prior written notice.
In December 2010, the Company entered into a research-only license agreement with an institution for certain intellectual property. The Company paid an upfront license fee and agreed to annual maintenance fees for each cell line licensed per year. The Company may terminate the agreement at any time with 60 days' prior written notice.
The Company recorded total research and development expense of $135,000, $25,000 and $160,000 in the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011, respectively, associated with upfront fees for the license agreements. Annual maintenance fees on all licenses total $95,000 beginning in 2012 up to a maximum of $170,000 through the term of the agreements and the Company could make milestone payments of up to $1.6 million under the licenses.
11. Employee benefit plan
In June 2011, the Company adopted a 401(k) retirement and savings plan (the 401(k) Plan) covering all employees. The 401(k) Plan allows employees to make pre-tax contributions up to the maximum allowable amount set by the IRS. Under the 401(k) Plan, the Company may make discretionary contributions as approved by the board of directors. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011, the Company made contributions to the 401(k) Plan of $25,000.
12. Subsequent events
The Company reviews all activity subsequent to year end but prior to the issuance of the financial statements for events that could require disclosure or that could impact the carrying value of assets or liabilities as of the balance sheet date. All significant subsequent events have been properly disclosed in the financial statements.
F-22
Verastem, Inc.
(A development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2010 (information as of September 30, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is unaudited)
F-23
Until , 2012 (25 days after commencement of this offering), all dealers that buy, sell, or trade shares of our common stock, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
Part IIInformation not required in prospectus
ITEM 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.
The following table sets forth the expenses to be incurred in connection with the offering described in this Registration Statement, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, all of which will be paid by us. All amounts are estimates except the Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. filing fee.
|
Amount
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee |
$ | 5,730 | |||
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. filing fee |
5,500 | ||||
NASDAQ listing fee |
* | ||||
Accountants' fees and expenses |
* | ||||
Legal fees and expenses |
* | ||||
Blue Sky fees and expenses |
* | ||||
Transfer Agent's fees and expenses |
* | ||||
Printing and engraving expenses |
* | ||||
Miscellaneous |
* | ||||
Total Expenses |
$ | * | |||
ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law permits a corporation to eliminate the personal liability of its directors or its stockholders for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except where the director breached his or her duty of loyalty, failed to act in good faith, engaged in intentional misconduct or knowingly violated a law, authorized the payment of a dividend or approved a stock repurchase in violation of Delaware corporate law or obtained an improper personal benefit. Our certificate of incorporation provides that no director shall be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty as a director, notwithstanding any provision of law imposing such liability, except to the extent that the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits the elimination or limitation of liability of directors for breaches of fiduciary duty.
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides that a corporation has the power to indemnify a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation and certain other persons serving at the request of the corporation in related capacities against expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlements actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with an action, suit or proceeding to which he or she is party or is threatened to be made a party by reason of such position, if such person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, in any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful, except that, in the case of actions brought by or in the right of the corporation, no indemnification shall be made with respect to any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery or other adjudicating court determines that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all of the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification for such expenses which the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
II-1
Part IIInformation not required in prospectus
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we will indemnify each person who was or is a party or threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of us) by reason of the fact that he or she is or was, or has agreed to become, our director or officer, or is or was serving, or has agreed to serve, at our request as a director, officer, partner, employee or trustee of, or in a similar capacity with, another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise (all such persons being referred to as an "Indemnitee"), or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in such capacity, against all expenses (including attorneys' fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such action, suit or proceeding and any appeal therefrom, if such Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best interests, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, he or she had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
Our certificate of incorporation also provides that we will indemnify any Indemnitee who was or is a party to an action or suit by or in the right of us to procure a judgment in our favor by reason of the fact that the Indemnitee is or was, or has agreed to become, our director or officer, or is or was serving, or has agreed to serve, at our request as a director, officer, partner, employee or trustee or, or in a similar capacity with, another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in such capacity, against all expenses (including attorneys' fees) and, to the extent permitted by law, amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, and any appeal therefrom, if the Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, our best interests, except that no indemnification shall be made with respect to any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to us, unless a court determines that, despite such adjudication but in view of all of the circumstances, he or she is entitled to indemnification of such expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that any Indemnitee has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, he or she will be indemnified by us against all expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred by him or her or on his or her behalf in connection therewith. If we don't assume the defense, expenses must be advanced to an Indemnitee under certain circumstances.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors. In general, these agreements provide that we will indemnify the director to the fullest extent permitted by law for claims arising in his or her capacity as a director of our company or in connection with his or her service at our request for another corporation or entity. The indemnification agreements also provide for procedures that will apply in the event that a director makes a claim for indemnification and establish certain presumptions that are favorable to the director.
We maintain a general liability insurance policy which covers certain liabilities of our directors and officers arising out of claims based on acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers.
The underwriting agreement we will enter into in connection with the offering of common stock being registered hereby provides that the underwriters will indemnify, under certain conditions, our directors and officers (as well as certain other persons) against certain liabilities arising in connection with such offering.
ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.
Set forth below is information regarding shares of common stock and preferred stock issued, and options granted, by us within the past three years that were not registered under the Securities Act of
II-2
Part IIInformation not required in prospectus
1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. Also included is the consideration, if any, received by us for such shares and options and information relating to the section of the Securities Act, or rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission, under which exemption from registration was claimed.
In August 2010, we sold an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $0.0001 for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000.
In October 2010 and November 2010, we issued an aggregate of 583,333 shares of common stock to the Whitehead Institute and entities and individuals affiliated with the Whitehead Institute pursuant to the terms of our exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute.
In November 2010, we sold an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of our series A preferred stock at a price per share of $1.00 for an aggregate purchase price of $4.0 million. In April 2011 we sold an aggregate of 12,000,000 shares of our series A preferred stock at a price per share of $1.00 for an aggregate purchase price of $12 million.
In April 2011, we sold an aggregate of 896,000 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $0.08 for an aggregate purchase price of $71,680.
In July 2011, we sold an aggregate of 16,025,000 shares of our series B preferred stock at a price per share of $2.00 for an aggregate purchase price of $32.0 million.
In November 2011, we sold an aggregate of 9,067,825 shares of our series C preferred stock at a price per share of $2.25 for an aggregate purchase price of $20.4 million.
In November 2011, we agreed to issue a warrant for the purchase of 500,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price equal to the average closing price of our common stock during the five days preceding the date of issuance to Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. upon achievement of a milestone.
No underwriters were involved in the foregoing sales of securities. The securities described in this section (a) of Item 15 were issued to investors in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, as set forth in Section 4(2) under the Securities Act, including in some cases, Regulation D promulgated thereunder, relative to transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering, to the extent an exemption from such registration was required. All purchasers of shares of preferred stock described above represented to us in connection with their purchase that they were accredited investors and were acquiring the shares for their own account for investment purposes only and not with a view to, or for sale in connection with, any distribution thereof. The purchasers received written disclosures that the securities had not been registered under the Securities Act and that any resale must be made pursuant to a registration statement or an available exemption from such registration.
Since inception, we have issued to certain employees, directors and consultants options to purchase an aggregate of 1,418,000 shares of common stock as of November 30, 2011, of which, as of November 30, 2011, no options had been exercised or forfeited, and options to purchase 1,418,000 shares of common stock remained outstanding at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.21 per share.
We have approved awards of restricted stock units, to be granted effective upon the closing of this offering, to various employees for an aggregate of 2,100,000 shares of our common stock.
The issuance of stock options and the common stock issuable upon the exercise of such options, and the grant of restricted stock units upon the closing of this offering and the issuance of common stock
II-3
Part IIInformation not required in prospectus
upon vesting of such restricted stock units, as described in this section (b) of Item 15 were, or will be, issued pursuant to written compensatory plans or arrangements with our employees, directors and consultants, in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act or the exemption set forth in Section 4(2) under the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder relative to transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering. All recipients either received adequate information about us or had access, through employment or other relationships, to such information.
All of the foregoing securities are deemed restricted securities for purposes of the Securities Act. All certificates representing the issued shares of capital stock described in this Item 15 included appropriate legends setting forth that the securities had not been registered and the applicable restrictions on transfer.
ITEM 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
The exhibits to the Registration Statement are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS.
II-4
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Cambridge, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on this 7th day of December, 2011.
VERASTEM, INC. | ||||
By: |
/s/ CHRISTOPH WESTPHAL, M.D., PH.D. Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities held on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ CHRISTOPH WESTPHAL, M.D., PH.D. Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. |
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal executive officer) |
December 7, 2011 | ||
/s/ ROBERT FORRESTER Robert Forrester |
Chief Operating Officer (Principal financial and accounting officer) |
December 7, 2011 |
||
* Richard Aldrich |
Director |
December 7, 2011 |
||
* John K. Clarke |
Director |
December 7, 2011 |
||
* Ansbert Gadicke, M.D. |
Director |
December 7, 2011 |
II-5
Signatures
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
* Stephen Kraus |
Director | December 7, 2011 | ||
* Henri Termeer |
Director |
December 7, 2011 |
*By: |
/s/ CHRISTOPH WESTPHAL, M.D., PH.D. Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D. Attorney-in-Fact |
II-6
Exhibit number |
Description of exhibit
|
||
---|---|---|---|
1.1** | Underwriting Agreement | ||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of the Registrant | ||
3.2* | Bylaws of the Registrant | ||
3.3** | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant to be effective upon the closing of this offering | ||
3.4** | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant to be effective upon the closing of this offering | ||
4.1** | Specimen certificate evidencing shares of common stock | ||
4.2* | Second Amended and Restated Investors' Rights Agreement, dated November 1, 2011, by and among the Registrant and the other parties thereto | ||
5.1** | Opinion of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP | ||
10.1* | 2010 Equity Incentive Plan | ||
10.2** | 2012 Incentive Plan | ||
10.3** | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under 2012 Incentive Plan | ||
10.4** | Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under 2012 Incentive Plan | ||
10.5** | Form of Employment Agreement, to be effective upon the closing of this offering, between the Registrant and Robert Forrester | ||
10.6** | Form of Employment Agreement, to be effective upon the closing of this offering, between the Registrant and Jonathan Pachter | ||
10.7 | Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and each director | ||
10.8* | Lease Agreement, dated May 2, 2011, between the Registrant and ARE-MA Region No. 38, LLC | ||
10.9* | Exclusive Patent License Agreement and Tangible Property Agreement, dated October 13, 2010, by and among the Registrant and the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research | ||
10.10** | Non-exclusive Patent License Agreement, dated October 13, 2010, by and among the Registrant and the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research | ||
10.11* | Letter Agreement, dated October 1, 2010, between the Registrant and the Broad Institute | ||
10.12* | Letter Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, as amended October 18, 2010, between the Registrant and Piyush Gupta, Ph.D. | ||
10.13* | Letter Agreement, dated August 20, 2010, between the Registrant and Eric Lander, Ph.D. | ||
10.14* | Letter Agreement, dated July 30, 2010, as amended October 18, 2010, between the Registrant and Robert Weinberg, Ph.D. | ||
10.15 | License Agreement, dated November 17, 2011, between the Registrant and Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | ||
10.16** | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under 2012 Incentive Plan | ||
23.1 | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP | ||
23.2** | Consent of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1) | ||
24.1* | Power of Attorney (included on signature page) |
Exhibit 3.1
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
VERASTEM, INC.
(Pursuant to Sections 242 and 245 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)
VERASTEM, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the General Corporation Law),
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:
1. That the name of this corporation is VERASTEM, INC., and that this corporation was originally incorporated pursuant to the General Corporation Law on August 4, 2010, under the name VERASTEM, INC. The original Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on August 4, 2010, was amended and restated on November 3, 2010, was amended on March 22, 2011 and was amended and restated on July 11, 2011.
2. That the Board of Directors duly adopted resolutions proposing to amend and restate the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation, declaring said amendment and restatement to be advisable and in the best interests of this corporation and its stockholders, and authorizing the appropriate officers of this corporation to solicit the consent of the stockholders therefor, which resolution setting forth the proposed amendment and restatement is as follows:
RESOLVED, that the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:
FIRST: The name of this corporation is VERASTEM, INC. (the Corporation).
SECOND: The address of the registered office of the Corporation in the State of Delaware is c/o United Corporate Services, Inc., 874 Walker Road, Suite C, Dover, County of Kent, Delaware 19904. The name of its registered agent at such address is United Corporate Services, Inc.
THIRD: The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law.
FOURTH: The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 93,921,586, consisting of (i) 52,960,793 shares of
Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share (Common Stock), and (ii) 40,960,793 shares of Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value per share (Preferred Stock).
The following is a statement of the designations and the powers, privileges and rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof in respect of each class of capital stock of the Corporation.
A. COMMON STOCK
1. General. The voting, dividend and liquidation rights of the holders of the Common Stock are subject to and qualified by the rights, powers and preferences of the holders of the Preferred Stock set forth herein.
2. Voting. The holders of the Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held at all meetings of stockholders (and written actions in lieu of meetings). There shall be no cumulative voting. The number of authorized shares of Common Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by (in addition to any vote of the holders of one or more series of Preferred Stock that may be required by the terms of the Certificate of Incorporation) the affirmative vote of the holders of shares of capital stock of the Corporation representing a majority of the votes represented by all outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote, irrespective of the provisions of Section 242(b)(2) of the General Corporation Law.
B. PREFERRED STOCK
16,000,000 shares of the authorized and unissued Preferred Stock of the Corporation are hereby designated Series A Preferred Stock, 16,025,000 shares of the authorized and unissued Preferred Stock of the Corporation are hereby designated Series B Preferred Stock and 8,935,793 shares of the authorized and unissued Preferred Stock of the Corporation are hereby designated Series C Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock shall have the following rights, preferences, powers, privileges and restrictions, qualifications and limitations. Unless otherwise indicated, references to Sections or Subsections in this Part B of this Article Fourth refer to sections and subsections of Part B of this Article Fourth.
1. Dividends.
The Corporation shall not declare, pay or set aside any dividends on shares of any other class or series of capital stock of the Corporation (other than dividends on shares of Common Stock payable in shares of Common Stock) unless (in addition to the obtaining of any consents required elsewhere in the Certificate of Incorporation) the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock then outstanding shall first receive, or simultaneously receive, a dividend on each outstanding share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock in an amount at least equal to (i) in the case of a dividend on Common Stock or any class or series that is convertible into Common Stock, that dividend per share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, as would equal the product of (A) the dividend payable on each share of such class or series determined, if applicable, as if all shares
of such class or series had been converted into Common Stock and (B) the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of a share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, in each case calculated on the record date for determination of holders entitled to receive such dividend or (ii) in the case of a dividend on any class or series that is not convertible into Common Stock, at a rate per share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, determined by (A) dividing the amount of the dividend payable on each share of such class or series of capital stock by the original issuance price of such class or series of capital stock (subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to such class or series) and (B) multiplying such fraction by an amount equal to the Series A Original Issue Price, the Series B Original Issue Price or the Series C Original Issue Price (each as defined below), as the case may be; provided that, if the Corporation declares, pays or sets aside, on the same date, a dividend on shares of more than one class or series of capital stock of the Corporation, the dividend payable to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock pursuant to this Section 1 shall be calculated based upon the dividend on the class or series of capital stock that would result in the highest Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, dividend. The Series A Original Issue Price shall mean $1.00 per share, subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock. The Series B Original Issue Price shall mean $2.00 per share, subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Series B Preferred Stock. The Series C Original Issue Price shall mean $2.25 per share, subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Series C Preferred Stock.
2. Liquidation, Dissolution or Winding Up; Certain Mergers, Consolidations and Asset Sales.
2.1 Preferential Payments to Holders of Preferred Stock. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation or Deemed Liquidation Event (as defined below), the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock then outstanding shall be entitled to be paid out of the assets of the Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders before any payment shall be made to the holders of Common Stock by reason of their ownership thereof, an amount per share equal to the Series A Original Issue Price, in the case of Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Original Issue Price, in the case of Series B Preferred Stock, and the Series C Original Issue Price, in the case of the Series C Preferred Stock, plus any dividends declared but unpaid thereon. If upon any such liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation or Deemed Liquidation Event, the assets of the Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders shall be insufficient to pay the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock the full amount to which they shall be entitled under this Subsection 2.1, the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock shall share ratably in any distribution of the assets available for distribution in proportion to the respective amounts which would otherwise be payable in respect
of the shares held by them upon such distribution if all amounts payable on or with respect to such shares were paid in full.
2.2 Distribution of Remaining Assets. In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation or Deemed Liquidation Event, after the payment of all preferential amounts required by Section 2.1 to be paid to the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, the remaining assets of the Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders shall be distributed among the holders of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Common Stock, pro rata based on the number of shares held by each such holder, treating for this purpose all such securities as if they had been converted to Common Stock pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Incorporation immediately prior to such dissolution, liquidation or winding up of the Corporation or Deemed Liquidation Event. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon such liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation or Deemed Liquidation Event, (i) the amount the holders of shares of Series C Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive shall be equal to the greater of (A) the amount such holder would be entitled to receive pursuant to the foregoing Subsection 2.1 and the first sentence of this Subsection 2.2, up to an aggregate amount not to exceed 1.75 times the Series C Original Issue Price for each share of Series C Preferred Stock and (B) the amount such holder would have received if all shares of Series C Preferred Stock had been converted into Common Stock immediately prior to such liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation or Deemed Liquidation Event, (ii) the amount the holders of shares of Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive shall be equal to the greater of (A) the amount such holder would be entitled to receive pursuant to the foregoing Subsection 2.1 and the first sentence of this Subsection 2.2, up to an aggregate amount not to exceed 1.75 times the Series B Original Issue Price for each share of Series B Preferred Stock and (B) the amount such holder would have received if all shares of Series B Preferred Stock had been converted into Common Stock immediately prior to such liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation or Deemed Liquidation Event and (iii) the amount the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive shall be equal to the greater of (A) the amount such holder would be entitled to receive pursuant to the foregoing Subsection 2.1 and the first sentence of this Subsection 2.2, up to an aggregate amount not to exceed 1.75 times the Series A Original Issue Price for each share of Series A Preferred Stock and (B) the amount such holder would have received if all shares of Series A Preferred Stock had been converted into Common Stock immediately prior to such liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation or Deemed Liquidation Event. The aggregate amount which a holder of a share of Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to receive under Subsections 2.1 and 2.2 is hereinafter referred to as the Series A Liquidation Amount; the aggregate amount which a holder of a share of Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to receive under Subsections 2.1 and 2.2 is hereinafter referred to as the Series B Liquidation Amount; and the aggregate amount which a holder of a share of Series C Preferred Stock is entitled to receive under Subsections 2.1 and 2.2 is hereinafter referred to as the Series C Liquidation Amount.
2.3 Deemed Liquidation Events.
2.3.1 Definition. Each of the following events shall be considered a Deemed Liquidation Event unless the holders of (i) at least sixty percent (60%) of the then
outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, voting together as a single class and on an as-converted basis, and (ii) at least sixty percent (60%) of the then outstanding shares of Preferred Stock voting together as a single class and on an as-converted basis (such holders, the Requisite Investors) elect otherwise by written notice sent to the Corporation at least 10 days prior to the effective date of any such event:
(a) a merger or consolidation in which
(i) the Corporation is a constituent party or
(ii) a subsidiary of the Corporation is a constituent party and the Corporation issues shares of its capital stock pursuant to such merger or consolidation,
except any such merger or consolidation involving the Corporation or a subsidiary in which the shares of capital stock of the Corporation outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continue to represent, or are converted into or exchanged for shares of capital stock that represent, immediately following such merger or consolidation, at least a majority, by voting power, of the capital stock of (1) the surviving or resulting corporation or (2) if the surviving or resulting corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of another corporation immediately following such merger or consolidation, the parent corporation of such surviving or resulting corporation (provided that, for the purpose of this Subsection 2.3.1, all shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Options (as defined below) outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation or upon conversion of Convertible Securities (as defined below) outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation shall be deemed to be outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation and, if applicable, converted or exchanged in such merger or consolidation on the same terms as the actual outstanding shares of Common Stock are converted or exchanged); or
(b) the sale, lease, transfer, exclusive license or other disposition, in a single transaction or series of related transactions, by the Corporation or any subsidiary of the Corporation of all or substantially all the assets of the Corporation and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, or the sale or disposition (whether by merger or otherwise) of one or more subsidiaries of the Corporation if substantially all of the assets of the Corporation and its subsidiaries taken as a whole are held by such subsidiary or subsidiaries, except where such sale, lease, transfer, exclusive license or other disposition is to a wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation.
2.3.2 Effecting a Deemed Liquidation Event.
(a) The Corporation shall not have the power to effect a Deemed Liquidation Event referred to in Subsection 2.3.1(a)(i) unless the agreement or plan of merger or consolidation for such transaction provides that the consideration payable to the stockholders of the Corporation shall be allocated among the holders of capital stock of the Corporation in accordance with Subsections 2.1 and 2.2.
(b) In the event of a Deemed Liquidation Event referred to in Subsection 2.3.1(a)(ii) or 2.3.1(b), if the Corporation does not effect a dissolution of the
Corporation under the General Corporation Law within 90 days after such Deemed Liquidation Event, then (i) the Corporation shall send a written notice to each holder of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock no later than the 90th day after the Deemed Liquidation Event advising such holders of their right (and the requirements to be met to secure such right) pursuant to the terms of the following clause (ii) to require the redemption of such shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, and (ii) the Requisite Investors so request in a written instrument delivered to the Corporation not later than 120 days after such Deemed Liquidation Event, the Corporation shall use the consideration received by the Corporation for such Deemed Liquidation Event (net of any retained liabilities associated with the assets sold or technology licensed, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Corporation), together with any other assets of the Corporation available for distribution to its stockholders, all to the extent permitted by Delaware law governing distributions to stockholders (the Available Proceeds), on the 150th day after such Deemed Liquidation Event, to redeem all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, at a price per share equal to the Series A Liquidation Amount, the Series B Liquidation Amount or the Series C Liquidation Amount, as the case may be. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a redemption pursuant to the preceding sentence, if the Available Proceeds are not sufficient to redeem all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock, the Corporation shall ratably redeem each holders shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock to the fullest extent of such Available Proceeds, and shall redeem the remaining shares as soon as it may lawfully do so under Delaware law governing distributions to stockholders. The provisions of Section 6 shall apply, with such necessary changes in the details thereof as are necessitated by the context, to the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock pursuant to this Subsection 2.3.2(b). Prior to the distribution or redemption provided for in this Subsection 2.3.2(b), the Corporation shall not expend or dissipate the consideration received for such Deemed Liquidation Event, except to discharge expenses incurred in connection with such Deemed Liquidation Event or in the ordinary course of business.
2.3.3 Amount Deemed Paid or Distributed. The amount deemed paid or distributed to the holders of capital stock of the Corporation upon any such Deemed Liquidation Event or redemption shall be the cash or the value of the property, rights or securities paid or distributed to such holders by the Corporation or the acquiring person, firm or other entity. The value of such property, rights or securities shall be determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
2.3.4 Allocation of Escrow. In the event of a Deemed Liquidation Event, if any portion of the consideration payable to the stockholders of the Corporation is placed into escrow and/or is payable to the stockholders of the Corporation subject to contingencies, the applicable transaction agreement shall provide that (a) the portion of such consideration that is not placed in escrow and not subject to any contingencies (the Initial Consideration) shall be allocated among the holders of capital stock of the Corporation in accordance with Subsections 2.1 and 2.2 as if the Initial Consideration were the only consideration payable in connection with such Deemed Liquidation Event and (b) any additional consideration which becomes payable to the stockholders of the Corporation upon release from escrow or satisfaction of contingencies shall be allocated among the holders of capital stock of
the Corporation in accordance with Subsections 2.1 and 2.2 after taking into account the previous payment of the Initial Consideration as part of the same transaction.
3. Voting.
3.1 General. On any matter presented to the stockholders of the Corporation for their action or consideration at any meeting of stockholders of the Corporation (or by written consent of stockholders in lieu of meeting), each holder of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock shall be entitled to cast the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of Common Stock into which the shares of Preferred Stock held by such holder are convertible as of the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote on such matter. Except as provided by law or by the other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, holders of Preferred Stock shall vote together with the holders of Common Stock as a single class and on an as-converted to Common Stock basis.
3.2 Election of Directors. The holders of record of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, exclusively and as a separate class, shall be entitled to elect four (4) directors of the Corporation (the Series A Directors), the holders of record of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Common Stock, exclusively and as a separate class, shall be entitled to elect two (2) directors of the Corporation, and the holders of record of the shares of Common Stock, exclusively and as a separate class, shall be entitled to elect one (1) director of the Corporation; provided, however, that (i) in the event that the Corporation does not consummate a Qualified Public Offering (as defined below) prior to the first anniversary of the Series C Original Issue Date, the holders of record of the shares of Series C Preferred Stock, exclusively and as a separate class, shall be entitled to elect an additional one (1) director of the Corporation and (ii) in the event of a Series C Redemption Default (as defined in Section 6.1.4 below), the holders of record of the shares of Series C Preferred Stock, exclusively and as a separate class, shall be entitled to elect an additional three (3) directors of the Corporation in accordance with Section 6.1.4 below. Any director elected as provided in the preceding sentence may be removed without cause by, and only by, the affirmative vote of the holders of the shares of the class or series of capital stock entitled to elect such director or directors, given either at a special meeting of such stockholders duly called for that purpose or pursuant to a written consent of stockholders. If the holders of shares of (i) Series A Preferred Stock, (ii) Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Common Stock or (iii) Common Stock, as the case may be, fail to elect a sufficient number of directors to fill all directorships for which they are entitled to elect directors, voting exclusively and as a separate class, pursuant to the first sentence of this Subsection 3.2, then any directorship not so filled shall remain vacant until such time as the holders of the (i) Series A Preferred Stock, (ii) Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, Series C Preferred Stock and Common Stock or (iii) Common Stock, as the case may be, elect a person to fill such directorship by vote or written consent in lieu of a meeting; and no such directorship may be filled by stockholders of the Corporation other than by the stockholders of the Corporation that are entitled to elect a person to fill such directorship, voting exclusively and as a separate class. At any meeting held for the purpose of electing a director, the presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the class or series entitled to elect such director shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of electing such director. Except as otherwise provided in this Subsection 3.2, a vacancy in any directorship filled by the holders of
any class or series shall be filled only by vote or written consent in lieu of a meeting of the holders of such class or series or by any remaining director or directors elected by the holders of such class or series pursuant to this Subsection 3.2.
3.3 Preferred Stock Protective Provisions. At any time when at least 893,579 shares of Preferred Stock (subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Preferred Stock) are outstanding, the Corporation shall not, either directly or indirectly by amendment, merger, consolidation or otherwise, do any of the following without (in addition to any other vote required by law or the Certificate of Incorporation) the written consent or affirmative vote of the Requisite Investors, given in writing or by vote at a meeting, consenting or voting (as the case may be) separately as a class on an as-converted to Common Stock basis:
(a) liquidate, dissolve or wind-up the business and affairs of the Corporation, effect any reclassification, reincorporation or recapitalization of the Corporations outstanding shares of capital stock or effect any Deemed Liquidation Event, or consent to any of the foregoing;
(b) amend, alter or repeal any provision of the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Corporation;
(c) create, or authorize the creation of, or issue or obligate itself to issue shares of (or debt convertible into shares of), any additional class or series of capital stock unless the same ranks junior to the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock with respect to the distribution of assets on the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, the payment of dividends and rights of redemption, or increase the authorized number of shares of any additional class or series of capital stock;
(d) (i) reclassify, alter or amend any existing security of the Corporation that is pari passu with the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock in respect of the distribution of assets on the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, the payment of dividends or rights of redemption, if such reclassification, alteration or amendment would render such other security senior to the Series C Preferred Stock in respect of any such right, preference or privilege, or (ii) reclassify, alter or amend any existing security of the Corporation that is junior to the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock in respect of the distribution of assets on the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, the payment of dividends or rights of redemption, if such reclassification, alteration or amendment would render such other security senior to or pari passu with the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock in respect of any such right, preference or privilege;
(e) purchase or redeem (or permit any subsidiary to purchase or redeem) or pay or declare any dividend or make any distribution on, any shares of capital stock of the Corporation other than (i) redemptions of or dividends or distributions on the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock as expressly authorized herein, (ii) dividends or other distributions payable on the Common Stock solely in
the form of additional shares of Common Stock and (iii) repurchases of stock from former employees, officers, directors, consultants or other persons who performed services for the Corporation or any subsidiary in connection with the cessation of such employment or service at the lower of the original purchase price or the then-current fair market value thereof;
(f) create, or authorize the creation of, or issue, or authorize the issuance of any debt security, or permit any subsidiary to take any such action with respect to any debt security, if the aggregate indebtedness of the Corporation and its subsidiaries for borrowed money following such action would exceed $1,000,000;
(g) effect any acquisition of capital stock of another entity which results in the consolidation of that entity into the results of operations of the Company or the acquisition of all or substantially all of the assets of another entity;
(h) increase or decrease the authorized number of directors constituting the Board of Directors; or
(i) increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Companys 2010 Equity Incentive Plan beyond 1,999,348 (the Reserved Share Amount) or create any new equity incentive plan.
3.4 Series C Preferred Stock Protective Provision. The Corporation shall not, either directly or indirectly by amendment, merger, consolidation or otherwise, increase or decrease the authorized number of shares of Series C Preferred Stock without (in addition to any other vote required by law or the Certificate of Incorporation) the written consent or affirmative vote of the Requisite Series C Investors (as defined below), given in writing or by vote at a meeting. Requisite Series C Investors shall mean (i) for so long as both of Eastern Capital Limited (ECL) and H & Q Healthcare Investors and H & Q Life Sciences Investors (together, H & Q) own shares of Series C Preferred Stock, each of ECL and H & Q, (ii) if at any time one, but not both, of ECL or H & Q own shares of Series C Preferred Stock, the one of ECL or H & Q who owns shares of Series C Preferred Stock and (iii) if at any time neither ECL nor H & Q own shares of Series C Preferred Stock, the holders of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock.
4. Optional Conversion.
The holders of the Preferred Stock shall have conversion rights as follows (the Conversion Rights):
4.1 Right to Convert.
4.1.1 Conversion Ratio.
(a) Each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall be convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time and from time to time, and without the payment of additional consideration by the holder thereof, into such number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock as is determined by dividing the Series A Original Issue Price by the Series A Conversion Price (as defined below) in effect at the time of conversion. The Series A
Conversion Price shall initially be equal to $1.00. Such initial Series A Conversion Price, and the rate at which shares of Series A Preferred Stock may be converted into shares of Common Stock, shall be subject to adjustment as provided below.
(b) Each share of Series B Preferred Stock shall be convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time and from time to time, and without the payment of additional consideration by the holder thereof, into such number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock as is determined by dividing the Series B Original Issue Price by the Series B Conversion Price (as defined below) in effect at the time of conversion. The Series B Conversion Price shall initially be equal to $2.00. Such initial Series B Conversion Price, and the rate at which shares of Series B Preferred Stock may be converted into shares of Common Stock, shall be subject to adjustment as provided below.
(c) Each share of Series C Preferred Stock shall be convertible, at the option of the holder thereof, at any time and from time to time, and without the payment of additional consideration by the holder thereof, into such number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock as is determined by dividing the Series C Original Issue Price by the Series C Conversion Price (as defined below) in effect at the time of conversion. The Series C Conversion Price shall initially be equal to $2.25. Such initial Series C Conversion Price, and the rate at which shares of Series C Preferred Stock may be converted into shares of Common Stock, shall be subject to adjustment as provided below.
4.1.2 Termination of Conversion Rights. In the event of a notice of redemption of any shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock pursuant to Section 6, the Conversion Rights of the shares designated for redemption shall terminate at the close of business on the last full day preceding the date fixed for redemption, unless the redemption price is not fully paid on such redemption date, in which case the Conversion Rights for such shares shall continue until such price is paid in full. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation or a Deemed Liquidation Event, the Conversion Rights shall terminate at the close of business on the last full day preceding the date fixed for the payment of any such amounts distributable on such event to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be.
4.2 Fractional Shares. No fractional shares of Common Stock shall be issued upon conversion of the Preferred Stock. In lieu of any fractional shares to which the holder would otherwise be entitled, the Corporation shall pay cash equal to such fraction multiplied by the fair market value of a share of Common Stock as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. Whether or not fractional shares would be issuable upon such conversion shall be determined on the basis of the total number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, the holder is at the time converting into Common Stock and the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon such conversion.
4.3 Mechanics of Conversion.
4.3.1 Notice of Conversion. In order for a holder of Preferred Stock to voluntarily convert shares of Preferred Stock into shares of Common Stock, such holder shall surrender the certificate or certificates for such shares of Preferred Stock (or, if such registered holder alleges that such certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, a lost certificate affidavit and agreement reasonably acceptable to the Corporation to indemnify the Corporation against any claim that may be made against the Corporation on account of the alleged loss, theft or destruction of such certificate), at the office of the transfer agent for the applicable series of Preferred Stock (or at the principal office of the Corporation if the Corporation serves as its own transfer agent), together with written notice that such holder elects to convert all or any number of the shares of the Preferred Stock represented by such certificate or certificates and, if applicable, any event on which such conversion is contingent. Such notice shall state such holders name or the names of the nominees in which such holder wishes the certificate or certificates for shares of Common Stock to be issued. If required by the Corporation, certificates surrendered for conversion shall be endorsed or accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Corporation, duly executed by the registered holder or his, her or its attorney duly authorized in writing. The close of business on the date of receipt by the transfer agent (or by the Corporation if the Corporation serves as its own transfer agent) of such certificates (or lost certificate affidavit and agreement) and notice shall be the time of conversion (the Conversion Time), and the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the shares represented by such certificate shall be deemed to be outstanding of record as of such date. The Corporation shall, as soon as practicable after the Conversion Time, (i) issue and deliver to such holder of Preferred Stock, or to his, her or its nominees, a certificate or certificates for the number of full shares of Common Stock issuable upon such conversion in accordance with the provisions hereof and a certificate for the number (if any) of the shares of Preferred Stock represented by the surrendered certificate that were not converted into Common Stock, (ii) pay in cash such amount as provided in Subsection 4.2 in lieu of any fraction of a share of Common Stock otherwise issuable upon such conversion and (iii) pay all declared but unpaid dividends on the shares of the applicable series of Preferred Stock converted.
4.3.2 Reservation of Shares. The Corporation shall at all times when any Preferred Stock shall be outstanding, reserve and keep available out of its authorized but unissued capital stock, for the purpose of effecting the conversion of the Preferred Stock, such number of its duly authorized shares of Common Stock as shall from time to time be sufficient to effect the conversion of all outstanding Preferred Stock; and if at any time the number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock shall not be sufficient to effect the conversion of all then outstanding shares of the Preferred Stock, the Corporation shall take such corporate action as may be necessary to increase its authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock to such number of shares as shall be sufficient for such purposes, including, without limitation, engaging in best efforts to obtain the requisite stockholder approval of any necessary amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation. Before taking any action which would cause an adjustment reducing the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price below the then par value of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the applicable series of Preferred Stock, the Corporation will take any corporate action which may, in the opinion of its counsel, be necessary in order that the Corporation may validly and legally issue fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock at such adjusted Series A Conversion Price, Series B Conversion Price or Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be.
4.3.3 Effect of Conversion. All shares of Preferred Stock which shall have been surrendered for conversion as herein provided shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding and all rights with respect to such shares shall immediately cease and terminate at the Conversion Time, except only the right of the holders thereof to receive shares of Common Stock in exchange therefor, to receive payment in lieu of any fraction of a share otherwise issuable upon such conversion as provided in Subsection 4.2 and to receive payment of any dividends declared but unpaid thereon. Any shares of Preferred Stock so converted shall be retired and cancelled and may not be reissued as shares of such series, and the Corporation may thereafter take such appropriate action (without the need for stockholder action) as may be necessary to reduce the authorized number of shares of such series of Preferred Stock accordingly.
4.3.4 No Further Adjustment. Upon any such conversion, no adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price shall be made for any declared but unpaid dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, surrendered for conversion or on the Common Stock delivered upon conversion.
4.3.5 Taxes. The Corporation shall pay any and all issue and other similar taxes that may be payable in respect of any issuance or delivery of shares of Common Stock upon conversion of shares of Preferred Stock pursuant to this Section 4. The Corporation shall not, however, be required to pay any tax which may be payable in respect of any transfer involved in the issuance and delivery of shares of Common Stock in a name other than that in which the shares of Preferred Stock so converted were registered, and no such issuance or delivery shall be made unless and until the person or entity requesting such issuance has paid to the Corporation the amount of any such tax or has established, to the satisfaction of the Corporation, that such tax has been paid.
4.4 Adjustments to Conversion Prices for Diluting Issues.
4.4.1 Special Definitions. For purposes of this Article Fourth, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) Option shall mean rights, options or warrants to subscribe for, purchase or otherwise acquire Common Stock or Convertible Securities.
(b) Series A Original Issue Date shall mean the date on which the first share of Series A Preferred Stock was issued.
(c) Series B Original Issue Date shall mean the date on which the first share of Series B Preferred Stock was issued.
(d) Series C Original Issue Date shall mean the date on which the first share of Series C Preferred Stock was issued.
(e) Convertible Securities shall mean any evidences of indebtedness, shares or other securities directly or indirectly convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock, but excluding Options.
(f) Additional Shares of Common Stock shall mean all shares of Common Stock issued (or, pursuant to Subsection 4.4.3 below, deemed to be issued) by the Corporation after the Series C Original Issue Date, other than (1) the following shares of Common Stock and (2) shares of Common Stock deemed issued pursuant to the following Options and Convertible Securities (clauses (1) and (2), collectively, Exempted Securities):
(i) shares of Common Stock, Options or Convertible Securities issued as a dividend or distribution on Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, provided (a) the number of shares of Common Stock issued as a dividend or distribution on a share of any series of Preferred Stock multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock into which a share of such series of Preferred Stock is then convertible is equal to (b) the number of shares of Common Stock issued as a dividend or distribution on a share of every other series of Preferred Stock multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock into which a share of such series of Preferred Stock is then convertible;
(ii) shares of Common Stock, Options or Convertible Securities issued by reason of a dividend, stock split, split-up or other distribution on shares of Common Stock that is covered by Subsection 4.5, 4.6, 4.7 or 4.8;
(iii) shares of Common Stock or Options issued to employees or directors of, or consultants or advisors to, the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to a plan, agreement or arrangement approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation (including at least a majority of the Series A Directors then in office), in any event, not to exceed the Reserved Share Amount;
(iv) shares of Common Stock or Convertible Securities actually issued upon the exercise of Options or shares of Common Stock actually issued upon the conversion or exchange of Convertible Securities, in each case provided such issuance is pursuant to the terms of such Option or Convertible Security, or upon a Special Mandatory Conversion (as defined below);
(v) shares of Common Stock issued in a Qualified Public Offering;
(vi) shares of Common Stock, Options or Convertible Securities issued to banks, equipment lessors or other financial institutions, or to real property lessors, pursuant to a debt financing, equipment leasing or real property leasing transaction approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation (including at least a majority of the Series A Directors then in office); or
(vii) shares of Common Stock, Options or Convertible Securities issued in connection with sponsored research, collaboration, technology license, development, OEM, marketing or other similar agreements or strategic partnerships approved by the affirmative written consent or vote of the Requisite Investors, including without limitation up to 583,333 shares issued (or, pursuant to Subsection 4.4.3 below, deemed to be issued) pursuant to the Exclusive Patent License and Tangible Property Agreement, dated October 13, 2010, by and between the Corporation and the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research as in effect on the Series C Original Issue Date and as it may be amended from time to time.
4.4.2 No Adjustment of Conversion Prices. No adjustment in the Series A Conversion Price shall be made as the result of the issuance or deemed issuance of Additional Shares of Common Stock if the Corporation receives written notice from the holders of at least two-thirds of the then outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock agreeing that no such adjustment shall be made as the result of the issuance or deemed issuance of such Additional Shares of Common Stock. No adjustment in the Series B Conversion Price shall be made as the result of the issuance or deemed issuance of Additional Shares of Common Stock if the Corporation receives written notice from the holders of at least two-thirds of the then outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock agreeing that no such adjustment shall be made as the result of the issuance or deemed issuance of such Additional Shares of Common Stock. No adjustment in the Series C Conversion Price shall be made as the result of the issuance or deemed issuance of Additional Shares of Common Stock if the Corporation receives written notice from the Requisite Series C Investors agreeing that no such adjustment shall be made as the result of the issuance or deemed issuance of such Additional Shares of Common Stock.
4.4.3 Deemed Issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock.
(a) If the Corporation at any time or from time to time after the Series C Original Issue Date shall issue any Options or Convertible Securities (excluding Options or Convertible Securities which are themselves Exempted Securities) or shall fix a record date for the determination of holders of any class of securities entitled to receive any such Options or Convertible Securities, then the maximum number of shares of Common Stock (as set
forth in the instrument relating thereto, assuming the satisfaction of any conditions to exercisability, convertibility or exchangeability but without regard to any provision contained therein for a subsequent adjustment of such number) issuable upon the exercise of such Options or, in the case of Convertible Securities and Options therefor, the conversion or exchange of such Convertible Securities, shall be deemed to be Additional Shares of Common Stock issued as of the time of such issue or, in case such a record date shall have been fixed, as of the close of business on such record date.
(b) If the terms of any Option or Convertible Security, the issuance of which resulted in an adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price pursuant to the terms of Subsection 4.4.4, are revised as a result of an amendment to such terms or any other adjustment pursuant to the provisions of such Option or Convertible Security (but excluding automatic adjustments to such terms pursuant to anti-dilution or similar provisions of such Option or Convertible Security) to provide for either (1) any increase or decrease in the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise, conversion and/or exchange of any such Option or Convertible Security or (2) any increase or decrease in the consideration payable to the Corporation upon such exercise, conversion and/or exchange, then, effective upon such increase or decrease becoming effective, the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be, computed upon the original issue of such Option or Convertible Security (or upon the occurrence of a record date with respect thereto) shall be readjusted to such Series A Conversion Price, Series B Conversion Price or Series C Conversion Price as would have obtained had such revised terms been in effect upon the original date of issuance of such Option or Convertible Security. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no readjustment pursuant to this clause (b) shall have the effect of increasing the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price to an amount which exceeds the lower of (i) the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be, in effect immediately prior to the original adjustment made as a result of the issuance of such Option or Convertible Security, or (ii) the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be, that would have resulted from any issuances of Additional Shares of Common Stock (other than deemed issuances of Additional Shares of Common Stock as a result of the issuance of such Option or Convertible Security) between the original adjustment date and such readjustment date.
(c) If the terms of any Option or Convertible Security (excluding Options or Convertible Securities which are themselves Exempted Securities), the issuance of which did not result in an adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, did not result in an adjustment to the Series B Conversion Price or did not result in an adjustment to the Series C Conversion Price pursuant to the terms of Subsection 4.4.4 (either because the consideration per share (determined pursuant to Subsection 4.4.5) of the Additional Shares of Common Stock subject thereto was equal to or greater than the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be, then in effect, or because such Option or Convertible Security was issued before the Series A Original Issue Date, the Series B Original Issue Date or the Series C Original Issue Date, as the case may be), are revised after the Series A Original Issue Date, the Series B Original Issue Date or the Series C Original Issue Date, as the case may be, as a result of an amendment to such terms or any other
adjustment pursuant to the provisions of such Option or Convertible Security (but excluding automatic adjustments to such terms pursuant to anti-dilution or similar provisions of such Option or Convertible Security) to provide for either (1) any increase in the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise, conversion or exchange of any such Option or Convertible Security or (2) any decrease in the consideration payable to the Corporation upon such exercise, conversion or exchange, then such Option or Convertible Security, as so amended or adjusted, and the Additional Shares of Common Stock subject thereto (determined in the manner provided in Subsection 4.4.3(a)) shall be deemed to have been issued effective upon such increase or decrease becoming effective.
(d) Upon the expiration or termination of any unexercised Option or unconverted or unexchanged Convertible Security (or portion thereof) which resulted (either upon its original issuance or upon a revision of its terms) in an adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price pursuant to the terms of Subsection 4.4.4, the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be, shall be readjusted to such Series A Conversion Price, such Series B Conversion Price or such Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be, as would have obtained had such Option or Convertible Security (or portion thereof) never been issued.
(e) If the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise, conversion and/or exchange of any Option or Convertible Security, or the consideration payable to the Corporation upon such exercise, conversion and/or exchange, is calculable at the time such Option or Convertible Security is issued or amended but is subject to adjustment based upon subsequent events, any adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price provided for in this Subsection 4.4.3 shall be effected at the time of such issuance or amendment based on such number of shares or amount of consideration without regard to any provisions for subsequent adjustments (and any subsequent adjustments shall be treated as provided in clauses (b) and (c) of this Subsection 4.4.3). If the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise, conversion and/or exchange of any Option or Convertible Security, or the consideration payable to the Corporation upon such exercise, conversion and/or exchange, cannot be calculated at all at the time such Option or Convertible Security is issued or amended, any adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price that would result under the terms of this Subsection 4.4.3 at the time of such issuance or amendment shall instead be effected at the time such number of shares and/or amount of consideration is first calculable (even if subject to subsequent adjustments), assuming for purposes of calculating such adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price that such issuance or amendment took place at the time such calculation can first be made.
4.4.4 Adjustment of Conversion Prices Upon Issuance of Additional Shares of Common Stock.
(a) In the event the Corporation shall at any time after the Series C Original Issue Date issue Additional Shares of Common Stock (including Additional Shares of Common Stock deemed to be issued pursuant to Subsection 4.4.3), without
consideration or for a consideration per share less than the Series A Conversion Price in effect immediately prior to such issue, then the Series A Conversion Price shall be reduced, concurrently with such issue, to a price (calculated to the nearest one hundredth of a cent) determined in accordance with the following formula:
CP2 = CP1* (A + B) ÷ (A + C).
For purposes of the foregoing formula, the following definitions shall apply:
(i) CP2 shall mean the Series A Conversion Price in effect immediately after such issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock;
(ii) CP1 shall mean the Series A Conversion Price in effect immediately prior to such issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock;
(iii) A shall mean the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock (treating for this purpose as outstanding all shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Options outstanding immediately prior to such issue or upon conversion or exchange of Convertible Securities (including the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock) outstanding (assuming exercise of any outstanding Options therefor) immediately prior to such issue);
(iv) B shall mean the number of shares of Common Stock that would have been issued if such Additional Shares of Common Stock had been issued at a price per share equal to CP1 (determined by dividing the aggregate consideration received by the Corporation in respect of such issue by CP1); and
(v) C shall mean the number of such Additional Shares of Common Stock issued in such transaction.
(b) In the event the Corporation shall at any time after the Series C Original Issue Date issue Additional Shares of Common Stock (including Additional Shares of Common Stock deemed to be issued pursuant to Subsection 4.4.3), without consideration or for a consideration per share less than the Series B Conversion Price in effect immediately prior to such issue, then the Series B Conversion Price shall be reduced, concurrently with such issue, to a price (calculated to the nearest one hundredth of a cent) determined in accordance with the following formula:
CP2 = CP1* (A + B) ÷ (A + C).
For purposes of the foregoing formula, the following definitions shall apply:
(i) CP2 shall mean the Series B Conversion Price in effect immediately after such issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock;
(ii) CP1 shall mean the Series B Conversion Price in effect immediately prior to such issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock;
(iii) A shall mean the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock (treating for this purpose as outstanding all shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Options outstanding immediately prior to such issue or upon conversion or exchange of Convertible Securities (including the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock) outstanding (assuming exercise of any outstanding Options therefor) immediately prior to such issue);
(iv) B shall mean the number of shares of Common Stock that would have been issued if such Additional Shares of Common Stock had been issued at a price per share equal to CP1 (determined by dividing the aggregate consideration received by the Corporation in respect of such issue by CP1); and
(v) C shall mean the number of such Additional Shares of Common Stock issued in such transaction.
(c) In the event the Corporation shall at any time after the Series C Original Issue Date issue Additional Shares of Common Stock (including Additional Shares of Common Stock deemed to be issued pursuant to Subsection 4.4.3), without consideration or for a consideration per share less than the Series C Conversion Price in effect immediately prior to such issue, then the Series C Conversion Price shall be reduced, concurrently with such issue, to a price (calculated to the nearest one hundredth of a cent) determined in accordance with the following formula:
CP2 = CP1* (A + B) ÷ (A + C).
For purposes of the foregoing formula, the following definitions shall apply:
(i) CP2 shall mean the Series C Conversion Price in effect immediately after such issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock;
(ii) CP1 shall mean the Series C Conversion Price in effect immediately prior to such issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock;
(iii) A shall mean the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to such issue of Additional Shares of Common Stock (treating for this purpose as outstanding all shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of Options outstanding immediately prior to such issue or upon conversion or exchange of Convertible Securities (including the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock) outstanding (assuming exercise of any outstanding Options therefor) immediately prior to such issue);
(iv) B shall mean the number of shares of Common Stock that would have been issued if such Additional Shares of Common Stock had been issued at a price per share equal to CP1 (determined by dividing the aggregate consideration received by the Corporation in respect of such issue by CP1); and
(v) C shall mean the number of such Additional Shares of Common Stock issued in such transaction.
4.4.5 Determination of Consideration. For purposes of this Subsection 4.4, the consideration received by the Corporation for the issue of any Additional Shares of Common Stock shall be computed as follows:
(a) Cash and Property: Such consideration shall:
(i) insofar as it consists of cash, be computed at the aggregate amount of cash received by the Corporation, excluding amounts paid or payable for accrued interest;
(ii) insofar as it consists of property other than cash, be computed at the fair market value thereof at the time of such issue, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Corporation; and
(iii) in the event Additional Shares of Common Stock are issued together with other shares or securities or other assets of the Corporation for consideration which covers both, be the proportion of such consideration so received, computed as provided in clauses (i) and (ii) above, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.
(b) Options and Convertible Securities. The consideration per share received by the Corporation for Additional Shares of Common Stock deemed to have been issued pursuant to Subsection 4.4.3, relating to Options and Convertible Securities, shall be determined by dividing
(i) the total amount, if any, received or receivable by the Corporation as consideration for the issue of such Options or Convertible Securities, plus the minimum aggregate amount of additional consideration (as set forth in the instruments relating thereto, without regard to any provision contained therein for a subsequent adjustment of such consideration) payable to the Corporation upon the exercise of such Options or the conversion or exchange of such Convertible Securities, or in the case of Options for Convertible Securities, the exercise of such Options for Convertible Securities and the conversion or exchange of such Convertible Securities, by
(ii) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock (as set forth in the instruments relating thereto, without regard to any provision contained therein for a subsequent adjustment of such number) issuable upon the exercise of such Options or the conversion or exchange of such Convertible Securities, or in the case of Options for Convertible Securities, the exercise of such Options for Convertible Securities and the conversion or exchange of such Convertible Securities.
4.4.6 Multiple Closing Dates. In the event the Corporation shall issue on more than one date Additional Shares of Common Stock that are a part of one transaction or a series of related transactions and that would result in an adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price pursuant to the terms of Subsection 4.4.4 then, upon the final such issuance, the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be, shall be readjusted to give effect to all such issuances as if they occurred on the date of the first such issuance (and
without giving effect to any additional adjustments as a result of any such subsequent issuances within such period).
4.5 Adjustment for Stock Splits and Combinations. If the Corporation shall at any time or from time to time after the Series C Original Issue Date effect a subdivision of the outstanding Common Stock, then the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price and the Series C Conversion Price in effect immediately before that subdivision shall be proportionately decreased so that the number of shares of Common Stock issuable on conversion of each share of such series shall be increased in proportion to such increase in the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock outstanding. If the Corporation shall at any time or from time to time after the Series C Original Issue Date combine the outstanding shares of Common Stock, then the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price and the Series C Conversion Price in effect immediately before the combination shall be proportionately increased so that the number of shares of Common Stock issuable on conversion of each share of such series shall be decreased in proportion to such decrease in the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock outstanding. Any adjustment under this subsection shall become effective at the close of business on the date the subdivision or combination becomes effective.
4.6 Adjustment for Certain Dividends and Distributions. In the event the Corporation at any time or from time to time after the Series C Original Issue Date shall make or issue, or fix a record date for the determination of holders of Common Stock entitled to receive, a dividend or other distribution payable on the Common Stock in additional shares of Common Stock, then and in each such event the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price and the Series C Conversion Price in effect immediately before such event shall be decreased as of the time of such issuance or, in the event such a record date shall have been fixed, as of the close of business on such record date, by multiplying the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be, then in effect by a fraction:
(i) the numerator of which shall be the total number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the time of such issuance or the close of business on such record date, and
(ii) the denominator of which shall be the total number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the time of such issuance or the close of business on such record date plus the number of shares of Common Stock issuable in payment of such dividend or distribution.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, (a) if such record date shall have been fixed and such dividend is not fully paid or if such distribution is not fully made on the date fixed therefor, the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price and the Series C Conversion Price shall be recomputed accordingly as of the close of business on such record date and thereafter the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price and the Series C Conversion Price shall be adjusted pursuant to this subsection as of the time of actual payment of such dividends or
distributions; and (b) that no such adjustment shall be made with respect to the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price if the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, simultaneously receive a dividend or other distribution of shares of Common Stock in a number equal to the number of shares of Common Stock as they would have received if all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, had been converted into Common Stock on the date of such event.
4.7 Adjustments for Other Dividends and Distributions. In the event the Corporation at any time or from time to time after the Series C Original Issue Date shall make or issue, or fix a record date for the determination of holders of Common Stock entitled to receive, a dividend or other distribution payable in securities of the Corporation (other than a distribution of shares of Common Stock in respect of outstanding shares of Common Stock) or in other property and the provisions of Section 1 do not apply to such dividend or distribution, then and in each such event the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock shall receive, simultaneously with the distribution to the holders of Common Stock, a dividend or other distribution of such securities or other property in an amount equal to the amount of such securities or other property as they would have received if all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, had been converted into Common Stock on the date of such event.
4.8 Adjustment for Merger or Reorganization, etc. Subject to the provisions of Subsection 2.3, if there shall occur any reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, consolidation or merger involving the Corporation in which the Common Stock (but not any of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock) is converted into or exchanged for securities, cash or other property (other than a transaction covered by Subsections 4.5, 4.6 or 4.7), then, following any such reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, consolidation or merger, each share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, shall thereafter be convertible in lieu of the Common Stock into which it was convertible prior to such event into the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property which a holder of the number of shares of Common Stock of the Corporation issuable upon conversion of one share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, immediately prior to such reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, consolidation or merger would have been entitled to receive pursuant to such transaction; and, in such case, appropriate adjustment (as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Corporation) shall be made in the application of the provisions in this Section 4 with respect to the rights and interests thereafter of the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, to the end that the provisions set forth in this Section 4 (including provisions with respect to changes in and other adjustments of the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price) shall thereafter be applicable, as nearly as reasonably may be, in relation to any securities or other property thereafter deliverable upon the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be.
4.9 Special Adjustments for Increase in Option Pool.
4.9.1 Series A Adjustment. If at any time prior to May 3, 2012, the Corporation increases the Reserved Share Amount or otherwise reserves shares of Common Stock for issuance to, or issues shares of Common Stock or grants Options to, employees or directors of, or consultants or advisors to, the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to an equity incentive plan, either alone or cumulatively in an amount that exceeds 1,999,348 shares of Common Stock (each such event, a Series A Reserved Amount Default), then upon the occurrence of each such Series A Reserved Amount Default during such period, the Series A Conversion Price shall be appropriately adjusted (calculated to the nearest one hundredth of a cent), such that the aggregate number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued pursuant to the Series A Purchase Agreement (as defined below) shall continue to represent the same proportion of the Company on a fully-diluted basis (assuming full conversion and exercise of all Options and other Convertible Securities then outstanding, and issuance of all shares and other rights available for issuance under equity incentive plans or pursuant to other instruments (and including the issuance of the shares of Common Stock or Options that resulted in such Series A Reserved Amount Default)), as such shares represented prior to the occurrence of such Series A Reserved Amount Default. Series A Purchase Agreement means that certain Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated on or about the Series A Original Issue Date, among the Corporation and the other parties thereto, as the same may be amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time. For clarity, any such adjustment pursuant to this Subsection 4.9.1 shall be effected simultaneously with any adjustments effected pursuant to Subsections 4.9.2 and 4.9.3 below.
4.9.2 Series B Adjustment. If at any time prior to May 3, 2012, the Corporation increases the Reserved Share Amount or otherwise reserves shares of Common Stock for issuance to, or issues shares of Common Stock or grants Options to, employees or directors of, or consultants or advisors to, the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to an equity incentive plan, either alone or cumulatively in an amount that exceeds 1,999,348 shares of Common Stock (each such event, a Series B Reserved Amount Default), then upon the occurrence of each such Series B Reserved Amount Default during such period, the Series B Conversion Price shall be appropriately adjusted (calculated to the nearest one hundredth of a cent), such that the aggregate number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued pursuant to the Series B Purchase Agreement (as defined below) shall continue to represent the same proportion of the Company on a fully-diluted basis (assuming full conversion and exercise of all Options and other Convertible Securities then outstanding, and issuance of all shares and other rights available for issuance under equity incentive plans or pursuant to other instruments (and including the issuance of the shares of Common Stock or Options that resulted in such Series B Reserved Amount Default)), as such shares represented prior to the occurrence of such Series B Reserved Amount Default. Series B Purchase Agreement means that certain Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated on or about the Series B Original Issue Date, among the Corporation and the other parties thereto, as the same may be amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time. For clarity, any such adjustment pursuant to this Subsection 4.9.2 shall be effected simultaneously with any adjustments effected pursuant to Subsection 4.9.1 above and Subsection 4.9.3 below.
4.9.3 Series C Adjustment. If at any time prior to May 3, 2012, the Corporation increases the Reserved Share Amount or otherwise reserves shares of Common Stock for issuance to, or issues shares of Common Stock or grants Options to, employees or
directors of, or consultants or advisors to, the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to an equity incentive plan, either alone or cumulatively in an amount that exceeds 1,999,348 shares of Common Stock (each such event, a Series C Reserved Amount Default), then upon the occurrence of each such Series C Reserved Amount Default during such period, the Series C Conversion Price shall be appropriately adjusted (calculated to the nearest one hundredth of a cent), such that the aggregate number of shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued pursuant to the Series C Purchase Agreement (as defined below) shall continue to represent the same proportion of the Company on a fully-diluted basis (assuming full conversion and exercise of all Options and other Convertible Securities then outstanding, and issuance of all shares and other rights available for issuance under equity incentive plans or pursuant to other instruments (and including the issuance of the shares of Common Stock or Options that resulted in such Series C Reserved Amount Default)), as such shares represented prior to the occurrence of such Series C Reserved Amount Default. Series C Purchase Agreement means that certain Series C Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated on or about the Series C Original Issue Date, among the Corporation and the other parties thereto, as the same may be amended, restated or otherwise modified from time to time. For clarity, any such adjustment pursuant to this Subsection 4.9.3 shall be effected simultaneously with any adjustments effected pursuant to Subsections 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 above.
4.9.4 IPO Exception. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Subsections 4.9.1, 4.9.2 and 4.9.3, if, prior to the consummation of a firm-commitment underwritten public offering, the Corporation adopts a new equity incentive plan, but does not issue shares of Common Stock or Options pursuant to such equity incentive plan until after the consummation of such firm-commitment underwritten public offering (such equity incentive plan, a Post-IPO Incentive Plan), (i) none of the increase by the Corporation of the Reserved Share Amount, the adoption by the Corporation of such Post-IPO Incentive Plan or the reservation of shares of Common Stock in an amount in excess of 1,999,384 shares of Common Stock, in each case in connection with such Post-IPO Incentive Plan, shall constitute a Series A Reserved Amount Default, Series B Reserved Amount Default or Series C Reserved Amount Default and (ii) for the avoidance of doubt, there shall be no adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, Series B Conversion Price or Series C Conversion Price as a result thereof because the adoption of an equity incentive plan and reservation of shares, without issuance of Options for shares of Common Stock thereunder, does not constitute an issuance or deemed issuance of Additional Shares of Common Stock. For the avoidance of doubt, in the event that, prior to the consummation of a firm-commitment underwritten public offering, the Corporation issues shares of Common Stock or grants Options pursuant to a Post-IPO Incentive Plan, such issuance may trigger an adjustment to the Series A Conversion Price, Series B Conversion Price or Series C Conversion Price, as applicable, in accordance with Subsections 4.9.1, 4.9.2 and 4.9.3.
4.10 Certificate as to Adjustments. Upon the occurrence of each adjustment or readjustment of the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price pursuant to this Section 4, the Corporation at its expense shall, as promptly as reasonably practicable but in any event not later than 10 days thereafter, compute such adjustment or readjustment in accordance with the terms hereof and furnish to each holder of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, a certificate setting forth such adjustment or readjustment (including the kind and amount of
securities, cash or other property into which the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, is convertible) and showing in detail the facts upon which such adjustment or readjustment is based. The Corporation shall, as promptly as reasonably practicable after the written request at any time of any holder of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock (but in any event not later than 10 days thereafter), furnish or cause to be furnished to such holder a certificate setting forth (i) the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price and the Series C Conversion Price then in effect, and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock and the amount, if any, of other securities, cash or property which then would be received upon the conversion of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock. The provisions of this Section may be waived with the written consent of the Required Investors.
4.11 Notice of Record Date. In the event:
(a) the Corporation shall take a record of the holders of its Common Stock (or other capital stock or securities at the time issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock) for the purpose of entitling or enabling them to receive any dividend or other distribution, or to receive any right to subscribe for or purchase any shares of capital stock of any class or any other securities, or to receive any other security; or
(b) of any capital reorganization of the Corporation, any reclassification of the Common Stock of the Corporation, or any Deemed Liquidation Event; or
(c) of the voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Corporation,
then, and in each such case, the Corporation will send or cause to be sent to the holders of the Preferred Stock a notice specifying, as the case may be, (i) the record date for such dividend, distribution or right, and the amount and character of such dividend, distribution or right, or (ii) the effective date on which such reorganization, reclassification, consolidation, merger, transfer, dissolution, liquidation or winding-up is proposed to take place, and the time, if any is to be fixed, as of which the holders of record of Common Stock (or such other capital stock or securities at the time issuable upon the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock) shall be entitled to exchange their shares of Common Stock (or such other capital stock or securities) for securities or other property deliverable upon such reorganization, reclassification, consolidation, merger, transfer, dissolution, liquidation or winding-up, and the amount per share and character of such exchange applicable to the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock, the Series C Preferred Stock and the Common Stock. Such notice shall be sent at least 10 days prior to the record date or effective date for the event specified in such notice.
5. Mandatory Conversion.
5.1 Trigger Events. Upon either (a) the closing of a Qualified Public Offering or (b) the date and time, or the occurrence of an event, specified by vote or written consent of the Requisite Investors (the time of such closing or the date and time specified or the time of the
event specified in such vote or written consent is referred to herein as the Mandatory Conversion Time), (i) all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock shall automatically be converted into shares of Common Stock, at the then effective conversion rate and (ii) such shares may not be reissued by the Corporation. As used herein, Qualified Public Offering shall mean either (a) the sale of shares of Common Stock to the public at a price of at least $3.00 per share (subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization with respect to the Common Stock), in a firm-commitment underwritten public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided that (1) such offering results in at least $35,000,000 of gross proceeds to the Corporation, and (2) the Common Stock is listed for trading on either the New York Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ Capital Market or the NASDAQ Global Market, or (b) any other firm-commitment underwritten public offering of shares of Common Stock deemed to be a Qualified Public Offering by the vote or written consent of the Requisite Investors.
5.2 Procedural Requirements. All holders of record of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock shall be sent written notice of the Mandatory Conversion Time and the place designated for mandatory conversion of all such shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock pursuant to this Section 5. Such notice need not be sent in advance of the occurrence of the Mandatory Conversion Time. Upon receipt of such notice, each holder of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock shall surrender his, her or its certificate or certificates for all such shares (or, if such holder alleges that such certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, a lost certificate affidavit and agreement reasonably acceptable to the Corporation to indemnify the Corporation against any claim that may be made against the Corporation on account of the alleged loss, theft or destruction of such certificate) to the Corporation at the place designated in such notice. If so required by the Corporation, certificates surrendered for conversion shall be endorsed or accompanied by written instrument or instruments of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Corporation, duly executed by the registered holder or by his, her or its attorney duly authorized in writing. All rights with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock converted pursuant to Subsection 5.1, including the rights, if any, to receive notices and vote (other than as a holder of Common Stock), will terminate at the Mandatory Conversion Time (notwithstanding the failure of the holder or holders thereof to surrender the certificates at or prior to such time), except only the rights of the holders thereof, upon surrender of their certificate or certificates (or lost certificate affidavit and agreement) therefor, to receive the items provided for in the next sentence of this Subsection 5.2. As soon as practicable after the Mandatory Conversion Time and the surrender of the certificate or certificates (or lost certificate affidavit and agreement) for Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, the Corporation shall issue and deliver to such holder, or to his, her or its nominees, a certificate or certificates for the number of full shares of Common Stock issuable on such conversion in accordance with the provisions hereof, together with cash as provided in Subsection 4.2 in lieu of any fraction of a share of Common Stock otherwise issuable upon such conversion and the payment of any declared but unpaid dividends on the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock converted. Such converted Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock shall be retired and cancelled and may not be reissued as shares of such series, and the Corporation may thereafter take such appropriate action
(without the need for stockholder action) as may be necessary to reduce the authorized number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock accordingly.
5A. Special Mandatory Conversion.
5A.1. Trigger Events. In the event that any holder of shares of Preferred Stock does not participate in a Qualified Financing (as defined below) by purchasing in the aggregate, in such Qualified Financing and within the time period specified by the Corporation (provided that the Corporation has sent to each holder of Preferred Stock at least 20 days written notice of, and the opportunity to purchase its Pro Rata Amount (as defined below) of, the Qualified Financing), such holders Pro Rata Amount, then the Applicable Portion (as defined below) of the shares of Preferred Stock held by such holder shall automatically, and without any further action on the part of such holder, be converted into shares of Common Stock at the Series A Conversion Price, the Series B Conversion Price or the Series C Conversion Price, as the case may be, in effect immediately prior to the consummation of such Qualified Financing, effective upon, subject to, and concurrently with, the consummation of the Qualified Financing. For purposes of determining the number of shares of Preferred Stock owned by a holder, and for determining the number of Offered Securities (as defined below) a holder of Preferred Stock has purchased in a Qualified Financing, all shares of Preferred Stock held by Affiliates (as defined below) of such holder shall be aggregated with such holders shares and all Offered Securities purchased by Affiliates of such holder shall be aggregated with the Offered Securities purchased by such holder (provided that no shares or securities shall be attributed to more than one entity or person within any such group of affiliated entities or persons). Such conversion is referred to herein as a Special Mandatory Conversion.
5A.2. Procedural Requirements. Upon a Special Mandatory Conversion, each holder of shares of Preferred Stock converted pursuant to Subsection 5A.1 shall be sent written notice of such Special Mandatory Conversion and the place designated for mandatory conversion of all such shares of Preferred Stock pursuant to this Section 5A. Upon receipt of such notice, each holder of such shares of Preferred Stock shall surrender his, her or its certificate or certificates for all such shares (or, if such holder alleges that such certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, a lost certificate affidavit and agreement reasonably acceptable to the Corporation to indemnify the Corporation against any claim that may be made against the Corporation on account of the alleged loss, theft or destruction of such certificate) to the Corporation at the place designated in such notice. If so required by the Corporation, certificates surrendered for conversion shall be endorsed or accompanied by written instrument or instruments of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Corporation, duly executed by the registered holder or by his, her or its attorney duly authorized in writing. All rights with respect to the Preferred Stock converted pursuant to Subsection 5A.1, including the rights, if any, to receive notices and vote (other than as a holder of Common Stock), will terminate at the time of the Special Mandatory Conversion (notwithstanding the failure of the holder or holders thereof to surrender the certificates for such shares at or prior to such time), except only the rights of the holders thereof, upon surrender of their certificate or certificates therefor (or lost certificate affidavit and agreement), to receive the items provided for in the next sentence of this Subsection 5A.2. As soon as practicable after the Special Mandatory Conversion and the surrender of the certificate or certificates (or lost certificate affidavit and agreement) for Preferred Stock so converted, the Corporation shall issue
and deliver to such holder, or to his, her or its nominees, a certificate or certificates for the number of full shares of Common Stock issuable on such conversion in accordance with the provisions hereof, together with cash as provided in Subsection 4.2 in lieu of any fraction of a share of Common Stock otherwise issuable upon such conversion and the payment of any declared but unpaid dividends on the shares of Preferred Stock converted and a new certificate for the number of shares, if any, of Series A Preferred Stock represented by such surrendered certificate and not converted pursuant to Subsection 5A.1. Such converted Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock shall be retired and cancelled and may not be reissued as shares of such series, and the Corporation may thereafter take such appropriate action (without the need for stockholder action) as may be necessary to reduce the authorized number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock accordingly.
5A.3. Definitions. For purposes of this Section 5A, the following definitions shall apply:
5A.3.1 Affiliate shall mean, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person who, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with such Person, including without limitation any stockholder, general partner, managing member, officer or director of such Person, or any venture capital fund or registered investment company now or hereafter existing that is controlled by or under common control with one or more general partners or managing members of, or shares the same management company or investment advisor with, such Person.
5A.3.2 Applicable Portion shall mean, with respect to any holder of shares of Preferred Stock, a number of shares of Preferred Stock calculated by multiplying the aggregate number of shares of Preferred Stock held by such holder immediately prior to a Qualified Financing by a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the amount, if positive, by which such holders Pro Rata Amount exceeds the number of Offered Securities actually purchased by such holder in such Qualified Financing, and the denominator of which is equal to such holders Pro Rata Amount.
5A.3.3 Offered Securities shall mean the equity securities of the Corporation set aside by the Board of Directors of the Corporation for purchase by holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock in connection with a Qualified Financing, and offered to such holders.
5A.3.4 Pro Rata Amount shall mean, with respect to any holder of Preferred Stock, the lesser of (a) a number of Offered Securities calculated by multiplying the aggregate number of Offered Securities by a fraction, the numerator of which is equal to the number of shares of Preferred Stock (on an as-converted basis) owned by such holder, and the denominator of which is equal to the aggregate number of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock (on an as-converted basis), or (b) the maximum number of Offered Securities that such holder is permitted by the Corporation to purchase in such Qualified Financing, after giving effect to any cutbacks or limitations established by the Board of Directors and applied on a pro rata basis to all holders of Preferred Stock.
5A.3.5 Qualified Financing shall mean any transaction involving the issuance or sale of Additional Shares of Common Stock (other than a public offering) with aggregate gross proceeds to the Corporation of no greater than $50,000,000 after the Series C Original Issue Date which would result in a reduction of the Series C Conversion Price pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Incorporation (without giving effect to the operation of Subsection 4.4.2), unless the Requisite Investors elect, by written notice sent to the Corporation at least ten (10) days prior to the consummation of the Qualified Financing, that such transaction not be treated as a Qualified Financing for purposes of this Section 5A.
6. Redemption.
6.1 Redemption.
6.1.1 Shares of Series C Preferred Stock shall be redeemed by the Corporation out of funds lawfully available therefor at a price equal to the Series C Original Issue Price per share, plus all declared but unpaid dividends thereon (the Series C Redemption Price), in three equal annual installments commencing not more than 60 days after receipt by the Corporation at any time after the fifth anniversary of the Series C Original Issue Date, from the Series C Requisite Investors, of written notice requesting redemption of all shares of Series C Preferred Stock (the Series C Redemption Notice). The date of each such installment shall be referred to as a Redemption Date. The Corporation shall send a written notice (the Notice to Series A and Series B Holders) to each holder of Series A Preferred Stock and each holder of Series B Preferred Stock no later than the 20th day after the receipt of the Series C Redemption Notice informing such holder of the receipt of the Series C Redemption Notice. On each Redemption Date, the Corporation shall redeem, on a pro rata basis in accordance with the number of shares of Series C Preferred Stock owned by each holder, that number of outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock determined by dividing (i) the total number of shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding immediately prior to such Redemption Date by (ii) the number of remaining Redemption Dates (including the Redemption Date to which such calculation applies); provided, however, that if the Corporation receives, no later than 20 days after delivery of the Notice to Series A and Series B Holders by the Corporation, from the holders of at least two-thirds of the then outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock, a written notice requesting redemption of all shares of Series B Preferred Stock (the Series B Redemption Notice), then on each Redemption Date, the Corporation shall redeem, on a pro rata basis in accordance with the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock owned by each holder, that number of outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock determined by dividing (i) the total number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding immediately prior to such Redemption Date by (ii) the number of remaining Redemption Dates (including the Redemption Date to which such calculation applies); provided further, however that Excluded Shares (as such term is defined in Subsection 6.2) shall not be redeemed and shall be excluded from the calculations set forth in this sentence. If the Corporation does not have sufficient funds legally available to redeem on any Redemption Date all shares of Series C Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock (if requested pursuant to a Series B Redemption Notice) to be redeemed on such Redemption Date, the Corporation shall redeem a pro rata portion of each holders redeemable shares of such capital stock out of funds legally available therefor, based on the respective amounts which would otherwise be payable in respect of the shares to be redeemed if the legally available funds
were sufficient to redeem all such shares, and shall redeem the remaining shares to have been redeemed as soon as practicable after the Corporation has funds legally available therefor.
6.1.2 Shares of Series B Preferred Stock shall be redeemed by the Corporation out of funds lawfully available therefor at a price equal to the Series B Original Issue Price per share, plus all declared but unpaid dividends thereon (the Series B Redemption Price), in three equal annual installments commencing not more than 60 days after receipt by the Corporation at any time after the fifth anniversary of the Series C Original Issue Date, from the holders of at least two-thirds of the then outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock, of written notice requesting redemption of all shares of Series B Preferred Stock (the Series B Redemption Notice). The date of each such installment shall be referred to as a Redemption Date. The Corporation shall send a written notice (the Notice to Series A and Series C Holders) to each holder of Series A Preferred Stock and each holder of Series C Preferred Stock no later than the 20th day after the receipt of the Series B Redemption Notice informing such holder of the receipt of the Series B Redemption Notice. On each Redemption Date, the Corporation shall redeem, on a pro rata basis in accordance with the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock owned by each holder, that number of outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock determined by dividing (i) the total number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding immediately prior to such Redemption Date by (ii) the number of remaining Redemption Dates (including the Redemption Date to which such calculation applies); provided, however, that if the Corporation receives, no later than 20 days after delivery of the Notice to Series A and Series C Holders by the Corporation, from the Requisite Series C Investors, a Series C Redemption Notice, then on each Redemption Date, the Corporation shall redeem, on a pro rata basis in accordance with the number of shares of Series C Preferred Stock owned by each holder, that number of outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock determined by dividing (i) the total number of shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding immediately prior to such Redemption Date by (ii) the number of remaining Redemption Dates (including the Redemption Date to which such calculation applies); provided further, however that Excluded Shares (as such term is defined in Subsection 6.2) shall not be redeemed and shall be excluded from the calculations set forth in this sentence. If the Corporation does not have sufficient funds legally available to redeem on any Redemption Date all shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock (if requested pursuant to a Series C Redemption Notice) to be redeemed on such Redemption Date, the Corporation shall redeem a pro rata portion of each holders redeemable shares of such capital stock out of funds legally available therefor, based on the respective amounts which would otherwise be payable in respect of the shares to be redeemed if the legally available funds were sufficient to redeem all such shares, and shall redeem the remaining shares to have been redeemed as soon as practicable after the Corporation has funds legally available therefor.
6.1.3 Shares of Series A Preferred Stock shall be redeemed by the Corporation out of funds lawfully available therefor at a price equal to the Series A Original Issue Price per share, plus all declared but unpaid dividends thereon (the Series A Redemption Price), in the case of the Series A Preferred Stock on each Redemption Date if the Corporation receives, no later than 20 days after delivery of the Notice to Series A and Series B Holders or the Notice to Series A and Series C Holders, as the case may be, by the Corporation, from the holders of at least two-thirds of the then outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock, a written notice requesting redemption of all shares of Series A Preferred Stock. On each
Redemption Date, the Corporation shall redeem, (i) first, the shares of Series C Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock pursuant to Sections 6.1.1 and 6.1.2, and (ii) second, if the Corporation has sufficient funds legally available to redeem shares of Series A Preferred Stock after redemption of the Series C Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock on such Redemption Date, on a pro rata basis in accordance with the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock owned by each holder of Series A Preferred Stock, that number of outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock determined by dividing (A) the total number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding immediately prior to such Redemption Date by (B) the number of remaining Redemption Dates (including the Redemption Date to which such calculation applies); provided, however, that Excluded Shares (as such term is defined in Subsection 6.2) shall not be redeemed and shall be excluded from the calculations set forth in this sentence. If the Corporation does not have sufficient funds legally available to redeem on any Redemption Date all shares of Series A Preferred Stock to be redeemed on such Redemption Date, the Corporation shall redeem, subject to the immediately preceding sentence, a pro rata portion of each holders redeemable shares of such capital stock out of funds legally available therefor, based on the respective amounts which would otherwise be payable in respect of the shares to be redeemed if the legally available funds were sufficient to redeem all such shares of Series A Preferred Stock and, subject to the immediately preceding sentence, shall redeem the remaining shares to have been redeemed as soon as practicable after the Corporation has funds legally available therefor.
6.1.4 In the event of a default by the Corporation on the redemption provisions set forth in this Section 6.1 (a Redemption Default), the holders of the unredeemed shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock shall be entitled to default interest at a per annum rate equal to 5% on the unpaid amount, which amount shall be increased by 1% at the end of each three month period thereafter until the Redemption Price, and any interest thereon, is paid in full. In addition and notwithstanding the foregoing sentence above, in the event of a Redemption Default affecting the Series C Preferred Stock (A Series C Redemption Default), the holders of the unredeemed Series C Preferred Stock shall be entitled to elect three additional directors of the Corporation, until such default is cured.
6.2 Redemption Notice. The Corporation shall send written notice of the mandatory redemption (the Redemption Notice) to each holder of record of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock not less than 40 days prior to each Redemption Date. Each Redemption Notice shall state:
(a) the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock held by the holder that the Corporation shall redeem on the Redemption Date specified in the Redemption Notice;
(b) the Redemption Date and the Redemption Price;
(c) the date upon which the holders right to convert such shares terminates (as determined in accordance with Subsection 4.1); and
(d) that the holder is to surrender to the Corporation, in the manner and at the place designated, his, her or its certificate or certificates representing the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock to be redeemed.
If the Corporation receives, on or prior to the 20th day after the date of delivery of the Redemption Notice to a holder of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock, written notice from such holder that such holder elects to be excluded from the redemption provided in this Section 6, then the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock registered on the books of the Corporation in the name of such holder at the time of the Corporations receipt of such notice shall thereafter be Excluded Shares.
6.3 Surrender of Certificates; Payment. On or before the applicable Redemption Date, each holder of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock to be redeemed on such Redemption Date, unless such holder has exercised his, her or its right to convert such shares as provided in Section 4, shall surrender the certificate or certificates representing such shares (or, if such registered holder alleges that such certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, a lost certificate affidavit and agreement reasonably acceptable to the Corporation to indemnify the Corporation against any claim that may be made against the Corporation on account of the alleged loss, theft or destruction of such certificate) to the Corporation, in the manner and at the place designated in the Redemption Notice, and thereupon the Redemption Price for such shares shall be payable to the order of the person whose name appears on such certificate or certificates as the owner thereof. In the event less than all of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock represented by a certificate are redeemed, a new certificate representing the unredeemed shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, shall promptly be issued to such holder.
6.4 Rights Subsequent to Redemption. If the Redemption Notice shall have been duly given, and if on the applicable Redemption Date the Redemption Price payable upon redemption of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock to be redeemed on such Redemption Date is paid or tendered for payment or deposited with an independent payment agent so as to be available therefor in a timely manner, then notwithstanding that the certificates evidencing any of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock so called for redemption shall not have been surrendered, all rights with respect to such shares shall forthwith after the Redemption Date terminate, except only the right of the holders to receive the Series A Redemption Price, the Series B Redemption Price or the Series C Redemption Price, as the case may be, without interest upon surrender of their certificate or certificates therefor.
7. Redeemed or Otherwise Acquired Shares. Any shares of Preferred Stock that are redeemed or otherwise acquired by the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries shall be automatically and immediately cancelled and retired and shall not be reissued, sold or transferred. Neither the Corporation nor any of its subsidiaries may exercise any voting or other rights granted to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock following redemption.
8. Waiver. Except as otherwise provided in this Certificate of Incorporation or required by law, any of the rights, powers, preferences and other terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock set forth herein may be waived on behalf of all holders of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock by the affirmative written consent or vote of the Requisite Investors, provided such waiver by its terms is equally applicable to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock. Any of the rights of the holders of Series A Preferred Stock may be waived (in a manner that does not apply to the holders of Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock) by the affirmative written consent or vote of at least two-thirds of the then outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock. Any of the rights of the holders of Series B Preferred Stock may be waived (in a manner that does not apply to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock) by the affirmative written consent or vote of at least two-thirds of the then outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock. Any of the rights of the holders of Series C Preferred Stock may be waived (in a manner that does not apply to the holders of Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock) by the affirmative written consent or vote of the Series C Requisite Investors.
9. Notices. Any notice required or permitted by the provisions of this Article Fourth to be given to a holder of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock shall be mailed, postage prepaid, to the post office address last shown on the records of the Corporation, or given by electronic communication in compliance with the provisions of the General Corporation Law, and shall be deemed sent upon such mailing or electronic transmission.
FIFTH: Subject to any additional vote required by the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, in furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by statute, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to make, repeal, alter, amend and rescind any or all of the Bylaws of the Corporation.
SIXTH: Subject to any additional vote required by the Certificate of Incorporation, the number of directors of the Corporation shall be determined in the manner set forth in the Bylaws of the Corporation.
SEVENTH: Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the Bylaws of the Corporation shall so provide.
EIGHTH: Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without the State of Delaware, as the Bylaws of the Corporation may provide. The books of the Corporation may be kept outside the State of Delaware at such place or places as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors or in the Bylaws of the Corporation.
NINTH: To the fullest extent permitted by law, a director of the Corporation shall not be personally liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. If the General Corporation Law or any other law of the State of Delaware is amended after approval by the stockholders of this Article Ninth to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then
the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law as so amended.
Any repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of this Article Ninth by the stockholders of the Corporation shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of, or increase the liability of any director of the Corporation with respect to any acts or omissions of such director occurring prior to, such repeal or modification.
TENTH: To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Corporation is authorized to provide indemnification of (and advancement of expenses to) directors, officers and agents of the Corporation (and any other persons to which General Corporation Law permits the Corporation to provide indemnification) through Bylaw provisions, agreements with such agents or other persons, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, in excess of the indemnification and advancement otherwise permitted by Section 145 of the General Corporation Law.
Any amendment, repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of this Article Tenth shall not adversely affect any right or protection of any director, officer or other agent of the Corporation existing at the time of such amendment, repeal or modification.
ELEVENTH: The Corporation renounces any interest or expectancy of the Corporation in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, any Excluded Opportunity. An Excluded Opportunity is any matter, transaction or interest that is presented to, or acquired, created or developed by, or which otherwise comes into the possession of, (i) any director of the Corporation who is not an employee of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, or (ii) any holder of Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock or any partner, member, director, trustee, stockholder, employee or agent of any such holder, other than someone who is an employee of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries (collectively, Covered Persons), unless such matter, transaction or interest is presented to, or acquired, created or developed by, or otherwise comes into the possession of, a Covered Person expressly and solely in such Covered Persons capacity as a director of the Corporation.
* * *
3. That the foregoing amendment and restatement was approved by the holders of the requisite number of shares of this corporation in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law.
4. That this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which restates and integrates and further amends the provisions of this corporations Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been duly adopted in accordance with Sections 242 and 245 of the General Corporation Law.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE BLANK]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been executed by a duly authorized officer of this corporation on this 1st day of November, 2011.
|
By: |
/s/ Robert Forrester |
|
Name: Robert Forrester | |
|
Title: Chief Operating Officer |
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
VERASTEM, INC.
Verastem, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the Corporation), does hereby certify as follows:
1. That the name of this corporation is Verastem, Inc. The original Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on August 4, 2010, was amended and restated on November 3, 2010, was amended on March 22, 2011, was amended and restated on July 11, 2011 and was amended and restated on November 1, 2011.
2. This Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted by unanimous written consent of the board of directors and written consent of the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with the applicable provisions of Sections 141, 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
3. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of Article FOURTH thereof in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:
The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 94,185,650, consisting of (i) 53,092,825 shares of Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share (Common Stock), and (ii) 41,092,825 shares of Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value per share (Preferred Stock).
4. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby further amended by deleting the first three sentences of Part B of Article FOURTH thereof in their entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:
16,000,000 shares of the authorized and unissued Preferred Stock of the Corporation are hereby designated Series A Preferred Stock, 16,025,000 shares of the authorized and unissued Preferred Stock of the Corporation are hereby designated Series B Preferred Stock and 9,067,825 shares of the authorized and unissued Preferred Stock of the Corporation are hereby designated Series C Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock shall have the following rights, preferences, powers, privileges and restrictions, qualifications and limitations. Unless otherwise indicated, references to Sections or Subsections in this Part B of this Article Fourth refer to sections and subsections of Part B of this Article Fourth.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been executed by a duly authorized officer of this corporation on this 15th day of November, 2011.
|
By: |
/s/ Robert Forrester |
|
Name: Robert Forrester | |
|
Title: Chief Operating Officer |
Exhibit 10.7
VERASTEM, INC.
Indemnification Agreement
This Agreement is made as of the day of 201 , by and between Verastem, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the Corporation), and (the Indemnitee), a director or officer of the Corporation.
WHEREAS, it is essential to the Corporation to retain and attract as directors and officers the most capable persons available, and
WHEREAS, the substantial increase in corporate litigation subjects directors and officers to expensive litigation risks at the same time that the availability of directors and officers liability insurance has been severely limited, and
WHEREAS, it is now and has always been the express policy of the Corporation to indemnify its directors and officers, and
WHEREAS, the Indemnitee does not regard the protection available under the Corporations Certificate of Incorporation and insurance as adequate in the present circumstances, and may not be willing to serve or continue to serve as a director or officer without adequate protection, and
WHEREAS, the Corporation desires the Indemnitee to serve, or continue to serve, as a director or officer of the Corporation.
NOW THEREFORE, the Corporation and the Indemnitee do hereby agree as follows:
1. Agreement to Serve. The Indemnitee agrees to serve or continue to serve as a director or officer of the Corporation for so long as the Indemnitee is duly elected or appointed or until such time as the Indemnitee tenders a resignation in writing or becomes otherwise incapable of serving due to his or her disability or death.
2. Definitions. As used in this Agreement:
(a) The term Proceeding shall include any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, arbitration, alternative dispute resolution proceeding, administrative hearing or other proceeding, whether brought by or in the right of the Corporation or otherwise and whether of a civil, criminal, administrative or investigative nature, and any appeal therefrom.
(b) The term Corporate Status shall mean the status of a person who is or was, or has agreed to become, a director or officer of the Corporation, or is or was serving, or has agreed to serve, at the request of the Corporation, as a director, officer, fiduciary, partner, trustee, member, employee or agent of, or in a similar capacity with, another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, limited liability company or other enterprise.
(c) The term Expenses shall include, without limitation, attorneys fees, retainers, court costs, transcript costs, fees and expenses of experts, travel expenses, duplicating costs, printing and binding costs, telephone charges, postage, delivery service fees and other disbursements or expenses of the types customarily incurred in connection with investigations, judicial or administrative proceedings or appeals, but shall not include the amount of judgments, fines or penalties against Indemnitee or amounts paid in settlement in connection with such matters.
(d) References to other enterprise shall include employee benefit plans; references to fines shall include any excise tax assessed with respect to any employee benefit plan; references to serving at the request of the Corporation shall include any service as a director, officer, employee or agent of the Corporation which imposes duties on, or involves services by, such director, officer, employee, or agent with respect to an employee benefit plan, its participants, or beneficiaries; and a person who acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in the interests of the participants and beneficiaries of an employee benefit plan shall be deemed to have acted in a manner not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation as referred to in this Agreement.
3. Indemnity of Indemnitee. Subject to Sections 6, 7 and 9, the Corporation shall indemnify the Indemnitee in connection with any Proceeding as to which the Indemnitee is, was or is threatened to be made a party (or is otherwise involved) by reason of the Indemnitees Corporate Status, to the fullest extent permitted by law (as such may be amended from time to time). In furtherance of the foregoing and without limiting the generality thereof:
(a) Indemnification in Third-Party Proceedings. The Corporation shall indemnify the Indemnitee in accordance with the provisions of this Section 3(a) if the Indemnitee was or is a party to or threatened to be made a party to or otherwise involved in any Proceeding (other than a Proceeding by or in the right of the Corporation to procure a judgment in its favor or a Proceeding referred to in Section 6 below) by reason of the Indemnitees Corporate Status or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in connection therewith, against all Expenses, judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by or on behalf of the Indemnitee in connection with such Proceeding, if the Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner which the Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Corporation and, with respect to any criminal Proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful.
(b) Indemnification in Proceedings by or in the Right of the Corporation. The Corporation shall indemnify the Indemnitee in accordance with the provisions of this Section 3(b) if the Indemnitee was or is a party to or threatened to be made a party to or otherwise involved in any Proceeding by or in the right of the Corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the Indemnitees Corporate Status or by reason of any action alleged to have been taken or omitted in connection therewith, against all Expenses and, to the extent permitted by law, amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by or on behalf of the Indemnitee in connection with such Proceeding, if the Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner which the Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Corporation, except that, if applicable law so provides, no indemnification shall be made under this Section 3(b) in respect of any claim, issue, or matter as to which the Indemnitee shall
have been adjudged to be liable to the Corporation, unless, and only to the extent, that the Court of Chancery of Delaware or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of such liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, the Indemnitee is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such Expenses as the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
4. Indemnification of Expenses of Successful Party. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to the extent that the Indemnitee has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in defense of any Proceeding or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein (other than a Proceeding referred to in Section 6), the Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by or on behalf of the Indemnitee in connection therewith. Without limiting the foregoing, if any Proceeding or any claim, issue or matter therein is disposed of, on the merits or otherwise (including a disposition without prejudice), without (i) the disposition being adverse to the Indemnitee, (ii) an adjudication that the Indemnitee was liable to the Corporation, (iii) a plea of guilty or nolo contendere by the Indemnitee, (iv) an adjudication that the Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner the Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Corporation, and (v) with respect to any criminal proceeding, an adjudication that the Indemnitee had reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful, the Indemnitee shall be considered for the purposes hereof to have been wholly successful with respect thereto.
5. Indemnification for Expenses of a Witness. To the extent that the Indemnitee is, by reason of the Indemnitees Corporate Status, a witness in any Proceeding to which the Indemnitee is not a party, the Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by or on behalf of the Indemnitee in connection therewith.
6. Exceptions to Right of Indemnification. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, except as set forth in Section 10, the Corporation shall not indemnify the Indemnitee in connection with a Proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by the Indemnitee unless the initiation thereof was approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the Corporation shall not indemnify the Indemnitee to the extent the Indemnitee is reimbursed from the proceeds of insurance, and in the event the Corporation makes any indemnification payments to the Indemnitee and the Indemnitee is subsequently reimbursed from the proceeds of insurance, the Indemnitee shall promptly refund such indemnification payments to the Corporation to the extent of such insurance reimbursement.
7. Notification and Defense of Claim. As a condition precedent to the Indemnitees right to be indemnified, the Indemnitee must notify the Corporation in writing as soon as practicable of any Proceeding for which indemnity will or could be sought. With respect to any Proceeding of which the Corporation is so notified, the Corporation will be entitled to participate therein at its own expense and/or to assume the defense thereof at its own expense, with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the Indemnitee. After notice from the Corporation to the Indemnitee of its election so to assume such defense, the Corporation shall not be liable to the Indemnitee for any legal or other expenses subsequently incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with such Proceeding, other than as provided below in this Section 7. The Indemnitee shall have the right to employ his or her own counsel in connection with such
Proceeding, but the fees and expenses of such counsel incurred after notice from the Corporation of its assumption of the defense thereof shall be at the expense of the Indemnitee unless (i) the employment of counsel by the Indemnitee has been authorized by the Corporation, (ii) counsel to the Indemnitee shall have reasonably concluded that there may be a conflict of interest or position on any significant issue between the Corporation and the Indemnitee in the conduct of the defense of such Proceeding or (iii) the Corporation shall not in fact have employed counsel to assume the defense of such Proceeding, in each of which cases the fees and expenses of counsel for the Indemnitee shall be at the expense of the Corporation, except as otherwise expressly provided by this Agreement, and provided that Indemnitees counsel shall cooperate reasonably with the Corporations counsel to minimize the cost of defending claims against the Corporation and the Indemnitee. The Corporation shall not be entitled, without the consent of the Indemnitee, to assume the defense of any claim brought by or in the right of the Corporation or as to which counsel for the Indemnitee shall have reasonably made the conclusion provided for in clause (ii) above. The Corporation shall not be required to indemnify the Indemnitee under this Agreement for any amounts paid in settlement of any Proceeding effected without its written consent. The Corporation shall not settle any Proceeding in any manner that would impose any penalty or limitation on the Indemnitee without the Indemnitees written consent. Neither the Corporation nor the Indemnitee will unreasonably withhold or delay their consent to any proposed settlement.
8. Advancement of Expenses. Subject to the provisions of Section 9, in the event that the Corporation does not assume the defense pursuant to Section 7 of any Proceeding of which the Corporation receives notice under this Agreement, any Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by or on behalf of the Indemnitee in defending such Proceeding shall be paid by the Corporation in advance of the final disposition of such Proceeding; provided, however, that the payment of such Expenses incurred by or on behalf of the Indemnitee in advance of the final disposition of such Proceeding shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the Indemnitee to repay all amounts so advanced in the event that it shall ultimately be determined that the Indemnitee is not entitled to be indemnified by the Corporation as authorized in this Agreement. Such undertaking shall be accepted without reference to the financial ability of the Indemnitee to make repayment. Any advances and undertakings to repay pursuant to this Section 8 shall be unsecured and interest-free.
9. Procedures.
(a) In order to obtain indemnification or advancement of Expenses pursuant to this Agreement, the Indemnitee shall submit to the Corporation a written request, including in such request such documentation and information as is reasonably available to the Indemnitee and is reasonably necessary to determine whether and to what extent the Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification or advancement of Expenses. Any such indemnification or advancement of Expenses shall be made promptly, and in any event within sixty (60) days after receipt by the Corporation of the written request of the Indemnitee, unless the Corporation determines within such sixty (60) day period that the Indemnitee did not meet the applicable standard of conduct. Such determination, and any determination that advanced Expenses must be repaid to the Corporation, shall be made in each instance (a) by a majority vote of the directors of the Corporation consisting of persons who are not at that time parties to the Proceeding (disinterested directors), whether or not a quorum, (b) by a committee of disinterested directors
designated by a majority vote of disinterested directors, whether or not a quorum, (c) if there are no disinterested directors, or if the disinterested directors so direct, by independent legal counsel (who may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, be regular legal counsel to the Corporation) in a written opinion, or (d) by the stockholders of the Corporation.
(b) The termination of any Proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the Indemnitee did not act in good faith and in a manner that the Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Corporation, and, with respect to any criminal Proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful.
(c) The Indemnitee shall cooperate with the person, persons or entity making such determination with respect to the Indemnitees entitlement to indemnification, including providing to such person, persons or entity upon reasonable advance request any documentation or information which is not privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure and which is reasonably available to the Indemnitee and reasonably necessary to such determination. Any Expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the Indemnitee in so cooperating shall be borne by the Corporation (irrespective of the determination as to the Indemnitees entitlement to indemnification) and the Corporation hereby indemnifies the Indemnitee therefrom.
10. Remedies. The right to indemnification or advancement of Expenses as provided by this Agreement shall be enforceable by the Indemnitee in any court of competent jurisdiction if the Corporation denies such request, in whole or in part, or if no disposition thereof is made within the applicable period referred to in Section 9. Unless otherwise required by law, the burden of proving that indemnification or advancement of Expenses is not appropriate shall be on the Corporation. Neither the failure of the Corporation to have made a determination prior to the commencement of such action that indemnification is proper in the circumstances because the Indemnitee has met the applicable standard of conduct, nor an actual determination by the Corporation that the Indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall be a defense to the action or create a presumption that the Indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct. The Indemnitees Expenses actually and reasonably incurred in connection with successfully establishing the Indemnitees right to indemnification, in whole or in part, in any such Proceeding shall also be indemnified by the Corporation.
11. Partial Indemnification. If the Indemnitee is entitled under any provision of this Agreement to indemnification by the Corporation for some or a portion of the Expenses, judgments, fines, penalties or amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by or on behalf of the Indemnitee in connection with any Proceeding but not, however, for the total amount thereof, the Corporation shall nevertheless indemnify the Indemnitee for the portion of such Expenses, judgments, fines, penalties or amounts paid in settlement to which the Indemnitee is entitled.
12. Subrogation. In the event of any payment under this Agreement, the Corporation shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all of the rights of recovery of the Indemnitee, who shall execute all papers required and take all action necessary to secure such
rights, including execution of such documents as are necessary to enable the Corporation to bring suit to enforce such rights.
13. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall continue until and terminate upon the later of (a) six years after the date that the Indemnitee shall have ceased to serve as a director or officer of the Corporation or, at the request of the Corporation, as a director, officer, partner, trustee, member, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, limited liability company or other enterprise or (b) the final termination of all Proceedings pending on the date set forth in clause (a) in respect of which the Indemnitee is granted rights of indemnification or advancement of Expenses hereunder and of any proceeding commenced by the Indemnitee pursuant to Section 10 of this Agreement relating thereto.
14. Indemnification Hereunder Not Exclusive. The indemnification and advancement of Expenses provided by this Agreement shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which the Indemnitee may be entitled under the Certification of Incorporation, the By-Laws, any other agreement, any vote of stockholders or disinterested directors, the General Corporation Law of Delaware, any other law (common or statutory), or otherwise, both as to action in the Indemnitees official capacity and as to action in another capacity while holding office for the Corporation. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit the Corporation from purchasing and maintaining insurance, at its expense, to protect itself or the Indemnitee against any expense, liability or loss incurred by it or the Indemnitee in any such capacity, or arising out of the Indemnitees status as such, whether or not the Indemnitee would be indemnified against such expense, liability or loss under this Agreement; provided that the Corporation shall not be liable under this Agreement to make any payment of amounts otherwise indemnifiable hereunder if and to the extent that the Indemnitee has otherwise actually received such payment under any insurance policy, contract, agreement or otherwise.
15. No Special Rights. Nothing herein shall confer upon the Indemnitee any right to continue to serve as an officer or director of the Corporation for any period of time or at any particular rate of compensation.
16. Savings Clause. If this Agreement or any portion thereof shall be invalidated on any ground by any court of competent jurisdiction, then the Corporation shall nevertheless indemnify the Indemnitee as to Expenses, judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement with respect to any Proceeding to the full extent permitted by any applicable portion of this Agreement that shall not have been invalidated and to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
17. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute the original.
18. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Corporation and its successors and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the estate, heirs, executors, administrators and personal representatives of the Indemnitee.
19. Headings. The headings of the paragraphs of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not be deemed to constitute part of this Agreement or to affect the construction thereof.
20. Modification and Waiver. This Agreement may be amended from time to time to reflect changes in Delaware law or for other reasons. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by both of the parties hereto. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision hereof nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing waiver.
21. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given (i) when delivered by hand or (ii) if mailed by certified or registered mail with postage prepaid, on the third day after the date on which it is so mailed:
(a) if to the Indemnitee, to:[ ]
(b) if to the Corporation, to:
Verastem, Inc.
215 First St. Ste. 440
Cambridge, MA 02142
Attn: General Counsel
Phone: (617) 252-9300
or to such other address as may have been furnished to the Indemnitee by the Corporation or to the Corporation by the Indemnitee, as the case may be.
22. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware. The Indemnitee may elect to have the right to indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of Expenses interpreted on the basis of the applicable law in effect at the time of the occurrence of the event or events giving rise to the applicable Proceeding, to the extent permitted by law, or on the basis of the applicable law in effect at the time such indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of Expenses is sought. Such election shall be made, by a notice in writing to the Corporation, at the time indemnification or reimbursement or advancement of Expenses is sought; provided, however, that if no such notice is given, and if the General Corporation Law of Delaware is amended, or other Delaware law is enacted, to permit further indemnification of the directors and officers, then the Indemnitee shall be indemnified to the fullest extent permitted under the General Corporation Law, as so amended, or by such other Delaware law, as so enacted.
23. Enforcement. The Corporation expressly confirms and agrees that it has entered into this Agreement in order to induce the Indemnitee to continue to serve as an officer or director of the Corporation, and acknowledges that the Indemnitee is relying upon this Agreement in continuing in such capacity.
24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement of the parties hereto in respect of the subject matter contained herein and supercedes all prior agreements, whether oral or written, by any officer, employee or representative of any party hereto in respect of the subject matter contained herein; and any prior agreement of the parties hereto in respect of the subject matter contained herein is hereby terminated and cancelled. For avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the foregoing does not apply to or limit the Indemnitees rights under Delaware law or the Corporations Certificate of Incorporation or ByLaws.
25. Consent to Suit. In the case of any dispute under or in connection with this Agreement, the Indemnitee may only bring suit against the Corporation in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The Indemnitee hereby consents to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the courts of the State of Delaware, and the Indemnitee hereby waives any claim the Indemnitee may have at any time as to forum non conveniens with respect to such venue. The Corporation shall have the right to institute any legal action arising out of or relating to this Agreement in any court of competent jurisdiction. Any judgment entered against either of the parties in any proceeding hereunder may be entered and enforced by any court of competent jurisdiction.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
|
VERASTEM, INC. | |
|
| |
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
INDEMNITEE: | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Name: |
Exhibit 10.15
Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions.
LICENSE AGREEMENT
17 November, 2011
by and between
VERASTEM, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
and
PONIARD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
a Washington corporation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page |
|
|
Table of Contents
|
| ||
1. |
Definitions |
1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
Definitions |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
Other Defined Terms |
7 |
|
|
|
|
2. |
License |
9 | |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
Grant |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
Sublicensing |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
No Other License |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
Government Interest |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
Reservation of Rights |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
Non-Compete |
11 |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Transfer of Information and Materials; Development |
12 | |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
Disclosure of Information and Transfer of Materials |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
Development and Commercialization Generally; Diligence |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
Development Plan and Benchmarks |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
Progress Reports on Development Plan |
12 |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Payments |
13 | |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
License Issue Fee |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
Licensed Product Development Milestones |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
Warrants |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
Royalties for Licensed Products |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
Reports on Revenues and Payments |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
Royalty Payments |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
Foreign Sales |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
Foreign Taxes |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
Late Payments |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.10 |
Record Keeping |
17 |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Patent Matters |
18 | |
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
Patent Prosecution and Maintenance |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
Infringement Actions |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
Pre-Challenge Requirements |
20 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
Patent Marking |
20 |
|
|
|
|
6. |
Indemnity and Insurance |
20 | |
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
Poniard Indemnity Obligations |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
Verastem Indemnity Obligations |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
Indemnification Procedure |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
Insurance |
22 |
|
|
|
|
7. |
Representations and Warranties; Disclaimer of Warranties |
23 | |
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
Mutual Representations and Warranties |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
Additional Poniard Representations and Warranties |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
Disclaimer of Warranty |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
Limitation of Liability |
26 |
|
|
|
|
8. |
Confidentiality and Publication |
26 | |
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
Treatment of Confidential Information |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.2 |
Permitted Disclosures |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
Publications |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
Publicity |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
Survival |
28 |
|
|
|
|
9. |
Term and Termination |
28 | |
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
Term |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
Termination Upon Mutual Agreement |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
Termination for Material Breach |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
Termination by Verastem for Convenience |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
Rights Upon Expiration |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
Rights Upon Termination |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
Accrued Rights |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
Survival |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.9 |
Work-in-Progress |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.10 |
Final Royalty Report |
30 |
|
|
|
|
10. |
Assignment; Successors |
30 | |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
Assignment |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
Binding Upon Successors and Assigns |
30 |
|
|
|
|
11. |
General Provisions |
31 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 |
Independent Contractors |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
Governmental Approvals and Marketing of Licensed Products |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
No Use of Name |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
U.S. Manufacture |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
Foreign Registration |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
Arbitration |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
Force Majeure |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
Entire Agreement; Modification |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
California Law |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.10 |
Construction |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.11 |
Severability |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.12 |
No Waiver |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.13 |
Attorneys Fees |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.14 |
Notices |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.15 |
Compliance with U.S. Laws |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.16 |
Counterparts |
35 |
Exhibit A: Licensed Patent Rights
Exhibit B: Transfer of Information and Materials
Exhibit C: Timeline Benchmarks and Development Plan
Exhibit D: Common Stock Warrants Agreement
Exhibit E: [**] and [**]
LICENSE AGREEMENT
This License Agreement is entered into and made effective as of this 17th day of November, 2011 (the Effective Date), by and between VERASTEM, INC., a Delaware corporation (Verastem) located at 215 First Street, Suite 440, Cambridge, MA 02142, and PONIARD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., a Washington corporation (Poniard) located at 300 Elliott Avenue West, Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98119.
RECITALS
A. Poniard has developed certain technology relating to the discovery of novel protein kinase inhibitors.
B. Verastem is engaged in research and development of pharmaceutical products for the treatment of cancer.
C. Poniard has disclosed to Verastem certain technology and Poniard has the right to grant a license to the technology, subject to certain rights of Scripps (as defined below).
D. Poniard desires to grant to Verastem, and Verastem wishes to acquire from Poniard, an exclusive, worldwide right and license to certain technology and patent rights owned or controlled by Poniard, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, Poniard and Verastem hereby agree as follows:
1. Definitions
1.1 Definitions
Capitalized terms shall have the meaning set forth herein.
Affiliate. The term Affiliate shall mean any entity which directly or indirectly controls, or is controlled by another entity. The term control as used herein means (a) in the case of corporate entities, direct or indirect ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of the stock or shares entitled to vote for the election of directors; or (b) in the case of non-corporate entities, direct or indirect ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of the equity interest with the power to direct the management and policies of such non-corporate entities.
Calendar Quarter. The term Calendar Quarter shall mean a calendar quarter ending on the last day of March, June, September or December.
Calendar Year. The term Calendar Year shall mean a period of time commencing on January 1 and ending on the following December 31.
Challenge. The term Challenge shall mean that Verastem has initiated (or requests a Sublicensee to initiate) a legal action in which it has alleged that an issued patent included in the Licensed Patent Rights is invalid or unenforceable or by which it provokes interference with a patent application included in the Licensed Patent Rights; provided, however, that, in the event such legal action is initiated by a Sublicensee with respect to an issued patent or patent application it has sublicensed and Verastem terminates such Sublicensees sublicense to the issued patent or patent application, such legal action shall not be deemed to be a Challenge for purposes of this Agreement and provided, further, that in the event Verastem does not terminate such sublicense due to the Challenge by the Sublicensee, such Challenge shall only result in consequences to such Sublicensee hereunder (i.e., increase in royalty rates on Sublicensees Net Sales pursuant to Section 4.4.5) and not to Verastem, except that Verastem shall be responsible for all of such Sublicensees obligations related to the Challenge if such Sublicensee fails to comply with such obligations as set forth above.
Commercially Reasonable Efforts. The term Commercially Reasonable Efforts shall mean, with respect to the performing Party, exerting such efforts and employing such resources as would normally be exerted or employed by such Party for a product of similar market potential, profit potential and strategic value at a similar stage of its product life, taking into account efficacy, safety, approved labeling, the competitiveness of the relevant marketplace, the patent, intellectual property and development positions of Third Parties, the applicable regulatory situation, the commercial viability of the product and other relevant development and commercialization factors based upon then-prevailing conditions.
Competing Product. The term Competing Product shall mean any pharmaceutical product, other than a Licensed Product, developed or sold for any oncology indication, a primary mode of action of which is inhibition of focal adhesion kinase (FAK).
Confidential Information. The term Confidential Information shall mean any and all proprietary or confidential information of Poniard or Verastem (each, as to its proprietary or confidential information, a Disclosing Party) which may be provided or made available to the other Party (the Receiving Party) at any time and from time to time during the Term. Information shall not be considered confidential to the extent that the Receiving Party can establish by competent proof that it:
(a) Is publicly disclosed through no fault of any Party hereto, either before or after it becomes known to the Receiving Party; or
(b) Was known to the Receiving Party prior to the date of this Agreement, which knowledge was acquired independently and not from the Disclosing Party;
(c) Is subsequently disclosed to the Receiving Party in good faith by a Third Party who has a right to make such disclosure; or
(d) Has been published by a Third Party as a matter of right.
If Confidential Information is required to be disclosed by Law or court order, the Receiving Party shall use reasonable efforts to limit the same to the minimum required to comply with the Law or court order, and shall use reasonable efforts to attempt to seek confidential treatment for that
disclosure, and prior to making such disclosure the Receiving Party shall notify the Disclosing Party, not later than [**] days (or such shorter period of time as may be reasonably practicable under the circumstances) before the disclosure in order to allow the Disclosing Party to comment and/or to obtain a protective or other order, including extensions of time and the like, with respect to such disclosure.
Control or Controlled. The term Control or Controlled shall mean, with respect to any item of Know-How or any Patent Right or other intellectual property right, the possession of the right (whether by ownership, license or otherwise (other than pursuant to a license granted under this Agreement)), to assign, or grant a license, sublicense or other right to or under, such Know-How, Patent Right or other intellectual property right as provided for herein without violating the terms of any agreement or other arrangement with any Third Party.
Cover, Covered or Covering. The term Cover, Covered or Covering shall mean, (a) with respect to a patent, that, in the absence of a license granted to a Person under a Valid Claim included in such patent, the practice by such Person of an invention claimed in such patent would infringe such Valid Claim, or (b) with respect to a patent application, that, in the absence of a license granted to a Person under a Valid Claim included in such patent application, the practice by such Person of an invention claimed in such patent application would infringe such Valid Claim if such patent application including such Valid Claim were to issue as a patent.
EMA. The term EMA shall mean the European Medicines Agency or any successor agency thereto having the same or similar functions.
FDA. The term FDA shall mean the United States Food and Drug Administration or any successor agency thereto having the same or similar functions.
Field. The term Field shall mean the diagnosis, treatment, prevention and/or control of all human diseases and conditions.
First Commercial Sale. The term First Commercial Sale shall mean, with respect to a Licensed Product in a country in the Territory, the first sale for use or consumption by the general public of such Licensed Product in such country following Regulatory Approval of such Licensed Product in such country. Sales or transfers of Licensed Products which are not for value, and sales or transfers of reasonable quantities of Licensed Products for Clinical Trial purposes or for compassionate or similar use, shall not be considered a First Commercial Sale.
Governmental Authority. The term Governmental Authority shall mean any court, agency, department, authority or other instrumentality of any national, state, county, city or other political subdivision.
IND. The term IND shall mean an application submitted to a Regulatory Authority to initiate human clinical trials, including (a) an Investigational New Drug application or any successor application or procedure filed with the FDA; (b) any non-United States equivalent of a United States Investigational New Drug application; and (c) all supplements and amendments that may be filed with respect to the foregoing.
In-Licensed Patent Rights. The term In-Licensed Patent Rights shall mean Licensed Patent Rights other than the Poniard Owned Patent Rights.
Know-How. The term Know-How shall mean any information, ideas, data, inventions, works of authorship, materials (including biological and chemical materials), trade secrets or technology (other than the Patent Rights), whether or not proprietary or patentable and whether stored or transmitted in oral, documentary, electronic or other form, including all Regulatory Documentation.
Law. The term Law shall mean any law, statute, rule, regulation, ordinance or other pronouncement having the effect of law, of any federal, national, multinational, state, provincial, county, city or other political subdivision.
Licensed Compound. The term Licensed Compound shall mean (a) [**] and/or [**]; (b) any metabolites or prodrugs of [**] and/or [**]; (c) any hydrates, conjugates, salts, esters, isomers, polymorphs or analogues of the foregoing; and (d) any other compounds that are Covered by a Licensed Patent Right and have as a primary mode of action the inhibition of FAK.
Licensed Know-How. The term Licensed Know-How shall mean all Know-How that (a) is Controlled by Poniard or its Affiliates as of the Effective Date and thereafter during the Term, and (b) (i) relates to a Licensed Compound or a Licensed Product and/or (ii) is (A) if such Know-How is under the Control of Poniard or its Affiliates as of the Effective Date, necessary or useful to research, develop, use, make, have made, market, offer to sell, sell, have sold, distribute, import or otherwise exploit Licensed Compounds and/or Licensed Products or (B) if such Know-How comes under the Control of Poniard or its Affiliates after the Effective Date, necessary to research, develop, use, make, have made, market, offer to sell, sell, have sold, distribute, import or otherwise exploit Licensed Compounds and/or Licensed Products.
Licensed Patent Rights. The term Licensed Patent Rights shall mean all Patent Rights that (a) as of the Effective Date and thereafter during the Term are Controlled by Poniard or its Affiliates; and (b) (i) Cover any Licensed Know-How or (ii) are (A) if such Patent Right has an effective filing date as of or prior to the Effective Date, otherwise necessary or useful to research, develop, use, make, have made, market, offer to sell, sell, have sold, distribute, import or otherwise exploit Licensed Compounds and/or Licensed Products; or (B) if such Patent Right has an effective filing date after the Effective Date, otherwise necessary to research, develop, use, make, have made, market, offer to sell, sell, have sold, distribute, import or otherwise exploit Licensed Compounds and/or Licensed Products. For purposes of clarity, the Licensed Patent Rights include Patent Rights licensed to Poniard under the Scripps Agreement. The Licensed Patent Rights as of the Effective Date are listed on Exhibit A. Annually, or earlier upon request by Verastem, the Parties shall update Exhibit A with current information identifying the patent applications and patents included in Licensed Patent Rights.
Licensed Product. The term Licensed Product shall mean a pharmaceutical product or composition containing a Licensed Compound as an active ingredient. For purposes of clarity, unless the context otherwise dictates, all references to Licensed Product shall be deemed to include references to the Licensed Compound contained in the Licensed Product.
Major Market Country. The term Major Market Country shall mean any of the following countries: the United States of America, the United Kingdom, France, Germany or Japan.
MHLW. The term MHLW shall mean the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, or any successor agency thereto having the same or similar functions.
NDA. The term NDA shall mean an application submitted to a Regulatory Authority for marketing approval of a product, including (a) a New Drug Application filed with the FDA, or any successor applications or procedures; (b) any non-United States equivalent of a United States New Drug Application; and (c) all supplements and amendments that may be filed with respect to the foregoing.
Net Sales. The term Net Sales shall mean the gross amount invoiced by Verastem, its Affiliates and Sublicensees, or any of them, on all sales of Licensed Products in the country of sale, less:
(a) discounts, chargebacks (only on a product by product basis) and rebates actually allowed;
(b) credits for claims, allowances, retroactive price reductions, returned goods or recalls;
(c) prepaid freight and insurance;
(d) sales or excise taxes, duties or other governmental charges actually paid in connection with sales of Licensed Products (but excluding what are commonly known as income taxes and, if not reimbursed, value added taxes); and
(e) any payment in the nature of a rebate in respect of sales to any governmental authority in respect of any government-subsidized program, including Medicare and Medicaid rebates.
Net Sales shall include all consideration charged by Verastem or its Affiliates or Sublicensees in exchange for any Licensed Products, including any monetary payments or any other property whatsoever. For purposes of determining Net Sales, a sale shall be deemed to have occurred when an invoice therefor shall be generated or the Licensed Product is shipped for delivery. Sales of Licensed Products among Verastem and its Affiliates and Sublicensees for resale or transfer of active pharmaceutical (API) for making of Licensed Products for sale shall be excluded, and only the subsequent sale of such Licensed Products by Verastem or its Affiliates or Sublicensees to unrelated parties shall be deemed Net Sales hereunder. Providing Licensed Product at no charge for preclinical, clinical, compassionate use, or regulatory purposes or as samples, and sales of Licensed Product for compassionate use, shall not be included in Net Sales.
In the event a Licensed Product is sold in combination with other components which if sold alone would not be subject to a royalty payment hereunder (a Combination Product), Net Sales of the Licensed Product, for purposes of this Agreement, shall be calculated by multiplying the actual Net Sales of the Combination Product by the fraction A/(A+B), where A is the gross selling price, during the royalty period in question, of the Licensed Product sold separately (i.e., without the other components) and B is the gross selling price, during the royalty period in question, of the other components sold separately. In the event that no such separate sales are made, Net Sales shall be calculated by multiplying the actual Net Sales of the Combination Product by the fraction C/(C+D),
where C is the fair market value of the Licensed Product (not including the other components) and D is the fair market value of such other components, such values being determined using generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied.
Party and Parties. The term Party shall mean Poniard or Verastem and the term Parties shall mean Poniard and Verastem.
Patent Right(s). The term Patent Right(s) shall mean patents and patent applications in any country in the world, including utility patents, utility models, design patents and certificates of invention, and all divisionals, continuations, continuations-in-part, substitutions, provisionals, reissues, reexaminations, renewals, extensions (including any supplemental patent certificate) and additions to any such patent applications and patents, all patents issuing therefrom and all counterparts of any of the foregoing in any country of the world.
Person. The term Person shall mean any individual, corporation, limited or general partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, trust, unincorporated association, governmental body, authority, bureau or agency, or any other entity or body.
Phase I Clinical Trial. The term Phase I Clinical Trial shall mean a human clinical trial that is intended to initially evaluate the safety, tolerance or pharmacological or antigenic effects of a product in human subjects, or that is otherwise described in 21 CFR 312.21(a) as amended (or its successor regulation or comparable Laws in countries outside the United States).
Phase II Clinical Trial. The term Phase II Clinical Trial shall mean a human clinical trial that generally meets the requirements of 21 C.F.R. § 312.21(b), as amended (or its successor regulation or comparable Laws in countries outside the United States) that is intended to support a preliminary determination as to whether a product is safe for its intended use, and to provide preliminary information about such products efficacy, in order to permit the design of further clinical trial(s), including pivotal Phase III Clinical Trials.
Phase III Clinical Trial. The term Phase III Clinical Trial shall mean a controlled study in humans of the efficacy and safety of a product, which is prospectively designed to demonstrate statistically whether such product is effective and safe for use in a particular indication in a manner sufficient to file an NDA to obtain Regulatory Approval to market the product, as further defined in 21 C.F.R. § 312.21(c), as amended (or its successor regulation or comparable Laws in countries outside the United States).
[**] or [**]. The term [**] or [**] shall mean the applicable compound identified in Exhibit E.
Poniard Owned Patent Rights. The term Poniard Owned Patent Rights shall mean Licensed Patent Rights that are owned by Poniard or its Affiliates.
Regulatory Approval. The term Regulatory Approval shall mean, with respect to a pharmaceutical product in a country or regulatory jurisdiction, the act of a Regulatory Authority necessary for the marketing and sale of such product in such country or regulatory jurisdiction, including the approval of an NDA by the FDA.
Regulatory Authority. The term Regulatory Authority shall mean any applicable government regulatory authority involved in granting approvals for the marketing and/or pricing of a pharmaceutical product in a country or regulatory jurisdiction, including the FDA and foreign equivalents thereof.
Regulatory Documentation. The term Regulatory Documentation shall mean, with respect to a Licensed Product, all INDs, Regulatory Approvals, pre-clinical and clinical data and information, regulatory materials, drug dossiers, master files, and any other reports, records, regulatory correspondence and other materials relating to the pre-clinical and clinical development and Regulatory Approval of such Licensed Product, or required to manufacture, distribute and sell such Licensed Product, including any safety database.
Royalty Term. The term Royalty Term shall mean, with respect to Licensed Products and a country, the period of time beginning with the First Commercial Sale of Licensed Product in such country and continuing until the expiration of the last Valid Claim of the Licensed Patent Rights Covering Licensed Products in such country.
Scripps. The term Scripps shall mean The Scripps Research Institute, a California non-profit public benefit.
Scripps Agreement. The term Scripps Agreement shall mean the License Agreement between Poniard and Scripps dated May 5, 2008.
Sublicensee. The term Sublicensee shall mean a Third Party to whom Verastem, or its Affiliate or another Sublicensee, has granted a sublicense in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
Territory. The term Territory shall mean all countries of the world.
Third Party. The term Third Party shall mean any Person other than the Parties and their Affiliates.
Valid Claim. The term Valid Claim shall mean a claim of (a) an issued and unexpired patent included in the Licensed Patent Rights which has not been held unenforceable, unpatentable or invalid by a decision of a court or governmental agency of competent jurisdiction, unappealable or unappealed within the time allowed for appeal, and which has not been admitted to be invalid or unenforceable through reissue or disclaimer or otherwise, or (b) a patent application included in the Licensed Patent Rights that has not been cancelled, withdrawn or abandoned and that does not have a priority date more than [**] years earlier.
1.2 Other Defined Terms.
Each of the following definitions is set forth in the section of this Agreement indicated below:
Definition |
|
Section |
Agreement |
|
Preamble |
Benchmarks |
|
3.3 |
Breaching Party |
|
9.3 |
Claims |
|
6.1 |
Combination Product |
|
1.1, Net Sales definition |
Commons Stock Warrant Agreement |
|
4.3 |
Competitive Infringement |
|
5.3.3 |
Disclosing Party |
|
1.1, Confidential Information definition |
Effective Date |
|
Preamble |
FAK |
|
1.1, Competing Product definition |
Indemnified Party |
|
6.3 |
Indemnifying Party |
|
6.3 |
Losses |
|
6.1 |
New License Agreement |
|
2.2.2 |
Non-Breaching Party |
|
9.3 |
Patent Rights Materials |
|
9.6.2(d) |
Poniard |
|
Preamble |
Poniard Indemnitee |
|
6.2 |
Receiving Party |
|
1.1, Confidential Information definition |
Royalty Report |
|
4.5 |
Scripps Patent Rights |
|
2.4 |
Term |
|
9.1 |
Verastem |
|
Preamble |
Verastem Indemnitee |
|
6.1 |
2. License
2.1 Grant
Poniard hereby grants and Verastem accepts, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and Sections 2.4 and 2.5, an exclusive, worldwide license (with right to sublicense as permitted under Section 2.2.1) under the Licensed Patent Rights and Licensed Know-How make and have made, to use and have used, to offer to sell, to sell and have sold, and import Licensed Compounds and Licensed Products in the Field.
2.2 Sublicensing
2.2.1 Granting
Verastem shall have the right to grant to its Affiliates and to Third Parties sublicenses under the license granted in Section 2.1. Each such sublicense shall be in writing and shall be consistent with the applicable terms and conditions of this Agreement and sufficient to enable Verastem to meet its diligence and reporting obligations hereunder. Verastem shall at all times be and remain responsible for its Affiliates and Sublicensees performance and compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement applicable to Affiliates and Sublicensees, including without limitation payment of all amounts that may become due hereunder as a result of Sublicensees activities. Poniard agrees that Verastems obligations under this Agreement may be satisfied through the performance of Verastems Affiliates and Sublicensees. Verastem shall, prior to granting any further sublicense of the Licensed Patent Rights (as defined in the Scripps Agreement) licensed from Scripps, and any Sublicensee shall, prior to granting any further sublicense of the Licensed Patent Rights (as defined in the Scripps Agreement) licensed from Scripps, provide Scripps with a copy of the proposed sublicense agreement, which may be in draft form and which may have financial provisions redacted, for Scripps to review solely for compliance with the provisions of the Scripps Agreement applicable to sublicenses of the Licensed Patent Rights (as defined in the Scripps Agreement) licensed from Scripps, provided however, that any such sublicense shall be subject to the provisions contained in the Scripps Agreement that are applicable to sublicenses (including without limitation the provisions regarding governmental interest, reservation of rights, development efforts, reporting, audit rights, indemnity, warranty disclaimer, limitation of liability, confidentiality, and rights upon expiration or termination but excluding the payment of a license fee). Such drafts shall be provided to Scripps at least [**] business days prior to the execution of such further sublicenses. If, within such [**] business day review period, Scripps notifies Verastem or such Sublicensee of provisions of the sublicense that do not comply with the requirements of the Scripps Agreement applicable to sublicenses, Scripps and Verastem (or the applicable Sublicensee granting the further sublicense) shall promptly discuss such concerns and Verastem (or the applicable Sublicensee granting the further sublicense) shall, before entering into the proposed sublicense, negotiate such changes to the proposed sublicense as are reasonably necessary to bring the proposed sublicense into compliance with the requirements of the Scripps Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Scripps Agreement applicable to a sublicense and any sublicense,
such terms of the Scripps Agreement shall prevail over the conflicting terms of the sublicense. Verastem shall forward to Poniard and to Scripps a copy of any all fully executed sublicense agreements within [**] days of execution.
2.2.2 Survival of Sublicenses
Any sublicense shall, at the election of the applicable Sublicensee, survive termination of this Agreement, in accordance with the provisions of this Section 2.2.2. Upon termination of this Agreement, and at the written request of a Sublicensee, Poniard will grant to each Sublicensee not then in default of its obligations under its sublicense agreement, an option to obtain directly from Poniard a license agreement on the terms set forth below, which option shall be exercisable by each Sublicensee during the [**] day period commencing on the later of the date of termination of this Agreement or when Sublicensee learns of such termination. In the event a Sublicensee elects to exercise this option and provides its written notice thereof within the [**] day period, as a condition precedent to Poniards obligation to grant the direct license to that Sublicensee, such Sublicensee must pay to Poniard all past due royalties, non-royalty revenue, patent costs and all other monies owed by Verastem to Poniard under this Agreement relating to the license rights hereunder that are sublicensed to Sublicensee. Upon Poniards receipt of all such outstanding monies, Poniard shall enter into a license agreement (a New License Agreement) directly with the requesting Sublicensee and the license granted in each New License Agreement shall be retroactive to the date of termination of this Agreement. Each New License Agreement shall be subject to the same non-financial terms and conditions as those in this Agreement; provided, however, that each New License Agreement shall contain substantially the same terms and conditions regarding sublicense scope, sublicense territory, duration of sublicense grant, and diligence obligations as the sublicense agreement between such Sublicensee and Verastem. In addition, (a) each Sublicensee shall agree in the New License Agreement to terms providing that in no event shall Poniard be liable to Sublicensee for any actual or alleged breach of such sublicense agreement by Verastem; (b) Poniard shall not have any obligations to such Sublicensee other than Poniards obligations to Verastem as set forth herein; and (c) in no event shall Poniard be obliged to accept provisions in the New License Agreement (i) unless such provisions correspond to rights granted by Verastem to Sublicensee in conformance with this Agreement and such provisions are not in conflict with the rights, duties and obligations accruing to the Verastem under this Agreement; or (ii) where such provisions are inconsistent with the legal obligations under any other sublicense agreement granted by Verastem, or by applicable federal, state or local statute or regulation. The financial consideration to Poniard under the New License Agreement shall be as follows: each such Sublicensee shall be required to make any monetary payment(s) to Poniard that, had this Agreement not been terminated, Verastem would have been required to make to Poniard under this Agreement based on the rights sublicensed to Sublicensee. Verastem must include or specifically reference this Section 2.2.2 in each of its sublicense agreements in order for such Sublicensee to have the option described above.
2.3 No Other License
This Agreement confers no license or rights by implication, estoppel, or otherwise under any patent applications or patents of Poniard other than Licensed Patent Rights regardless of whether such patents are dominant or subordinate to Licensed Patent Rights.
2.4 Government Interest
Verastem and Poniard acknowledge that Scripps has received, and expects to continue to receive, funding from the United States Government in support of Scripps research activities. Verastem and Poniard acknowledge and agree that their respective rights and obligations pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the rights of the United States Government, existing and as amended, which may arise or result from Scripps receipt of research support from the United States Government, including but not limited to, 37 C.F.R. 401, the NIH Grants Policy Statement and the NIH Guidelines for Obtaining and Disseminating Biomedical Research Resources.
2.5 Reservation of Rights
With respect to the Licensed Patent Rights licensed to Poniard pursuant to the Scripps Agreement (the Scripps Patent Rights), Verastem acknowledges that Scripps has retained rights under the Scripps Agreement for itself and the United States government, including the right of Scripps to grant nonexclusive licenses (without the right to sublicense) to nonprofit or academic institutions to use for any noncommercial research or educational purposes any Scripps Patent Rights. Upon Verastems request, Poniard shall provide Verastem, but not more frequently than quarterly, a list of any such nonexclusive licenses, including the name of the nonprofit or academic institution and the scope of the license, which shall be deemed to be confidential information of Poniard under the terms of this Agreement.
2.6 Non-Compete
During the Term, Poniard agrees not to, and shall cause its Affiliates not to, directly or indirectly, including through any ownership interest, develop, manufacture, market, sell, detail, promote or otherwise commercialize any Competing Product in the Field in any country in the Territory.
3. Transfer of Information and Materials; Development
3.1 Disclosure of Information and Transfer of Materials
3.1.1 Initial Disclosure and Transfer.
(a) Within [**] days after the Effective Date, Poniard shall provide to Verastem the data, materials, reports and other information listed on Exhibit B and shall make available to Verastem, in a mutually-agreed upon format, material information regarding the Licensed Know-How and Licensed Patent Rights.
(b) Within [**] days after the Effective Date, Poniard shall transfer to Verastem all of Poniards existing supply of [**] drug substance. Upon Verastems request, Poniard shall transfer to Verastem any agreements or arrangements with Third Party vendors to manufacture Licensed Compounds or Licensed Products.
3.1.2 Ongoing Disclosure and Transfer.
After the Effective Date, Poniard shall make its and its Affiliates relevant scientific and technical personnel available to Verastem to answer any questions or provide instruction as reasonably requested by Verastem concerning the Licensed Know-How delivered pursuant to Section 3.1.1 in order to ensure that Verastem acquires all of the Licensed Know-How and instructions from Poniard needed to be able to effectively utilize the data, materials, reports and other information described on Exhibit B.
3.2 Development and Commercialization Generally; Diligence
From and after the Effective Date, Verastem shall be responsible for the development (including obtaining Regulatory Approval for) and commercialization of the Licensed Compound and the Licensed Product. Verastem shall own all Regulatory Approvals for Licensed Products. Verastem shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to, directly and/or through its Affiliates and/or Sublicensees, develop, and after receipt of Regulatory Approval, commercialize, Licensed Products in the Field in the Major Market Countries.
3.3 Development Plan and Benchmarks
Prior to signing this Agreement, Verastem has provided to Poniard its Development Plan and under which Verastem intends to bring the subject matter of the Licensed Patent Rights to the point of commercial use. Based on this Development Plan, a development timeline (Benchmarks) has been established and set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto.
3.4 Progress Reports on Development Plan
Verastem shall provide written annual reports on its product development progress or efforts to commercialize under the Development Plan within [**] days after May 31 of each Calendar Year until annual, aggregate worldwide Net Sales first reach [**] Dollars ($[**]). Progress reports shall include, but not be limited to progress on research and development and status of applications for regulatory approvals, manufacturing, sublicensing, marketing, importing and sales during the
preceding Calendar Year, as well as plans for the present Calendar Year. Poniard also encourages these reports to include information on any of Verastems public service activities that relate to the Licensed Patent Rights. If reported progress differs from that projected in the Development Plan, Verastem shall explain the reasons for such differences. In any such annual report, Verastem may propose amendments to the Development Plan or Benchmarks, acceptance of which by Poniard may not be denied unreasonably. Verastem agrees to provide any additional information reasonably requested by Poniard to evaluate Verastems performance under this Agreement and, upon reasonable request, to discuss such information with Poniard. Poniard shall not unreasonably withhold approval of any request of Verastem to extend the time periods in the Development Plan or Benchmarks if such request is supported by a reasonable showing by Verastem of diligence in its performance under the Development Plan and toward bringing the Licensed Products to the point of commercial use. Verastem shall report to Poniard the dates for achieving the Benchmarks specified in Exhibit C and the first commercial sale of a Licensed Product in each Major Market Country within [**] days of such occurrences.
4. Payments.
4.1 License Issue Fee
Verastem agrees to pay and shall pay to Poniard a license issue fee in the amount of Two Hundred Five Thousand U.S. Dollars (U.S. $250,000) within ten (10) days after the Effective Date.
4.2 Licensed Product Development Milestones
Verastem agrees to pay and shall pay (or cause its Affiliates or Sublicensees to pay) to Poniard the following one-time development and regulatory milestone payments within [**] days after the first achievement by Verastem, its Affiliates or its Sublicensees of each milestone event:
Milestone Event: |
|
Milestone Payment (US$): |
The first dosing of the first patient in a Phase I Clinical Trial for a Licensed Product |
|
[**] U.S. Dollars (US $[**]) |
[**] |
|
[**] U.S. Dollars (US $[**]) |
[**] |
|
[**] U.S. Dollars (US $[**]) |
[**] |
|
[**] U.S. Dollars (US $[**]) |
[**] |
|
[**] U.S. Dollars (US $[**]) |
[**] |
|
[**] U.S. Dollars (US $[**]) |
[**] |
|
[**] U.S. Dollars (US $[**]) |
The total milestone payments payable to Poniard pursuant to this Section 4.2 for all Licensed Products worldwide shall not exceed Thirteen Million Two Hundred Fifty Thousand U.S. Dollars (US$13,250,000).
4.3 Warrants
Within [**] days after the first dosing of the first patient in the first Phase I Clinical Trial for a Licensed Product by Verastem, its Affiliates or Sublicensees, the Parties shall enter into a common stock warrant agreement, in the form set forth in Exhibit D (the Common Stock Warrant Agreement) pursuant to which Verastem shall issue to Poniard warrants to purchase five hundred thousand (500,000) shares of Verastems Common Stock (as defined in the Common Stock Warrant Agreement), which warrants shall have an exercise period of three (3) years and an exercise price per share equal to the per share valuation of Verastems common stock as of the most recent round of preferred stock financing of Verastem as of the date the warrants are issued or, if Versatem is a public company at such time, the average closing price of Verastems common stock during the five trading days preceding the first dosing of the first patient in the first Phase I Clinical Trial for a Licensed Product by Verastem, its Affiliates or Sublicensees.
4.4 Royalties for Licensed Products
4.4.1 Running Royalties
Verastem agrees to pay and shall pay to Poniard a running royalty on a country-by-country basis in the amount of:
(a) [**] percent ([**]%) of aggregate worldwide Net Sales less than $[**] of Licensed Products made by Verastem, its Affiliates or its Sublicensees in the Calendar Year;
(b) [**] percent ([**]%) of aggregate worldwide Net Sales greater than $[**], but less than $[**] of Licensed Products made by Verastem, its Affiliates or its Sublicensees in the Calendar Year; or
(c) [**] percent ([**]%) of aggregate worldwide Net Sales greater than $[**] of Licensed Products made by Verastem, its Affiliates or its Sublicensees in the Calendar Year;
provided, however, that, on a country-by-country basis, following the expiration or termination of Poniards royalty payment obligations under the Scripps Agreement with respect to Licensed Product in such country, the running royalty shall be reduced as follows:
(i) [**] percent ([**]%) of aggregate worldwide Net Sales less than $[**] of Licensed Products made by Verastem, its Affiliates or its Sublicensees in the Calendar Year;
(ii) [**] percent ([**]%) of aggregate worldwide Net Sales greater than $[**], but less than $[**] of Licensed Products made by Verastem, its Affiliates or its Sublicensees in the Calendar Year; or
(iii) [**] percent ([**]%) of aggregate worldwide Net Sales greater than $[**] of Licensed Products made by Verastem, its Affiliates or its Sublicensees in the Calendar Year.
4.4.2 Multiple Royalties
No multiple royalties shall be due because any Licensed Product is Covered by more than one of the Licensed Patent Rights or patent claims therein. With respect to a particular Net Sales of a Licensed Product, Verastem shall pay only one royalty to Poniard, as applicable, pursuant to Section 4.4.
4.4.3 Third Party Payments
Poniard shall be responsible for one hundred percent (100%) of all amounts payable to any Third Party under any agreement or arrangement to which Poniard is a party as of the Effective Date and that are applicable to the Licensed Compound, Licensed Product, Licensed Know-How and/or Licensed Patent Rights, including amounts payable to Scripps under the Scripps Agreement. If Poniard enters into any agreement or arrangement with a Third Party after the Effective Date under which Poniard obtains Control of Know-How, Patent Rights or other intellectual property rights that are necessary to research, develop, use, make, have made, market, offer to sell, sell, have sold, distribute, import or otherwise exploit the Licensed Compound and/or Licensed Product, Verastem shall have the right to have such Know-How, Patent Rights or other intellectual property rights included in the Licensed Know-How and/or Licensed Patent Rights, in which case Verastem shall be responsible for any amounts payable to the Third Party on account of such sublicense to Verastem hereunder, provided that such amounts shall be deemed to be amounts that Verastem pays to a Third Party to license or acquire technology from a Third Party for purposes of the royalty reduction provisions of the paragraph below. If Verastem does not elect to have such Know-How, Patent Rights or other intellectual property rights included in the Licensed Know-How and/or Licensed Patent Rights (and to pay such amounts payable to the Third Party) as set forth in the immediately preceding sentence, such Know-How, Patent Rights or other intellectual property rights shall be deemed to not be Licensed Know-How or Licensed Patent Rights.
If Verastem, its Affiliate or its Sublicensee licenses or acquires technology from a Third Party in order to develop or commercialize a Licensed Product, and Verastem, its Affiliate or its Sublicensee is required to pay such Third-Party(ies) license fees, milestone payments, royalties or other amounts, then Verastem may deduct up to [**] percent ([**]%) of the amount paid to such Third Parties from the payments owing to Poniard for such Licensed Product. In no event will a deduction, or deductions, under this Section 4.4.3 reduce any payment made by Verastem to Poniard hereunder to less than [**] percent ([**]%) of the otherwise applicable payment amount. If, but for the preceding sentence, a deduction under this Section 4.4.3 would have reduced a payment made by Verastem to Poniard hereunder to less than [**] percent ([**]%) of the otherwise applicable payment amount, the amount of such deduction that was not deducted due to such limitation shall be carried forward for deduction against subsequent payments hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a deduction under this Section 4.4.3 would reduce a royalty payment made by Verastem to Poniard hereunder with respect to Net Sales by Verastem and its Affiliates and Sublicensees to less than the royalty payment amount that Poniard is required to pay Scripps pursuant to the Scripps Agreement with respect to Net Sales by Verastem and its Affiliates and Sublicensees, Verastem shall pay to Poniard an additional royalty payment amount so that the total royalty payment amount that Verastem pays to Poniard equals the royalty payment amount that Poniard is required to pay Scripps pursuant to the Scripps Agreement with respect to Net Sales by Verastem and its Affiliates and Sublicensees.
4.4.4 Royalty Term
(a) Royalties shall be payable with respect to a Licensed Product and a country during the applicable Royalty Term.
(b) Upon the expiration of the applicable Royalty Term with respect to a Licensed Product in a country, the license granted to Verastem under Section 2.1 shall be deemed a fully paid-up, exclusive, perpetual, sublicenseable license with respect to such Licensed Product in such country.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that (i) the Royalty Term with respect to a Licensed Product and a country terminates hereunder and (ii) Poniard continues to have royalty payment obligations under Section 3.3 of the Scripps Agreement (as such amount may be adjusted in accordance with Section 3.6 of the Scripps Agreement) with respect to Net Sales of Licensed Products by Verastem and its Affiliates and Sublicensees in such country, Verastem shall pay to Poniard the royalty amount due to Scripps pursuant to Section 3.3 of the Scripps Agreement (as such amount may be adjusted in accordance with Section 3.6 of the Scripps Agreement) with respect to such Net Sales of Licensed Products in such country.
4.4.5 Royalty Increase for Licensed Products
Notwithstanding Section 4.4.1, in the event Verastem Challenges an issued patent or patent application included in the Licensed Patent Rights, the royalty rate specified in Section 4.4.1 shall be increased by [**] percent ([**]%) during the pendency of the Challenge (and by [**] percent ([**]%) in the event Verastems Challenge is unsuccessful) with respect to the Net Sales of the Licensed Products that would, in the absence of the license granted by this Agreement, infringe a Valid Claim of the Challenged patent or patent application in the country of sale, such increase to occur with respect to of the Calendar Quarter commencing immediately after the date Verastem first institutes such Challenge.
In the event Verastem institutes a Challenge, Verastem shall have no right to recoup, recover, set off or otherwise get reimbursement of any royalties, milestone payments, patent costs or other monies paid hereunder during the period of such Challenge. Verastem hereby voluntarily and irrevocably waives any right to seek return of such royalties, milestone payments, patent costs or other monies in the event Verastem directly or indirectly institutes any Challenge.
4.5 Reports on Revenues and Payments
(a) Verastem shall submit to Poniard, no later than [**] days after the end of each Calendar Quarter after the First Commercial Sale, a royalty report (the Royalty Report) setting forth for such quarter at least the following information: (i) the gross amounts due or charged for such Licensed Products; (ii) a list of each deduction applicable to determine the Net Sales of Licensed Products in each country; and (iii) the amount of royalty due on all of the above, or if no royalties are due to Poniard for any reporting period, the statement that no royalties are due and an explanation why they are not due for that quarterly period.
(b) Each Royalty Report shall be certified as correct by an officer of Verastem and shall include a detailed listing of all deductions from royalties.
4.6 Royalty Payments
Verastem shall pay to Poniard with each Royalty Report the amount of royalty due with respect to such quarter. If multiple technologies are covered by the license granted hereunder, Verastem shall specify which Licensed Patent Rights are utilized for each Licensed Product included in the Royalty Report. All payments due hereunder shall be deemed received when funds are credited to Poniards bank account and shall be payable by check or wire transfer in United States Dollars.
4.7 Foreign Sales
The remittance of royalties payable on sales outside the United States shall be payable to Poniard in United States Dollar equivalents at the official rate of exchange of the currency of the country from which the royalties are payable, as quoted in The Wall Street Journal, East Coast edition for the last business day of the Calendar Quarter in which the royalties are payable. If the transfer of or the conversion into the United States Dollar equivalents of any such remittance in any such instance is not lawful or possible, the payment of such part of the royalties as is necessary shall be made by the deposit thereof, in the currency of the country where the sale was made on which the royalty was based to the credit and account of Poniard or its nominee in any commercial bank or trust company of Poniards choice located in that country, prompt written notice of which shall be given by Verastem to Poniard.
4.8 Foreign Taxes
Any tax required to be withheld by Verastem under the Laws of any foreign country for any royalties or other amounts due hereunder or for the accounts of Poniard shall be promptly paid by Verastem for and on behalf of Poniard to the appropriate governmental authority, and Verastem shall furnish Poniard with proof of payment of such tax together with, if reasonably available, official or other appropriate evidence issued by the applicable government authority. Any such tax actually paid on Poniards behalf shall be deducted from royalty payments due Poniard.
4.9 Late Payments
Late payments of any and all payments due hereunder shall be subject to a charge of one and one-half percent (1-1/2%) per month, or two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) whichever is greater.
4.10 Record Keeping
Verastem shall keep, and shall require its Affiliates and Sublicensees to keep, accurate records (together with supporting documentation) of Licensed Products made, used or sold under this Agreement, appropriate to determine the amount of royalties, milestone payments and other monies due to Poniard hereunder. Such records shall be retained for at least [**] years following the end of the reporting period to which such records relate. They shall be available during normal business hours for examination and copying by an independent certified public accountant selected by Poniard (and reasonably acceptable to Verastem) and under an obligation of confidentiality to Verastem, for the purpose of verifying Verastems reports and payments hereunder. In conducting examinations pursuant to this Section, Poniards accountant shall have access to all records which are reasonably relevant to the calculation of payments to Poniard under Article 4. The results of such
audit shall be made available to both Parties. Poniards accountant shall not disclose to Poniard any information other than information relating to the accuracy of reports and payments made hereunder.
Such examination by Poniards accountant shall be at Poniards expense. If there has been an underreporting or underpayment in excess of five percent (5%) for any calendar year then Verastem shall pay the reasonable and documented cost of such examination as well as any additional sum that would have been payable to Poniard had the Verastem reported correctly, plus interest in accordance with Section 4.9. All payments due hereunder shall be made within [**] days of receipt of a written invoice from Poniard.
5. Patent Matters
5.1 Patent Prosecution and Maintenance
5.1.1 In-Licensed Patent Rights
The Parties acknowledge that pursuant to Poniards agreements with Third Parties pursuant to which Poniard has licensed or otherwise obtained Control of In-Licensed Patent Rights, including the Scripps Agreement, such Third Parties may retain the right to file, prosecute and maintain such In-Licensed Patent Rights. To the extent that Poniard has the right to consult with the patent attorneys selected by such Third Parties on matters relating to such In-Licensed Patent Rights and/or the right to review and provide comments on patent applications and other submissions relating to such In-Licensed Patent Rights, Poniard shall: (a) keep Verastem timely informed with regard to the patent application and maintenance processes and other submissions for the In-Licensed Patent Rights; (b) give Verastem and Verastems counsel reasonable opportunity to review and comment on the text of each patent application within the In-Licensed Patent Rights and other submissions relating thereto before filing, including the type and scope of the useful claims and the nature of supporting disclosures; and (c) include Verastems comments in any comments provided to such Third Parties. Poniard shall deliver to Verastem copies of all patent applications, amendments, related correspondence, and other related matters as to the In-Licensed Patent Rights in a timely matter. Poniard shall invoice Verastem, and Verastem shall pay, for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses of Poniard, including any reasonable attorney fees, relating to the filing, prosecution, and maintenance of the In-Licensed Patent Rights.
5.1.2 Poniard Owned Patent Rights
(a) Verastem shall have the first right to file, prosecute and maintain, at Verastems expense, the Poniard Owned Patent Rights in the Territory using patent counsel selected by Verastem and approved by Poniard, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Poniard shall, at Verastems expense and reasonable request, assist and cooperate in the filing, prosecution and maintenance of or any related necessary action for Poniard Owned Patent Rights. Verastem shall provide Poniard sufficiently in advance, where reasonable, for Poniard to comment, with copies of all patent applications and other material submissions and communications (including oral communications) with any patent counsel or patent authorities pertaining to Poniard Owned Patent Rights. Verastem shall give due consideration to Poniards comments, but shall have the final say in determining whether or not to incorporate such comments.
(b) If Verastem declines to file, prosecute or maintain any Poniard Owned Patent Rights in any country in the Territory, desires to allow any Poniard Owned Patent Rights to lapse in any country in the Territory, or desires to abandon any Poniard Owned Patent Rights in any country in the Territory before all appeals within the respective jurisdiction have been exhausted, then: (a) Verastem shall provide Poniard with reasonable written notice of such decision so as to permit Poniard to decide whether to file, prosecute or maintain such Poniard Owned Patent Right in such country and to take any necessary action; and (b) following notice from Verastem pursuant to clause (a), Poniard may, by providing prompt written notice thereof to Verastem, assume control of the filing, prosecution and/or maintenance of such Poniard Owned Patent Right in such country, at Poniards expense.
5.2 Infringement Actions
5.2.1 Notice of Alleged Infringement
Each Party shall inform the other Party promptly in writing of any alleged infringement by a Third Party of the Licensed Patent Rights Covering the Licensed Products which comes to its attention and of any reasonably available evidence thereof. During the Term, the Parties shall consult with each other regarding such infringement of any patent within the Licensed Patent Rights.
5.2.2 Enforcement of Licensed Patent Rights
(a) Except as provided in clause (b) below with respect to In-Licensed Patent Rights, Verastem shall have the first right to enforce the Licensed Patent Rights against any and all actual or suspected infringements in the Field of any Licensed Patent Rights by Third Parties making, using or selling in the Field in the Territory a product that is or may be competitive with the Licensed Product (Competitive Infringement). Verastem may enter into settlements, stipulated judgments or other arrangements respecting such infringement, at its own expense. Poniard shall permit any action to be brought in its name if necessary or desirable to bring or maintain such action or to prove damages, and Verastem shall hold Poniard harmless from any costs, expenses or liability arising from such action. Poniard agrees to provide reasonable assistance which Verastem may request in any litigation arising in accordance with the provisions of this Section 5.2.2. In the event Verastem decides not to enforce the Licensed Patent Rights against any such infringement, Verastem shall notify Poniard in writing promptly following such determination and Poniard shall have the right, but not the obligation, to enforce the Licensed Patent Rights against such infringement on its own behalf and at its own expense.
(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that, pursuant to its agreement with a Third Party licensor related to In-Licensed Patent Rights, Poniard has the right to enforce such In-Licensed Patent Rights against a Competitive Infringement, but is not permitted to delegate such rights to Verastem, Poniard shall, as directed by Verastem and at Verastems expense, enforce such In-Licensed Patent Rights (including by initiating a suit or taking other appropriate action as directed by Verastem) against such Competitive Infringement. In the event Verastem decides not to direct Poniard to enforce the Licensed Patent Rights against any such infringement, Verastem shall notify Poniard in writing promptly following such determination and Poniard shall have the right, but not the obligation, to enforce the Licensed Patent Rights against such infringement on its own behalf and at its own expense.
5.2.3 Allocation of Recovery
(a) Any damages or other recovery from an infringement action undertaken by Verastem pursuant to Section 5.2.2(a) shall first be used to reimburse the Parties for the costs and expenses incurred in such action, and shall thereafter be allocated between the Parties as follows: (i) [**] percent ([**]%) to Poniard and (ii) [**] percent ([**]%) to Verastem. If Verastem decides not to undertake such action, then any damages or recovery obtained by Poniard by undertaking such action, net of the Parties costs and expenses incurred in such infringement action, shall be allocated entirely to Poniard and shall be the sole property of Poniard.
(b) Any damages or other recovery from an infringement action undertaken by Poniard pursuant to Section 5.2.2(b) shall (i) first be used to reimburse the Parties for the costs and expenses incurred in such action, (ii) second, if such action included an In-Licensed Patent Right, any amounts required to be paid to the relevant Third Party licensor shall be paid to such licensor to the extent provided in the agreement between Poniard and such licensor with respect to the applicable In-Licensed Patent Rights and (iii) third the remainder shall be allocated between the Parties as follows: (A) [**] percent ([**]%) to Poniard and (B) [**] percent ([**]%) to Verastem. If Verastem decides not to direct Poniard to undertake such action, then any damages or recovery obtained by Poniard by undertaking such action, net of the Parties costs and expenses incurred in such infringement action, shall be allocated entirely to Poniard and shall be the sole property of Poniard.
5.3 Pre-Challenge Requirements
Verastem will provide written notice to Poniard at least [**] days prior to instituting a legal action that alleges that an issued patent included in the Licensed Patent Rights is invalid or unenforceable or by which it provokes interferences with a patent application included in the Licensed Patent Rights. Verastem will include with such written notice a list of all prior art and a description of the other facts and arguments that supports its contention that such patent is invalid or unenforceable, or such patent application does not contain patentable subject matter and should not issue, to enable the Parties to attempt in good faith to mutually resolve such issues.
5.4 Patent Marking
To the extent required by applicable Law, Verastem shall mark all Licensed Products or their containers in accordance with the applicable patent marking Laws.
6. Indemnity and Insurance
6.1 Poniard Indemnity Obligations
Poniard hereby agrees to indemnify, defend (by counsel reasonably acceptable to Verastem) and hold harmless Verastem and its Affiliates, and their directors, officers, employees, agents, successors, assigns and other representatives (collectively, the Verastem Indemnitees) from and against all damages, claims, liabilities, losses and other expenses, including reasonable attorneys fees, expert witness fees and costs, whether or not a lawsuit or other proceeding is filed, (collectively, Losses) arising from claims asserted by Third Parties (Claims), that arise out of: (a) any breach by Poniard of this Agreement, or (b) any negligent act or omission or willful
misconduct of any Poniard Indemnitee; provided that to the extent any Claim directly arises out of any grossly negligent action, or failure to act, by a Verastem Indemnitee, a material breach of any Law by a Verastem Indemnitee, or Verastems breach of this Agreement, that has been finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or by arbitration, Poniards liability for the Claim hereunder will be apportioned.
6.2 Verastem Indemnity Obligations
Verastem hereby agrees to indemnify, defend (by counsel reasonably acceptable to Poniard) and hold harmless Poniard and its Affiliates, and their directors, officers, employees, agents, successors, assigns and other representatives (collectively, the Poniard Indemnitees) from and against all Losses arising from Claims that arise out of: (a) Verastems or its Affiliates or Sublicensees use of any of the Licensed Patent Rights, (b) alleged defects or other problems with any of the Licensed Products manufactured, sold, distributed or rendered by Verastem or its Affiliates or Sublicensees, including any personal injuries, death or property damages related thereto, (c) any advertising or other promotion of the Licensed Products by Verastem, its Affiliates or Sublicensees, (d) any allegations that the Licensed Products developed, manufactured, sold, distributed or rendered by Verastem or its Affiliates or Sublicensees and/or any trademarks, service marks, logos, symbols, slogans or other materials used by Verastem or its Affiliates or Sublicensees in connection with or to market Licensed Products violate or infringe upon the trademarks, service marks, trade dress, trade names, copyrights, patents, works of authorship, inventorship rights, trade secrets, database rights, rights under unfair competition Laws, rights of publicity, privacy or defamation, or any other intellectual or industrial property rights of any Third Party, (e) Verastems or its Affiliates or Sublicensees failure to comply with any applicable Laws, (f) Verastems or its Affiliates or Sublicensees transactions with Third Parties or the operation of their respective businesses, and/or (g) the negligent or willful acts or omissions of Verastem or its Affiliates or Sublicensees; provided that to the extent any Claim directly arises out of any grossly negligent action, or failure to act, by a Poniard Indemnitee, a material breach of any Law by a Poniard Indemnitee, or Poniards breach of this Agreement, that has been finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or by arbitration, Verastems liability for the Claim hereunder will be apportioned.
6.3 Indemnification Procedure
In the event of a claim by a Third Party against any Person entitled to indemnification under this Agreement, the relevant indemnified Party (the Indemnified Party) shall promptly notify the other Party (in such capacity, the Indemnifying Party) in writing of the claim (it being understood that the failure by the Indemnified Party to give prompt notice of a Third Party claim as provided in this Section 6.3 shall not relieve the Indemnifying Party of its indemnification obligation under this Agreement except and only to the extent that such Indemnifying Party is actually prejudiced as a result of such failure to give prompt notice). Within thirty (30) days after delivery of such notification, the Indemnifying Party may, upon written notice thereof to the Indemnified Party, undertake and solely manage and control, at its sole expense and with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Indemnified Party, the defense of the claim. If the Indemnifying Party does not undertake such defense, the Indemnified Party shall control such defense. The Party not controlling such defense shall cooperate with the other Party and may, at its option and expense, be separately represented in such action. The Party controlling such defense shall keep the other Party advised of
the status of such action, suit, proceeding or claim and the defense thereof and shall consider recommendations made by the other Party with respect thereto. Except if the Indemnifying Party did not undertake defense of the claim, the Indemnifying Party shall not be liable for any litigation costs or expenses incurred by the Indemnified Party without the Indemnifying Partys written consent. The Indemnified Party shall not settle any such action, suit, proceeding or claim without the prior written consent of the Indemnifying Party, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. The Indemnifying Party shall not settle any such action, suit, proceeding or claim, or consent to any judgment in respect thereof, that does not include a complete and unconditional release of the Indemnified Party from all liability with respect thereto, that imposes any liability or obligation on the Indemnified Party or that acknowledges fault by the Indemnified Party, without the prior written consent of the Indemnified Party.
6.4 Insurance
Verastem shall name Poniard and the Poniard Indemnitees as additional insured on any commercial general liability and product liability insurance policies maintained by Verastem, its Affiliates and Sublicensees applicable to the Licensed Products.
6.4.1 Amount
During the time any such Licensed Product is involved in a Clinical Trial or being commercially distributed or sold (other than for the purpose of obtaining regulatory approvals) by Verastem or its Affiliates or Sublicensees, Verastem (or its Affiliate or Sublicensee, as the case may be) shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure and maintain (a) commercial general liability insurance in amounts not less than $[**] per occurrence and $[**] annual aggregate and naming Poniard and the Poniard Indemnitees as additional insured and (b) product liability insurance in amounts not less than $[**] per claim and $[**] annual aggregate and naming Poniard and the Poniard Indemnitees as additional insured. Such commercial general liability insurance shall provide (i) broad form contractual liability coverage for Verastems indemnification under this Agreement and (ii) coverage for litigation costs. Such product liability insurance shall provide (x) product liability coverage, (y) broad form contractual liability coverage for Verastems indemnification under this Agreement, and (z) coverage for litigation costs. If Verastem elects to self-insure all or part of the limits described above (including deductibles or retentions which are in excess of $[**] annual aggregate) such self-insurance program must be acceptable to Poniard in its reasonable discretion unless Verastem or its Affiliates or Sublicensee has and maintains a market capitalization in excess of [**] Dollars ($[**]). The insurance coverage amounts specified herein or the maintenance of such insurance policies shall not in any way limit Verastems indemnity or other liability under this Agreement.
6.4.2 Subrogation
In addition, Verastem, on behalf of itself and its insurance carriers, waives any and all claims and rights of recovery against the Poniard Indemnitees for insured losses, including all rights of subrogation, with respect to either Partys performance under this Agreement or for any loss of or damage to Verastem or its property or the property of others under its control. Verastems commercial general liability insurance and product liability policies shall also include a waiver of subrogation consistent with this Section 6.4.2 in favor of the Poniard Indemnitees. Verastem shall
be responsible for obtaining such waiver of subrogation from its insurance carriers. Verastems insurance policies shall be primary and not contributory to any insurance carried by its sublicensees or by Poniard. Upon Poniards request, Verastem shall deliver to Poniard copies of insurance certificates or binders and such waiver of subrogation that complies with the requirements of this Article 6.
6.4.3 Notice
Verastem shall provide Poniard with written notice at least (a) [**] days prior to the non-renewal of such insurance by Verastem and (b) [**] days prior to the cancellation of such insurance. If Verastem does not obtain replacement insurance providing comparable coverage within such [**] day or [**] day period, as applicable, Poniard shall have the right to terminate this Agreement effective at the end of such period without notice or any additional waiting periods.
6.4.4 Time Period
Verastem shall maintain such product liability insurance beyond the expiration or termination of this Agreement during (a) the period that any Licensed Product relating to, or developed pursuant to, this Agreement is being commercially distributed or sold by Verastem or by a Sublicensee, Affiliate or agent of Verastem; and (b) a reasonable period after the period referred to in Section 6.4.4 (a) above which in no event shall be less than [**] years.
7. Representations and Warranties; Disclaimer of Warranties
7.1 Mutual Representations and Warranties
Each Party represents and warrants that:
(a) it is a corporation duly organized and in good standing under the Laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation, and it has full power and authority and the legal right to own and operate its property and assets and to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and as it is contemplated to be conducted by this Agreement;
(b) it has the full right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to grant the rights and licenses granted by it under this Agreement;
(c) as of the Effective Date, there are no existing or, to its knowledge, threatened actions, suits or claims pending with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement or its right to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement;
(d) as of the Effective Date, it has taken all necessary action on its part to authorize the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of its obligations under this Agreement;
(e) this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered on behalf of it, and constitutes a legal, valid, binding obligation, enforceable against it in accordance with the terms hereof, subject to the general principles of equity and to bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium and other similar Laws affecting the enforcement of creditors rights generally;
(f) as of the Effective Date, all necessary consents, approvals and authorizations of all Regulatory Authorities and Governmental Authorities and other Persons required to be obtained by it in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of its obligations under this Agreement have been obtained (other than Regulatory Approvals to develop, market and commercialize Licensed Products);
(g) (i) neither such Party nor, to the actual knowledge of such Party, any employee, agent or subcontractor of such Party involved or to be involved in the development and commercialization of Licensed Products has been debarred under Subsection (a) or (b) of Section 306 of the United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 335a); (ii) no Person who is known by such Party to have been debarred under Subsection (a) or (b) of Section 306 of such Act will be employed by such Party in the performance of any activities hereunder; and (iii) to the actual knowledge of such Party, no Person on any of the FDA clinical investigator enforcement lists (including the (1) Disqualified/Totally Restricted List, (2) Restricted List and (3) Adequate Assurances List) will participate in the performance of any activities hereunder; and
(h) the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of its obligations hereunder do not conflict with, or constitute a default under, any of its contractual obligations.
7.2 Additional Poniard Representations and Warranties
Poniard represents, warrants and covenants to Verastem that:
(a) To the knowledge of Poniard, the issued Patent Rights encompassed within the Licensed Patent Rights, are valid and enforceable patents and no Third Party (i) is infringing any such patents as of the Effective Date or (ii) has challenged the extent, validity or enforceability of such Patent Rights (including through the institution or written threat of institution of interference, nullity or similar invalidity proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office or any analogous foreign Governmental Authority).
(b) Exhibit A contains a complete and correct list of all Patent Rights which are owned by or otherwise Controlled by Poniard or its Affiliates as of the Effective Date (and identifies the entity that owns and the entity that Controls each patent and patent application) that relate to, or are necessary or useful to develop or commercialize Licensed Compounds or Licensed Products.
(c) Poniard either is the sole legal and beneficial owner of, or has a valid license under, the Licensed Know-How and Licensed Patent Rights, free of any lien, encumbrance, charge, security interest, mortgage or other similar restriction, and no Person, has any right, interest or claim in or to, and neither Poniard nor any of its Affiliates has entered into any agreement granting any right, interest or claim in or to, any Licensed Know-How or Licensed Patent Right to any Third Party.
(d) Poniard has complied with all applicable Laws, including any disclosure requirements, in connection with the filing, prosecution and maintenance of the Licensed Patent Rights in the Territory.
(e) Except as previously disclosed to Verastem with respect to the Scripps Patent Rights, the Licensed Know-How and Licensed Patent Rights were not developed with funding from the
United States government or any other Governmental Authority pursuant to which the Governmental Authority has, or shall have, any rights in any Licensed Know-How or Licensed Patent Rights.
(f) Poniard has obtained assignments from the inventors of all inventorship and ownership rights relating to the Poniard Owned Patent Rights, all inventors are disclosed and named in the Licensed Patent Rights and all such assignments of inventorship rights relating to the Poniard Patent Rights are valid and enforceable.
(g) Except with respect to the Scripps Patent Rights, as of the Effective Date, none of the Licensed Know-How or Licensed Patent Rights has been licensed or otherwise made available (including pursuant to any immunity from suit arrangement) to Poniard or any of its Affiliates from a Third Party and there is no agreement other than the Scripps Agreement between Poniard or any of its Affiliates and any Third Party pursuant to which Poniard or any of its Affiliates has licensed any In-Licensed Patent Rights from any Third Party.
(h) Poniard has provided to Verastem a true and complete copy of the Scripps Agreement. As of the Effective Date, there are no amendments to the Scripps Agreement, the Scripps Agreement is in full force, Poniard is in compliance with the Scripps Agreement and Poniards entry into this Agreement does not conflict with the Scripps Agreement. Poniard shall maintain the Scripps Agreement in effect, shall not amend the Scripps Agreement in a manner that is detrimental to the rights of Verastem under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Verastem, and shall promptly notify Verastem of the expiration of the term of the Scripps Agreement, any notice of breach or any other notice that the Scripps Agreement may be terminated.
(i) There is no action, claim, demand, suit, proceeding, arbitration, grievance, citation, summons, subpoena, inquiry or investigation of any nature, civil, criminal, regulatory or otherwise, in Law or in equity, pending or, to the knowledge of Poniard, threatened against Poniard, any of its Affiliates or any Third Party, in each case in connection with the Licensed Know-How, the Licensed Patent Rights, the Licensed Compounds or the Licensed Products.
(j) To the knowledge of Poniard, all information provided by Poniard to Verastem regarding the Licensed Patent Rights prior to the Effective Date has been accurate in all material respects.
7.3 Disclaimer of Warranty
EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS ARTICLE 8, NEITHER PARTY MAKES ANY REPRESENTATIONS OR EXTENDS ANY WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, QUALITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NONINFRINGEMENT, OR VALIDITY OF PATENT CLAIMS.
7.4 Limitation of Liability
EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO EACH PARTYS INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS IN ARTICLE 7, IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, EXEMPLARY OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS OR EXPECTED SAVINGS OR OTHER ECONOMIC LOSSES, OR FOR INJURY TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY) ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR ITS SUBJECT MATTER. THE FOREGOING EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS SHALL APPLY TO ALL CLAIMS AND ACTIONS OF ANY KIND AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO NEGLIGENCE OR STRICT LIABILITY), OR ANY OTHER GROUNDS, AND REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES, AND NOTWITHSTANDING ANY FAILURE OF ESSENTIAL PURPOSE OF ANY LIMITED REMEDY. THE PARTIES FURTHER AGREE THAT EACH WARRANTY DISCLAIMER, EXCLUSION OF DAMAGES OR OTHER LIMITATION OF LIABILITY HEREIN IS INTENDED TO BE SEVERABLE AND INDEPENDENT OF THE OTHER PROVISIONS SINCE THEY EACH REPRESENT SEPARATE ELEMENTS OF RISK ALLOCATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES.
8. Confidentiality and Publication
8.1 Treatment of Confidential Information
Each Receiving Party agrees that all Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party (a) shall not be used by the Receiving Party except to perform its obligations or exercise its rights under this Agreement, (b) shall be maintained in confidence by the Receiving Party, and (c) except as permitted by Sections 8.2, 8.3 and 8.4, shall not be disclosed by the Receiving Party to any Person without the prior written consent of the Disclosing Party.
8.2 Permitted Disclosures
The Receiving Party may provide the Disclosing Partys Confidential Information:
(a) to the Receiving Partys and its Affiliates employees, consultants and advisors who have a need to know such Confidential Information and are bound by an obligation to maintain the confidentiality of the Disclosing Partys Confidential Information to the same extent as if they were parties hereto;
(b) to the employees, consultants and advisors of Sublicensees and potential Sublicensees who have a need to know such Confidential Information for purposes of the Receiving Party or its Affiliates granting sublicenses under Know-How, Patent Rights or other intellectual property rights as permitted herein and who are bound by an obligation to maintain the confidentiality of the Disclosing Partys Confidential Information to the same extent as if they were parties hereto;
(c) to patent offices or Regulatory Authorities in order to seek or obtain Patent Rights or approval to conduct Clinical Trials or to gain Regulatory Approval, as provided herein; provided, that such disclosure may be made only to the extent reasonably necessary to seek or obtain such Patent Rights or approvals;
(d) to the extent reasonably necessary for the development and/or commercialization of the Licensed Products in accordance with the licenses granted under this Agreement; or
(e) if such disclosure is required by Law (including by rules or regulations of any securities exchange or NASDAQ) or to defend or prosecute litigation or arbitration; provided, that prior to such disclosure, to the extent permitted by Law or such rules or regulations, the Receiving Party promptly notifies the Disclosing Party of such requirement and furnishes only that portion of the Disclosing Partys Confidential Information that the Receiving Party is legally required to furnish.
8.3 Publications
Verastem shall have the right to make disclosures pertaining to Licensed Products in scientific journals or other publications. To the extent that any such publication in any way mentions or refers to Scripps or the Scripps Patent Rights, Verastem shall provide Scripps with an advance copy of the proposed publication, and Poniard shall then have [**] days in which to recommend any changes it reasonably believes are necessary to preserve any Patent Rights or Know-How belonging in whole or in part to Scripps. If Scripps informs Verastem that such publication, in Scripps reasonable judgment, could be expected to have a material adverse effect on any patentable invention owned by or licensed to, in whole or in part, Scripps, or on any Know-How which is Confidential Information (as defined in the Scripps Agreement) of Scripps, Verastem shall delay or prevent such publication as follows: (a) with respect to a patentable invention, such publication shall be delayed sufficiently long to permit the timely preparation and filing of a patent application (not to exceed [**] days); and (b) with respect to Know-How which is Confidential Information (as defined in the Scripps Agreement)of Scripps, such Know-How shall be deleted from the publication.
8.4 Publicity
Neither Party shall have the right to make any public announcements with respect to this Agreement, nor publicly disclose the terms of this Agreement, without the prior written consent of the other Party, except as follows:
(a) Each Party may make public announcements with respect to this Agreement or disclose the terms of this Agreement to the extent such disclosure is required by Law (including by rules or regulations of any securities exchange or NASDAQ) or to defend or prosecute litigation or arbitration; provided, that, prior to such disclosure, to the extent permitted by Law or such rules or regulations, the disclosing Party promptly notifies the other Party of such requirement and the disclosing Party furnishes only those terms of this Agreement that the disclosing Party is legally required to furnish.
(b) Each Party may make subsequent disclosures of information which has been previously disclosed in accordance with this Agreement.
(c) Each Party may publicly file this Agreement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any other relevant securities commission in any country, and shall request, and use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to obtain confidential treatment of terms permitted to be redacted; provided, that the redaction of such terms is permitted by the applicable rules and
regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any such securities commission.
(d) Poniard may disclose this Agreement to (i) Scripps, to the extent required under the Scripps Agreement; and (ii) Poniards Affiliates, and Poniards and its Affiliates employees, staff members, consultants and advisors; provided, that such Persons are bound to maintain the confidentiality of this Agreement to the same extent as if they were parties hereto.
(e) Verastem may disclose this Agreement to (i) Verastems Affiliates, and Verastems and its Affiliates employees, consultants and advisors; (ii) Verastems and its Affiliates and then-current and potential Third Party licensors, licensees, Sublicensees and consultants, and (iii) Verastems then-current and potential lenders, investors and acquirers; provided, that such Persons are bound to maintain the confidentiality of this Agreement to the same extent as if they were parties hereto.
(f) Verastem may publicly disclose that Verastem is licensed under the Licensed Know-How and Licensed Patent Rights and may make statements of fact with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.
8.5 Survival
The confidentiality obligations set forth in this Article 8 shall survive for [**] years after the Term.
9. Term and Termination
9.1 Term
Unless terminated sooner in accordance with the terms set forth herein, the term of this Agreement (the Term) shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall expire upon the last to expire Royalty Term.
9.2 Termination Upon Mutual Agreement
This Agreement may be terminated by mutual written consent of both Parties.
9.3 Termination for Material Breach
If either Party (the Non-Breaching Party) believes that the other Party (the Breaching Party) is in material breach of this Agreement (including any material breach of a representation or warranty made in this Agreement), then the Non-Breaching Party may deliver notice of such breach to the Breaching Party. If the Breaching Party fails to cure such breach within the [**] day period after the Breaching Partys receipt of such notice, the Non-Breaching Party may terminate this Agreement in its entirety upon written notice to the Breaching Party.
In the event a Party gives notice to the Breaching Party pursuant to this Section 9.3 as a result of a material breach (or alleged material breach) by the Breaching Party and, on or before the end of the cure period therefor set forth above, either Party has requested an arbitration pursuant to Section 11.6 in which the Breaching Party is in good faith disputing such basis for termination pursuant to this Section 9.3, then this Agreement shall not terminate unless and until such arbitrators issue a final ruling or award upholding such basis for termination and the Breaching Party subsequently fails to comply with the arbitrators award provisions addressing the steps the Breaching Party must take to cure such breach.
9.4 Termination by Verastem for Convenience
Verastem may terminate this Agreement or any portion of its license rights hereunder by giving ninety (90) days advance written notice of termination to Poniard.
9.5 Rights Upon Expiration
Except as provided below, neither Party shall have any further rights or obligations upon the expiration of this Agreement upon its regularly scheduled expiration date other than the obligation of Verastem to make any and all reports and payments for the final quarterly period in accordance with Sections 4.5, 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8. Sections 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, 2.5, 4.4.3, 4.4.4, 4.10, 7.3, 7.4 and 9.5 and Articles 6, 8, 10 and 11 shall also survive the expiration of this Agreement.
9.6 Rights Upon Termination
Upon any termination of this Agreement by mutual agreement of the Parties pursuant to Section 9.2, by either Party pursuant to Section 9.3 or by Verastem pursuant to Section 9.4, the following shall apply:
(a) the licenses granted to Verastem hereunder shall terminate and revert to Poniard, except that any Sublicensee who is not then in breach of its sublicense shall have the right to continue its license rights as set forth in Section 2.2.2.
(b) Verastem shall make any and all reports and payments for the final quarterly period in accordance with Sections 4.5, 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8.
(c) except as otherwise provided in Section 9.9 of this Agreement with respect to work-in-progress, upon such termination, Verastem shall have no further right under this Agreement to practice any invention Covered by the Licensed Patent Rights.
(d) Upon any such termination, Verastem shall promptly return to Poniard or destroy all materials, samples, documents, information, and other materials that are Covered by a Valid Claim of an issued patent included in the Licensed Patent Rights solely owned by Poniard (Patent Rights Materials); provided, however, that Verastem may retain one archival copy of the Patent Rights Materials and shall not be obligated to return to Poniard or destroy proprietary information which Verastem can show that it independently developed, or Patent Rights Materials that may be used pursuant to 35 USC 271(e)(1) without infringing a Valid Claim of an issued patent included in the Licensed Patent Rights.
9.7 Accrued Rights
Any such termination shall not relieve either Party from any obligations accrued to the date of such termination. Termination of this Agreement shall be in addition to, and shall not prejudice, the Parties remedies at law or in equity, including the Parties ability to receive legal damages and/or equitable relief with respect to any breach of this Agreement, regardless of whether or not such breach was the reason for the termination.
9.8 Survival
Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, the following provisions shall survive such termination: Sections 4.10, 7.3, 7.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9 and 9.10 and Articles 6, 8, 10 and 11.
9.9 Work-in-Progress
Upon any such early termination of the licenses granted hereunder in accordance with this Agreement, Verastem shall be entitled to finish any work-in-progress and to sell any completed inventory of a Licensed Product Covered by Licensed Patent Rights which remain on hand as of the date of the termination, so long as Verastem sells such inventory in the normal course of business and at regular selling prices and pays to Poniard the royalties applicable to said subsequent sales in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement, provided that no such sales shall be permitted after the expiration of [**] months after the date of termination.
9.10 Final Royalty Report
Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, Verastem shall submit a final report to Poniard and any payments due Poniard and unreimbursed patent expenses invoiced by Poniard shall become immediately payable.
10. Assignment; Successors
10.1 Assignment
Any and all assignments of this Agreement or any rights granted hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, are void; provided, however, that either Party may, without such consent, assign this Agreement and transfer its rights and obligations hereunder in connection with a merger, consolidation or reorganization of that Party or to an Affiliate or a purchaser of all or substantially all of its assets.
10.2 Binding Upon Successors and Assigns
Subject to the limitations on assignment herein, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any successors in interest and assigns of Poniard and Verastem. Whenever there has been an assignment by Verastem as permitted by this Agreement, the term Verastem as used in this Agreement shall also include and refer to, if appropriate, such assignee. Whenever there has been an assignment by Poniard as permitted by this Agreement, the term Poniard as used in this Agreement shall also include and refer to, if appropriate, such assignee.
11. General Provisions
11.1 Independent Contractors
The relationship between Poniard and Verastem is that of independent contractors. Poniard and Verastem are not joint venturers, partners, principal and agent, master and servant, employer or employee, and have no other relationship other than independent contracting parties. Poniard and Verastem shall have no power to bind or obligate each other in any manner, other than as is expressly set forth in this Agreement.
11.2 Governmental Approvals and Marketing of Licensed Products
Verastem shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary governmental approvals for the development, production, distribution, performance, sale and use of any Licensed Product at Verastems expense, including any safety studies. Verastem shall have sole responsibility for any warning labels, packaging and instructions as to the use of Licensed Products and for the quality control for any Licensed Products.
11.3 No Use of Name
The use of the name The Scripps Research Institute, Scripps, TSRI, Poniard or any variation thereof in connection with the advertising, sale or performance of Licensed Products is expressly prohibited.
11.4 U.S. Manufacture
To the extent required, Verastem agrees to abide by the Preference for United States Industry as set forth in 37 CFR 401.14 (I).
11.5 Foreign Registration
Verastem agrees to register this Agreement with any foreign governmental agency which requires such registration, and Verastem shall pay all costs and legal fees in connection therewith. In addition, Verastem shall ensure that all foreign Laws affecting this Agreement or the sale of Licensed Products are fully satisfied.
11.6 Arbitration
Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof shall be settled by binding confidential arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and the procedures set forth below. In the event of any inconsistency between the Rules of AAA and the procedures set forth below, the procedures set forth below shall control. Judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrators may be enforced in any court having jurisdiction thereof.
11.6.1 Location
The location of the arbitration shall be in the County of San Diego, California.
11.6.2 Selection of Arbitrators
The arbitration shall be conducted by a panel of three neutral arbitrators who are independent and disinterested with respect to the Parties, this Agreement, and the outcome of the arbitration. Each Party shall appoint one neutral arbitrator, and these two arbitrators so selected by the Parties shall then select the third arbitrator, and all arbitrators must have at least ten (10) years experience in mediating or arbitrating cases regarding the same or substantially similar subject matter as the dispute between Verastem and Poniard. If one Party has given written notice to the other Party as to the identity of the arbitrator appointed by the Party, and the Party thereafter makes a written demand on the other Party to appoint its designated arbitrator within the next [**] days, and the other Party fails to appoint its designated arbitrator within [**] days after receiving said written demand, then the arbitrator who has already been designated shall appoint the other two arbitrators.
11.6.3 Discovery
The arbitrators shall decide any disputes and shall control the process concerning these pre-hearing discovery matters. Pursuant to the Rules of AAA, the Parties may subpoena witnesses and documents for presentation at the hearing.
11.6.4 Case Management
Prompt resolution of any dispute is important to both Parties; and the Parties agree that the arbitration of any dispute shall be conducted expeditiously. The arbitrators are instructed and directed to assume case management initiative and control over the arbitration process (including scheduling of events, pre-hearing discovery and activities, and the conduct of the hearing), in order to complete the arbitration as expeditiously as is reasonably practical for obtaining a just resolution of the dispute.
11.6.5 Remedies
The arbitrators may grant any legal or equitable remedy or relief that the arbitrators deem just and equitable, to the same extent that remedies or relief could be granted by a state or federal court, provided however, that no punitive damages may be awarded. No court action shall be maintained seeking punitive damages. The decision of any two of the three arbitrators appointed shall be binding upon the Parties. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, prior to or while an arbitration proceeding is pending, either Party has the right to seek and obtain injunctive and other equitable relief from a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce that Partys rights hereunder.
11.6.6 Expenses
The expenses of the arbitration, including the arbitrators fees, expert witness fees, and attorneys fees, may be awarded to the prevailing Party, in the discretion of the arbitrators, or may be apportioned between the Parties in any manner deemed appropriate by the arbitrators. Unless and until the arbitrators decide that one Party is to pay for all (or a share) of such expenses, both Parties shall share equally in the payment of the arbitrators fees as and when billed by the arbitrators.
11.6.7 Confidentiality
Except as set forth below, and as necessary to obtain or enforce a judgment upon any arbitration award, the Parties shall keep confidential the fact of the arbitration, the dispute being arbitrated, and the decision of the arbitrators. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties may disclose information about the arbitration to persons who have a need to know, such as directors, trustees, management employees, witnesses, experts, investors, attorneys, lenders, insurers, and others who may be directly affected. Additionally, if a Party has stock which is publicly traded, the Party may make such disclosures as are required by applicable securities Laws, but will use commercially reasonable efforts to seek confidential treatment for such disclosure.
11.7 Force Majeure
Neither Party will be held liable or responsible to the other Party nor be deemed to have breached this Agreement for failure or delay in fulfilling or performing any provision of this Agreement when such failure or delay results from causes beyond the reasonable control of the affected Party, which may include embargoes, acts of war (whether declared or not), insurrections, riots, civil commotions, acts of terrorism, strikes, lockouts or other labor disturbances, or acts of God. The affected Party will notify the other Party of such force majeure circumstances as soon as reasonably practical and will make every reasonable effort to mitigate the effects of such force majeure circumstances. If a Party is so delayed and such failure or omission is not cured within ninety (90) days, the other Party may terminate this Agreement upon written notice
11.8 Entire Agreement; Modification
This Agreement and all of the attached Exhibits, set forth the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties as to the subject matter hereof, and supersede all prior or contemporaneous agreements or understandings, whether oral or written. There shall be no amendments or modifications to this Agreement, except by a written document which is signed by both Parties.
11.9 California Law
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the Laws of the State of California without regard to its conflicts or choice of Laws principles thereof.
11.10 Construction
In construing this Agreement, unless expressly specified otherwise;
references to Sections, Articles and Exhibits are to sections and articles of, and exhibits to, this Agreement;
except where the context otherwise requires, use of either gender includes the other gender, and use of the singular includes the plural and vice versa;
headings and titles are for convenience only and do not affect the interpretation of this Agreement;
any list or examples following the word including shall be interpreted without limitation to the generality of the preceding words;
except where the context otherwise requires, the word or is used in the inclusive sense;
all references to dollars or $ herein shall mean U.S. Dollars; and
each Party represents that it has been represented by legal counsel in connection with this Agreement and acknowledges that it has participated in the drafting hereof. In interpreting and applying the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the Parties agree that no presumption will apply against the Party which drafted such terms and provisions.
11.11 Severability
Should any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement be held invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall be considered severed from this Agreement and shall not serve to invalidate the remaining provisions thereof. The Parties shall make a good faith effort to replace any invalid or unenforceable provision with a valid and enforceable one such that the objectives contemplated by them when entering this Agreement may be realized.
11.12 No Waiver
Any delay in enforcing a Partys rights under this Agreement or any waiver as to a particular default or other matter shall not constitute a waiver of such Partys rights to the future enforcement of its rights under this Agreement, excepting only as to an express written and signed waiver as to a particular matter for a particular period of time.
11.13 Attorneys Fees
In the event of a dispute between the Parties hereto or in the event of any default hereunder, the Party prevailing in the resolution of any such dispute or default shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys fees and other costs incurred in connection with resolving such dispute or default. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Parties agree that this Section 11.13 shall not apply, and attorneys fees shall not be awarded to either Party, with respect to any Challenge or any action wherein Verastem alleges that it is not required to comply with or perform some or all of the provisions of this Agreement based upon a good faith claim that any of the Licensed Patent Rights are invalid or unenforceable. Each Party acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement has been submitted to the scrutiny of the Party and its own counsel, from whom the Party has sought advice and received representation in the negotiation and execution of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be given a fair and reasonable interpretation in accordance with the words hereof, without consideration or weight being given to it having been drafted by, or on behalf of, one of the Parties or its counsel.
11.14 Notices
Any notices required by this Agreement, including approvals, pre-approvals and consents, shall be in writing, shall specifically refer to this Agreement and shall be sent by registered or
certified airmail, postage prepaid, or by telefax, telex or cable, charges prepaid, or by overnight courier, postage prepaid and shall be forwarded to the respective addresses set forth below unless subsequently changed by written notice to the other Party:
For Verastem: |
Verastem, Inc. |
|
215 First Street, Suite 440 |
|
Cambridge, MA 02142 |
|
Attention: Robert Forrester |
|
Fax No.: (617) 812-0059 |
|
|
With a copy to: |
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP |
|
60 State Street |
|
Boston, MA 02109 |
|
Attention: Steven D. Barrett, Esq. |
|
Fax No.: (617) 526-5000 |
|
|
For Poniard: |
Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
300 Elliott Avenue West, Suite 500 |
|
Seattle, WA 98119 |
|
Attention: Vice President Legal |
|
Fax No.: (206) 286-2537 |
|
|
With a copy to: |
Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
7000 Shoreline Court, Suite 270 |
|
South San Francisco, CA 94080 |
|
Attention: Vice President Business Development |
|
Fax No: (650) 583-3789 |
Notices shall be deemed delivered upon the earlier of (a) when received; (b) three (3) days after deposit into the U.S. mail; (c) the date notice is sent via telefax, telex or cable; or (d) the day immediately following delivery to an overnight courier guaranteeing next-day delivery (except Sunday and holidays).
11.15 Compliance with U.S. Laws
Nothing contained in this Agreement shall require or permit Poniard or Verastem to do any act inconsistent with the requirements of any United States Law, regulation or executive order as the same may be in effect from time to time.
11.16 Counterparts
This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each and every one of which shall be deemed an original, notwithstanding variations in format or file designation which may result from the electronic transmission, storage and printing of copies from separate computers or printers. Facsimile signatures and signatures transmitted via PDF shall be treated as original signatures.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement by their duly authorized representatives as of the date set forth above.
PONIARD: |
VERASTEM: | |||
|
| |||
PONIARD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
VERASTEM, INC. | |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
By: |
Ronald A. Martell |
|
By: |
Robert Forrester |
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
CEO |
|
Title: |
COO |
EXHIBIT A
LICENSED PATENT RIGHTS
Scripps Patents/Applications
Poniard Ref # |
|
Serial # |
|
Filing Date |
|
Country |
|
Title |
|
Status |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
Poniard Patents/Applications
Poniard Ref # |
|
Serial # |
|
Filing Date |
|
Country |
|
Title |
|
Status |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
|
[**] |
EXHIBIT B
TRANSFER OF INFORMATION AND MATERIALS
The following information and materials shall be transferred to Verastem by Poniard promptly after execution of this Agreement, in accordance with Section 3.1.1:
Item |
|
Detailed Description |
Chemistry |
|
|
Protocols for all analogs |
|
[**] |
SAR tables |
|
[**] |
Intermediates from project (both contracted and purchased) |
|
[**] |
Final compounds including PFE |
|
[**] |
Master list of cmpds: QA/QC, analytical data (LC/MS, NMR for final cmpds-Zip files) |
|
[**] |
|
|
|
Biology |
|
|
FAK biochemical assay information |
|
[**] |
Cellular assay information |
|
[**] |
PK and tolerability studies: in life protocol and analysis |
|
[**] |
Item |
|
Detailed Description |
PK in vitro and assay information |
|
[**] |
Bioanalytical methods for [**] |
|
[**] |
[**] |
|
[**] |
Bulk Materials |
|
[**] |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Final report on collaboration project |
|
[**] |
Program data |
|
[**] |
[**].
EXHIBIT C
TIMELINE BENCHMARKS AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Product Development |
|
Time from Effective Date |
[**] |
|
[**] years |
[**] |
|
[**] years |
[**] |
|
[**] years |
[**] |
|
[**] years |
[**] |
|
[**] years |
[**]
EXHIBIT D
COMMONS STOCK WARRANTS AGREEMENT
THIS WARRANT AND THE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ISSUED UPON ITS
EXERCISE ARE SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON
TRANSFER SET FORTH IN SECTION 5 OF THIS WARRANT
Number of Shares: 500,000
(subject to adjustment)
Date of Issuance: [ ]
Original Issue Date (as defined in subsection 2(a)): [ ]
Verastem, Inc.
Common Stock Purchase Warrant
(Void after [INSERT THIRD ANNIVERSARY OF ISSUANCE DATE])
Verastem, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for value received, hereby certifies that Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or its registered assigns (the Registered Holder), is entitled, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, to purchase from the Company, at any time or from time to time on or after the date of issuance and on or before 5:00 p.m. (Boston time) on [INSERT THIRD ANNIVERSARY OF ISSUANCE DATE], 500,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, of the Company (Common Stock), at a purchase price of $[TO BE INSERTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION [ ] OF LICENSE AGREEMENT] per share. The shares purchasable upon exercise of this Warrant, and the purchase price per share, each as adjusted from time to time pursuant to the provisions of this Warrant, are hereinafter referred to as the Warrant Shares and the Purchase Price, respectively.
1. Exercise.
(a) Exercise for Cash. The Registered Holder may, at its option, elect to exercise this Warrant, in whole or in part and at any time or from time to time, by surrendering this Warrant, with the purchase form appended hereto as Exhibit I duly executed by or on behalf of the Registered Holder, at the principal office of the Company, or at such other office or agency as the Company may designate, accompanied by payment in full, in lawful money of the United States, of the Purchase Price payable in respect of the number of Warrant Shares purchased upon such exercise.
(b) Cashless Exercise.
(i) The Registered Holder may, at its option, elect to exercise this Warrant, in whole or in part and at any time or from time to time, on a cashless basis, by surrendering this Warrant, with the purchase form appended hereto as Exhibit I duly executed by or on behalf of the Registered Holder, at the principal office of the Company, or at such other office or agency as the Company may designate, by canceling a portion of this Warrant in payment of the Purchase Price payable in respect of the number of Warrant Shares purchased upon such exercise. In the event of an exercise pursuant to this subsection 1(b), the number of
Warrant Shares issued to the Registered Holder shall be determined according to the following formula:
X = Y(A-B)
A
Where: X = the number of Warrant Shares that shall be issued to the Registered Holder;
Y = the number of Warrant Shares for which this Warrant is being exercised (which shall include both the number of Warrant Shares issued to the Registered Holder and the number of Warrant Shares subject to the portion of the Warrant being cancelled in payment of the Purchase Price);
A = the Fair Market Value (as defined below) of one share of Common Stock; and
B = the Purchase Price then in effect.
(ii) The Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock shall be determined as follows:
(1) If the Common Stock is listed on a national securities exchange or another nationally recognized trading system as of the Exercise Date, the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock shall be deemed to be the average of the high and low reported sale prices per share of Common Stock thereon on the trading day immediately preceding the Exercise Date (provided that if no such price is reported on such day, the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock shall be determined pursuant to clause (2)).
(2) If the Common Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange as of the Exercise Date, the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock shall be deemed to be the amount most recently determined by the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board) to represent the fair market value per share of the Common Stock (including without limitation a determination for purposes of granting Common Stock options or issuing Common Stock under any plan, agreement or arrangement with employees of the Company); and, upon request of the Registered Holder, the Board (or a representative thereof) shall, as promptly as reasonably practicable but in any event not later than 10 days after such request, notify the Registered Holder of the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock and furnish the Registered Holder with reasonable documentation of the Boards determination of such Fair Market Value. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Board has not made such a determination within the three-month period prior to the Exercise Date, then (A) the Board shall make, and shall provide or cause to be provided to the Registered Holder notice of, a determination of the Fair Market Value per share of the Common Stock within 15 days of a request by the Registered Holder that it do so, and (B) the exercise of this Warrant pursuant to this subsection 1(b) shall be delayed until such determination is made and notice thereof is provided to the Registered Holder.
(c) Exercise Date. Each exercise of this Warrant shall be deemed to have been effected immediately prior to the close of business on the day on which this Warrant shall have been surrendered to the Company as provided in subsection 1(a) or 1(b) above (the Exercise Date). At such time, the person or persons in whose name or names any certificates for Warrant Shares shall be issuable upon such exercise as provided in subsection 1(d) below shall be deemed to have become the holder or holders of record of the Warrant Shares represented by such certificates.
(d) Issuance of Certificates. As soon as practicable after the exercise of this Warrant in whole or in part, and in any event within 10 days thereafter, the Company, at its expense, will cause to be issued in the name of, and delivered to, the Registered Holder, or as the Registered Holder (upon payment by the Registered Holder of any applicable transfer taxes) may direct:
(i) a certificate or certificates for the number of full Warrant Shares to which the Registered Holder shall be entitled upon such exercise plus, in lieu of any fractional share to which the Registered Holder would otherwise be entitled, cash in an amount determined pursuant to Section 3 hereof; and
(ii) in case such exercise is in part only, a new warrant or warrants (dated the date hereof) of like tenor, calling in the aggregate on the face or faces thereof for the number of Warrant Shares equal (without giving effect to any adjustment therein) to the number of such shares called for on the face of this Warrant minus the number of Warrant Shares for which this Warrant was so exercised (which, in the case of an exercise pursuant to subsection 1(b), shall include both the number of Warrant Shares issued to the Registered Holder pursuant to such partial exercise and the number of Warrant Shares subject to the portion of the Warrant being cancelled in payment of the Purchase Price).
2. Adjustments.
(a) Adjustment for Stock Splits and Combinations. If the Company shall at any time or from time to time after the date on which this Warrant was first issued (or, if this Warrant was issued upon partial exercise of, or in replacement of, another warrant of like tenor, then the date on which such original warrant was first issued) (either such date being referred to as the Original Issue Date) effect a subdivision of the outstanding Common Stock, the Purchase Price then in effect immediately before that subdivision shall be proportionately decreased. If the Company shall at any time or from time to time after the Original Issue Date combine the outstanding shares of Common Stock, the Purchase Price then in effect immediately before the combination shall be proportionately increased. Any adjustment under this paragraph shall become effective at the close of business on the date the subdivision or combination becomes effective.
(b) Adjustment for Certain Dividends and Distributions. In the event the Company at any time, or from time to time after the Original Issue Date shall make or issue, or fix a record date for the determination of holders of Common Stock entitled to receive, a dividend or other distribution payable in additional shares of Common Stock, then and in each such event the Purchase Price then in effect immediately before such event shall be decreased as
of the time of such issuance or, in the event such a record date shall have been fixed, as of the close of business on such record date, by multiplying the Purchase Price then in effect by a fraction:
(1) the numerator of which shall be the total number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the time of such issuance or the close of business on such record date, and
(2) the denominator of which shall be the total number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the time of such issuance or the close of business on such record date plus the number of shares of Common Stock issuable in payment of such dividend or distribution;
provided, however, that if such record date shall have been fixed and such dividend is not fully paid or if such distribution is not fully made on the date fixed therefor, the Purchase Price shall be recomputed accordingly as of the close of business on such record date and thereafter the Purchase Price shall be adjusted pursuant to this paragraph as of the time of actual payment of such dividends or distributions.
(c) Adjustment in Number of Warrant Shares. When any adjustment is required to be made in the Purchase Price pursuant to subsections 2(a) or 2(b), the number of Warrant Shares purchasable upon the exercise of this Warrant shall be changed to the number determined by dividing (i) an amount equal to the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of this Warrant immediately prior to such adjustment, multiplied by the Purchase Price in effect immediately prior to such adjustment, by (ii) the Purchase Price in effect immediately after such adjustment.
(d) Adjustments for Other Dividends and Distributions. In the event the Company at any time or from time to time after the Original Issue Date shall make or issue, or fix a record date for the determination of holders of Common Stock entitled to receive, a dividend or other distribution payable in securities of the Company (other than shares of Common Stock) or in cash or other property (other than regular cash dividends paid out of earnings or earned surplus, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), then and in each such event provision shall be made so that the Registered Holder shall receive upon exercise hereof, in addition to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable hereunder, the kind and amount of securities of the Company, cash or other property which the Registered Holder would have been entitled to receive had this Warrant been exercised on the date of such event and had the Registered Holder thereafter, during the period from the date of such event to and including the Exercise Date, retained any such securities receivable during such period, giving application to all adjustments called for during such period under this Section 2 with respect to the rights of the Registered Holder.
(e) Adjustment for Reorganization. If there shall occur any reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification, consolidation or merger involving the Company in which the Common Stock is converted into or exchanged for securities, cash or other property (other than a transaction covered by subsections 2(a), 2(b) or 2(d)) (collectively, a Reorganization), then, following such Reorganization, the Registered Holder shall receive upon exercise hereof the kind
and amount of securities, cash or other property which the Registered Holder would have been entitled to receive pursuant to such Reorganization if such exercise had taken place immediately prior to such Reorganization. In any such case, appropriate adjustment (as determined in good faith by the Board) shall be made in the application of the provisions set forth herein with respect to the rights and interests thereafter of the Registered Holder, to the end that the provisions set forth in this Section 2 (including provisions with respect to changes in and other adjustments of the Purchase Price) shall thereafter be applicable, as nearly as reasonably may be, in relation to any securities, cash or other property thereafter deliverable upon the exercise of this Warrant.
(f) Certificate as to Adjustments. Upon the occurrence of each adjustment or readjustment of the Purchase Price pursuant to this Section 2, the Company at its expense shall, as promptly as reasonably practicable but in any event not later than 10 days thereafter, compute such adjustment or readjustment in accordance with the terms hereof and furnish to the Registered Holder a certificate setting forth such adjustment or readjustment (including the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property for which this Warrant shall be exercisable and the Purchase Price) and showing in detail the facts upon which such adjustment or readjustment is based. The Company shall, as promptly as reasonably practicable after the written request at any time of the Registered Holder (but in any event not later than 10 days thereafter), furnish or cause to be furnished to the Registered Holder a certificate setting forth (i) the Purchase Price then in effect and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock and the amount, if any, of other securities, cash or property which then would be received upon the exercise of this Warrant.
3. Fractional Shares. The Company shall not be required upon the exercise of this Warrant to issue any fractional shares, but shall pay the value thereof to the Registered Holder in cash on the basis of the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock, as determined pursuant to subsection 1(b)(ii) above.
4. Investment Representations. The initial Registered Holder represents and warrants to the Company as follows:
(a) Investment. It is acquiring the Warrant, and (if and when it exercises this Warrant) it will acquire the Warrant Shares, for its own account for investment and not with a view to, or for sale in connection with, any distribution thereof, nor with any present intention of distributing or selling the same; and the Registered Holder has no present or contemplated agreement, undertaking, arrangement, obligation, indebtedness or commitment providing for the disposition thereof.
(b) Accredited Investor. The Registered Holder is an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act).
(c) Experience. The Registered Holder has made such inquiry concerning the Company and its business and personnel as it has deemed appropriate; and the Registered Holder has sufficient knowledge and experience in finance and business that it is capable of evaluating the risks and merits of its investment in the Company.
5. Transfers, etc.
(a) This Warrant and the Warrant Shares shall not be sold or transferred unless either (i) they first shall have been registered under the Act, or (ii) the Company first shall have been furnished with an opinion of legal counsel, reasonably satisfactory to the Company, to the effect that such sale or transfer is exempt from the registration requirements of the Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no registration or opinion of counsel shall be required for (i) a transfer by a Registered Holder which is an entity to a wholly owned subsidiary of such entity, a transfer by a Registered Holder which is a partnership to a partner of such partnership or a retired partner of such partnership or to the estate of any such partner or retired partner, or a transfer by a Registered Holder which is a limited liability company to a member of such limited liability company or a retired member or to the estate of any such member or retired member, provided that the transferee in each case agrees in writing to be subject to the terms of this Section 5, or (ii) a transfer made in accordance with Rule 144 under the Act.
(b) Each certificate representing Warrant Shares shall bear a legend substantially in the following form:
The securities represented by this certificate have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered, sold or otherwise transferred, pledged or hypothecated unless and until such securities are registered under such Act or an opinion of counsel satisfactory to the Company is obtained to the effect that such registration is not required.
The foregoing legend shall be removed from the certificates representing any Warrant Shares, at the request of the holder thereof, at such time as (i) a period of at least one year, as determined in accordance with paragraph (d) of Rule 144 under the Act, has elapsed since the later of the date the Warrant Shares were acquired from the Company or an affiliate of the Company, and (ii) the Warrant Shares become eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144(b)(1)(i) under the Act.
(c) The Company will maintain a register containing the name and address of the Registered Holder of this Warrant. The Registered Holder may change its address as shown on the warrant register by written notice to the Company requesting such change.
(d) Subject to the provisions of Section 5 hereof, this Warrant and all rights hereunder are transferable, in whole or in part, upon surrender of this Warrant with a properly executed assignment (in the form of Exhibit II hereto) at the principal office of the Company (or, if another office or agency has been designated by the Company for such purpose, then at such other office or agency).
6. Notices of Record Date, etc. In the event:
(a) the Company shall take a record of the holders of its Common Stock (or other stock or securities at the time deliverable upon the exercise of this Warrant) for the purpose of entitling or enabling them to receive any dividend or other distribution, or to receive any right to subscribe for or purchase any shares of stock of any class or any other securities, or to receive any other right; or
(b) of any capital reorganization of the Company, any reclassification of the Common Stock of the Company, any consolidation or merger of the Company with or into another corporation, or any transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or
(c) of the voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company, then, and in each such case, the Company will send or cause to be sent to the Registered Holder a notice specifying, as the case may be, (i) the record date for such dividend, distribution or right, and the amount and character of such dividend, distribution or right, or (ii) the effective date on which such reorganization, reclassification, consolidation, merger, transfer, dissolution, liquidation or winding-up is to take place, and the time, if any is to be fixed, as of which the holders of record of Common Stock (or such other stock or securities at the time deliverable upon the exercise of this Warrant) shall be entitled to exchange their shares of Common Stock (or such other stock or securities) for securities or other property deliverable upon such reorganization, reclassification, consolidation, merger, transfer, dissolution, liquidation or winding-up. Such notice shall be sent at least 5 days prior to the record date or effective date for the event specified in such notice.
7. Reservation of Stock. The Company will at all times reserve and keep available, solely for issuance and delivery upon the exercise of this Warrant, such number of Warrant Shares and other securities, cash and/or property, as from time to time shall be issuable upon the exercise of this Warrant.
8. Exchange or Replacement of Warrants.
(a) Upon the surrender by the Registered Holder, properly endorsed, to the Company at the principal office of the Company, the Company will, subject to the provisions of Section 5 hereof, issue and deliver to or upon the order of the Registered Holder, at the Companys expense, a new Warrant or Warrants of like tenor, in the name of the Registered Holder or as the Registered Holder (upon payment by the Registered Holder of any applicable transfer taxes) may direct, calling in the aggregate on the face or faces thereof for the number of shares of Common Stock (or other securities, cash and/or property) then issuable upon exercise of this Warrant.
(b) Upon receipt of evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Company of the loss, theft, destruction or mutilation of this Warrant and (in the case of loss, theft or destruction) upon delivery of an indemnity agreement (with surety if reasonably required) in an amount reasonably satisfactory to the Company, or (in the case of mutilation) upon surrender and cancellation of this Warrant, the Company will issue, in lieu thereof, a new Warrant of like tenor.
9. Notices. All notices and other communications from the Company to the Registered Holder in connection herewith shall be mailed by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, or sent via a reputable nationwide overnight courier service guaranteeing next business day delivery, to the address last furnished to the Company in writing by the Registered Holder. All notices and other communications from the Registered Holder to the Company in connection herewith shall be mailed by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, or sent via a reputable
nationwide overnight courier service guaranteeing next business day delivery, to the Company at its principal office set forth below. If the Company should at any time change the location of its principal office to a place other than as set forth below, it shall give prompt written notice to the Registered Holder and thereafter all references in this Warrant to the location of its principal office at the particular time shall be as so specified in such notice. All such notices and communications shall be deemed delivered (i) two business days after being sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or (ii) one business day after being sent via a reputable nationwide overnight courier service guaranteeing next business day delivery.
10. No Rights as Stockholder. Until the exercise of this Warrant, the Registered Holder shall not have or exercise any rights by virtue hereof as a stockholder of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event (i) the Company effects a split of the Common Stock by means of a stock dividend and the Purchase Price of and the number of Warrant Shares are adjusted as of the date of the distribution of the dividend (rather than as of the record date for such dividend), and (ii) the Registered Holder exercises this Warrant between the record date and the distribution date for such stock dividend, the Registered Holder shall be entitled to receive, on the distribution date, the stock dividend with respect to the shares of Common Stock acquired upon such exercise, notwithstanding the fact that such shares were not outstanding as of the close of business on the record date for such stock dividend.
11. Amendment or Waiver. Any term of this Warrant may be amended or waived only by an instrument in writing signed by the party against which enforcement of the change or waiver is sought. No waivers of any term, condition or provision of this Warrant, in any one or more instances, shall be deemed to be, or construed as, a further or continuing waiver of any such term, condition or provision.
12. Section Headings. The section headings in this Warrant are for the convenience of the parties and in no way alter, modify, amend, limit or restrict the contractual obligations of the parties.
13. Governing Law. This Warrant will be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York (without reference to the conflicts of law provisions that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction).
14. Electronic Signatures. This Warrant may be executed by exchange of signatures by fax or electronic mail.
EXECUTED as of the Date of Issuance indicated above.
|
VERASTEM, INC. | |
|
| |
|
By: |
|
|
|
Name: |
|
|
Title: |
EXHIBIT I
PURCHASE FORM
To: |
Dated: |
The undersigned, pursuant to the provisions set forth in the attached Warrant (No. ), hereby elects to purchase (check applicable box):
o shares of the Common Stock of Verastem, Inc. covered by such Warrant; or
o the maximum number of shares of Common Stock covered by such Warrant pursuant to the cashless exercise procedure set forth in subsection 1(b).
The undersigned herewith makes payment of the full purchase price for such shares at the price per share provided for in such Warrant. Such payment takes the form of (check applicable box or boxes):
o $ in lawful money of the United States; and/or
o the cancellation of such portion of the attached Warrant as is exercisable for a total of Warrant Shares (using a Fair Market Value of $ per share for purposes of this calculation) ; and/or
o the cancellation of such number of Warrant Shares as is necessary, in accordance with the formula set forth in subsection 1(b), to exercise this Warrant with respect to the maximum number of Warrant Shares purchasable pursuant to the cashless exercise procedure set forth in subsection 1(b).
|
Signature: |
|
|
| |
|
Address: |
EXHIBIT II
ASSIGNMENT FORM
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, hereby sells, assigns and transfers all of the rights of the undersigned under the attached Warrant (No. ) with respect to the number of shares of Common Stock of Verastem, Inc. covered thereby set forth below, unto:
Name of Assignee |
|
Address |
|
No. of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: |
|
|
Signature: |
|
Signature Guaranteed:
By: |
|
|
The signature should be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (banks, stockbrokers, savings and loan associations and credit unions with membership in an approved signature guarantee medallion program) pursuant to Rule 17Ad-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the use of our report dated November 2, 2011, except for Note 12(b), as to which the date is December 2, 2011, in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-177677) and related Prospectus of Verastem, Inc.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston,
Massachusetts
December 2, 2011
December 7, 2011
VIA EDGAR SUBMISSION |
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549
Attention: Jeffrey P. Riedler
Re: |
Verastem, Inc. | |
|
Registration Statement on Form S-1 | |
|
File Number 333-177677 |
|
Ladies and Gentlemen:
On behalf of Verastem, Inc. (the Company), submitted herewith for filing is Amendment No. 1 (Amendment No. 1) to the Registration Statement referenced above (the Registration Statement).
Amendment No. 1 is being filed in response to comments contained in the letter dated November 30, 2011 from Jeffrey P. Riedler of the Staff (the Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) to Christoph Westphal, M.D., Ph.D., the Companys Chief Executive Officer. The responses set forth below are based upon information provided to Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP by the Company. The responses are keyed to the numbering of the comments and the headings used in the Staffs letter. Where appropriate, the Company has responded to the Staffs comments by making changes to the disclosure in the Registration Statement as set forth in Amendment No. 1.
On behalf of the Company, we advise you as follows:
General
1. Please note that where we provide examples to illustrate what we mean by our comments, they are examples and not complete lists. If our comments are applicable to portions of the filing that we have not cited as examples, please make the appropriate changes in accordance with our comments.
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment. To the extent applicable, the Company has revised the disclosure in other portions of Amendment No. 1 in response to the Staffs comments.
2. We note that there are a number of additional exhibits that still need to be filed. Please provide these exhibits as promptly as possible. Please note that we may have comments on these materials once they are provided.
Response: The Company will file all exhibits as promptly as practicable and acknowledges that the Staff may have further comments upon examination of these exhibits.
3. We note that you have submitted a confidential treatment request. Please note that you will be receiving comments to the confidential treatment request under separate cover and that all confidential treatment issues must be resolved before we will consider a request for acceleration of the registration statement.
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment.
4. Please note that when you file a pre-effective amendment containing pricing-related information, we may have additional comments. As you are likely aware, you must file this amendment prior to circulating the prospectus. Please note that when you file a pre-effective amendment that includes your price range, it must be bona fide. We interpret this to mean that your range may not exceed $2 if you price below $20 and 10% if you price above $20.
Response: The Company acknowledges that the Staff may have additional comments when the Company files a pre-effective amendment containing pricing-related information. The Company is aware that it must file this amendment prior to circulating the prospectus. The Company further acknowledges the Staffs interpretation regarding the parameters of a bona fide price range. When the Company files a pre-effective amendment containing a price range, the range will satisfy these parameters.
Cover Page
5. Please advise us as to the status of your listing application with The NASDAQ Global Market. If you have filed the listing application or taken steps beyond your expectation to apply, please update your disclosure accordingly.
Response: The Company has applied to list its common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market and has revised the disclosure accordingly on the cover page of the prospectus and elsewhere in Amendment No. 1.
Prospectus Summary, page 1
6. On page 6 you have stated that you have not independently verified the data obtained from industry publications and third party research, surveys and studies. It is not appropriate to disclaim information included in your filing. Please delete this paragraph.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has deleted this paragraph from Amendment No. 1.
The Offering, page 7
7. You state that The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering is based on 10,476,652 actual shares of our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2011 Please revise this disclosure to be consistent with the 4,986,333 actual shares outstanding as stated in your Capitalization table at page 41 and pages F-3 and F-5 of your financial statements or further advise us on this matter.
Response: The Company has 10,476,652 shares of common stock outstanding, including 5,490,319 and 5,021,572 shares of unvested common stock as of September 30, 2011 and November 30, 2011, respectively, that remain subject to repurchase by the Company. Pursuant to the guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (ASC Topic 718), the Company reflects the shares that remain subject to vesting as outstanding in its financial statements and related disclosures only as they vest. ASC Topic 718 provides that shares issued before the employer call lapses are not considered outstanding for accounting purposes because the holder is not entitled to the rewards of stock ownership. In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised its disclosure throughout Amendment No. 1 to indicate that 5,490,319 and 5,021,572 of the 10,476,652 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2011 and November 30, 2011, respectively, are not yet vested and remain subject to repurchase by the Company.
Rick Factors, page 10
8. We note your reference throughout the registration statement to the costs you will incur as a result of becoming a public company including increased legal, compliance, accounting and investor and public relations expenses. Please revise your disclosure to provide a separate risk factor highlighting these costs and any other risks that the company may face in its efforts to comply with the requirements of operating as a public company.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised its disclosure to provide a separate risk factor on page 38 of Amendment No. 1.
Our approach to the discovery and development of product candidates that target CSCs is unproven, and we do not know whether we will be able to develop any products of commercial value. page 12
9. We note your statement that there is an ongoing debate regarding the existence of CSCs and that the discovery by your scientific co-founders of the link between the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and the emergence of cancer stem cells is not universally accepted. Please revise your risk factor disclosure to provide a summary of any opposing views or contrasting opinions with regard to CSCs and their importance in developing treatments for cancer.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on pages 13 and 14 of Amendment No. 1.
Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to limit commercialization of any products that we may develop. page 21
10. Please revise your statement that you currently have $3.0 million in product liability insurance to clarify whether this limitation applies on a per incident basis or in the aggregate.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on page 23 of Amendment No. 1.
Our future success depends on our ability to retain our chief executive officer and other key executives and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. page 33
11. To the extent you have experienced problems attracting and retaining qualified personnel in the recent past, please revise to describe these problems.
Response: The Company advises the Staff that it has not experienced material difficulty in attracting and retaining qualified personnel.
Dilution, page 43
12. Please provide us with your calculations for determining historical net tangible book value per share and the increase attributable to the conversion of outstanding preferred stock as of September 30, 2011.
Response: The Companys calculations for determining historical net tangible book value per share and the increase attributable to the conversion of outstanding preferred stock as of September 30, 2011 are based on 10,476,652 shares of common stock outstanding, including 5,490,319 unvested shares of common stock subject to repurchase by the Company that are
not reflected as outstanding for accounting purposes in the Companys financial statements and related disclosures pursuant to the guidance in ASC Topic 718. In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on page 45 of Amendment No. 1 to clarify this fact.
The Companys calculations are as follows:
Net tangible book value per share:
|
Net tangible book value |
|
$ |
(7,639,000 |
) |
|
Shares of common stock |
|
10,476,652 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(A) |
|
$ |
(0.73 |
) per share |
Increase attributable to the conversion of preferred stock:
|
Pro forma net tangible book value |
|
$ |
60,642,000 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Conversion of series A, B and C preferred stock |
|
41,092,825 |
| ||
|
Shares of common stock |
|
10,476,652 |
| ||
|
|
|
51,569,477 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share |
(B) |
|
$ |
1.18 |
per share |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
Increase attributable to the conversion of preferred stock (B-A) |
|
$ |
1.91 |
| |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 47
Research and Development Expenses, page 48
13. We note your statement in the second to last paragraph on page 48 that you expect to initiate IND-enabling toxicology studies for VS-507 in late 2011. As it is already November 2011, please update your disclosure to indicate whether such studies have been initiated or revise this statement to provide a more meaningful timeline. To the extent necessary, please also update the expected timeline for your submission of the IND for VS-507.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on page 51 of Amendment No. 1.
Critical Accounting Policies and significant Judgments and Estimates
Stock Based Compensation, page 50
14. Please disclose the reasons for the increase in value per common share from $.0001 for the 10 million restricted common shares issued in August 2010 to $.08 for the 583,333 common share issued to acquire intellectual property and the restricted shares issued to new employees that occurred between October 2010 and April 2011 given that the assumptions used to determine their fair value disclosed on page F-18 are similar. Please also disclose why the value of the common shares issued to employees decreased from $.08 in June 2010 to $.055 in September 2011 given that the assumptions used to determine their fair value are also similar. Please also provide us with the computations used to determine the value of $.0001, $.08 and $.055 for your common shares. Please be sure to provide us with all of the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these issuances, including the valuation model used, expected price volatility, estimated term, risk free interest rate, dividends and any other factors considered in determining the fair value of your common stock issuances in 2010 and 2011.
Response: In response to the Staffs comments regarding the changes in the value per share of common stock, the Company has revised the disclosure on pages 55 through 57 of Amendment No. 1 to provide a list of factors that contributed to the change in value from the prior valuation period.
The Company respectfully advises the Staff that, as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the per share value of the Companys common stock increased for each valuation period as compared to the prior valuation period as follows:
· $0.0001 in August 2010;
· $0.08 for the period from November 30, 2010 to June 30, 2011;
· $0.55 (not $0.055) for the period from July 31, 2011 to September 20, 2011; and
· $1.52 at September 30, 2011.
The Companys contemporaneous valuation of November 30, 2010 determined the fair value of the Companys common stock to be $0.08 per share. This was an increase from the previous fair value of the Companys common stock of $0.0001 per share, as determined by its board of directors in August 2010. The increase in value from August 2010 was primarily due to the following factors:
· the Company entered into consulting agreements with its scientific advisory board;
· the Company signed an exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (the Whitehead Institute), which includes the right to VS-507 for use in treating cancer, the Companys first license for intellectual property;
· the Company signed an agreement to sell 16.0 million shares of its series A preferred stock at $1.00 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $16.0 million and then sold 4.0 million of such shares for an aggregate purchase price of $4.0 million; and
· the Company hired its first three employees and commenced operations.
The Companys contemporaneous valuation of July 31, 2011 determined the fair value of its common stock to be $0.55 per share. This was an increase from the previous fair value of its common stock of $0.08 per share. The increase in value from November 30, 2010 was primarily due to the following factors:
· the Company sold the remaining 12.0 million shares of its series A preferred stock for an aggregate purchase price of $12.0 million;
· the Company entered into a facility lease agreement, moved into its new facility and began operating its own laboratory;
· the Company sold 16.0 million shares of its series B preferred stock at $2.00 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $32.1 million; and
· the Company hired three members of its executive management team, its Chief Operating Officer, Vice President and Head of Research and Vice President Preclinical Development and CMC.
The Companys contemporaneous valuation of September 30, 2011 determined the fair value of its common stock to be $1.52 per share. This was an increase from the previous fair value of $0.55 per share. The increase in value from July 31, 2011 was primarily due to the following factors:
· the Company hired its Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Development and, as a result, its executive management team was complete and in place;
· the Company made significant progress negotiating the in-licensing of additional product candidates; and
· the Company selected investment bankers and initiated the process of preparing to file a registration statement for an initial public offering, significantly accelerating the timeframe for a potential initial public offering since July 31, 2011 and increasing the probability of an initial public offering from 25% to 50%.
In response to the Staffs comment requesting the computations used to determine the value of $0.0001 for the Companys common stock, the Company advises the Staff that, in August 2010, the Company determined that the fair value of its common stock was de minimis and equal to the par value per share. The Company had been incorporated on August 4, 2010 but had no assets. The Company had not yet agreed to a term sheet for the exclusive license from the Whitehead Institute and had not yet agreed to sell shares of its series A preferred stock to investors.
In November 2010, the Company determined the fair value of its common stock of $0.08 per share using the methods in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Technical Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation (the Practice Aid). The Company calculated the fair value of its total equity, or its Enterprise Value, using the Adjusted Net Asset Approach outlined in the Practice Aid. As of the date of its contemporaneous valuation, the Company did not use the Income Approach outlined in the Practice Aid because it did not have any projections of revenue or earnings due to the early stage of its research and development and the Company did not use the Market Approach outlined in the Practice Aid
because comparative information was not available. As such, the Company determined that neither approach would provide a reliable fair value determination. The Adjusted Net Asset Approach consists of calculating the fair value of total assets and then deducting the fair value of total liabilities to determine the fair value of total equity distributable to holders of preferred stock and common stock. The Company then allocated the value between the holders of preferred stock and common stock based upon the Current Value Method outlined in the Practice Aid, which consisted of deducting the liquidation preference of the Companys series A preferred stock to calculate the amount available to holders of common stock and common stock equivalents. The Practice Aid indicates that the Current Value Method is appropriate when an entity is at an early stage of its development and (a) no material progress has been made on the enterprises business plan, (b) no significant common equity value has been created in the business above the liquidation preference on the preferred shares, and (c) there is no reasonable basis for estimating the amount and timing of any such common equity value above the liquidation preference that might be created in the future. As of the date of its contemporaneous valuation, the Company determined that it satisfied this criteria.
The calculation of value per common share as of November 30, 2010 was:
|
Enterprise Value |
|
$ |
18,347 |
|
|
Less: series A preferred stock liquidation preference |
|
$ |
(16,000 |
) |
|
Value available for common stock and common stock equivalents |
|
$ |
2,347 |
|
|
Plus: option proceeds from in-the-money stock options |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Value available for common stock and common stock equivalents |
|
$ |
2,347 |
|
|
Divided by: total number of common stock and common stock equivalents |
|
26,583 |
| |
|
Value per common share (marketable basis) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
Discount for lack of marketability |
|
15 |
% | |
|
Value per common share (non-marketable basis) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
In July 2011, the Company determined the fair value of its common stock of $0.55 per share using the Market Approach outlined in the Practice Aid. The Company selected the Market Approach, specifically the Recent Transactions Method, because it had recently completed the sale of its series B preferred stock to investors in an arms length transaction. Four of such investors were not previously affiliated with the Company and purchased 4.3 million of the shares of series B preferred stock. The Company used
the Reverse Backsolve Method outlined in the Practice Aid and applied this method using the Option Pricing Method outlined in the Practice Aid to allocate the equity value of the Company.
The calculation of value per common share as of July 31, 2011 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tranche Allocated to the Following Share Classes |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(A) |
- |
|
(B) |
= |
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
Prior Call |
|
Call Option |
|
Tranche |
|
Series A |
|
Series B |
|
Common |
|
Common |
| |||||||||
Description |
|
|
|
Option |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Preferred |
|
Preferred |
|
Stock |
|
Options |
| |||||||||
Equity Value - Call Option 1 |
|
Tranche 1 |
|
$ |
62,300 |
|
$ |
27,534 |
|
$ |
34,766 |
|
$ |
11,577 |
|
$ |
23,189 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
| ||
Call Option 1 - Call Option 2 |
|
Tranche 2 |
|
$ |
27,534 |
|
$ |
26,116 |
|
$ |
1,418 |
|
$ |
531 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
$ |
354 |
|
$ |
0 |
| ||
Call Option 2 - Call Option 3 |
|
Tranche 3 |
|
$ |
26,116 |
|
$ |
17,173 |
|
$ |
8,944 |
|
$ |
3,275 |
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
$ |
2,185 |
|
$ |
204 |
| ||
Call Option 3 - Call Option 4 |
|
Tranche 4 |
|
$ |
17,173 |
|
$ |
13,159 |
|
$ |
4,014 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
2,323 |
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
$ |
144 |
| ||
Call Option 4 - Call Option 5 |
|
Tranche 5 |
|
$ |
13,159 |
|
$ |
12,698 |
|
$ |
461 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
421 |
|
$ |
39 |
| ||
Call Option 5 - Call Option 6 |
|
Tranche 6 |
|
$ |
12,698 |
|
$ |
7,399 |
|
$ |
5,299 |
|
$ |
3,064 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
2,044 |
|
$ |
191 |
| ||
Allocation of the Remainder |
|
Tranche 7 |
|
$ |
7,399 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
7,399 |
|
$ |
2,710 |
|
$ |
2,714 |
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
$ |
169 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
62,300 |
|
$ |
21,157 |
|
$ |
32,038 |
|
$ |
8,359 |
|
$ |
746 |
| ||||
|
|
Total Shares per Class |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
16,025 |
|
10,673 |
|
995 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Value Per Share, Marketable Basis |
|
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
| |||||||||
|
|
Discount For Lack of Marketability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Fair Value Per Share, Non-Marketable Basis |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
The Company relied on the following key assumptions in the valuation under the Option Pricing Method.
· The total equity value of the Company was $62.3 million, which the Company determined using an iterative process (factoring in the liquidation preference, liquidation order, conversion order and overall distribution of the proceeds in the event of a liquidation) that resulted in the value of the latest round of financing.
· The estimated time to a liquidity event was 2.0 years, which the Company determined by assuming a weighted average timeline of an initial public offering in 1.0 year (weighted at 25%) and of a sale in 2.33 years (weighted 75%). The 2.33 years was based on the weighted average of multiple merger and acquisition scenario timelines.
· Volatility was 65% based on the monthly historical realized volatilities of eight representative public companies over a period of 2.0 years (the estimated time to a liquidity event). The representative public companies were: Exelixis, Inc., Geron Corporation, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Oncothyreon Inc., Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.
· The risk-free rate was 0.36% based on the two-year U.S. Treasury yield.
· No dividends were considered because the Company had not declared a dividend and had not authorized a cumulative dividend.
· The discount for lack of marketability of the common stock was 30% based upon the Protective Put Method outlined in the Practice Aid.
In September 2011, the Company determined the fair value of its common stock of $1.52 per share using the Market Approach outlined in the Practice Aid. The Company selected the Market Approach because it was negotiating the sale of its series C preferred stock to investors in an arms length transaction as of the valuation date. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had decided to undertake an initial public offering and had selected investment bankers. As such, the Company estimated the probability of an initial public offering at 50% and a sale at 50% for purposes of the Market Approach.
The calculation of value per common share as of September 30, 2011, based an initial public offering scenario weighted at 50% and a sale scenario weighted at 50%, was:
Scenario |
|
Fair Value |
|
Scenario |
|
Weighted Fair |
|
| ||
Initial public offering |
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
50% |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
Sale |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
50% |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
Weighted-Average Fair Value Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
The Company relied on the following key assumptions in the initial public offering scenario.
· The sale of the Companys series C preferred stock being negotiated would be sold at $2.25 per share.
· The projected enterprise value of the Company was $125.0 million.
· The timeline to an initial public offering was six months.
· The risk-adjusted discount rate was 30%.
· The holders of preferred stock would elect to convert their shares of preferred stock into shares of common stock as part of the initial public offering, thereby foregoing the preferential rights of the preferred stock, including but not limited to the liquidation preference.
· No discount for lack of marketability.
The Company used the Reverse Backsolve Method outlined in the Practice Aid in determining the valuation in a sale scenario and applied this method using the Option Pricing Method outlined in the Practice Aid to allocate the equity value of the Company.
The calculation of value per common share in the sale scenario was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tranche Allocated to the Following Share Classes |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(A) |
- |
|
(B) |
= |
|
(C) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
Prior Call |
|
Call Option |
|
Tranche |
|
Series A |
|
Series B |
|
Series C |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Common |
| |||||||||||
Description |
|
|
|
Option |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Preferred |
|
Preferred |
|
Preferred |
|
Stock |
|
Options - @$0.08 |
|
Options - @$0.55 |
| |||||||||||
Equity Value - Call Option 1 |
|
Tranche 1 |
|
$ |
77,500 |
|
$ |
36,214 |
|
$ |
41,286 |
|
$ |
11,370 |
|
$ |
22,775 |
|
$ |
7,142 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
| ||
Call Option 1 - Call Option 2 |
|
Tranche 2 |
|
$ |
36,214 |
|
$ |
34,663 |
|
$ |
1,551 |
|
$ |
528 |
|
$ |
529 |
|
$ |
148 |
|
$ |
346 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
| ||
Call Option 2 - Call Option 3 |
|
Tranche 3 |
|
$ |
34,663 |
|
$ |
26,986 |
|
$ |
7,677 |
|
$ |
2,536 |
|
$ |
2,540 |
|
$ |
708 |
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
$ |
233 |
|
$ |
0 |
| ||
Call Option 3 - Call Option 4 |
|
Tranche 4 |
|
$ |
26,986 |
|
$ |
24,407 |
|
$ |
2,579 |
|
$ |
844 |
|
$ |
846 |
|
$ |
236 |
|
$ |
553 |
|
$ |
78 |
|
$ |
22 |
| ||
Call Option 4 - Call Option 5 |
|
Tranche 5 |
|
$ |
24,407 |
|
$ |
19,239 |
|
$ |
5,168 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
2,520 |
|
$ |
702 |
|
$ |
1,648 |
|
$ |
231 |
|
$ |
67 |
| ||
Call Option 5 - Call Option 6 |
|
Tranche 6 |
|
$ |
19,239 |
|
$ |
18,685 |
|
$ |
553 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
147 |
|
$ |
344 |
|
$ |
48 |
|
$ |
14 |
| ||
Call Option 6 - Call Option 7 |
|
Tranche 7 |
|
$ |
18,685 |
|
$ |
18,553 |
|
$ |
133 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
112 |
|
$ |
16 |
|
$ |
5 |
| ||
Call Option 7 - Call Option 8 |
|
Tranche 8 |
|
$ |
18,553 |
|
$ |
12,198 |
|
$ |
6,355 |
|
$ |
3,584 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
2,347 |
|
$ |
329 |
|
$ |
95 |
| ||
Call Option 8 - Call Option 9 |
|
Tranche 9 |
|
$ |
12,198 |
|
$ |
10,518 |
|
$ |
1,680 |
|
$ |
605 |
|
$ |
606 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
396 |
|
$ |
56 |
|
$ |
16 |
| ||
Allocation of the Remainder |
|
Tranche 10 |
|
$ |
10,518 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
10,518 |
|
$ |
3,444 |
|
$ |
3,450 |
|
$ |
962 |
|
$ |
2,255 |
|
$ |
317 |
|
$ |
91 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
77,500 |
|
$ |
22,912 |
|
$ |
33,266 |
|
$ |
10,043 |
|
$ |
9,662 |
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
$ |
309 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
Total Shares per Class |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
16,025 |
|
4,467 |
|
10,477 |
|
1,471 |
|
423 |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Value Per Share, Marketable Basis |
|
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
$ |
0.73 |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount for Lack of Marketability |
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Value, Non-Marketable Basis |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
The Company relied on the following key assumptions in applying the Option Pricing Method.
· The total equity value of the Company was $77.5 million, which the Company determined using an iterative process (factoring in the liquidation preference, liquidation order, conversion order and overall distribution of the proceeds in the event of a liquidation) that resulted in the value of the sale of series C preferred stock at $2.25 per share that was being negotiated as of September 30, 2011.
· The timeline to a sale was 2.25 years.
· Volatility was 65% based on the monthly historical realized volatilities of eight representative public companies over a period of 2.25 years (the estimated time to a sale). The representative public companies were: Exelixis, Inc., Geron Corporation, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Oncothyreon Inc., Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.
· The risk-free rate was 0.29% based on the two-year U.S. Treasury yield.
· No dividends were considered because the Company had not declared a dividend and had not authorized a cumulative dividend.
· The discount for lack of marketability of the common stock was 15% based upon the Protective Put Method outlined in the Practice Aid.
15. We will evaluate the valuations of your common stock and option issuances when an IPO price has been determined.
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources, page 57
16. All of your product candidates are in preclinical development. Given the potential increase in your valuation once one or some of your products reach clinical development, please disclose the estimated amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenses that you will incur to reach clinical development for one or more of your products.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on pages 51 and 61 of Amendment No. 1.
Executive Compensation, page 98
17. We note that you have discussed the terms of your employment agreements with Mr. Forrester and Dr. Pachter throughout this section of the filing; however, the exhibit index implies that the agreements will not be entered into until 2012. Please reconcile.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on pages 110 and 118 of Amendment No. 1 and in the Exhibit Index to reconcile this disclosure.
18. We note your cross-reference to headings entitled -Employment agreements on page 101 and -Potential payments upon termination or change in control on page 105. Neither of these headings appears in the filing. Please revise to provide an accurate cross-reference to the intended sections or include a placeholder in the event the sections will be included in a later amendment to the filing. Please note that information regarding potential payments upon termination or change in control transactions should be included pursuant to Item 402(j) of Regulation S-K.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on pages 118 through 120 of Amendment No. 1 to include these sections.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, page F-2
19. Please have your independent auditor issue a signed auditors report to include in your Form S-1.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised page F-2 of Amendment No. 1 to include the conformed signature of the Companys independent registered public accounting firm as evidence of the prior receipt of a manually signed auditors report.
Financial Statements, page F-3
20. We note that the pro forma financial statements at and as of September 30, 2011 does not include the issuance and conversion of the Series C convertible preferred stock. This is not the case in your presentation of pro forma financial information in all other areas of the Form S-1, which includes the issuance and conversion of the Series C convertible preferred stock. We believe it would be more coherent to the reader if the pro forma financial information had the same meaning throughout the Form S-1. Please revise the
pro forma financial information to include the conversion of the Series C convertible preferred stock throughout the form S-1.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure of pro forma financial information on pages F-3 and F-5 of Amendment No. 1 to include the issuance and conversion of the Series C convertible preferred stock as of September 30, 2011.
Note 6 Common Stock, page F-15
21. The expected volatility used to determine the value of your stock options is based on a representative group of companies with similar characteristics to you, including early stage of development and therapeutic focus over a two year period. Please disclose the representative group of companies with similar characteristics and the stage of their products in development. Please also tell us why the assumed volatility was computed over a two year period instead of the expected six year term of the options.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure on page F-18 of Amendment No. 1 to disclose the representative group of companies. The Company advises the Staff that it used the historical volatility of the representative group of companies over the expected six year term of the options, as disclosed on page F-18 of Amendment No. 1, in the calculation of the fair value of its stock option awards on the grant date. Volatility over a two-year period was used as an input in the Market Approach in the Companys contemporaneous common stock valuation on July 31, 2011 under the Option Pricing Method. The two-year term used in the contemporaneous common stock valuation corresponds to the estimated time to a liquidity event.
Note 10. License Agreements, page F-21
22. Please revise your disclosures for the three license agreements to provide further transparency of your license agreements, including but not limited to the other party in the agreements and quantitative values for the respective components of each agreement as outlined in the contracts. For example, with regards to the exclusive license agreement, please disclose:
· the other party to the agreement;
· the aggregate value of the upfront license fee, reimbursed patent related fees and costs incurred by the licensor and an affiliate of the licensor, value for the annual license maintenance fees; and
· the value of the 583,333 shares of common stock issued and who the shares were issued to.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure in Note 10 on pages F-21 and F-22 of Amendment No. 1 to include disclosure of the following:
· the other party to the exclusive license agreement is the Whitehead Institute;
· the Company paid the Whitehead Institute an upfront license fee and reimbursed patent related fees and costs incurred by the Whitehead Institute and an affiliate of the Whitehead Institute totaling approximately $104,000 in the aggregate; and
· the 583,333 shares of common stock were issued to the Whitehead Institute and entities and individuals affiliated with the Whitehead Institute, and the value of such shares was $46,000.
The Company has not disclosed the annual license maintenance fees payable to the Whitehead Institute pursuant to the exclusive license agreement because the Company has determined that the amount of such fees are not currently, and are not expected in the future to be, material to the Companys financial statements.
The Company also has determined that the other license agreements referenced in Note 10 on pages F-21 and F-22 of Amendment No. 1 are not individually material to its financial statements. In making this determination regarding materiality, the Company considered expenses incurred to date and potential future payments under the license agreements. As disclosed in Note 10 on page F-22 of Amendment No. 1, total research and development expense associated with upfront license fees under all license agreements, including the exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute described above, was $135,000, $25,000 and $160,000 in the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010, the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the period from August 4, 2010 (inception) to September 30, 2011, respectively. Beginning in 2012, the annual maintenance fees under all license agreements, including the exclusive license agreement with the Whitehead Institute described above, will be between $95,000 and $170,000 per year. Based on this determination that the other license agreements are not material to its financial statements, the Company has
not described the details of such license agreements in Note 10 on pages F-21 and F-22 of Amendment No. 1.
The Company also has added disclosure about a fourth license agreement, which it entered into in November 2011 with Poniard Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Poniard). The Company has included disclosure in Note 12 on page F-23 of Amendment No. 1 to include disclosure of the other party to the license agreement, the fees the Company agreed to pay upon the achievement of specified milestones and the details of a warrant the Company agreed to issue upon achievement of a specified milestone. The Company has not disclosed the upfront license fee paid to Poniard pursuant to the license agreement because the Company has determined that the amount of such fee is not material to the Companys financial statements.
Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities, pages II-2
23. We note that on November 21, 2011 you filed an amendment to the Form D originally filed November 10, 2011 that modified the reported offering by including two additional investors and an additional $299,997 in total amount of securities sold. Please revise the disclosure under Item 15 of your registration statement to provide the information required under Item 701 of Regulation S-K with regard to this transaction or identify where in your registration statement this disclosure has been provided.
Response: In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure under Item 15 of Part II of Amendment No. 1.
* * *
If you have any further questions or comments, or if you require any additional information, please contact the undersigned by telephone at (212) 937-7206 or facsimile at (212) 230-8888. Thank you for your assistance.
Very truly yours, |
|
|
|
/s/ Brian A. Johnson |
|
Brian A. Johnson |
|